Alaska Health Policy Review
comprehensive, authoritative, nonpartisan
top
September 21, 2010 - Vol 4, Issue 19
In this Issue
Interview with Mary Tonsmeire
Please Respect Our Copyright
Industry's Role in Health Care Workforce Development in Alaska
AHPR Staff and Contributors
Subscribe Now to the Alaska Health Policy Review
Resources

Alaska Health Care Workforce Coalition

Health Care Occupations to Have Strongest Growth

Medical School in Alaska

The Trust Work Force Development Focus Area

From the Editor

Dear Reader:

Remember "show and tell" when you were a kid? You would take some object up to the front of the class and try to tell them about it without fainting or getting sick. There is so much happening locally and nationally around health policy that I thought I would do a little "show and tell." I promise not to suffer visceral consequences.

Show and tell #1 - Commonwealth North is to be commended for the great health policy presentations it has been putting on through its Health Care Action Coalition. For example, CWN is presenting a special health care forum in partnership with the Mat-Su Health Foundation and the Wasilla and Palmer Chambers of Commerce on the economic impacts of health care reform September 22nd from 12-1:30pm at the Alaska Job Corps Center in Palmer. Deb Erickson, executive director of the Alaska Health Care Commission, Mark Foster, principal of Mark A. Foster and Associates, and Tom Nighswander, Commonwealth North Health Care Action Coalition co-chair, will present the latest analysis and potential impacts to Alaska businesses and individuals.

Show and tell #2 - On September 15 the governor appointed five new members to the Alaska Health Care Commission. They will be taking us into the brave new world of health care reform in Alaska. Maybe you know some of them...
  • Patrick Branco of Ketchikan, representing the Alaska State Hospital & Nursing Home Association
  • Emily Ennis of Fairbanks, representing the Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority
  • David Morgan of Anchorage, representing community health centers
  • Dr. Timothy Noah Laufer of Anchorage, representing primary care physicians
  • Col/Dr. Paul Friedrichs of Elmendorf AFB, representing the VA medical services in Alaska
Show and tell #3 - September 23 is the six-month anniversary of the signing of the Affordable Care Act. Families USA, in partnership with several other organizations, has compiled a series of practical materials for you to use as new features of the law phase in. From fact sheets to brochures to flyers, you can find it all here. Here are some tools and fact sheets related to each six-month milestone provision:
Show and tell #4 - Two fabulous articles just below! Mary Tonsmeire on the Juneau Teen Health Centers -- now in three schools, and Karen Perdue on health care workforce issues.

That's my "show and tell." If there are no questions, I'll just go back to my seat now.

Lawrence D. Weiss PhD, MS
Editor, AHPR
ldweiss@acpp.info

Interview with Mary Tonsmeire of Juneau Teen Health Center

Mary Tonsmeire
Mary Tonsmeire is the adolescent health care coordinator for the Juneau Teen Health Center, which now operates out of three schools in the Juneau area. In this interview Tonsmeire recounts the history of the development of the health centers touching on a wide variety of issues such as parental consent, mental health, birth control, dispensed medications, and pointers on how to start a health center in a school in your community. This is a unique institution in Alaska, and a fascinating read about an innovative health care delivery system for teens. This transcript of the interview has been edited for clarity and length.

linksLinks to selected topics

History of the Juneau Teen Health Center
"Had you been on the school board in September, how would you have voted on this issue?"
Community partners add to the variety of services offered
Parental consent is required for students to access expanded services
New school plans included space for the teen health center
Who do the health centers serve?
How are the health centers funded?
Overview of services provided at the teen health centers
Just who is staffing the health centers?
Adolescents do have the right to reproductive health services

historyEarly Planning for the Juneau Teen Health Center

AHPR:
What is your position with the Juneau Teen Health Clinic and how did you become involved with it?    
    
Tonsmeire: A brief history was that in the late 1980s, the community of Juneau had what was called the Blue Ribbon Commission. It was an overview of the community and a whole variety of what the citizens of the community saw as [important issues] -- whether it was harbors or roads or transportation or a whole variety of different issues. And certainly among those issues -- this is all second hand information for me -- was health care. One of the small strands on health care was the strong feeling by the community that Juneau had a lot of good quality health services for our adolescents -- teens -- but the kids weren't accessing the services. They were looking for a resolution to that. Like, is there a way that we can have our teens do a better job accessing the existing services? One of the action steps that was eventually developed was to have a position, and rather than make the position a school district position, they choose to make the position a municipal position. It was under what was then the Department of Health and Social Services, and they called the position the adolescent health care coordinator.

They hired into that position in January 1990. I applied and was accepted into the position and began working at JDHS, Juneau-Douglass High School, which was our only traditional high school at that time. I was located in a small area in the counseling department and my position was not well developed. It was primarily the mission of connecting kids to services, and I was starting in the middle of a school year. When I began talking to staff, at the time, about what they saw as students who needed assistance in connecting to services, the initial students that were referred to me primarily were pregnant and parenting students. So I began working with students who needed to be connected to primary health care or were applying for Denali KidCare, accessing day care, learning how to fill out those forms. I began working with a whole variety of community providers around improving the coordination of services for students who were pregnant or had delivered and were returning to school.

Out of that experience, we began with a small group of us that began meeting on a regular basis to see, as a group, is there a better way that we can streamline coordination of services so students don't have to make so many different appointments in their week when they're trying to juggle having a baby or child care and going to school. A lot of these students had to use public transportation and our buses at that time ran once an hour. There were just a variety of different issues. The group began working together to develop what later became the Juneau Teen Parent Program. We wrote a grant and began with a parenting class and began having a specific class in the school that was for pregnant and parenting students to give them sort of a home, a class during their day was where they could address those needs and where we had access to them to help them access services, etc.

