Please visit my newly-designed Web site, www.georgecurry.com. The Newsroom section was created for hard-core news junkies, with dozens of interesting links conveniently located in one central place. The Resource Center is filled with useful links, including one for free legal forms, how to find jobs overseas, preparing for different types of standardized tests, figuring out distances between two cities, searching for college scholarships, debunking Internet hoaxes and so much more. Explore the updated site and tell your friends about it.
My new site was designed by Iverson Gandy, III, a young African-American entrepreneur who owns his own Web firm, Gandylabs. If you like what you see, give the brother some business. To avoid filters from blocking receipt of this newsletter now or in the future, add george@georgecurry.com to your address book. You can scroll to the bottom of this newsletter for information on how to forward it to friends or update your e-mail address.
|
|
Michael Steele Genuflects for Limbaugh
|

By George E. Curry
NNPA Columnist
Michael Steele, basking in the celebration his sixth-ballot election as the first Black chairman of the Republican Party, was quick to pick a fight with President Barack Obama, saying, "It's going to be an honor to spar with him."
However, Steele refused to get into the ring with Rush Limbaugh, the reigning GOP champion. After giving an accurate description of Rush Limbaugh on D.L. Hughley's CNN show, Steele bent over backwards - or just plain bent over - profusely apologizing to Limbaugh.
The kowtowing was prompted by this exchange between Hughley and Steele:
HUGHLEY: You know what we do, we talk like we're talking now. You have your view. I have mine. We don't need incendiary rhetoric.
STEELE: Exactly.
HUGHLEY: Like Rush Limbaugh, who is the de facto leader of the Republican Party.
STEELE: No, he's not.
HUGHLEY: I will tell you what ...
STEELE: I'm the de facto leader of the Republican Party.
But Steele did not stop there. He added, "So let's put it into context here. Let's put it into context here. Rush Limbaugh is an entertainer. Rush Limbaugh, his whole thing is entertainment. Yes, it's incendiary. Yes, it's ugly."
And it only got uglier when Limbaugh posted a response on his Web site, titled, "A Few Words for Michael Steele," which was actually 2,491 words for Michael Steele, none of them complimentary.
Telling Steele that, in effect, he should be seen rather than heard, Limbaugh wrote,
"It's time, Mr. Steele, for you to go behind the scenes and start doing the work that you were elected to do instead of trying to be some talking head media star, which you're having a tough time pulling off."
Steele told Politico, "I have enormous respect for Rush Limbaugh. I was maybe a little bit inarticulate...There was no attempt on my part to diminish his voice or his leadership."
As if that weren't enough, Steele offered this poorly-worded explanation: "I went back at that tape and I realized words that I said weren't what I was thinking. It was one of those things where I thinking I was saying one thing, and it came out differently. What I was trying to say was a lot of people... want to make Rush the scapegoat, the bogeyman, and he's not."
Steele is a lot of things, but inarticulate is not one of them. When it comes to Rush Limbaugh, he is spineless. Steele should have had the courage of his convictions rather than caving in to a blowhard who demands - and gets - serial apologies from Republicans willing to take him on.
Rush Limbaugh is not only the face of the Republican Party, he's the death of it. And a few Republicans, Steele not among them, are willing to say that for fear of risking Limbaugh's wrath. An exception is longtime Republican activist David Frum.
In an article in Newsweek, he said: "And for the leader of the Republicans? A man who is aggressive and bombastic, cutting and sarcastic, who dismisses the concerned citizens in network news focus groups as 'losers.' With his private plane and his cigars, his history of drug dependency and his personal bulk, not to mention his tangled marital history, Rush is a walking stereotype of self-indulgence-exactly the image that Barack Obama most wants to affix to our philosophy and our party. And we're cooperating!"
