|
DOUBLE WRIST-LOCK (DWL) CLARIFICATION
Today's yakkity-yak will be short but sweet. I'd like to hammer home and elucidate on one of the principles in our most recent RAW DVD (RAW 105--see above).
The submission in question is the double wrist-lock to we wrasslers, the Kimura to jiu-jitsu enthusiasts, and ude garami to our judoka brethren. It is one of those submissions that seems subject to an experience curve, that is, the greener your opponent the greater the odds you can catch him or her with it. As you gain experience, you're caught less by this one. This seems to be due to the ease of countering once you recognize the inception of the submission and that counter, for the most part, needs little technical skill--just a little tweak of body-position, add a bit of strength.
If we look at fight metrics (statistical analysis of combat sports for the uninitiated) we see high occurrences of the submission popping up in lower level MMA competition (feeder events) and we see it high in the rankings in the lesser experienced divisions in submission only events. The more elite the MMA event , the higher the experience level in submission only competition, the scarcer this submission becomes. (For a detailed look at fight metrics see our book The Essentials).
Why does this submission fall in utility as more experience is gained? Well, we discuss this in-depth on RAW 105 but, as I said, let's elaborate a bit. Yes, it does indeed seem to be a strength-move in the sense that the offender must pit his/her strength against that of the defender's and often times the offender is pitting his strength in what seems to be a deficient position of mechanical advantage. In other words, the discrepancy in the submission may be found in the set-up.
If we look at how the DWL is set-up we can already see some problems. First, the Western wrestling tradition of fishing for the hand/wrist is right out due to the no-grabbing the glove rule. Working the hand/wrist kills the strength counter but, we need legal alternatives.
Second, without the friction provided by gi-on-gi contact or, at least, gi-on-skin contact power-outs by the defender are more likely to occur.
And thirdly, there seems to be an overall misconception about the path of this submission. Does the arm need to be fed behind the back? Dragged along the mat? Straightened and twisted? Is the step-over essential?
It seems that if we re-evaluate the submission from the ground up (so to speak) we can then tweak our approach and start returning an old standby to a new go-to friend.
In striking, success if found more often than not, in the combination sequence; in submissions, success is is usually due to impervious set-ups.
|