Certainly, other than a health class, there were no parenting classes at that time in our school. So, from that we continued to look at what the different issues were as a group. The group was SEARHC [SouthEast Alaska Regional Health Consortium], which was Indian Health Services, Tlinqit and Haida, Headstart, Juneau Public Health Center, some primary health care providers, day care assistance, etc., were part of that original group. We reached a point where we were at the table and saying, "OK, this is what we've done. We've done this and this and this and we're trying to coordinate that. If there is one more task that we can take on for the next year, what would it be?" Everybody sat there and looked at each other and said, "Prevent pregnancy." It was perfectly clear that that would be the one thing that we could do that would make the young adolescents' lives far better was -- rather than waiting until they were pregnant and parenting to coordinate services -- provide them with some coordinated services prior to pregnancy. Back to selected topics list

voted"Had you been on the school board in September, how would you have voted on this issue?"

You didn't have to look very far to discover that in the United States at that time there was this model called School Based Health Services, and there were established school based health centers in both Seattle and Portland. We began communicating with those cities and those sites and learning more about what it would look like to have school based health services and how they managed them and how they worked with the community on providing those services. We, as a group, decided that it would be worthwhile to speak with the school district regarding would the school district be open to us providing school health based services. We were proposing a very small proposal. It was three hours after school, two days a week, staffed by an advanced nurse practitioner one day and public health the next day.

We wrote a small grant for that maternal and child health grant. We brought the proposal to the superintendent and to the school district with the feeling that they would say either "yes" or "no," but the proposal went into an extended -- over a year -- community debate. [There was a] huge public forum and meetings [with] much discussion about the idea of reproductive health available within the school. We were proposing more than just reproductive health. Having seen the models in Seattle and Portland, we recognized that it was important that these practitioners do sports physicals and sore throats and acne and any adolescent health issue should be addressed and at least referred to the appropriate provider in the community.

We were looking at trying to provide a more comprehensive model of health care than was offered at Public Health at that time. Public Health was primarily, and only, reproductive health. We were proposing at this site that we would do something a little broader. They ended up turning the proposal down in the fall of 1992. In September, they turned it down. And I believe it was in October we had an election, a school board election. And for whatever reason, the newspaper chose to have a column. They have a matrix that they run on the candidates and where they stand on a whole variety of different issues, that they publish in the paper. That year they asked all the candidates who were running for school board, "Had you been on the school board in September, how would you have voted on this issue?" Everyone who said they would have opposed it did not get elected. Everyone who said that supported it got elected, and we had been turned down five to four in September.

The new school board took that as a mandate to ask us to come back and present another proposal. We tweaked the original proposal and brought forward a proposal, and we began offering services in the 92-93 school year, in January. Again, it was just a few hours, two days a week, we would take over the school nurses' office in the after school hours and we began doing that. Within that first four months of beginning to provide services, it became real clear real fast that we needed to add mental health. To begin trying to provide any kind of comprehensive services for adolescents and not have access to a mental health clinician just wasn't going to work. In the 1993-1994 school year -- because my position came out from the Department of Health and Social Services, and because the Department of Health and Social Services was at that time where community mental health services were -- my administrator, my supervisor released one of the mental health clinicians to the high school. I think it was three or four hours a week so that we had a slot that, as we were seeing kids for primary health care, that we could refer into. Because it was located in the counseling department, the school counselors also had access to referring clients into it. Back to selected topics list

partnersCommunity partners add to the variety of services offered

As we established and developed our model, the initial foundation, which has expanded over time, is a memorandum of agreement between what we call the "community partners." At this time we have six community partners. Our community partners are the city and borough of Juneau. I represent the city of Juneau, and the admin assistant who works with me, [we] are the municipality's contribution to the project. The Juneau School District, which provides us with access to computers and mail-outs, and provides us a setting within the school that has bathrooms and sinks and what we need to provide medical services today. Another partner is Southeast Alaska Regional Health Corporation [SEARHC], which is Indian Health Services, and they provide advanced nurse practitioner hours to provide primary health care other than reproductive health.

We have another grant from Maternal Child Health, State of Alaska, where we provide some on-site reproductive health services. We have a contract with AWARE [Aiding Women in Abuse and Rape Emergencies], which is the domestic violence shelter here in Juneau. It provides counseling, masters level counseling, for students around any sort of relational issues -- past physical or emotional abuse, sexual abuse, etc. Another partner is JYS -- Juneau Youth Services. JYS provides us with mental health services counseling with masters level clinicians. And then of course the State of Alaska Public Health provides us with our reproductive health services through two public health nurses. All of our labs, our STD testing, etc, goes through State of Alaska, and our coordination around birth control goes through State of Alaska. [We] have these community partners who come together and every two years sign a memorandum of agreement that they will coordinate services through the teen health center. Back to selected topics list

consentParental consent is required for students to access expanded services

Then the next layer on top of that is that at the beginning of each school year, a consent goes out to every parent who has a high school student enrolled. The consent gives the parents three choices: they can sign a consent that opens the door to all of our services to their child so their child can get sports physicals and strep throat tests and any variety of health care, nutrition counseling services. Or, they can sign a withhold consent and should their child seek services at any of our sites, the child is explained that their parent has signed a withhold consent and clearly wants to be involved in their health care, and if the student has health issues that they don't want their parents involved in, we would tell them where in the community they could get those services but that we cannot provide them. We have to honor the withhold consent.

