Greetings!

 

This monthly newsletter is intended to provide interesting news and cases in criminal law.  We hope that you will find it entertaining as well as useful. 

 

Sincerely,

 

Jeff Hammerschmidt and Mark Broughton 

Hammerschmidt Broughton Law Corporation

Phone: 559-772-4614

Jeff@hbcriminaldefense.com    

Mark@hbcriminaldefense.comView our profile on LinkedInFollow us on TwitterFind us on Facebook

www.hbcriminaldefense.com   

 

  

Innocence  

 

On November 7, 2007, the innocence of Armando Ortiz was affirmed when Superior Court Judge Gary D. Hoff reversed his murder conviction. In 2002 Armando, a Fresno resident who at the time was 16 years old, was tried as an adult and wrongfully convicted of the murders of Manar Jaber, a 19-year old Reedley woman, and her unborn child. He had been sentenced to two life terms in prison without the possibility of parole.

On June 11, 2008, Fresno County District Attorney John Skiles dropped all charges against Armando in the case, which remains open. "I feel about as good as I have in thirty years of practicing law," said Mark Broughton, Armando's court-appointed attorney who was handling the retrial of Armando's case. "This is just a wonderful day not only for Armando but for his family and, really, the justice system. So I'm very, very, very happy today."

Armando's case came to the attention of the Northern California Innocence Project after his appellate attorney informed the organization that there were numerous alibi witnesses who had never been interviewed during his trial. Upon taking the case, Innocence Project attorneys and law students discovered that even though Armando's trial attorney knew about the alibi witnesses, he never contacted them. The witnesses would have testified that Armando was with them at the time of Manar Jaber's and her child's murder. As a result of these facts, Judge Hoff reversed Armando's conviction due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (IAC).

 

"People are wrongfully convicted in this country," Mark Broughton explained at the time, "and there are a number of reasons why that occurs. It does happen. But I'm very happy that in this case we were able to finally show the prosecution that Armando is completely innocent." Cookie Ridolfi, executive director of the Northern California Innocence Project, added that "everyone suffers when the wrong person is convicted.

 

Mr. Ortiz was deprived of his freedom before he had a chance to reach adulthood, and a brutal murderer remains at large."

According to their website, "The Northern California Innocence Project embodies Santa Clara University's mission to create a more just and humane world through working to exonerate innocent prisoners and pursue legal reforms that address the causes and consequences of wrongful convictions." It is a member of the Innocence Network, an Innocence Project affiliation of independent organizations working to overturn wrongful convictions and improve the criminal justice system.

In 2010 Innocence Network organizations secured 29 exonerations of people who had been convicted of crimes they did not commit. In three of those instances, individuals had already served more than thirty years in prison before being exonerated. Moreover, in a surprising number of those cases police and prosecutorial misconduct played a significant role in the wrongful convictions.

The Armando Ortiz case endures as a powerful demonstration of how innocence is too often sacrificed upon the altar of expediency over justice, even to this very day. As such, it is also a crushing indictment of the brokenness in the criminal justice system. "Somewhere along the line we have lost the concept of the presumption of innocence, of proof beyond a reasonable doubt," says Mark Broughton. "What we now have in a real sense is absolutely the opposite - guilty until proven innocent."

Ultimately, while the legal quagmire and victory which surrounded the Armando Ortiz case captures foremost attention, we must never forget that the most painful and irrecoverable loss of innocence in this most tragic matter is that of young Manar Jaber and her unborn child.

Crazy Laws & Lawsuits 

 

If you die in Seattle, you owe the city $50. And if you don't pay, something bad could happen to you.

 

 

Men's Health Magazine:

Fresno America's Drunkest City

 

 

For the second year in a row Men's Health Magazine listed Fresno, CA as America's drunkest city.  It based its results on data gathered "from the FBI, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Fatality Analysis Reporting System...read the entire article

Innocence Network Organizations Secured 29 Exonerations in 2010  

 

New report details this year's wrongful convictions across 14 states, two countries.

 

A report released by the Innocence Network 

reveals that there have been 29 exonerations in North America in the past year, including 3 instances where the wrongfully convicted served more than 3 decades behind bars before being exonerated.

 

The report, "Innocence Network Exonerations 2010," provides information about each of this year's 29 exonerations in 14 states and two countries. Misidentification and unvalidated forensics played a significant role in many of the exonerations, but this year also saw a surprising number of cases where police and prosecutorial misconduct were in large part to blame for the wrongful conviction.

read the entire article... 