Frum worries about the future of the Republican Party. "We lost the presidency in 2008. In 2006 and 2008, together, we lost 51 seats in the House and 14 in the Senate. Even in 2004, President Bush won reelection by the narrowest margin of any reelected president in American history," he said. "The trends below those vote totals were even more alarming. Republicans have never done well among the poor and the nonwhite-and as the country's Hispanic population grows, so, too, do those groups. More ominously, Republicans are losing their appeal to voters with whom they've historically done well."
But Limbaugh has another agenda, according to Frum.
"Rush knows what he is doing. The worse conservatives do, the more important Rush becomes as leader of the ardent remnant. The better conservatives succeed, the more we become a broad national governing coalition, the more Rush will be sidelined."
Limbaugh is anything but sidelined. He said on his radio program, "I'm not in charge of the Republican Party, and I don't want to be. I would be embarrassed to say that I'm in charge of the sad-sack state that it's in. If I were chairman of the Republican Party, given the state that it's in, I would quit."
And that's exactly what some Republicans are saying Steele should do, including Ada Fisher, a Black national committeewoman from North Carolina.
For now, however, it looks like Michael Steele is safe. And the only thing he's going to quit doing is criticizing Rush Limbaugh.
George E. Curry, former editor-in-chief of Emerge magazine and the NNPA News Service, is a keynote speaker, moderator, and media coach. He can be reached through his Web site, www.georgecurry.com.
|
|
Is Michael Steele The Next Sarah Palin? 
By George Alexander
(c) Huffington Post
March 6, 2009
Lights! Camera! Action! The past week has been nothing short of the third season of a GOP reality show, which began with George W. Bush's prolonged administration in its first season, continued with the McCain/Palin ticket in season two and now with Barack Obama's election---making black the new black---begins season three with Michael Steele as the Republican National Committee's first African American chairman sparring with radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh.
Like Sarah Palin, Steele was to represent a new vision, new possibilities for a troubled party trying to find its mooring and sense of purpose in an America and a world that continues to demand change and evolution. Steele's supporters no doubt had seen him as an obvious visual symbol of a party renaissance. A new school voice in a hackneyed institution. But then came the media. Then came Rush.
In the show's latest episode, it was the upstart Steele, "secure" in his position as the party leader ready to lead his charges. So self-assured had Steele been in his post that he actually attacked Limbaugh---a long-time GOP cast member---on D.L. Hughley's just canceled CNN show, calling Limbaugh merely an entertainer whose remarks can be incendiary. In other words, he's not to be taken seriously. Big mistake.
Steele correctly acknowledged the toxic nature of Limbaugh's daily political vitriol. He spoke the truth. The problem is that as the RNC chair he failed to realize the power of the media and the damage that a man like Limbaugh with daily access to the airwaves can do. After all, Limbaugh draws millions of listeners a week and boasts a 60% approval rating among Republicans. Putting it mildly, a man like Limbaugh can take out many a would-be rising GOP leader.
Like any new character will learn, old school villains don't die easily. In fact, nothing seems to rile them more than a new challenger who underestimates the villain's prowess. Steele clearly did not calculate the impact his comments would have on Limbaugh's loyal followers---who wrote in demanding that the talk show host respond to Steele's remarks---or might garner the talk show even more support. Indeed, the Washington Post reports that amidst the controversy, Limbaugh's listenership has increased this week to 25 million from 14.2 million.
Riding cheers from his fan base, following Steele's comments Limbaugh scolded Steele on-air:
"Michael Steele, you are head of the RNC. You are not head of the Republican Party. Tens of millions of conservatives and Republicans have nothing to do with the RNC and right now they want nothing to do with it, and when you call them asking them for money, they hang up on you. I hope that changes."
Ouch!
In my native Alabama, Limbaugh's lambasting is what we call "putting someone back in their place." There can be racial or class undertones to such an exchanges. In this instance, it was Limbaugh's not so subtle way of reminding Steele to get back in line and to do what he was told to do. On American Idol, it would be akin to Simon telling a contestant that they will never make it in the music business.
