|
Greetings!
We have some office space available for sublease at the CSID offices in Washington DC. If you know any person(s) or organization(s) who is/are looking for office space in DC, please let them know so that they can contact me as soon as possible. Please forward this announcement to anyone who might be interested.
OFFICE SPACE AVAILABLE FOR SUBLEASE
PRIME LOCATION & FURNISHED office space available for sublease at CSID main office in DOWNTOWN WASHINGTON DC (1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 601, Washington DC). Space available from 1 to 5 office rooms (fully furnished) and rent is between $2,000 and $6,000 per month. Rent includes use of board room, kitchenette, and conference rooms (up to 100 people). Ideal location and flexible terms.
EXCELLENT LOCATION - next to Johns Hopkins Univ., SAIS, Brookings, Carnegie Endowment, and USIP. Three blocks from DuPont Circle metro.
For further information, please contact Dr. Radwan Masmoudi at (202) 265-1200 or at masmoudi@islam-democracy.org
|
 Public Hearing before on: ENGAGING WITH MUSLIM COMMUNITIES AROUND THE WORLD
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
UNITED STATES SENATE
Thursday, February 26, 2009 Time: 2:30 P.M. 419 Dirksen Senate Building
Presiding: Senator Kerry
Witnesses:
Panel 1:
The Honorable Madeleine K. Albright Former Secretary of State Washington, DC
Admiral William J. Fallon, USN (ret.) Former Commander of U.S. Central Command Cambridge, MA
Panel 2:
Dalia Mogahed Executive Director Gallup Center for Muslim Studies, Washington, DC
Eboo Patel Executive Director Interfaith Youth Core, Chicago, IL
Jim Sciutto Senior Foreign Correspondent ABC News, London, UK
Read Announcement
|
EVENT: The Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) and the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) present:
Strategies for Engaging Political Islam: A Middle East, U.S. and EU 'Trialogue'
While much attention has been paid to whether Islamists are becoming more moderate, or whether they are committed to democracy, far less effort has been devoted to developing a practical strategy for engaging Islamists. There are many obstacles to such engagement, including Westerners' disagreements with Islamists' political agendas, authoritarian regimes' tactics to exclude Islamists from the political process, and Islamists' suspicion of American and European motives. As a result, American and European government efforts to start a dialogue with Islamists in the Middle East are often divergent, uncoordinated and incompatible, where such efforts exist at all.
Engagement is important, however, because Islamists are a major political force in most Middle Eastern countries - a force about which U.S. and European policymakers are generally unfamiliar. How do Middle Easterners believe that the U.S. and the EU can play a positive role in dealing with Islamists? Where do Americans and Europeans see shared opportunities to engage Islamists, and what types of programs can take advantage of these opportunities? How would engagement affect Islamists' attitudes towards the U.S. and Europe, and towards political reform in the region?
Please join us for a panel discussion with:
Ruheil Gharaibeh Deputy Secretary General, Islamic Action Front, Jordan
Shadi Hamid Director of Research, The Project on Middle East Democracy
Zoé Nautré Visiting Fellow, German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP), Berlin
Mona Yacoubian Special Adviser, Muslim World Initiative, Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention, United States Institute of Peace
Moderated by Nathan Brown, Director of the Institute for Middle East Studies, George Washington University
Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:00 - 2:00 pm
The Henry L. Stimson Center 1111 19th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036 Twelfth Floor Lunch will be served.
Please RSVP by email to RSVP@pomed.org
|
Sen. Kyl hosts anti-Islamic Dutch lawmaker
By Associated Press Republican Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona is hosting a film screening at the Capitol on Thursday for a far-right Dutch lawmaker who claims that Islam inspires terrorism.
Kyl is sponsoring the event for Geert Wilders, who was denied entry to London earlier this month because British officials said he posed a threat to public order.
Wilders' 15-minute film juxtaposes verses from the Quran with images of violence by Muslims. Wilders has called the Quran a "fascist book" and said it should be banned.
Kyl agreed to facilitate the event because "all too often, people who have the courage to point out the dangers of militant Islamists find themselves vilified and endangered," said spokesman Ryan Patmintra.
Thursday's event was being sponsored by the International Free Press Society, headed by Danish activist Lars Hedegaard, and the Center for Security Policy, a think tank in Washington led by Republican Frank Gaffney.
Wilders' film has sparked protests around the world, and it has inspired a debate on freedom of speech. Wilders had been invited to Britain by a member of Parliament's upper house, the House of Lords, to show his film. But the British government refused his entry into the country, saying he posed a threat to "community harmony."