If the parent ignores the form and does not send back either a positive consent or a withhold consent, the parents are informed that under state law, we can provide reproductive health. For those students we can only offer reproductive health. So for those students, we can only offer reproductive health services. That's how we do it. Over the years since the 92-93 school year we have gone from providing four hours of service with one day of public health nurse and one day of advanced practitioner to today we're extending, this year, into the alternative high school trying to establish on-site services at the alternative high school. This is a real stretch for us. We now have two high schools. Our community built a new high school in the valley, so we do not have more students but our students are spread out between three sites now: Thunder Mountain in the valley, JDHS downtown, and an alternative high school called Yaakoosge [Daakahidi], which is near JDHS.

AHPR: That's an extraordinary story. Approximately what percentage of the parents of students do give consent?

Tonsmeire: The vast majority. I bet [at] any one time we have, I would say somewhere between 150 to 200 withhold consents from a population of, I think, over 1,800 kids. So everybody else doesn't necessarily mean they're a full consent. They're either nothing or a full consent. Historically over time our full consents have increased over the years. As, I think, as the community became more comfortable. Back to selected topics list

newNew school plans included space for the teen health center

AHPR: When you say you're currently in three high schools, does that include the alternative high school?

Tonsmeire: We're just now getting a place to stock our immunizations.

AHPR: The alternative High School makes a total of three, is that correct?

Tonsmeire: Yes, and our population right now is approximately, I think just under 700 students at Thunder Mountain, closer to 900 students at JDHS, and 150 at the alternative high school.

AHPR: At each of those sites, you have what? A suite of rooms?

Tonsmeire: It depends on the site but yes, I think a suite of rooms is a nice way to say it. We have a site at Thunder Mountain and that was a really a wonderful, strong affirmation that occurred of our services. Another significant point in our development was the community debated for like 10 years on whether or not we should have two high schools -- what should the two high schools look like and what should they be, etc. -- but from the very beginning there was always a teen health center in the new high school. There was never a question of whether they should put one at both buildings. I just really felt that was 10 years of work that preceded the beginning planning stages. Where should they locate the teen health center?

So yes, we have a suite of rooms that were designed for us at Thunder Mountain, a small suite of rooms that were designed to have a school-based health center at Thunder Mountain. And at JDHS we have a classroom that was cut into a suite of rooms so that we have a private bathroom and the sink. We must have a bathroom and a sink -- that's what we really have to have -- to provide the primary health care piece. And there has to be a level of privacy for that bathroom.

AHPR: How many hours a week do each of these sites operate?

Tonsmeire: Between our two sites last year, we had a total of about 40 hours of clinician time. But that was six hours here and six hours there. We try to be operational at JDHS on Tuesdays and Thursdays. And we try to be operational at Thunder Mountain on Wednesdays. We are going to shift; it's going to be Mondays and Wednesdays. Our Friday services we try to alternate between the two sites. And then on top of that, we're trying to find a way to coordinate services at Yaakoosge. Yaakoosge is very physically close but is in a separate building.

AHPR: Are your hours mostly after the regular school hours?

Tonsmeire: No, they're during the school day. Back to selected topics list

serveWho do the health centers serve?

AHPR: Could you clarify what your relationship to the school district is? In other words, you're on school property and you're using school facilities, but it's not sponsored by the school district. How exactly is that relationship?

Tonsmeire: We are community health providers located in the high school. The school district is one of our major partners in the memorandum of agreement. The school district and our memorandum of agreement goes before the school board once a year. Our consents that I mentioned go out in the packet that goes out to every parent at the beginning of the school year -- what classes your child is in, etc., [and among] all of those releases that you sign as a parent -- in that packet is a teen health center consent. Every year you have a prompt to think about, "Do I want my kid to continue to use those services?" or "I haven't signed the consent in the past, but my student now is a senior, maybe I want to rethink that and sign a positive consent." It's not unusual for students to enter the high school as freshmen and have a withhold consent and by the time they reach their senior year, have a positive consent as the student gets older and the parent feels that it's more appropriate for them to access services.

AHPR: Are your patients only the students at those high schools?

Tonsmeire: We will serve high school age students. We will not serve middle school students. But if a young person is 20 and has dropped away from the school and is now re-enrolled in the alternative high school, we will serve anyone who has not graduated high school and is high school age. As long as in some mechanism, at some point, that their parent had an opportunity to sign a consent either yay or nay. Sometimes we get students in HomeBRIDGE [Juneau's home school program]. Some of the HomeBRIDGE students will want to participate in sports, and parents will call up and refer their child in for a sports physical. We are also OK with parents who have a withhold on file signing a positive consent today, us giving the student a sports physical today, and them handing us a withhold consent at the end of the appointment. As long as we had the full consent for the appointment and the parent understands that while a student is with a clinician the student has the right to access any information that they want.

AHPR: Do you have a count of total weekly visits in the two main schools, or some average maybe?

Tonsmeire: We did over 2,000 visits last year. Last year, we were up significantly in appointments over previous years. As we went into trying to staff two high schools -- that was the 08-09 school year -- that was when we began needing to staff both Thunder Mountain and JDHS. Prior to that school year, we went through a professional planning process, and out of that process came a re-affirmation, a re-commitment of the partners and expansion of hours in order to address the issue of two sites. As we increased our clinician hours, our appointments went up to 1,500, approximately, a year. Then last year we began dispensing birth control on site and our visits went up to 2,000 per year. We had always prescribed birth control but students had to go to either the public health center or SEARHC to pick them up. It was part of the original agreement that we would not dispense birth control on site. The only medications that we dispensed on site that we got approval for over 10 years ago was anti-biotics for sexually transmitted diseases. Last year we were able to get the support we needed to begin dispensing birth control on site, so our visits increased significantly last year. Back to selected topics list

fundingHow are the health centers funded?

AHPR: Everybody, of course, is going to want how the health clinic is funded.