Witnessing Steele capitulate so abruptly was quite painful yet entertaining. But he really had no choice if he wants a future in his party. It's the price of the ticket in today's GOP. Limbaugh is on the airwaves and the faster you can make peace with the man holding the mic the better. It's like walking into a comedy club late and having the comedian call you out. The best thing to do is to sit down and be quiet until he finds another victim. Steele needed to shut Rushgate down and shut it down fast, hoping to stage a recovery in an upcoming GOP episode.
Steele's performance to date is largely reminiscent of that of Palin's national debut. When Palin stepped into the national spotlight, she took no time proclaiming that 8 million holes had been punched in the political glass ceiling for women, referencing the number of Democratic primary votes earned by Hillary Clinton. The GOP hoped disaffected Clinton supporters would jump the Democratic ship. They didn't.
With Steele, the GOP arguably hopes that he will not only help the party galvanize its conservative base, but bring younger and more African American voters into the fold. The GOP knows it will never be the number one party of choice for blacks and other progressive voters. But as the 2004 presidential election demonstrated, peeling off just enough black support from Democrats in closely contested states like Ohio is all you need to win. That year 16% of black voters in Ohio supported Bush up from 9% in 2000, enough to give Bush a second term. After all, a win is a win.
Yet the challenge for Steele is enormous. And to gain credibility in his party and the country before he becomes Palinized, he needs to reintroduce himself and he needs to act quickly and skillfully before it's too late. Some GOP insiders---namely Dr. Ada Fisher, an African American RNC member from South Carolina----are already calling for his resignation. Steele's dilemma reflects the dicey road black, other minority leaders and women must oftentimes walk when attempting to navigate the treacherous political landscape and its landmines. Seeking to appeal to the larger population while still appearing loyal---or at least sensitive to---the issues most important to their respective ethnic or gender group is no easy task. Barack Obama did it brilliantly and won the White House.
Obama's win debatably has caused a sort of political schizophrenia for some black conservatives. Many don't really want to be the on the wrong side of history as having vilified the country's first black president regardless of party affiliation. But they still want to remain true to conservative principles.
Yet Steele's recent attempts at using hip hop vernacular won't help the GOP woo black and younger voters anymore than parading Palin around spouting, "I'm just a soccer mom from Wasilla," helped the GOP win over intelligent women. If there's one thing young people detest, it's a lack of authenticity. You can't pretend to be down for their causes then promote policies that are perceived to disregard them. Young voters don't want rhetoric. In these challenging economic times, Americans of all stripes want jobs, food, healthcare and access to education. The recent polls indicating the public's support of how President Obama is handling the economic crisis, underscores what's on the minds Americans. And until the GOP decides to get in touch with the American people, the rest of us will be content watching the show. Grab the Goobers, folks. It's getting good.
|
Blacks, Whites Hear Obama Differently
By Nia-Malika Henderson © POLITICO
March 3, 2009
On his pre-inaugural visit to Ben's Chili Bowl, a landmark for Washington's African-American community, President Barack Obama was asked by a cashier if he wanted his change back.
"Nah, we straight," Obama replied.
The phrase was so subtle some listeners missed it. The reporter on pool duty quoted Obama as saying, "No, we're straight."
But many other listeners did not miss it. A video of the exchange became an Internet hit, and there was a clear moment of recognition among many blacks, who got a kick out of their Harvard-educated president sounding, as one commenter wrote on a hip-hop site, "mad cool."
On matters of racial identity, many observers in the African-American community say he benefits from what's known as "dog-whistle politics." His language, mannerisms and symbols resonate deeply with his black supporters, even as the references largely sail over the heads of white audiences.
This is part of the reason that as a candidate, Obama won intense support among African-Americans while never being branded, in the fashion of a Jesse Jackson, as a candidate defined by race.
In January remarks about the economy, Obama made a reference to "American dreams that are being deferred," a phrase black audiences understood without a citation as black poet Langston Hughes'. First lady Michelle Obama often cites her upbringing in the "South Side of Chicago." On Election Night, the winner promised that "we as a people will get there," an echo of Martin Luther King Jr. made more powerful by not expressly invoking King's name.