British Foreign Secretary David Miliband told the British Broadcasting Corp. that Wilders was guilty of "extreme anti-Muslim hate." He said, "There is no freedom to stir up racial and religious hatred."
Several leading senators, including Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., declined to comment.
Full Article |
|
The Gallup Center for Muslim Studies
Muslim Americans: A National Portrait
An in-depth analysis of America's most diverse religious community
Monday, March 2, 2009 11:30a.m.-1:15p.m. (Refreshments will be served)
Newseum, Room 704, 555 Pennsylvania Avenue NW (6th Street Entrance), Washington, D.C.
On March 2, the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies, as a part of the Muslim West Facts Project www.MuslimWestFacts.com, will release the first-ever fully random representative study of Muslim Americans, derived from more than 300,000 national household surveys. Muslim Americans: A National Portrait provides an unprecedented snapshot of this diverse community revealing a uniquely American story of ethnic and political diversity, upward mobility, and entrepreneurship - representing a national reservoir of intellectual capital and creative energy, as well as a valuable brain trust for engaging the Muslim World. At the same time, the study revealed lingering obstacles to the full integration of Muslim Americans into the nation's political and civic fabric, especially among young people, presenting a challenge to the community and the wider public in reaping the full benefits of this cultural and intellectual resource. Featured Experts:
Dalia Mogahed Gallup Senior Analyst and Executive Director, Gallup Center for Muslim Studies
Ahmed Younis Senior Analyst, Gallup Center for Muslim Studies
Magali Rheault Senior Analyst, Gallup Center for Muslim Studies
RSVP required: 202-715-3147 or via e-mail jason_bough@gallup.com |
Quieter Approach to Spreading Democracy Abroad
By PETER BAKER | The New York Times Fresh from orchestrating a historic victory, President Obama's campaign manager, David Plouffe, headed to the remote seaside town of Baku for a lucrative speech. For Mr. Plouffe, it was a chance to pocket an easy $50,000. But for the authoritarian government of Azerbaijan, it was a chance to burnish the reputation of a harsh system headed by the son of a K.G.B. general. An outcry forced Mr. Plouffe to donate the cash to pro-democracy groups in the former Soviet Union, but to some policy experts it spotlighted a shift in American attitudes toward advancing the cause of democracy abroad. Mr. Plouffe did not intend to give succor to a despot, friends said, but evidently did not think to determine whether the supposed civic group forking over the money had ties to an anti-democratic regime. Four years after President George W. Bush declared it the mission of America to spread democracy with the goal of "ending tyranny in our world," his successor's team has not picked up the mantle. Since taking office, neither Mr. Obama nor his advisers have made much mention of democracy-building as a goal. While not directly repudiating Mr. Bush's grand, even grandiose vision, Mr. Obama appears poised to return to a more traditional American policy of dealing with the world as it is rather than as it might be. The essential tension for the Obama team is whether to let Mr. Bush's strong association discredit the very idea of spreading democracy. "It's sadly ironic that an administration that put democracy promotion at the forefront of its foreign policy has created such controversy about what has been a bipartisan ambition," said Kenneth Wollack, president of the National Democratic Institute, a government-financed group, affiliated with the Democratic Party, that promotes democracy abroad. Where Mr. Bush called the spread of freedom the central goal of American policy, Mr. Obama made just passing reference to those who silence dissent being on "the wrong side of history." Indeed, his secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton, outlined a policy of the "Three D's" - defense, diplomacy and development. The fourth D, democracy, did not make the list. And if that were not clear, during her trip to Asia last week, she said that human rights violations by China "can't interfere" with cooperation between Washington and Beijing on other issues. That may simply be a more honest statement of longstanding reality in the Chinese-American relationship, but it still seemed jarring. " As a Democrat, I am particularly troubled," said Jennifer Windsor, executive director of Freedom House, a group that promotes democracy and liberty abroad. " To see democracy promotion as particularly Republican or Bush policy is to misunderstand our country's foreign policy history." Mr. Obama, Ms. Windsor said, should find his own way to advance the cause. " The challenge for the Obama team is to find words and concepts that enable the administration to distinguish itself from the Bush administration, but not to downgrade support for democracy and civil and political rights," she said. "So far, I haven't seen them even try." Carl Gershman, president of the National Endowment for Democracy, said Mr. Obama should retool the agenda to make it more of a long-term goal instead of an immediate policy instrument. He argued " for lowering the profile of the issue without abandoning the commitment, especially in the Middle East, which is the toughest region, but where more progress was achieved in the last period than is generally recognized." Mr. Inboden said Mr. Obama has the chance to rebrand democracy. His own election generated enormous good will around the world, an "incredibly profound and incredibly potent" statement about American democracy, Mr. Inboden said. And so, he said, "There's real opportunity there."Maybe others see it that way, too. Last week, in what some saw as a goodwill gesture toward Mr. Obama, Egypt released Mr. Nour again. Full Article
|
Egypt unexpectedly frees political prisoner
By Jeffrey Fleishman and Noha El-Hennawy | Catholic News Service
An Egyptian political dissident whose imprisonment had strained relations between Cairo and Washington for more than three years was unexpectedly freed today in an apparent goodwill gesture toward the new Obama administration.
