1.The Wolves Are
Howling
| |
Oh, I like times like this. As soon as there is a perceived weakness
with the market leader, the contenders try to gnaw away at the prey (= you and
me). In the last edition of the newsletter I reported on the SDL Trados conundrums
that were created, first by not communicating a new license policy well and
then by solving it in a rather forthcoming manner. Still, I (and I am sure many
of you) received a mail from the maker of MemoQ addressed to the "Dear
frustrated Trados User," offering a competitive upgrade from Trados
to their tool.
I really hope that other tool vendors will show the same kind of
combativeness (or humor, or business sense) in the coming days and roll out
similar offers.
In the first few months of this year, knowing that the new version of Trados
would be as different from the old as it is, I gave a number of talks where I
prognosticated that the rather one-sided tool landscape would break up. Rather
than anyone replacing SDL as the main tool provider, however, it looks like there
will be a much more healthy co-existence of a number of more or less equal-sized
providers -- among them, of course, SDL. (After all, it would be a shame not to
have their new and better tool suite as part of the mix.) But I would love for
it to be a mix. And with standards, especially XLIFF (and TMX), now much
more widely accepted, it could really happen without major hiccups due to the
diversity of technology that we use to process data.
|
2. Abracadabra! (Premium Content)
| |
A little tool that I wasn't aware of is TransAbacus. I looked at it this
week and liked what I saw -- provided that users are aware of certain
restriction of this tool.
All too often we get queries from (potential) clients that sound a bit like
this: "Can you translate my website for me? Just go to www.microsoft.com and give me a bid."
Now, chances are that you will not get a query for this specific website (in
fact, I know you won't). Even if you did, our tool in question would not be of
much help. However, let's imagine you get a query to a much, much smaller,
static (more on that in a second) website. Something like
www.internationalwriters.com. You might ask the client to send you the source
files that need to be translated -- but we all know how they'll respond to that,
right? "The WHAT files? Can't you just go and look at the website?"
And since we are still in the bidding process, we gotta be nice and not
argue (that will have to be done with the exact same question once we get the
job). So we need to find out a) what kind of website it is, b) how many files
of what type need to be translated, c) how may words on those files need to be
translated, and d) how much time we'll need to manipulate complex file formats
(graphics, Flash files, PDF files) so that our translation can be used.
Assuming that we find out that this is a static website (a website where
the content does not sit in a database that is dynamically served to webpages
as users request those), we need to at least get an overview of how many words
are located in the translatable files. One way to do that would be to go to the
site, open each web page, select File> Save as, and make sure that Webpage,
complete or Webpage, HTML only is selected under Save as Type
in Firefox or IE. And do this for every single page.
Just kidding.
If you were to really do that, you would not only waste hours, but you'd
be likely to miss a lot of files in the process. A much better way of going
about it is to use a web spider that allows you to download a complete website.
These are tools like Tenmax Teleport Pro or the free HTTrack.
With these applications you can download all the files of a static website,
including multimedia content, PDFs, etc., and then use a word count tool such
as PractiCount & Invoice or
one of its many competitors to make counts. You could use your TEnT to count
words as well, and in that case you will even get repetition counts, etc. For
graphics, you can use a free tool like XnView
to quickly browse through those files to find how many graphics need to be
translated; for Flash files you can use a tool like the Flash Decompiler
or others and so on.
Not surprisingly, the makers of TransAbacus felt
that this is still a little bit too involved, so they set out to offer an
easier solution:
Once you open TransAbacus, just enter a URL (website address) and
you will be presented with a list of HTML, PDF, and RTF files on the site in
which words were automatically counted. Those counts can be saved in a text
file (or a slightly corrupted CSV file) and you can use that as the basis of
your estimate. It's easy enough, and in my tests this all worked seamlessly.
However, I still have a word of caution or two.
This is great for super-simple websites (like www.internationalwriters.com),
but that's about it. And even super-simple websites may have graphics that you
might need to evaluate.
Also, it's not clear how words are counted. One
of the things that I really like about the above-mentioned PractiCount &
Invoice is that you can decide what counts as a delimiter and define words
in the process; or, alternatively, you can use the MS Word parameters
for word counts (without committing their well-documented errors, such as
foregoing certain parts of documents). Not that MS Word is the best
possible way to count words, but as it is, it's a quasi-standard and therefore reduces
the risk of conflict with clients. These are options that you don't have with TransAbacus.
(Admittedly, the word count was less then 3% off in a text count that I ran
compared to P&I.) |
3. Données!
| |
The makers of the translation environment tool (TEnT) Similis
sent a note to me this last week saying that they have also released a large,
searchable data pool. It's still in beta stage (don't use the English user
interface!), but on test.libellex.fr you
can find interesting data mostly between English and French.
I am not sure what the purpose of this tool eventually will be, maybe
just to show off the sophisticated alignment features that Similis has
for a number of European languages. Currently the data consists mostly of EU
data and other aligned (but not further specified) data from Similis
customers.
The search itself is a little slow (compared to the recently reported engines
of TDA and Linguee), but it might still unearth interesting
material for EN<>FR translators.
Again (and I'm sort of repeating myself here), the good news is that
bilingual data is more accessible than ever before, and we are among the first who
should be able to benefit from it.
|
| ADVERTISEMENT |
Take the fast lane with
AlignFactory
Align
with speed and accuracy and increase the performance of your existing tools.
Automate your document alignment process. Correct segments with the built-in
alignment editor. Produce alignments in TMX format, with or without TM
attributes, in LogiTerm bitexts format or in HTML without language
tags.
sales@terminotix.com
-- www.terminotix.com
|
4.
