Dear Friends and Neighbors,
I am pleased to announce that I will be hosting a
Town Hall meeting on Saturday, January
27th at Fairfax City Hall from 10:00 to
11:30 a.m. I hope that you will stop by to hear
about what is going on at the General Assembly and
provide your feedback. Also, please take a moment to
fill out my 2007 survey. Your opinion is very
important to me. More information can be found at
www.davidbulova.com.
We began Session on January 10th with opening
ceremonies and the Governor’s State of the
Commonwealth speech in Jamestown. It was hard not to
think about how blessed we are as a nation as we
gathered within the boundaries of the original
Jamestown Fort established in 1607. Here, from
humble beginnings, the seeds were planted for the
ideals we cherish today – freedom of
religion, rule of law, and a representative form of
government.
Although we have been in Session for only a week,
the General Assembly is in full swing. As reported
in the papers, the House and Senate
Republicans released their transportation plan on
Thursday. The major themes – linking
growth and development, new transportation funding,
and VDOT reforms – are on point. However, the
details are critical. I agree with many of the
components (including a Northern Virginia-specific
plan), while others may be cause for concern (such
as $250 million from the General Fund that currently
goes to other priorities). At this point I am
keeping an open mind and will work diligently to
represent the best interests of the 37th District
and Virginia. Overall, I am glad that we have a
framework to begin deliberations.
On Friday, we considered a change to the
House Rules that would require recorded
votes in subcommittees. Last year, the
rules were changed to allow bills to be killed
without a recorded vote. Subcommittees, while a
very important part of the legislative process, can
be very small (between 5-9 members) and do not
typically represent a good cross-section of
legislators. As a result, serious issues of
accountability and fairness come to play. A
resolution was introduced by Delegate Plum of
Fairfax to require recorded votes. Regrettably, the
bill (HR 48) was defeated 39Y-59N.
While the most controversial issues are yet to
make their way through committee, I wanted to
provide some insight into just a few of the other
issues that we have dealt with in the last week.
Most of these aren’t front-page news. But they
are interesting in their own right and more typical
of the issues we deal with on a daily basis. I hope
you enjoy reading about them.
Regulation of Apparel and Buttons in
Voting Areas (HB 1769). For as long as I
remember, it has been a rule that you must take off
political buttons, stickers, hats, etc. when in the
actual voting area. The idea is that the campaign
ends outside, and that the process of actually
voting should be free from distraction. HB 1769
proposes to remove this prohibition. The bill was
introduced as a free speech measure and in
recognition that most people are courteous enough
not to come into the voting area as a walking
billboard. The counter argument is that although it
may be a minor inconvenience, the rule is meant to
protect voters from the small number of people who
don’t exercise common-sense. Both sides agreed
that consistency was important, since election
officers shouldn’t have to be constantly
making judgment calls about whether someone has
crossed the line. Politics makes odd bedfellows,
with me and Delegate McQuigg from Prince William
opposing the measure. Although the bill passed
unanimously out of committee, there was enough
concern on the House Floor to have the measure
re-referred back to committee for additional
consideration.
Career and Technical Education
Requirement in High School (HB 1442). I
received a number of emails and calls from
constituents on this bill, which would require that
two of the elective courses required for a standard
diploma be in career and technical education. The
issue that this bill is trying to address is very
real – Virginia has a shortage of workers in
the technical fields. And for those students who are
not planning to attend college, having some
marketable technical skill upon graduation is a
plus. However, because of the requirement, the
measure takes away opportunities for concentrating
in other areas. It also requires that a student
take a sequence of two related technical electives
(for instance, Shop I and Shop II), meaning that if
you don’t like the first course, you must
continue or loose that credit. In the end, it
appeared to me that this is an issue best handled by
local school boards and guidance councilors who can
work to meet individual student needs. Most of the
Northern Virginia delegation, including myself,
voted against the bill. However, it ultimately
passed (72Y-25N) and is now in the Senate for
consideration.
Disposition of Inaugural Committee Funds
(HB 1977). Most of the inaugural activities
when a Governor is elected are funded through
private donations. But after the swearing-in,
parades, and inaugural ball, what happens to the
excess funds? Although inaugural activities are
non-partisan, any excess money can currently be
given to various campaign committees even if the
donors never meant for that to be the case. HB 1977
would limit how excess funds can be dispersed
– providing an option for either returning the
funds to the donors, or donating the excess to
charity. It seems that this is a way to make
government a little more open and so I voted for
the measure. Unlike the bill described above, I was
on the prevailing side of this issue (62Y-32N). It
is interesting to note that the vote didn’t
break along partisan or even regional lines.
Thanks to everyone who has come to visit me in
Richmond and shared their views in emails, letter,
and phone calls. I hope to see you next weekend at
the Town Hall meeting!
Sincerely,
David Bulova