Or a year ago in South Carolina, when he tried to swat down the persistent rumors that he is Muslim. "They try to bamboozle you, hoodwink you," Obama said that night, in what many listeners heard as an unmistakable reference to activist Malcolm X, as portrayed in Spike Lee's movie.
"All of us knew that he was referencing Malcolm X, and when he said it, the reaction was instantaneous," said William Jelani Cobb, a professor at Spelman College who specializes in black history and politics.
Dog-whistle politics was hardly invented by Obama. One of its most deft practitioners lately was President George W. Bush. He regularly borrowed the language of evangelical Christianity and the anti-abortion movement to signal he was simpatico with their beliefs, even as he often avoided obvious displays of support that might turn off middle-of-the-road voters.
"The code words matter, how you dress matters, how you speak matters; it's all subliminal messaging, and all politicians use it," said Michael Fauntroy, an assistant professor of public policy at George Mason University, who specializes in race and American politics. "Ronald Reagan used to talk about making America the shining city on a hill, which is about America as divinely inspired, and it has a deep vein in the evangelical conservative movement. It goes on all the time, and there are so many circumstances when only the target people get the message."
But Fauntroy said the stakes were higher for Obama, who had to "deracialize himself."
John McWhorter, a linguist at the conservative Manhattan Institute, said that he believes that in Obama's case coded messaging, which can be a matter of words, sound or grammar or all of them, is partly conscious because "he knows it arouses black audiences."
"Black English, especially the cadence, is becoming America's youth lingua franca, especially since the mainstreaming of hip-hop. Its sound conveys warmth, authenticity and a touch of seductive danger not only to blacks but many whites, especially ones below about 50," McWhorter said. "Obama's tapping into that cadence helped win him the election. Imagine John Kerry or Hillary Clinton saying, 'Yes, we can!&rsqu; It would have sounded phony - only in what I call a 'black-cent' can it sound prophetic and arousing."
Ari Fleischer, former press secretary for George W. Bush, said that dog-whistle politics at its best is not really about politics at all.
"The connection that Barack Obama has to the black community and the connection George Bush has to the evangelical community began long before they began running for president. It was a natural and deep connection, politics aside," Fleischer said. "When they became candidates, it was a powerful, strong bond that created a base for both people. ... But genuine speech with conviction has tremendous power, and there always is a tendency for the base to hear the deeper message and say, 'That was sweet. He's talking to me.'"
Bush used phrases lifted from church hymns and the Bible to signal an affinity for like-minded Christians. The phrase "culture of life," became part of the political lexicon when Bush used it weeks before the 2000 election - it was a less political, more evangelical version of "pro-life."
Bush also recognized that he had to tread carefully with his evangelism - keeping his most loyal voters satisfied, even if following through on policy initiatives might be difficult.
As for Obama, an aide declined to talk about whether it was a matter of strategy.
Beyond speech, blacks have picked up certain pieces of Obama's mannerisms, particularly his walk, that signal authenticity. Bush had his cowboy strut, and Obama has a swagger - a rhythmic lope that says cool and confident and undeniably black. It was most noticeable on his first post-election trip to the White House, some said.
"The swagger was out of control, dragging the left foot, it was like, 'Barack, you have got to calm down,'" said Melissa Harris-Lacewell, a Princeton University professor who teaches courses in politics and black studies. "The swagger thing just got worse and worse during the campaign. ... I am sure David Axelrod told him to stop swaggering. ... I can't imagine that anyone is telling him to do that."
"In those circumstances, it is his blackness kind of squishing out of the edges. It's not the same thing as deploying it like Bush did, but it has the same effect ... solidifying his base of black folks," she said.
Yet the question remains as to how far style or even swagger can take Obama among black people, without matching policies seen as beneficial to the black community.
