ToolkitSmall

A computer newsletter for translation professionals

Issue 8-10-124
(the one hundred twenty-fourth edition)
Contents
1. Spell-Cheques (Premium Content)
2. Andrä's ontram
3. A Reminder about the Tools of the Future
4. This 'n' That
The Last Word on the Tool Kit
"Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee"

I felt as if this quote from that most heralded of American heroes -- Muhammad Ali -- was directly aimed at me after I received dozens of emails lecturing me on the appropriate usage of "peak" vs. "pique." My editor and I felt (and still feel) the pain of making such a foolish error in front of an audience of word lovers, aka translators. To refresh your memory, of course, there was nothing in the last issue that "peaked my interest"; rather, my interest was "piqued" . . . a term, as Jean Robertson pointed out, that is derived from the "French piquer, which means to sting (like a bee)." Yes, it does hurt. And yes, we knew better. It simply slipped under our radar.

(But then, as belated salve on the wound, I just found this quote from former U.S. president Andrew Jackson: "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word." I wouldn't be surprised if the current president would agree with that.)

1. Spell-Cheques (Premium Content)

While we're on the topic of badly misspelled words, Sergio Lozano wrote this:

Is there a way to remove words from Word's spellcheck dictionary? I don't know how many times I have typed tow when I meant two. I would rather have tow be flagged as a misspelled word, though putting in an autocorrect entry is a good workaround. Nonetheless, I'm curious as to whether you can mess with Word's default dictionary.

That's a good question and the quick answer is that it is not possible to mess with the Word spelling dictionaries directly. The emphasis here is on directly -- while you can't modify the main dictionaries, it is possible to teach Word to ignore certain words by entering them into an "exclusion" dictionary.  An exclusion dictionary causes Word's spelling engine to ignore the entries in the main dictionary for the words it contains. This means that you can tell Word to treat certain words as misspelled, even though your spelling dictionary thinks they are OK. (Sergio's example was one instance where this would be handy; other examples might be theatre vs. theater, public vs. pubic, or abut vs. about).

First the procedures for Office 2003 and below. In a document in Word or in a text editor, enter the words you would like to exclude in lowercase letters, each followed by a hard return. Here's what the words we mentioned above would look like:

tow
theatre
pubic
abut

Once you have added the most annoying offenders, save the file to C:\Documents and Settings\<user name>\Application Data\Microsoft\Proof (Word 2003 and below and Windows XP) or C:\Users \<user name>\AppData\Microsoft\Proof (Word 2003 and below and Windows Vista).

Save this as a text file (if you used MS Word, you'll need to select Text Only (*.txt)) under Files of type in the Save as dialog and choose the following naming convention: mssp3<two or three digit language code>.exc.For Spanish this would be mssp3es.exc, French would be mssp3fr.exc, etc. (you can find the correct naming if you look for the .lex files that are stored under C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Proof).

For Word 2007 it is a little less complicated because here the file already exists (it is automatically created the first time you add a word to the custom dictionary). You will be able to find a file with the long file name ExcludeDictionary<LanguageCodeLanguageID>.lex in the folder C:\Documents and Settings\<user name>\Application Data\Microsoft\UProof (Windows XP) or C:\Users \<user name>\AppData\Microsoft\UProof (Windows Vista). (To see those files and folders, you will need to make sure that you have the display of hidden files and folders enabled under Start> (Settings>) Control Panel> Folder Options> View.)

The U.S. English file name would look like this: ExcludeDictionaryEN0409.lex. You will simply have to open it in Notepad or another text editor (or Word) and add the lower-case terms that you want to have excluded as described above.

Sound complicated? Well, just imagine how complicated it was to research these things to present them to you. (-: Actually, if you just try to follow your combination of Office and Windows versions it isn't that hard, and the reward can be sweat -- I mean, sweet.

While we're at spell-checking, here are a couple of other helpful hints.

Most of you know not to use the Automatic Language Detection that you can activate in the Language dialog in Word (you can access that by clicking on the language identifier down on the task bar in Word). This was one of those things that were meant well but brought about all kinds of issues, including bloated documents and a more difficult processing of these documents in some TEnTs (translation environment tools). What I've been looking for ever since Word 97 and never adequately understood is the option right above it: Do not check spelling or grammar. It's entirely possible that I was alone in this misunderstanding, but I always took that to refer to the complete document (and, yes, I always wondered why it didn't work right). Well, it only works for the passage that you select, of course, meaning that you can define certain parts (or all parts if you select all) to be not spell-checked.

