|
Greetings!
Spring is in the air! As families prepare to decorate
eggs during the coming week, they will not only have
to
deal with surging food costs but also have to make
sense out of the confusing and meaningless label
claims found on egg cartons. FACT believes if
consumers are paying more for eggs, at the very least
they should be getting what they thought they paid for.
Labels help consumers make purchasing decisions
and thus it's absolutely essential that these labels are
truthful. In this issue you will read about misleading
labels on egg cartons and how, unlike beef, chicken
and other dairy labels which must be approved by the
USDA, egg labels fall through the cracks. This
loophole enables egg producers to freely use any
language they chose to describe their products,
regardless of accuracy. FACT will also provide you
with information on what the labels really mean.
In addition, you will read about how FACT, as part of
the Keep Antibiotics Working (KAW) coalition, is urging
pharmaceutical company Schering-Plough to
withdraw
its new animal drug application to the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for the approval of cefquinome. If
cefquinome is approved for use in cattle, human
health could be at risk. Please consider signing our
petition to Schering-Plough -- we hope that an outcry
of
public concern will motivate the company to stop its
efforts to get this drug approved.
You may have seen FACT and the KAW coalition
featured in Parade Magazine last weekend. The
weekly column focused on what Congress is doing to
end the practice of feeding antibiotics used to cure
human illnesses to chickens, cattle, sheep and pigs.
Read the full column
to learn more.
Clearly this been a busy winter and no doubt
spring will be just as full of activity for us. If you have
any questions about FACT please contact me at (773)
525-4952 or visit our website at www.food
animalconcerns.org. Thank you
for your support of our work and I hope you enjoy this
edition of FACT Sheets!
Sincerely,
Richard Wood
Executive Director
|
Regulatory Loophole Allows Misleading Labels on Egg Cartons
|
|
Food Animal Concerns Trust helps consumers make humane food choices
With the cost of eggs skyrocketing -- a dozen Grade A
eggs now costs nearly 79 percent more than it did a
year ago -- FACT believes more than ever that
consumers should be
given accurate information about what they are
buying.
Currently, inadequate regulation of label claims on
egg cartons makes this all but impossible.
Consumer confusion regarding the production claims
made on egg cartons has increased, and for good
reason. Egg labels that consumers may recognize
include Free-Range, Natural, Organic, Cage-Free,
Free-Roaming, and Vegetarian Fed. The reality is,
however, that not all eggs are created the same,
which
is why accurate and government monitored labels are
so important. The majority of eggs today are
produced
on factory farms in windowless, confined spaces.
Hens are packed up to five-at-a-time into battery
cages
typically 12 by 18 inches in area, making it impossible
for them to stretch their wings. In reaction to this
inhumane production system, consumers have
started to demand humane alternatives, farming
methods which allow hens to move around freely and
engage in natural behaviors such as dust bathing,
nesting and pecking.
Well-intentioned consumers are falsely reassured by
these labels. With the exception of the Certified
Organic label and those verified by humane certifying
groups such as the American Humane Association,
Humane Farm Animal Care, and the Animal Welfare
Institute, an unknown number of the additional animal
welfare claims found on egg packaging are merely
marketing tactics and all go unregulated by the federal
government.
There are two government agencies that regulate
eggs. The USDA, which enforces labeling on most
meat, dairy and poultry products, oddly does not have
labeling authority over raw shell eggs, unless the
eggs
are Certified Organic. Although the FDA is technically
responsible for raw shell eggs, the agency's focus is
on public safety. They do not allocate resources to
verify label claims. The FDA has stated that they will
only pursue an investigation into fraudulent claims on
shell egg labels if the claim is related to public health
and safety.
In light of these disturbing trends -- high egg prices
and weak labeling regulations -- there are several
steps that concerned and informed consumers can
take to ensure that they are getting what they pay for:
1. Do your research. FACT encourages consumers
to
talk with the farmer whenever possible. Visit the
company's website and ask questions about how they
raise their animals. FACT can provide assistance and
tools to help.