Tonsmeire: Each of the partners comes to the table with what they can contribute. Sometimes the mental health counselor from AWARE is an in-kind contribution. The public health center nurses who come in and staff the Teen Health Center every week at different locations -- and will extend into the alternative high school this year -- are in-kind hours from the State of Alaska Public Health. The nurse practitioners that come in and provide reproductive and primary health care services are funded through a combination of municipal grant and Maternal/Child Health grant.

My position and the admin assistant position, we are city employees and we are the city's contribution to the project. SEARHC provides one advanced nurse practitioner a week for four hours that is the Indian Health Service contribution to the project. Each of the providers and we pay through a grant. We pay for additional mental health hours from Juneau Youth Services but honestly, we get much, much more from the grant than what we pay for. So, I mean it's a patchwork of agencies, a patchwork of support -- financial and otherwise.

AHPR: The other question that a lot of the planners and professionals are going to ask is the question of liability. How is that covered?

Tonsmeire: The providers are working under their home agency. Back to selected topics list

overviewOverview of services provided at the teen health centers

AHPR: You may have already discussed this, but I wanted to ask what kinds of services are provided. You've talked about some of them. Is this essentially the same kind of primary care that somebody would get, or the same spread of primary care services as if they went in to one of those walk-in clinics that are around town?

Tonsmeire: Well, the walk-in clinic would probably have more lab services than we have. The walk-in clinic would probably be open every day of the week for eight hours. We have nurse practitioners for 3½, 4 hours twice a week in populations of 1,000 kids. So, I would say we have significantly less hours. We have the ability to prescribe -- and the prescriptions are called out to local pharmacies -- but then the student has to, in order to pick up the prescription, has to be able to access either money or insurance. Our nurse practitioners can order x-rays but the parent has to take the student to the hospital and pay for the x-rays, etc. We try not to be a medical home. Our interest isn't in becoming a student's medical home, but of those 2,000 appointments -- some interesting information -- almost half of them are mental health.

Everybody wants to talk about reproductive health and that is the hot topic, but reproductive health honestly is only about 25 percent of what we do. Historically, one of the areas that we truly provide, and a need that isn't addressed out at that walk-in clinic that you're describing, is allowing students' access to a masters level clinician without filling out a zillion pieces of paper. Oh, and then another thing is 50 percent of our visits are minority and our population in the school is not 50 percent minority. Our minority population is around 23 percent. I think a lot of the kids we see, their parents are uninsured or underinsured. They work for Walmart or they're a hair dresser self-employed. We see a lot of kids that it's more difficult for them to access health care than others.

AHPR: That's really a great service you all are providing.

Tonsmeire: We work hard not to carry kids with ongoing, chronic issues. They really do need a primary provider. They really do need someone who is open 52 weeks a year, five days a week, and we really try to work with those families to fill out Denali KidCare forms or get to the appropriate services in town. Our reproductive health services always lead with abstinence. We truly, truly believe that abstinence is the best choice -- reproductive health choice -- for any teen, but when teens are sexually active, I think it's important that they get good, solid medical information and testing.

AHPR: In terms of the services you do offer, is there a waiting list or can kids get services most of the time they come to the door? How does that work?

Tonsmeire: Pretty much we will schedule them in -- like a student coming in today to be seen might not be seen until Thursday or Friday of this week because the clinician who's coming in tomorrow, Tuesday, is already full and we will put them on what we call "back up." We move the kids through appointments, and passes go out that release them from class. If we discover that a student who is scheduled for the 9:00 appointment is not in school, we'll pull the name of the student who showed up early this morning with a fever and a sore throat and see if we can work them in. If we feel that it's better for the student to access their primary health care, we always encourage kids to do that. There's times when no matter how hard we try, everybody waits to the day before the sports physical is due and 20 kids show up. Our sports physicals are good. They're not that "stand in line" sports physical. We take a good 25, 30 minutes with every student. We go over a very comprehensive health history and try to give the student a good physical. So on any given day, we can only do at most eight to ten sports physicals. So those would be times when we really can't serve all the kids who want the service. And we do some level of prioritizing based on what we feel is need. If we feel that something can wait easier until Friday to be seen, we will move kids out of appointments to get someone who honestly is very sick in, so we try to juggle our services and serve the kids the best way we can. Back to selected topics list

staffingJust who is staffing the health centers?

AHPR: Are students ever charged for the services in your facilities or is their insurance, if they have it, ever billed for those services?

Tonsmeire: No, but I mentioned to you that we went through a significant planning process in the 2007-2008 school year where we looked at how we had always done business, all the different components. All the partners were at the table, and one of the things we did discuss and think about was billing. Should we consider billing? After much discussion the decision was: no.

AHPR: In terms of staffing at your facilities, you have advanced nurse practitioners and what other types of people actually staff your facilities?

Tonsmeire: We have one physician's assistant and the other primary health care is advanced nurse practitioners. We have mental health clinicians. All of our mental health clinicians have masters. I wish we could have a stable nutritionist but our nutrition physician is sort of a "comes and goes" position. We have had and we continue to try and get a nutritionist to come in at least on a monthly basis so that students can be referred to a registered dietitian. And we have public health nurses providing traditional public health services: immunizations, STD testing, birth control.

AHPR: Do you think that this a model that could work at other schools across the state? I ask because in my experience, it sounds really quite unique. I think they are starting, I think there's a space for a clinic here at one school in Anchorage -- one middle school I think it is -- but other than that I'm not really aware of such a comprehensive type of clinic in schools in Alaska.