Staff Spotlight

Hope Restored: Mark's Reflections On The Armando Ortiz Case

 

The Armando Ortiz case was a pivotal moment in Mark Broughton's career as an attorney. The following is Mark's reflections on the 2008 case, the Innocence Project that redeemed Armando's innocence, and the impact it had on Mark personally and professionally. In his own words...

 

How did you become involved in the Armando Ortiz case?

In November 2007 the Superior Court appointed me to a retrial of a murder case. It just happened to be the case for Armando Ortiz whose wrongful conviction was reversed only a few days earlier. Interestingly I had been in court that same day with an intern and a young attorney and we personally witnessed the celebration outside the courtroom right after the judge's decision. We even chatted with the folks from the Innocence Project who had worked on the case and won the victory for Armando.

What did you learn were the reasons for Armando's wrongful conviction?

Firstly, I sincerely believe that the fundamental duty of a lawyer is to aggressively represent each and every client with all the resources and experience he has to protect and preserve their constitutional rights. In Armando's case his trial attorney, who passed away not long ago, failed terribly on this particular occasion in his duty to his client. Specifically he had failed to contact witnesses whom he knew about and who had a credible alibi for Armando. I also learned that he hadn't generated any expense on investigation. This astounded me.

I also discovered that the prosecutor during the trial had informed the judge on the record that he had spoken to the witnesses and found them not to be credible. The truth was that the DA's office had never interviewed these witnesses. If they had they would have known that Armando had an alibi. This is one of the other main factors that led to Armando's wrongful conviction: terrible police work and investigation, and a prosecution that was interested only in getting a conviction rather than finding the truth.

How did the people from Innocence Project help you with Armando's case?

Following my appointment to Armando's retrial, I contacted his appellate lawyers and the Innocence Project folks who had worked on it. They were very helpful in directing me to the key points of the case. Perhaps, above all, they all were completely convinced Armando was totally innocent. I hear this all the time, but this was different. There was something compelling in the way they talked about Armando and the case. It got me focused, and committed from the outset. And those same folks continued to support my efforts throughout the whole process of bringing Armando's case to trial again. We were all thankful when, in June 2008, the District Attorney finally decided to drop all charges against Armando in the case. It was an amazing day, and a much deserved redemption for Armando.

One thing that still sticks out to me now is how committed they were, not only to Armando and his case, but to "the cause" - men and women who have been wrongfully convicted in this country for crimes they didn't commit. I cannot overstate the depth of admiration I have for the Innocence Project and the work they do.

Have there been any additional developments in Armando's case?

We were back in court for Armando in March 2011.  All the time while Armando has been in prison, the Department of Corrections (CDC) has been collecting restitution (for burial expenses and other costs related to the death of Manar Jaber, whose murder Armando was wrongfully convicted of) and fines and such from his account, even after the reversal and dismissal. We had to go back to court to have the order of dismissal corrected by the judge. I am advised that Armando will be given full credit for all the money that was taken from him all this time. It should also be pointed out that the Innocence Project was there for Armando again. I made the official appearance, but they did the work. They never give up.

 

How has the Armando Ortiz case impacted you personally and professionally?

 

I think of that day and those people and Armando quite often.

 

When it's all over, I can say that one time in my life, for one guy and his family, I was able to participate in correcting a wrong and to bring about justice. It is easy in the criminal process to lose hope, to feel defeated, to feel as if one can no longer make a difference, to feel that the system is so big and rife with prejudice that one has no chance at all at achieving justice. Taking a step back, it seems that there is a purpose in the universe, and that we all play a part in it even though we may not know or appreciate it at the time. And then I think of Armando and I remember why I am doing this. He has given to me much more that I gave to him. And I feel a resurgence of strength, a renewal of faith. My hope is restored.

About Hammerschmidt Broughton Law Corporation


The Hammerschmidt Broughton Law Corporation is dedicated to providing the highest level of legal representation to persons accused of crimes in Federal and State courts. We also represent clients in Department of Motor Vehicle driver's license revocation hearings and administrative licensure proceedings. We take on appeals, expungements and other post-conviction matters.

 

The firm is rated "AV" by Martindale Hubbell, the highest rating awarded to a law firm. The firm is also listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers, a distinction reserved for the top five percent of law firms in the United States. The firm focuses on putting the client's needs first by keeping clients up to date on the status of the case, and by returning telephone calls quickly.

 

Contact Us to discuss your case. The sooner you call for a free consultation, the sooner we can begin working for you.

 

Disclaimer: The information you obtain in this newsletter is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.