Ayman Nour, who ran against President Hosni Mubarak in 2005 and was later jailed on widely criticized forgery charges, was driven home from Cairo's Tora Prison. The Egyptian prosecutor's office said Nour, who has heart and eye ailments, was released for medical reasons. Nour's five-year sentence was due to end in 2010.
Nour's case came to symbolize the relentless campaign by Mubarak's ruling National Democratic Party to silence political opponents, despite outcries from international human rights groups. Former President Bush and members of his administration had repeatedly urged the Egyptian government to release Nour and to stop intimidation and harassment that have marred the country's national and local elections.
"Why they did this is unknown," Nour told the Associated Press after his release. "I am coming out with an open heart and am ready to work and nothing has changed. A lot of things have been put on hold over the past years."
Nour's release comes amid talk that U.S. secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is likely to visit Egypt for a donor's conference on the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. Nour had reached out to Obama during the U.S. presidential campaign. In August, he wrote Obama from prison, asking that Washington push for a Middle East that "embodies the dreams of Arab reformers for democracy and change."
Egypt receives nearly $2 billion annually in U.S. military and economic aid.
Full Article
|
Engaging Hamas? Hamas is a Mideast reality
The group has evolved dramatically as a movement that can't be wished away by the U.S. and Israel.
By Fawaz A. Gerges | Los Angeles Times
Now that the guns have fallen silent and the dust is settling over Gaza, it is time to revisit the received wisdom in Israel, the United States and some European quarters that Hamas is a monolithic, Al Qaeda-like terrorist organization bent on Israel's destruction and that, therefore, Israel has no choice but to isolate Hamas and use overwhelming force to overcome it.
In fact, there is substantial evidence to the contrary. Far from a monolith, there are multiple clashing viewpoints and narratives within Hamas. Over the years, I have interviewed more than a dozen Hamas leaders inside and outside the Palestinian territories. Although, on the whole, Hamas' public rhetoric calls for the liberation of all historic Palestine, not only the territories occupied in 1967, a healthier debate occurs within.
Nuanced differences exist among Hamas' leaders, some of whom have repeatedly said they wanted a two-state solution.
In the last year, more and more Hamas moderates have called for tahdia (a minor truce) or hudna (a longer-term truce), which obviously implies some measure of recognition. Hamas moderates, in effect, are justifying their policy shift by using Islamic terms. In Islamic history, hudnas sometimes develop into permanent truces.
My conversations with Hamas' rank and file suggest that the militant organization has evolved considerably since the group unexpectedly won power in Gaza in free elections in 2006. Before that, Hamas was known for its suicide bombers, not its bureaucrats. But that had to change. "It is much more difficult to run a government than to oppose and resist Israeli occupation," a senior Hamas leader told me while on official business in Egypt in 2007. "If we do not provide the goods to our people, they'll disown us."
The Hamas leadership has undergone a transformation "right under our very noses" by recognizing that "its ideological goal is not attainable and will not be in the foreseeable future," Halevy wrote recently in Yedioth Ahronoth. His verdict is that Hamas is now ready and willing to accept the establishment of a Palestinian state within the temporary borders of 1967.
If Hamas is so eager to accept a two-state solution, why doesn't it simply announce that it recognizes Israel's existence and promise to negotiate a peace deal that allows the two countries to coexist? Apparently, Hamas' leaders believe that accepting Israel's presence is the last card in their arsenal. Why bargain it away before the talks even start?
So far, the strategy of isolating and militarily confronting Hamas pursued by Israel and the Bush administration has not appeared to weaken the organization dramatically; if anything, it has strengthened hard-liners within and reinforced the culture of extremism and martyrdom.
If it won't engage Hamas, the U.S. and Europe will never know if it can evolve into an open, tolerant and peaceful social movement. But most important, there can be no durable resolution of the 100-year-old conflict if Hamas is not consulted about peacemaking and if the Palestinians remain divided. Like it or hate it, Hamas is the most powerful organization in the Palestinian territories; it is deeply entrenched in society. Israel cannot wish it away.