Tonsmeire: I've spoken at conferences up north at various times over the years, and what I try to emphasize when I'm speaking at those kinds of settings, is to be sensitive to how different all of our communities are in Alaska, and to return to that fact that we began offering services eight hours a week - just two days in the school nurse's office after school. Sometimes by just beginning to do what you can do in your community, whether it's seeing if you can have a relationship with a mental health unit, or outpatient mental health services that are currently providing services to young people in the community, but finding that they frequently don't show up for their appointments -- is there a way that you can coordinate those services at the school where you might get better compliance and easier access. I don't think that people should look at this complex thing that we have going right now and say, "Oh no, no, no. I couldn't do it." I think that folks should look at where we began, and that was a public health nurse one day a week to do STD testing to link students to the existing public health center and to give information on reproductive health: what's normal, what's not, what's available.

AHPR: It might be a little premature to ask this question, but do you anticipate changes to the structure, funding, or services at your clinics in the coming years as a result of health reform at the federal level?

Tonsmeire: Possibly. I don't know. I think it depends on what else reform at the federal level ends up looking like. Back to selected topics list

adsAdolescents do have the right to reproductive health services

AHPR: Are there any local or state policies that do affect or could affect the work of the clinic in a positive or negative way?

Tonsmeire: Well, there is the fact that adolescents have the right in our state to free and confidential information, treatment and testing in the area of reproductive health, and that facilitates teens accessing those particular services. I really think it significantly helps in identifying STDs early and treating them, and I really think that it gives students accurate and personal information. It's one thing to go into classrooms and do reproductive health presentations. That's a really wonderful form of education, but whenever we can take that level of education and bring it down to an individual in a very personal setting and talk about you and your risk factors and your history, I think it becomes so much more relevant, and being able to offer that to young people is really important. I think the other thing that we do is we teach kids how to access health care over their lifetime, and I think that's really important -- how to identify when they're having a problem, and how to get help. I think that's a good life skill.

Other states, depending on the state, will allow adolescents to seek some level of mental health services without parental consent. Our state does not, so any of those counseling appointments that we provide, those students have consents on file. The parents may have signed the consent a year ago or two years ago and are not aware that their student is talking to a counselor now. We certainly will notify families if there's ever a concern around an issue of harm, and we work very, very hard with students to bring their parents into those counseling sessions because it's very, very hard to make counseling progress without involving parents.

AHPR: I've reached the end of the list of questions I wanted to cover, and I tremendously appreciate the time you've spent going over these issues. Do you have any last words that you would like to say on any related subject to the readers of Alaska Health Policy Review?

Tonsmeire: If there is anything that you can do in your community to make mental health services more available to your adolescents, I would really, really urge you to do that. That, in this community, was an area that we could all come to some level of agreement upon -- that we have a lot of concern about our adolescents and their issues with depression and substance abuse and our suicide rates and all of that. If there's something that we could do to help our young people feel safe when they access mental health services, I think that would be very important.

AHPR: Well, thank you so much, Mary, I really appreciate you taking the time for this. I think it's been a great interview and I think there's going to be a lot of interest in what you've said.

Tonsmeire: Thank you. Back to selected topics list

Back to top

Please Respect Our Copyright

Alaska Health Policy Review is sent to individual and group subscribers for their exclusive use. Please contact us for information regarding significant discounts for multiple subscriptions within a single organization. Distributing copies of the Alaska Health Policy Review is prohibited under copyright restrictions without written permission from the editor; however, we encourage the use of a few sentences from an issue for reviews and other "Fair Use."

We appreciate your referral of colleagues to akhealthpolicy.org in order to obtain a sample copy. The Alaska Center for Public Policy holds the copyright for Alaska Health Policy Review. Your respect for our copyright allows us to continue to provide this service to you.

For all related matters, please contact the editor, Lawrence D. Weiss, at health.policy.review@gmail.com.

Back to top
 
Industry's Role in Health Care Workforce Development in Alaska

On August 19, 2010, the Commonwealth North Health Care Action Coalition sponsored a forum addressing health care workforce development in Alaska. Panel member, Karen Perdue, newly appointed CEO and president of the Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association [ASHNHA], focused her presentation on industry's role in developing a health care workforce. Prior to her position at ASHNHA, Perdue served as University of Alaska associate vice president for Health Programs and as commissioner of the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. The breadth of Perdue's experience in both the private and public sectors allows her the unique ability to analyze health care workforce training issues from several perspectives. In this wide-ranging discussion she addresses how the University of Alaska determines which health occupation training programs to offer, the importance that credentialing has for students, the challenges around health care apprenticeships, and Yupik translators, among many other subjects. Facilitating the forum was Tom Nighswander, M.D., of the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium [ANTHC] and fellow presenters were Jan Harris of the University of Alaska Anchorage and Dennis Valenzeno. Ph.D., program director of the Alaska WWAMI program.

Perdue: A little bit about me. I actually just left the University of Alaska. I was there as associate vice president for health programs so many of the things that Jan [Harris] is talking about are bringing me down memory lane. A lot of fabulous things have been happening at the university in regard to this. So just to think about my talk today, I think it's about what is industry's role in this and probably from the perspective of being at the university and now in private industry -- what is our role in many of these things? So that's what I want to focus on.

The hospital association I think has had a long-standing, positive role in workforce development. The health industry is 26,000 employees and lots of different places where people work, not just hospitals -- clearly - [but also] primary care settings, physicians' offices, community based services. It's very, very important to keep that perspective. But some of those organizations are not as organized as hospitals because they [hospitals] have infrastructure and 7,000 employees, big HR departments, so they are very focused on this issue.

When we focus on workforce, we have to keep in mind that we're speaking for sometimes the whole industry even though our needs might be more narrow than that. I think that ASHNHA [Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association] has had a good record of thinking in that way.