Be Advised to Use an
Advisor (Premium Content)
| |
Belarc Advisor to be exact. The irony with this tool is that
while it reminds you of the necessity of Windows and Office
updates, it does not remind you to update itself. So I have been using a copy
that I downloaded a few years ago, unaware of the interesting new features that
it now offers.
This tool provides you with a very detailed report of all the hardware
and software that you have installed, including operating system, processor
speed and memory, system serial number, printers, controllers, displays, etc.
This can be very helpful for various reasons. It gives you instantaneous
access to all the information you need when your computer needs to be serviced;
it shows you how many crazy applications you have installed (and hopefully
convinces you to uninstall a bunch of them in due time); and it lists serial
numbers for many of the software programs you installed which you might
otherwise have forgotten or have a hard time getting to.
What I did not mention is that it's free, it takes
just a minute or so to install and not more than two to execute to receive a
many-paged report, and as mentioned above, it now also gives you a report on Windows
or Office updates you might have missed (therefore circumventing the
memory-draining Windows-internal tool for this purpose).
|
5.
cATAtonic No More
| |
I'm a proud member of the ATA, the American Translators Association (though I still long for the day when it changes
its name to American Translators' Association), but with a large, 10,000-member
organization like that, things sometimes take a long time to develop. However, once
they do, it's all the more pleasant. Here are a couple of examples:
At least here in the U.S., the ATA certification is an important
qualifier for professional translators. For years there has been a demand for
computerized exams, but the actual development turned out to be much more
complex than originally anticipated. And yet a few weeks ago there was a first
very successful real-life sitting with no unexpected glitches, so you should
expect to quickly see more of those.
Another thing that took quite awhile to develop was a policy for the ATA Member-Provider Program. It,
too, is finally done and Ted Wozniak's Payment Practices list (a database
on payment habits of translation agencies) is the first offering, with reduced
fees for ATA members. Expect to see yours truly's TranslatorsTraining offered
there sometime soon as well.
And then this email reached me a little while ago from David Hostyk:
I am a member of the
ATA and I enjoy reading your column [in the ATA Chronicle]; and I think your
readers might enjoy learning about a program I have written.
For years I have
been frustrated at the inefficiency of the mouse-keyboard setup. I hate moving my hands from the Home key
position. So I developed a software application called Integrated
Keyboarding, available at: www.inkeyboard.com.
The program allows you
to control the computer from the keyboard, without moving your hands. Whether
it's moving the mouse, moving the cursor, scrolling, dragging, highlighting or
numbers, you use your second, third and fourth fingers in their Home key positions.
There are separate versions for right-handed and left-handed people.
I looked at it (there is a helpful video presentation) and I think it's quite cool. Everything can be
controlled from the main keyboard, including all the tasks that the mouse, the
number keypad, or the arrow keys usually provide. Aside from the problem that
-- once you get used to it -- you would sort of cripple yourself for keyboards
on machines that do not have this program installed, it's helpful for anyone
who thinks it's silly to move around too much on the extended keyboard/mouse
interface. Plus, the fact that this was developed by a translator and ATA
member double-qualifies it in my mind.
|
6.
Nice and Useful
| |
With some applications you say to yourself: "Wow, this is what I
have been waiting and looking for forever!" With others you say:
"Yeah, that's nice -- not earth-shattering, but helpful." And that
impression will only be stronger when realizing that that particular utility is
free.
FileTypesMan
is one of those tools. Its a no-install little program that gives you very easy
access to what is otherwise accessible under Tools> Folder> File Types
in Windows Explorer in Windows XP and before (and without such
tool not accessible anymore under Windows Vista). This is the place
where you can decide with what program a type of file opens when you
double-click on it etc. FileTypesMan makes this all more accessible and
less technical.
Plus, when you click on a certain file type you also have access to
helpful things like these:
- Open this file
type immediately after download without confirmation
- Always show
this file extension
- Don't add this
file type to Recent Documents in Window's Start menu
(in case you don't want your kids or spouse to see that you always read Excel
sheets or something like that when they are asleep)
- Show this file
type in the New menu of Windows Explorer
Also, while you are at the site from which you can download FileTypesMan
there are hundreds (well, maybe just dozens) of other little free programs all
developed by the same guy. Most are very helpful, while quite a few others are beyond
my technical expertise and interest (and I would not be surprised if many of
you would have the same impression).
Here is another tool of a very different nature that I was made aware of
by Christian Oblin. Christian contacted me awhile back asking for help in
finding a little application he had used years ago that automatically entered Word
comments with glossary matches into .doc files any time such a match is found
in an associated text file. I did not know that exact tool -- though most TEnTs
and terminology tools offer something similar, of course -- but then he wrote
back, saying that he had found it himself again: It's Glossy.
As the name suggests, it's not the most current tool (I strongly doubt that it
would run on Word 2007), and in fact the purchase page is currently offline
-- but the trial download works.
If you want to try it, I would strongly discourage you from using it for
HTML files as they describe it (I am almost certain that this is going to
create problems), but for some Word files and projects it might be helpful.
Of course, if you have a full-blown TEnT, I am not sure what the use
would be.
|
7.
A Love Story (continued)
| |
In this newsletter you can find an intermittent series
about characters I really like. I have a passion for exploring different
writing systems, character sets, and fonts & this is the latest specimen.
If you have a Javascript-enabled browser, hold your
cursor over the character for a definition.
|
The Last Word on the Tool Kit
|
|
If you would like to promote this newsletter by placing a link on your website, I will in turn mention your website in a future edition of the Tool Kit. Just paste the code you find here into the HTML code of your webpage, and the little icon that is displayed on that page with a link to my website will be displayed.
Last week this reader added a link:
http://anuvaadkiduniya.blogspot.com
© 2009 International Writers' Group | |