Header
In This Issue
Benjamin Franklin and Dave "Crash" Craddock
Winter Flying
Introducing N184TN
Thank You from a customer
Join Our Mailing List!
Quick Links
 
 
Contact Us
 
facebook badge
 
 
 
 
Welcome...
...to Mooney Accolades!  We have received many wonderful Mooney stories.  Thank you!  Our plan is to include them in upcoming issues of Accolades.  Please be patient.  If you don't see your story in this issue, it will be coming soon.  Please keep the stories, pictures, helpful tips, and questions coming. 
  
This newsletter is YOUR newsletter.  We invite you to send us your Mooney stories; submit questions to our Experts, Bill Wheat and Stacey Ellis; or just drop us a note to say "Hi!" at Mooney Accolades .  We look forward to hearing from you soon. 
Benjamin Franklin and Dave "Crash" Craddock
 "Benjamin Franklin would have been angry at me if I didn't buy this airplane."  That's how Dave "Crash" Craddock started the article we published part one of in the last issue of Accolades.  Here is part two.
 
Speed is King.   My Mooney Acclaim Type S beat a Cessna 400 hands down in three speed tests conducted side by side at the request of several Cessna employees. Right after my lovely wife and I took delivery, we set out to establish a speed record between San Antonio and Tampa on our way to display the Batmobile at Sun-n-Fun 2008. Terrible thunderstorms shut down the entire gulf region and we diverted to Pensacola, Florida where we met a very nice Cessna salesman who was quite interested in setting up speed contests. I let him know that my wife had earlier that day seen 239 knots true @ FL 250 over the warm gulf.  This was April.  I suggested South Lake Tahoe in late June at our Flying Dentists Association annual meeting.  The race was on!
 Batmobile
Our group always invites airplane manufacturers to bring planes to our meetings for us to check out and hopefully purchase.  Cessna brought 3, that's right THREE C400's and gave countless demo rides to our group.  They also came to race.  They even brought a videographer to document the event.  After insuring we had equal payloads, my plane always had a Cessna rep in it and their plane always had a flying dentist in it.
 
We did three tests in all.  The first test was a formation takeoff.  The C400 was the lead and was to do a normal max performance takeoff.  I would be right wing.  The goal of this test was to see if the Acclaim's 280 horses could keep up with the C400's 310 horses.  Hrumph!  Almost immediately on the takeoff roll I was twisting the throttle frantically back!! First test over...Acclaim wins hands down.  I'll never forget glancing over at Chris from Cessna in the right seat. He had this huge sheepish grin on his face.  We were both thinking the same thing - can't believe how much I reduced that throttle to keep from overtaking the C400.  I was quite proud.
 
We agreed we liked to run the engines in cruise at 30.5 inches of manifold and 2500 RPMs. So for the second test, we climbed to a cruise altitude of 12,500feet MSL and the C400 would set his power to those numbers.  I would fly loose formation and adjust my manifold to stay the same speed.  The result - I had to decrease my manifold 3 inches to 27.5.  Acclaim Type S wins round two. By the way, that decrease in manifold amounted to a decrease in fuel burn of approximately 2 gallons per hour.
 
Test 3 - cruising at 11,500 feet we would be loosely side by side and throw the throttles and RPMs full forward and record individual ground speeds. Balls out. Again 310 horses for them and 280 for the Batmobile. (That's a 10% difference for those of you in Rio Linda.) Result: Mooney 7 knots faster.  Now the kicker to all these tests.....My Mooney had TKS installed which decreases the speed approximately 9 knots.  The C400 had NO TKS..  That means the Acclaim is somewhere around 15 or 16 knots faster than the C400 if they are equipped similarly. 
 
A footnote about Cessna and the tests:  The Cessna representatives could not have been more gracious.  They were kind, funny, gave countless free demo rides to our group, joined us for drinks and meals, and even paid for my fuel tab for the weekend!
Winter Flying
 by Wayne Fischer Wayne Fischer
  
 
 As I'm writing this, it is late August in Carefree, AZ, with bright blue skies and about 105 degrees. I know what you are thinking! How can he possibly know anything about winter flying with that perspective? Well, I did spend 7 years flying out of Minot AFB, ND, and 30 years out of Denver, CO, with many winter trips to Minneapolis, MN, Chicago, IL, Detroit, MI, Cleveland, OH, Buffalo and Syracuse, NY. One of my worst winter flying encounters was a monumental blizzard in Boston, MA. Heavy wet snow, high winds, followed by sub zero temperatures, which turned Logan Airport into an absolute nightmare. By the way, much of the time in Denver was spent in the Colorado Rockies with my Mooney. There, the credibility factor has been addressed, and we'll get on with the discussion.
 