[Earlier] we talked about private sector investment and that [made me] think of everything involved in the nursing issue. I was driving in the car the other night and I was listening to the candidate forums. People are often asked a question and they [the candidates] don't know what to say and they go -- at least two or three of the candidates -- said, "Well, you know, that nursing program is doing good." So it takes ten years before you finally get to the point where people can say something like that. I think that's a huge sign of success, but in looking back at the time I came to the university, the nursing issue was a big contentious issue. The hospitals were very dissatisfied. Dennis Murray, in particular, had a real articulate point of view about [how] the university was not responding to this workforce need, and not thinking creatively. I think that was true. I think that was quite true.

So industry stepped forward with the university [and] we came up with a common plan, and that plan, if I may, I want to emphasize was across the university system. It was not UAA vs. UAF vs. UAS. It was a common system. Beside the fact that there was a common plan that everyone agreed to, industry stepped forward and invested. If that had not happened, I think it would have been just another report on the shelf, and Jan agrees. She and I were there at the beginning. I think we have to keep in mind that sometimes that money may not be permanent money but it would be important leveraged money. We're seeing that today in graduate medical education, we're seeing hospitals step forward, not just Providence but other hospitals step forward and invest in graduate medical education.

These planning structures are very important so that industry can feel like they know what they're investing in, they know their money is not going into the big, black hole of the university -- that it's going to the thing they're focused on and that there's metrics on how those funds are being spent. There have been some comments about the success of nursing and I think it has laid the groundwork for other things, and I think that that will be the task that we have in the future.

"This is labor, industry, university, [and] other partners coming together and saying, "OK, there's too much to do in the day that we've got. How are we going to prioritize? ... Our role is to stay at the table, and to continue to invest but continue to ask the tough questions and not feel like we're a rubber stamp of the process.

A little bit about this plan -- [Alaska Health Workforce Plan] [has] a lot of nomenclature and details in it but the thing about this plan that's so good is actually the same thing as about this thing. [Perdue displays two brochures.] This brochure took two years to do in the university because it has every academic program and every MAU [Major Administrative Unit] on it and it's a brochure so it was very complicated. But it represents what's happened at the university, which is centralized -- with appropriate respect to the individual academic freedom of the individual units -- centralized coordinated planning. That's what this is. And that's what this plan is. That's exactly what this plan is.

This is labor, industry, university, [and] other partners coming together and saying, "OK, there's too much to do in the day that we've got. How are we going to prioritize? Now, if we can keep this going and industry can stay at the table, this will probably leverage more private investment, it will leverage forward movement. Sometimes industry's role is going to be to say, "You're not moving fast enough. Forget all this fighting, forget all this studying, we've got to get going." So I think we're very excited about this plan. We're very excited about page 24 even though the top tier is a lot of stuff, it's still the first cut we've ever had of what are the priorities because we know we can't do everything.

Our role is to stay at the table, and to continue to invest but continue to ask the tough questions and not feel like we're a rubber stamp of the process. I think there are some things that I've learned from the university system that is really important to bring back to my private sector colleagues and here are some of the things. They may seem very obvious.

The way a university works is called credit hour production -- that's sort of like in business that's your coin of the realm, that's how you make money is you offer programs and students actually enroll. If you're teaching some esoteric thing and you've got five students in it, that's not going to be a moneymaker for you. In some ways, some of the health programs are like that. They're very small and they're very expensive so you have to really be mindful from the university's perspective, that  sometimes it's a loss leader, sometimes it's just the right thing to do, and sometimes it's just really not the right thing to do because it's really expensive and only five people are going to get trained in it. Credit hour production is very important.

In the health program, credit hour production at the university has been phenomenal and it has caused chancellors and presidents and boards of regents to say, "This is important." If we had all this planning and we opened these courses and no students enrolled, we wouldn't be here today talking. But truthfully, this is an open enrollment university but these programs are highly competitive. That's very, very important inside the university system.  

Student pressure is also a very important thing to know about. Students are not stupid. They want to go through the system as fast as they can, and they also want to enroll in something they know will be credentialed and has high quality. They don't want to get a degree in something where they can't get to licensure, so you have to really focus on credentialing. The MPH program just went through [an accrediting] system, and the students who enrolled in to some degree took a leap of faith to know that that program would be [accredited] at the end.

Sometimes people come to us and say, "Well, why can't you do something on FAS," or some other thing. If you cram all that in to a basic degree, it's only going to displace something else that might be a generic skill or it's going to take more time for the degree and the students want to get through because they don't want to pay more than they have to. I think that's a fundamental point to think about when we're designing and sequencing courses.

This is a serious issue in distance [education] because the university does not have a good system for planning the sequencing for the prerequisites and many of the courses system-wide. That should come soon, I hope, but students can get really delayed because they can't enroll in a basic class they need to move to the next level. All that planning right now is done more geographically than it is across the virtual system of distance delivery.

"Not all the training is university-based, and that's really important to focus on -- that we've got good trainers in other areas, we've got on-the-job training, we've got work-based learning that can occur. I will say it's been very difficult to match up the apprenticeship system and health care professions."

Another issue is the [prerequisites]. [There is discussion of the number of students in Anchorage who want to be in the nursing program.] 800 students are all thinking they are going to get in those 100 slots. They're all having to take math, science, chemistry, whatever those issues are so those departments are getting overwhelmed but they're not getting any of the resources the Legislature has provided for those students. So they're not always happy ...

Harris: About us doing more.

Perdue: Yes. You have to think about that. So those are some things I think from my perspective I can bring to industry as to how a system will work.