Some of Obama's advisors are on record saying that they favor dialogue with organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood. Some even believe that the president may feel the same way, though he has not said so. If they are wrong, and Obama thinks that a "durable peace" can be achieved without talking to Hamas, he will be in for a rude awakening.
Full Article
|
Advanced Study of Nonviolent Conflict
As cases of nonviolent conflict rise globally, it is ever more incumbent for NGOs, journalists, scholars, and policy makers to understand how this form of struggle works, the strategies that make it effective, and the skills involved in its execution. The Institute will address these and other critical questions:
What are the most important strategic considerations in nonviolent civil resistance? What roles do media, communications and new technology play in nonviolent struggles? How do the actions of external actors impact indigenous nonviolent movements? Historical and contemporary cases of civilian-based struggles will be examined, including issues-based movements as well as popular struggles against foreign occupations and authoritarian governments.
As the oldest exclusively graduate school of international affairs in the United States, The Fletcher School continues to meet the demands of a changing world. As both a professional and academic institution, Fletcher develops the vital link between theory and practice in international relations. The Fletcher School is pleased to offer a certificate in the Advanced Study of Nonviolent Conflict that draws upon its multi-disciplinary approach to global affairs.
WHO SHOULD APPLY?Members of local and international NGOs, journalists, staff members of international institutions, think-tanks and research groups, and interested policy analysts and advisors. FEESParticipants or their sponsoring organizations will be expected to cover their own travel expenses to and from Boston. Registration fees are as follows: $500 Corporations, government, media $350 Non profit int'l orgs, foundations $200 Non profit local or community-based organizations INQUIRIES & APPLICATIONSPlease direct inquiries for more information about the curriculum and faculty to Althea Middleton-Detzner, Assistant Director, Programs and Research, International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, icnc@nonviolent-conflict.org Only a limited number of applicants will be invited to participate in the Summer Institute. Applicants should send a copy of their CV, along with completing the application form, no later than March 13, 2009, to Althea Middleton-Detzner, icnc@nonviolent-conflict.org. DOWNLOAD THE FSI APPLICATION FORM
|
2009 CIPE Youth Essay Competition
As part of CIPE's ongoing effort to reach out to young people, we are pleased to announce the 2009 Youth Essay Competition. The competition is an opportunity for youth around the world to get involved in a global civic discussion on issues that concern them. The contest is open to young people ages 18-30 and has three general topics: Citizenship in a Democratic Society, Educational Reform and Employment Opportunities, and Entrepreneurship & Leadership. Essays should be 2,000-4,000 words in length and must be submitted by March 1, 2009. Please visitwww.cipe.org/essay for more information. CIPE is offering a $1,000 honorarium for the winners, and will publish the top three winning essays via itsEconomic Reform Feature Service, which is distributed to more than 3,000 subscribers.
Essay topics and questions:
Citizenship in a Democratic Society
What needs to be done to develop a sense of citizenship in young people and help them realize their role in a democratic society?
Educational Reform and Employment Opportunities
How can you reform your country's education system so that graduates have the necessary skills for employment in the public and private sectors?
Entrepreneurship and Leadership
What needs to be done in your country to provide youth with the opportunity to become entrepreneurs and/or leaders in their communities?
Feel free to contactessay@cipe.org if you have any questions.
|
|
|
Please SUPPORT our work either by renewing your membership (by credit card or by check), or by making a tax-deductible donation of $50, $100, $500 or whatever you can afford. (donate online or by check).
Center for the Study of Islam & Democracy Membership/Donation Form - 2009
Name: __________________________________________________________
Institution:_______________________________________________________
Address: ________________________________________________________
City_________________________State___________Zip _________________
Tel.:____________________________________________________________
Fax.:____________________________________________________________
E-mail:__________________________________________________________
I would like to join CSID as:
Student Member $20 Newsletter Subscription $20 Institutional Member $200 CSID 500 Club $500 Associate Member $50 Founding Member $1000 Member $100 Lifetime Member $2500 National Advisory Board $1,000 International Advisory Board $5,000
I would like to make a tax-deductible donation for: $__________
Please mail, along with payment, to: CSID, 10612-D Providence Road, Suite 704, Charlotte, NC, 28277
|
To become a member of CSID, please click here. To make a donation, please click here. Please remember that CSID needs your membership and support to continue its mission of promoting a greater understanding of Islam in the US, and a better understanding and implementation of democracy in the Muslim world. With our best wishes and regards,
Sincerely,
|
Radwan A. Masmoudi President
Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy |
|
|