Here's another one: Many of us don't do all our translation work in an Office program; we use an independent TenT instead. While some tools such as Wordfast, Multitrans, and MetaTexis still primarily use the Word interface for their translation activities, they are all about to go to an independent editor, as Trados has done with TagEditor, or as tools such as Déjà Vu, Heartsome, MemoQ, SDLX, Transit, and tons of other ones have always done.

The problem has traditionally been that it was a shame to have to use the third-party spell-checking systems (for a relatively limited number of languages) that come with those tools. Most of the vendors had chosen the third-party spelling engine by Wintertree, which typically was not up to par with what Word had to offer. Plus, the entries in the custom dictionaries were not all automatically transferred, so all the work that you might have spent to add hundreds of terms to the Word spell-checker was not available when checking with SDLX, Déjà Vu, Trados TagEditor, or any of the other tools that used Wintertree.

If you are intent on using the Wintertree spell-checker, there is a trick to selecting the custom.dic file from Word: in Déjà Vu and SDLX, select Dictionaries> Import in the Check Spelling dialog, change the Files of Type to External Files, and import the .dic dictionary that is typically under C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\Application Data\Microsoft\Proof. In Trados TagEditor, select Tools> Plug-ins> WinterTree Spelling Checker, select Properties, Custom Dictionaries, and Add. Select the above described custom.dic, highlight it, and click on Set as default.

But all this was generally not good enough. So most of the tools today (including the three mentioned above) have embraced one of two strategies: they either allow you to use MS Word's spell-checker directly (provided, of course, that it is installed!) or they use the same engine that OpenOffice.org uses.

Here are some examples: MemoQ, OmegaT, Swordfish, and Heartsome all use the current Hunspell engine of OpenOffice, and Transit uses MySpell, the earlier version of OpenOffice's spell-check engine. The benefit of this is that these are free and the number of supported languages is not only very large but also consistently growing.

And with Halloween coming up and all, I can't help pointing to this silly cartoon again: www.internationalwriters.com/spellcheck.jpg.

ADVERTISEMENT

Why pay a high price for a CAT tool and keep fighting with it every day?

Make your life simpler and easier by making the right choice! Heartsome Translation Studio is what you need and deserve:

  • based on open standards
  • cross-platform
  • supports all major database types
  • the most customizable CAT tool in the market
  • gives you the choice to deliver in XLIFF and TMX or tagged RTF and TXT TM formats

And as Jost puts it in the Tool Kit: "There are many obvious benefits to Heartsome -- platform-independence, a fairly small footprint on your system, a good choice of underlying database servers . . . and a very pleasant 'feel.' . . . It is certainly an interesting and powerful tool."

Enjoy the spirit of freedom. Make today your independence day! Buy now at www.heartsome.net.

2. Andrä's ontram

You know, as much as I liked what I saw of this tool (ontram), I am just not sure that the company name (Andrä) will help it make its way on the international market. (As a side note, I'm still convinced that AOL -- America Online -- failed in places like Germany because of its internationally rather disadvantageous name.)

However, this might not be a problem for the Andrä AG, which so far has offered its fine translation management system mostly to the German market. I met Herr Andrä at a conference awhile back and have exchanged a couple of calls since then, and the more I have seen of his tool, the more I have liked it. But first, let's put it into some context. Though the tool comes in three flavors -- an Enterprise edition, a Value edition, and an SAAS edition -- it is primarily built for very large enterprises, as the two primary customers Bosch and Mercedes Benz can attest. And while there is at least one implementation at a language service provider location, the LSP market is presently not the company's main market focus.

The concept of the tool is to manage and process files from a wide variety of formats, in particular desktop publishing formats, office and tagged formats, and also multimedia e-learning and Flash files. While the management component consists of a no-frills wokflow-based interface for the project manager, the translatables are presented to the translator and editor in a web-based interface or as a Trados, Transit, or OmegaT (!) package that can be processed in the appropriate tool. The benefit of the external packages is obvious -- translators can work in the environment they are used to. However, the drawback is that some of the facilities that the rather powerful browser-based online interface offers are not available then -- such as access to more translation memory resources, a preview feature in Office, PDF or HTML, and the comment feature.

