I submitted to the test because Olsen and his accomplices told a very different story from Janet and myself. According to Olsen, I jumped in front of his car at the beginning of the protest. Janet and I said that Olsen intentionally used his vehicle as a weapon of intimidation, nearly hitting me as I stood on the sidewalk. My polygraph examination indicated that Janet and I were telling the truth.

At the end of the protest, Olsen reappeared, this time with two other Carlton Pools employees in his vehicle. Janet and I say Olsen pulled his vehicle in front of our minivan, facing the wrong way, to again try to intimidate us. Olsen completely denied that he drove to the wrong side of the road. Again, the polygraph indicated Janet and I were telling the truth.

Olsen and one of his accomplices claim that I hit Olsen with a closed fist. In fact, I merely gave Olsen a hard shove as Olsen was assaulting Janet. The polygraph test indicated that I was telling the truth.

This was not a case of investigators have trouble finding the truth. On the contrary, this was a case of investigators doing everything in their power to bury the truth.

As the 911 recording demonstrates, the police were very concerned when they learned that an individual was brandishing a gun on a public street, especially since they now had to confront the same individual. They were understandably concerned about the threat such an individual poses to themselves and the public at large.

While the cops were extremely concerned that a man had a gun that could be pointed at them, they seemingly weren't concerned at all that that man had actually pointed that gun at animal activists on a public street in broad daylight, and in the process endangered the public at large.

The Warminster investigation was headed by Warminster Police Detective James Boston. Boston had a special relationship with the pigeon shooters that would only become known later.

Boston did not talk to Stu Chaifetz, who witnessed some of Olsen's misdeeds.  Boston did not investigate our claim that Olsen twice used his vehicle to threaten and intimidate. Boston ordered the seizure of not only SHARK's video camera, but also our laptop computer, while neglecting to seize cameras used by Olsen and one of his accomplices.

Warminster is located in Bucks County, which like Berks County, is well known to us for its corruption. Bucks County District Attorney David Heckler has long been a friend of pigeon shooters, so it came as no surprise that Heckler's office and the Warminster Police, and especially Detective Boston worked very well together. Indeed, it was a case of brothers and sisters in sleaze.

If the one-sided investigation by Detective Boston was somewhat indicative that his unprejudiced role as a police officer was compromised, Boston's conduct, and the conduct of others in the Warminster Police on the day of court left no doubt whatsoever.

From the moment we walked into the courthouse on June 30, we witnessed the close, indeed cozy relationship the police had with the very people who had attempted to intimidate us, one of whom had pulled a loaded semi-automatic handgun on a public street in broad daylight.

We watched and listened as Officer Melissa Herman explained a problem she was having with her pool to the Carlton Pools thugs, and listened to them assure her that they could fix her problem. We watched as lead Detective Boston and other police officers similarly interacted with the thugs.

As if that weren't enough, Detective Boston and gunman Robert Olsen later took seats next to Stu Chaifetz outside the courtroom, where they proceeded to discuss various ways to kill animals.  Perhaps my descriptor of the "Twilight Zone" was a bit understated. The "Outer Limits" is probably more accurate. Too bad cameras weren't allowed in the courthouse.

When the cops and the Carlton Pools thugs took their little lovefest outside the courthouse, Janet Enoch sprung into action.

Wealthy businessman and pigeon shooter Joe Solana (left) and his employee gunman Robert Olsen hanging out with Detective Boston (light blue shirt and tie), at the Warminster Court hearing (Olsen's co-workers who were with him when he pulled the gun are in the background). Did the cops wash Solana's car along with the other service they performed for him that day?

She snapped shots of the disturbing collage of supposed law enforcement, pigeon shooters, and pigeon shoot minions. Welcome to Warminster, Pennsylvania.

Throw into that disturbing pot District Judge Daniel J.Finello, who was as prejudiced a judge as I have ever seen. Finello complained about the length of the trial. Finello claimed that the fact that Janet and I carried video cameras meant we were agitators. Finello claimed that our protest was somehow illegitimate because we didn't know where we were.

"Judge" Dan Finello: Local hack politician. PA elects local judges who don't need to have any knowledge of the law. Finello fits that bill just right.

In any legitimate place, Olsen would have been dealt with severely. There would have been an investigation into Olsen's repeated offensive behavior toward us that led up to the gun pulling. Olsen's cohorts would have been charged as accessories. That obviously is not what happened.

My polygraph examination was given by a professional examiner located in Pennsylvania, a former police officer now operating a private business. I never met the examiner before the day of the test, and have not spoken to him since. His one and only function was to give me an examination to determine whether I was telling the truth. The polygraph examiner determined that I was truthful.

Unfortunately, I am virtually 100% certain that both the Warminster Police and the Bucks County District Attorney's Office will completely ignore the test results. The truth is the last thing they are interested in. These "authorities" have an agenda of protecting the bad guys, and they're going to stick to it.

It's really sad that truth, justice and the American way isn't to be found in the Warminster Police Department, Bucks County District Attorney's Office, or the courts, but rather, on a machine that was likely made in China. What does that say about our country?