Not all the training is university-based, and that's really important to focus on -- that we've got good trainers in other areas, we've got on-the-job training, we've got work-based learning that can occur. I will say it's been very difficult to match up the apprenticeship system and health care professions. We've got a disconnect a little bit with our Department of Labor on that issue because most of these programs are accredited and the way the apprenticeship works may not totally fit with that. Not all the programs are university-based.

One more thing is that grant funding is just an anathema to building academic programs. I mean you can just see it logically. You get a big, huge grant and then you hire faculty or trainers or whatever it is and then the grant is done. Hopefully the students are finished, but the main thing about training is when you start a program and you commit to a student, you have to finish that. That is just unethical not to do that. That is why it's very nerve wracking for any kind of trainer to build their system on grants. Which means the only other sources of revenue are tuition, state support, or private industry. Those are the three because grants are a bad deal. They're good for planning but they're really not good for training.

My final things are, where do I see us going and what areas maybe for this year we would focus on, and I just listed a couple. This direct service worker, this 6,000 workforce group [has] many different job titles -- CNA or ... Basically they're the person that takes care of the person. They're the one that's really on the front line. That workforce is so important and that workforce is fractionated into what we pay that person, what that license is, [and] what that career ladder is. The turnover is huge -- sometimes over 100 percent -- the turnover in a year in those jobs. That affects quality. Huge effects to the quality, right?

There has been a fabulous effort going on -- that's a national model -- in Alaska for establishing a credentialing system for direct service workers. Basically, it is a laddered system that allows you to develop competencies. It divides the competencies into levels which hopefully someday would match up to licensure and job titles. Nowhere else in the country have we been able to do that. The mental health trust has helped fund that and develop that. Those competencies are now done and the questions being asked are: "Can employers afford to implement it?" "Should it be mandatory?" "Could Medicaid mandate it, for instance?" A lot of things [could] come from that system, but just getting that far has been huge. If it could be put into place people could progress and they wouldn't waste training. Wasting training is really bad because if you're going to do training, you want to put it in the bank so that it could lead to something else. That is a very fabulous thing that needs to be focused on.

Audience member: Karen, give me some other examples of direct service workers.

Perdue: CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistant], PCAs [Personal Care Attendant], but these are also the people that work in our developmental disabilities. Hope Resources, all the trust beneficiary groups, for instance, use those, and also residential facilities for children. That kind of thing.

The graduate medical education -- Dennis [Valenzeno] will probably talk about that -- but I think our industry is very, very interested in psychiatry. Pediatrics is moving along but internal medicine is probably a really important one because there's such a shortage of internal medicine positions. Our challenge with these specialized programs is we don't have the volume to build our own programs. We pretty much just have to accept that. Jan and I did a pharmacy study and the smallest pharmacy school for admission is 60 students in each year. That's the smallest one in the country. So if we have 60 pharmacy students times four, that's more pharmacists than we have in the whole state I think, isn't it?

Harris: It's getting there. Our consultants proposed if we did it at all that 30 would be the number and that's really not a self-sustaining school. That put us more in the partnership mode.

Perdue: We have to do partnerships. That's really the most economic, and the quality is a key issue too. But pharmacy is an area that I think we should definitely focus on. If we worked on it every day for the next five years we would get a pharmacy strategy in our state, but we have to do it. That's the kind of effort it's going to take.

"There has been a fabulous effort going on -- that's a national model -- in Alaska for establishing a credentialing system for direct service workers. Basically, it is a laddered system that allows you to develop competencies. ... Nowhere else in the country have we been able to do that."

And then the therapies, which we do have a growing strategy on partnerships with occupational therapy but physical therapy there is nothing developed yet. Back to this final thing of these planning structures and these data systems that help us feed back metrics of: How are we doing on the vacancies? Are we making any progress? Those are needing to be developed and then we need to keep this planning process alive in a way that leverages private investment and responds to student demand. Again, it's great to have a program but if students aren't going to enroll in it because it's not going to lead to licensure, to a job, it's not going to go anywhere.

One final thing about public money. The Legislature will respond to specifics if it's explained to them over and over enough. Like nursing, or psychiatry. I don't know all the different ones but they'll respond and I hope the health care commission will respond to things like that. But if we go in and say we need a plan and it's very general and so on, that's a tough, tough, tough sell so we have to get down to the occupational specific. That's what this plan does. It goes to the jobs, to the occupations or to the professions. It does not focus on what can labor bring or what can industry bring or whatever. It's really got to focus on the actual profession. Those are my ramblings.

Nighswander: Good, thank you, Karen. Any questions for Karen?

Audience member: Karen, just a question. Early on you were talking about graduate medical education and institutions other than Providence stepping up. I think as a physician, generally [when] I think graduate medical education, I'm thinking residencies and fellowships. You're obviously using a broader definition. What are some of the examples that are out there?

Perdue: Well, the psychiatry residency, I think, Fairbanks Memorial is interested in investing. I think Bartlett is looking at it. Another example would be the accredited internship for the psychology PhD program. We've gotten a lot of in-kind and important support from rural mental health providers. That consortium is off and running, as an example.

Harris: Pediatrics has four different clinical facilities that are interested in participating.

Audience member: My question is: What outside sources, outside public monies does the program get?

Perdue: The hospitals donate block grants of money.

Audience member: Via ASHNHA or individually?

Perdue: Individually. It goes into the university foundation and then it comes out. Most of them don't need a tax credit because they're nonprofit but you can track it. That's hard to sustain over a long period of time. There's more of a preference for jumpstarting rather than doing long term funding but Providence, Fairbanks Memorial, Bartlett, Ketchikan, Central [Peninsula] ...

Harris: Bethel

Perdue: ... have stuck with the nursing program.