            It seems to me a discussion of what constitutes winter flying is in order, since one pilot opinion can vary considerably from another point of view. Certainly, a pilot based in the Great Lakes region will have a perspective different than a pilot based in Great Falls, MT. To the OH pilot, the prospect of low ceilings, low-level icing, and generally sloppy conditions are normal winter flying. The MT based pilot will not have the moisture-laden clouds as often as the OH pilot, but icing is still a factor, albeit on a different scale. Winds are a very significant factor to the pilot flying in the mountainous areas of our country, and present a very important factor in the MT pilot's decision making. Most mountain pilots know that if the winds at mountaintop are 30 Kts or greater, one better re-evaluate the importance of the flight. By the way, Colorado has been successful in providing mountain pass AWOS systems throughout the state, which has greatly improved the flight planning. The pilot based in the San Joaquin Valley is aware of the dense and persistent fog that is prevalent during the winter months, so it becomes apparent winter flying means different things to different pilots.
 
            One aspect of winter flying common to most pilots is the subject of icing. Let's look first at airframe icing on the ground. In my judgment, this is probably the easiest to recognize, and should be the easiest decision to make. Never, ever take off with any accumulation of ice or frost on your airplane. I usually try to avoid words like "always" and "never", but in this case the word never really does apply. It's very simple-don't take off with any ice or frost on your airplane!
 
            It seems to me that almost everything to be written about in-flight icing has been around a long time, but as new pilots become exposed to the dangers, it is best we take another look at the subject. The most common misperception is that the result of ice is a degradation of the load carrying capability of the airplane. We have all heard the hangar conversation where a pilot says, "my airplane can carry a lot of ice". Meaning of course that the weight of the ice is the dangerous factor. Most Mooney pilots already know that the ice changes the shape of the airfoil (wing and tail), and dramatically increases the stall speed of the subject airfoil. Most Mooney pilots also know that their Mooney airfoils are more effective in accumulating ice than other airplanes. The big, fat Bonanza wing has a bigger bow wave, which deflects more of the molecules, hence accumulating ice at a slower rate. It is still a problem to the Bonanza pilot, but only gives him a little more time to realize he's in trouble. There are almost unlimited icing scenarios, so I don't intend to get in to discussion of rime vs. clear, except to say that freezing rain is the devil himself, and bad things will happen if we don't get out of it quickly. And therein lies the overriding objective of every Mooney pilot exposed to in-flight icing-Get out of it as soon as you can! Even the old adage of climbing to get out of freezing rain is under question. Are we certain the warmer air is only 1000' or so above us, and can our normally aspirated Mooney climb with the already accumulated ice? Maybe a 180 turn is more appropriate in this case.
 
            A winter weather problem peculiar to the turbocharged Mooney is the possibility of fuel icing at the high altitudes and colder atmosphere. Fuel icing can also be a problem for any Mooney operating in extremely cold conditions, so it is wise to use aviation isopropyl alcohol in the POH recommended proportions. My friend, Don Kaye, has had first hand experience with operating a Bravo in the flight levels during the winter, and knows the feeling when the engine starts to sputter because of fuel icing.
 
            Strong winter headwinds at normal cruising altitudes will invariably lead to a decrease in the range capability of our Mooney. The accident reports are replete with fuel exhaustion crashes, and it's always the same excuse-I have made this trip many times and always had enough fuel. But not this time! Know the winds and plan accordingly.
 
            I believe forecast-icing conditions should always make us plan for an alternative strategy. Remember, waiting until tomorrow is an alternative strategy!
 
Fly Safe!    
Introducing N184TN
 
 31-0084 full image 
 
 
 
N184TN is a single engine, normalized turbo with 280 hp.  Painted Matterhorn White with a Cumulas Gray metallic base, she sports trim stripes in Ruby and Titanium.  Lush alloy leather with gray carpeting dresses out her interior.
                                          glass panel 31-0084
 
Equipped with the Garmin G1000 glass cockpit, WAAS Avionics package, ELT ME406, Bose Headsets, Oxygen system, dark tinted rear side windows, and a metallic paint upgrade, this lady is looking for a new home.  For more information, click here.
Thank you letter from a customer...
 
 "Stacey, Paul,
 
I wanted to thank you and Paul for the help on Friday.  Also, I need to offer an apology to Paul.
 
When I talked with Paul, he made the point that the problem sounded like the autopilot was not connected. It occurred to me that I had not checked the CB for the autopilot. When I went back it was off. Somehow I had hit it at some point and turned it off. Paul, I think I said I recycled the CB, I just cycled it. I should have checked, but the messages you get (data path failed and the red x) were not obvious to me in part because I was under some pressure to get back to Chicago and the Garmin is and will remain a bit of mystery to me. Paul's suggestion helped to start me thinking and that saved the flight.
 
Once again, thanks. For what it is worth, made the flight from Angel Fire to Waukegan (north of Chicago) FL190 with true airspeed of 205 at 27 inches MP/2400 and with a great tailwind. Did it in a little over 4 hours using 75 gals of fuel, including a big divert going into Waukegan. 
 
The more I fly it the more impressed I am with the aircraft. I think it is the supreme single engine airplane in terms of range, speed, cost, fuel consumption. Nothing can match it on all counts.
 
Once again, Stacy and Paul ,thanks for the help with my lack of thinking."