2. Look for eggs certified by one of the humane
groups (i.e., the American Humane Association,
Humane Farm Animal Care, and the Animal Welfare
Institute) or USDA Certified Organic eggs. Organic
standards specify that laying hens must be cage-free
and have some form of access to the outdoors.
Organic hens are also fed an all-vegetarian diet free of
antibiotics and pesticides.
3. Visit FACT's website for information on how to
make Humane Choices: http://www.foodanimalconcerns.org/humane1.htm
|
|
What Do Egg Labels Really Mean?
|
|
Become Informed For Your Next Trip to the Grocery Store
Free-Range: While the USDA has defined the
meaning of "free-range" for some poultry products,
there are no standards in "free-range" egg
production.
Free-range" or "free-roaming" on a label implies that
the animal had unrestrained access to the outside
world. In reality, the term only guarantees that the
animal has had some opportunity to go outdoors each
day -- through a door left open at some point, for
example -- with no requirement that it actually gets
there. Moreover, the use of the term "free-range" is
only defined by USDA for chickens that are eaten, not
those that lay eggs.
Cage-Free: As the term implies, hens laying
eggs
labeled as "cage-free" are uncaged inside barns or
warehouses, but generally do not have access to the
outdoors. They have the ability to engage in many of
their natural behaviors such as walking, nesting, and
spreading their wings. Beak trimming and forced
molting through starvation are permitted.
Vegetarian-Fed: These birds are provided a
more natural feed than that received by most laying
hens, but this label does not have significant
relevance to the animals' living conditions.
Grass-Fed or Pastured: This label indicates
that the
hens have been raised on pasture. However,
because there are no standards defining "grass-fed,"
as there are for "organic" and "free farmed" (see
below), and no third-party verification, this label leaves
the consumer in the dark. Practitioners of grass-fed
or
pastured poultry often use rotational grazing systems
with movable cages for at least some portion of the
bird's life. This is a desirable option (assuming it can
be verified), as birds eat more naturally, consume
fewer resources, and live more in tune with their
natural behaviors and needs while on pasture. Many
suppliers of grass-fed egg-producing hens also
report
that their eggs are higher in healthy Omega-3 fatty
acids than conventional eggs.
Certified Organic: The birds are uncaged
inside barns or warehouses, and are required to have
outdoor access (although there have been concerns
about lax enforcement, with some large-scale
producers not providing birds meaningful access to
the outdoors). They are fed an organic, all-vegetarian
diet free of antibiotics and pesticides, as required by
the USDA's National Organic
Program. Forced molting through starvation is
permitted. Compliance is verified through third-party
auditing.
Fertile: These eggs were laid by hens that
lived with roosters, meaning they most likely were not
caged.
Omega-3 Enriched: This label claim has
no
relevance to animal welfare.
Natural: This label has no relevance to
animal welfare. As currently defined by the
USDA, "natural" refers to a type of processing.
|
|
Stop Approval of Animal Drug that Threatens Public Health!
|
|
|
Antibiotic resistance is a growing crisis in human
medicine, and the use of important human drugs in
animal agriculture unnecessarily places our health at
risk. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is
currently considering an application by drug company
Schering-Plough to allow an antibiotic called
cefquinome to be used to treat cattle respiratory
infections. Cefquinome is from the class of drugs
known as "fourth-generation cephalosporins" -- drugs
that are highly valued in human medicine to treat life-
threatening infections. Widespread use of cefquinome
in cattle could drive human bacterial resistance to this
critical
class of drugs.
Some animal drugs, such as cefquinome, are
indiscriminately applied via injection to entire herds or
flocks. Bacteria that are constantly exposed to
antibiotics develop resistance to these drugs over
time. When humans and animals get sick from
resistant bacteria, the antibiotics prescribed will no
longer work, resulting in life-threatening infections.
We need your help to ensure that the FDA does not
approve cefquinome. While FDA is dragging its feet,
another way to stop this public health threat is for drug
company Schering-Plough to pull its application for
the
approval of cefquinome. Please sign this petition to Schering-Plough CEO Fred
Hassan urging the company to withdraw its
application for use of cefquinome in cattle.
For
more information visit
www.keepantibioticsworking.com.
|
|
|