|
|
Thoughts From the Forests & Fields
|
February/March, 2010
|
|
|
|
Greetings!
Last month a paper was published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. This paper, by Tachjian, et al, Use of Herbal Products and Potential
Interactions In Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases, purports to be an
authoritative look at the risks and dangers of people using herbs along with
cardiac medications. Unfortunately
while there are very real risks, especially patients taking blood thinners such
as Warfarin and anticoagulant herbs, this paper does a tremendous disservice to
anyone trying to gain accurate information on the topic.
The poor quality of this work raises several important
issues. First, the three authors
(two of which are MD's) obviously have no experience with herbal medicines and
their writing this paper is about as valid as me writing a paper on the use of
pharmaceuticals in treating heart disease. I am sure they are very good cardiologists, but in my
opinion they should stick to what they know and were trained for.
The second issue is this work is so full of errors one
wonders how it ever got through a peer review process. Many people have suggested there is a
double standard in peer review medical journals when it comes to negative
articles on herbal medicine.
Since so many of these articles are so seriously flawed one could easily
assume there is an anti-herb bias and that anything saying herbs are dangerous
will get published no matter how erroneous it may be. While I will not go as far as to say there is an active
conspiracy against herbs, I would say that in the general medical community
ignorance and fear of herbs and their uses is so vast and so broad that these
journals are incapable of adequately vetting these articles. I would even put forth a "radical"
proposition that perhaps in the future any article about herbal medicine in a
medical journal or any study of herbal medicines should actually include a
clinical herbalist as part of the design and research team. Unfortunately I doubt researchers or
editors will actually take my suggestion seriously.
|
Some of the significant errors found in this article include:
·
Foods such as soy milk and grapefruit juice are
listed as foods.
·
Also included as "herbs" are Chan Su (Chinese
toad skin extract), Gossypol (an experimental male contraceptive derived from
Cotton seed, only used in China), Tetrandrine (an alkaloid extracted from
Stephania tetrandra and not available in the U.S. or Europe), and Yohimbine (an
alkaloid extracted from Yohimbe, Yohimbine is a prescription drug).
·
The authors also include Uzara root, an herb so
obscure I have never heard of it and Gynura divaricata which is a little-known
folk medicine in China.
·
Beyond these "small faults" the article mentions
two cardiac glycoside containing plants, Strophanthus (misspelled as
Storphanthus in the article) and Oleander, neither of which is available in the
U.S. or Canada as a herbal product.
·
Finally, the authors have selectively chosen (it
is possible sheer ignorance is at fault here) to list adverse effects of herbs,
even when more recent studies have disproven these theoretical risks. Many books and articles suggest that
there might be a risk of administering Hawthorn along with cardiac glycosides. A 2003 human trial (Tankanow, et al,
2003), clearly showed that there was no interaction between these 2
medications.
·
Also cited is the widely discredited clinical
report by Siegel on Ginseng Abuse Syndrome. In this paper the author noted many effects of Ginseng use
including hypertension, behavioral changes and diarrhea, all of which turned
out to be caused by excessive coffee drinking by test subjects.
|
|
It is truly sad when such uninformed and flawed papers are
given the medical "seal of approval." It creates and adds to the medical profession's and public's
fear of herbs, most of which are very safe. Secondly, it spreads misinformation which, as we see by the
Siegel article published in 1979, is difficult to erase. And finally it obscures the accurate
information that could benefit the medical profession, such as possible
interactions between St. John's wort and Digoxin or garlic and Dan Shen (Salvia
miltiorrhiza) with anticoagulants.
The last part of the article discusses the lack of
regulatory oversight and quality control with herbal products. I whole-heartedly agree the authors of
this and similar articles need more regulatory oversight and quality control as
this article is ample evidence of neither in many medical journals.
|
|
|
|
Bibliography
Dharmananda, S., Safety Issues Affecting Chinese Herbs: The
Case of Ginseng, Instit Trad Med, Dec., 2000,
www.itmonline.org/arts/ginseng.htm
Siegel, R.K., Ginseng Abuse Syndrome: Problems With the
Panacea, JAMA, 1979;241:1614-5
Tachjian, A., MD, Viqar, M., et al, Use of Herbal Products
and Potential Interactions in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases, Journal of
the American College of Cardiology, 2010; 55(6):515-525
Tankanow, R., Tamer, et al, Interaction Study Between
Digoxin and a Preparation of Hawthorn (Crataegus oxyacantha), J Clin Pharmacol,
2003;43(6):637-42
Sincerely,
David Winston, RH (AHG) |
|
|
|
|
|
|