Audience member: So Karen, you're talking primarily about rotations, not actual programs in those institutions -- the difference being, for instance, Providence has a family practice residency program as opposed to having family practice residents from Seattle come up for a month out of their 36 months of training. Are you talking about some of these other institutions actually having programs?

Perdue: I was being too general. In the nursing program the industries actually send money -- $50, or $100, or $200,000, or $300,000 to the university and say. "Do good work in nursing." Over time that's hard to sustain, but they've done that. In terms of this residency, those models are being built and in the psychiatry residency the same mechanism is being planned right now where there would be donations for the service.

Audience member: And I believe, Karen and Jan, in pediatrics, that is also true that both Providence and I know the Native hospital and two others [garbled] Alaska Regional are actually sending real money to support that program.

Perdue: Residencies might be easier in the long run because you can make revenue off the person. That person is actually performing a service and able to bill.

"One of the resources in the community is the Alaska Immigration Justice Project which has the language interpreter center. Over the last couple years there has been training for medical interpretation in Anchorage and then just recently out in Dillingham for, I believe, it's Yupik ... "

Audience member:But I think what you say is right. These others are mostly rotations in terms of GME [graduate medical education] although moving forward, we're looking at possibilities for other full residencies.

Audience member: Are the unions active at all?

Perdue: That is a great question because the model that is one that we probably want to look at is the pipeline training system, the Alaska Work system in which the revenue that comes in for some of that infrastructure is off union dues. It's pennies and dimes off the union dues. It goes into a pot. In the trades, the unions serve two functions. They're sort of the employer/matcher as well as the recognized trainer and in our system it's not quite the same. But I think it's an area to look for for long-term sustainable investment.

Audience member: What efforts are being made in training or in recruitment to meet the needs of the increasingly linguistically and culturally diverse patient population of Alaska?

Perdue: One thing is just to train those -- I mean it's simplistic -- but to train people from those communities.

Audience member: Are there recruitment efforts to do that?

Harris: And support once students are admitted also.

Perdue: [Repeating the question for those on the phone] The question is: What programs are being made to match the trained workforce with the disparate or underrepresented populations, the cultural complexity of the population? And the answer is: Some.

Audience member: One of the resources in the community is the Alaska Immigration Justice Project which has the language interpreter center. Over the last couple years there has been training for medical interpretation in Anchorage and then just recently out in Dillingham for, I believe, it's Yupik, so that's something that's actually a resource for the community. I know at the Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center interpreters are used to help so that family members don't end up translating for their parents or grandparents, and it makes certain that the patient is getting really good care [and] people don't end up with mistakes.

Perdue: That's a really good point, that's a very good point.

Audience member: I was actually speaking to someone, a reporter, about this yesterday. That very question and our commitment at ANHC, the Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, was largely a workforce development commitment because you can get on the phone and use specific interpreters for roughly the same amount of money, and the bank is broader on the phone than you can get in town but you've got to develop this workforce. These folks need the jobs, they're entry-level positions for health care and legal education, and if you don't employ them, of course, there's not going to be enough work and it will fail.

Audience member: First of all, I was really happy to hear about the competencies that are being developed, I think [garbled] for the direct service workers.

Perdue: Right.

Audience member: In both of your presentations, you mentioned vacancies being created by the aging population and I know there's some efforts for some senior clinics, at least in Anchorage, and I know that the GEC [Geriatric Education Center] closed, and I'm just wondering what role does the industry or the university now play to help train the workforce to be prepared for our aging population in the geriatrics or gerontology specialties. Is there any plan to develop something like that?

Audience member:You're right, the geriatric center did not get re-funded and so that's going to be a difficult piece to put together in terms of that ongoing effort. I think it's kind of too new. I don't think there is a strategy that I'm aware of unless Jan can comment.

Harris: There is a little bit of one developed but it will need to be developed further in that some of what the GEC was doing with paraprofessional education, continuing education, especially the Trust [Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority] training cooperative effort can pick up some of that. There's an intention there to make sure that some of that area is covered. The other area that's really critical is for health professionals, and so we're planning to work with a group within the university from the health programs to infuse more into the existing curriculum, which was an intention anyway. It's just that we need to do it now without the GEC funding.

Audience member: But I think there's certainly barriers as Karen pointed out. There's been a tremendous initiative with the Trust for the direct service worker, but there really isn't yet clear alignment. There really was a disassociation several years ago and the idea was that the personal care attendant was very different from the CNA, which I never believed was true but that's how it got developed. That was intentional and it created a misalignment.

I think that going forward, hopefully, as Karen says, through the trust initiative, etc., there would be more alignment for students, but it's a tough sell. For example, this past week the federal government in their wisdom decided that someone under 18 cannot use a Hoyer lift because it's a mechanical device and they could get injured. What irony do you have there? It's a mechanical device so they don't get injured, right? But if you're under 18, what that does, just to point out, is that when you try to align the students in high school programs, which we don't have enough of, what's the incentive? I can't go to work, and the facilities, from a risk aversion point, say, "Ah, you've got to be 18." So we're basically shutting off the pipeline of students that would be interested because we put all these barriers in front of them and in front of organizations to employ them.

Back to top

AHPR Staff and Contributors

Lawrence D. Weiss, PhD, MS, Editor
Jacqueline Yeagle, Newsletter design and editing
Subscribe Now to the Alaska Health Policy Review

The Review is issued electronically, weekly during the regular legislative session and monthly the rest of the year.
 
A standard 12-month subscription to the Alaska Health Policy Review is available for $850. Please inquire about discount rates for multiple recipients in the same organization, legislators, and small nonprofit organizations.
 
Don't miss an issue! Send orders, comments, and inquiries to Lawrence D. Weiss at health.policy.review@gmail.com, or call (907) 276-2277.

Back to top