A couple of other outstanding features are the morphologically based fuzzy search in the TM in some languages (German, English, and French) -- other languages are supported, but not on a morphological level -- and the easy integration into content management systems. Some of the features that I did not like were the less-than-apparent view of terminology and translation memory matches, coupled with the very mouse-based interface in the browser-based environment (vs. a more productive keyboard-based one).

What is very impressive is the company's vision. Rather than seeing themselves on the verge of conquering the world (as some competitors did/do), they strongly believe in their product and would like to see it grow organically into new fields rather than pushing it into something that it cannot do at a high level. In the long run, I can certainly see ontram filling some of the vaccuum that has been left by Idiom.


3. A Reminder about the Tools of the Future

Here's what I wrote about nine months ago:

Wouldn't we all love to know what the translation tools of the future will be like? Like most everyone, I have some ideas of my own. But think how much better and more helpful it would be if a large number of translation professionals from all backgrounds came together and sketched out how they're using tools today and how they think tools need to develop to help them more effectively. Sounds intriguing, doesn't it?

That's what Translation Summit participants of the last two years also thought, so we started creating a survey to analyze just that. Since there's a lot of ground to cover, we decided to split the survey into two parts. The first part is short and sweet and covers just some of the decisions involved in choosing a tool. (Remember, "tool" here refers to any software tool that is used in the translation process.) The second part will be a bit longer and will look in more detail at current usage scenarios and potential problems.

The first part of the survey was published yesterday, and I'd like to invite and encourage you to take 10 minutes to respond. At the end of the survey there will also be a field where you can indicate whether you are interested in taking part in the second round of the survey next year.

Needless to say, all individual answers will be kept confidential. However, we do intend to publish the compiled results on member sites of FIT (the International Federation of Translators), ATA, and the Translation Summit so that tool vendors and other relevant parties can see what kind of tools they need to develop to support us and be ultimately successful in the market.

Here is the link: www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=Vestz_2fkHfp0eosNk_2bcXktA_3d_3d. And thanks again for your input.

Quite a few of you did respond -- thanks very much -- but I would like to issue the invitation one more time, kind of as a last push before going to the next step. Also, there are several foreign language versions of the survey now:

Please feel free to use these instead of the English version if you prefer to do that.


ADVERTISEMENT

Across Personal Edition -- the next generation translation workbench!

FREELANCERS BENEFIT FROM

1. all-in-one and beginning-to-end multiformat editor

2. free license (worth 1450 USD / 980 euros)

3. free training and support

Register now and join a community of more than 5,000 freelance translators!

www.my-across.net

4. This 'n' That

How is this for a VERY cool keyboard shortcut: When you're in a browser window (I tested this with Firefox, IE, Safari, and Opera), you can use the space bar to scroll down on a Web page one full screen at a time. And if you want to scroll up again, use Shift + space bar. No thank yous needed (unless you're still reading the Standard edition -- in that case, you might feel free to subscribe to the Premium edition :-)).

Awhile back I mentioned that the website of the British ITI (Institute of Translators and Interpreters) provides a tremendous resource with its calendar of translation-related events. I mentioned this recently to an esteemed colleague who was unaware of this, and so I thought that many of you might be unaware of this as well. Here it is: www.iti.org.uk/ice.

Oh, and then I'm sure you all celebrated International Translation Day this last week. My youngest daughter Anna came home from elementary school all flustered and excited, saying, "Papa, you were mentioned on the intercom in school today. Someone said it was International Translation Day and that Anna's dad is a translator." Yes, I know what you think -- we live in a backward little town! Still, it was nice to hear and made me appreciate Translation Day for the very first time. Of course, you won't be surprised to hear that Jeromobot received many well-wishes on September 30 -- so many, in fact, that he decided to have a facelift -- check it out.

The Last Word on the Tool Kit

If you would like to promote this newsletter by placing a link on your website, I will in turn mention your website in a future edition of the Tool Kit. Just paste the code you find here into the HTML code of your webpage, and the little icon that is displayed on that page with a link to my website will be displayed.

Here's a website that has recently displayed the Tool Kit link:

www.tecnotradublog.com.ar

© 2008 International Writers' Group