"The swagger goes a long way for Barack, a long way," Harris-Lacewell said, adding that the black support will mean a boost in polls. "Black people were strong supporters of Clinton because of race. ... If it works for someone who is just symbolically for the black president, it will be very powerful for the actual black president."
Notably, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele has used phrases recently like "bling bling" to describe the stimulus package and "off the hook" to describe the new RNC outreach plans, at a time when he is trying to step up the party's appeal to African-American voters.
Beyond stylistic gestures, Obama has made several overtures to the black press since winning in November. His first print interview as president-elect was given to Ebony and his first print interview as president was given to Black Enterprise. And at his first press conference, journalists from the black press were given prime seating - yet weren't called on for questions.
Strategy or not, Obama's efforts will likely continue, some said, and so far have helped.
"I think that the combination of his style and his swagger and his connection to the various currents of culture make him seem like a man who is much younger than he is," Cobb said. "Bt the genius with Obama is that he is fluent in it, so it doesn't come off as a deliberate kind of doling out of references or points. It winds up to being to his benefit politically."
|
Stocks Misused as 'Scorecard' of White House Policy

|
© Fairness and Accuracy in Media (FAIR)
March 5, 2009
To hear some in the corporate media tell it, you judge a president by how the Dow Jones Industrial Average is performing--and, thus, Barack Obama is not doing a very good job.
As NBC's Meet the Press host David Gregory said (3/1/09):
The Obama stimulus package, $787 billion. The housing plan, $75 billion. That's $2.3 trillion. Seven hundred and fifty billion dollars additional in this document for additional bailout money for the banks. Meantime, what metric do we have to see how people--what people think of that government intervention? The Dow is one metric. It closed on Friday at its lowest level since 1997, just over 7,000.
MSNBC host Chris Matthews put it earlier (Hardball, 2/23/09):
How does [Obama] deal with the fact that he has a scorecard now. It's called the Dow Jones.... No matter what they say, the Dow keeps going down. It's down to almost 7,000 now. I used to think 8,000 was the floor. It's heading toward 6,000! People are really getting angry! I'm getting angry!
Some of the commentary was even blunter. NBC's financial pundit Jim Cramer declared on the March 3 Today show that Obama is pursuing a "radical agenda" that amounts to the "greatest wealth destruction I've seen by a president." When reporter Erin Burnett seemed to disagree slightly, Cramer retorted: "The stock market is the country right now. This is where people's wealth is."
But reporters and commentators are mistaken if they believe the Dow Jones average amounts to a public referendum on the Obama White House (or any other White House, for that matter). There is also little evidence that a rising stock market is necessarily tied to increased prosperity or broad economic health; it is a measure of what people who trade stocks think those stocks are worth, i.e. how much they think other traders would pay for them. As Dean Baker wrote in response to a Washington Post article (3/3/09), the value of the Dow is not a reliable indicator of much of anything: "As should be apparent at this point, the stock market can often be driven by irrational exuberance. Remember, it was almost three times as high in 2009 dollars back in 2000 as it is today. Did that make sense?"
"It took only 14 trading sessions for the Dow to fall from 8,000 to less than 7,000," declared Today host Matt Lauer (3/3/09). As pointed out by Media Matters (3/3/09), MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer seemed to more explicitly tie the market average to Obama: "Since Election Day, the Dow Jones industrial average has dropped nearly 3,000 points.. It's shed a quarter of its value in just the past two months." The Dow had also lost more than 3,000 points in the six months prior to Election Day, which might suggest the problems started long before last November.
And such commentary certainly suggests that the downturn in the market is some sort of reaction to White House actions--rather than a response to the routinely downbeat reports from major corporations, indicating that they will make less money and hence be worth less to investors than they have in the recent past (and in the case of many major financial corporations, their balance sheets are worse than downbeat). As the Washington Post reported (3/5/09): "The U.S.. recession is dragging down almost every industry in almost every part of the country and businesses do not expect conditions to improve until late this year at the earliest, according to a Federal Reserve report released yesterday."
If reporters really want to assess public reaction to White House economic proposals, there is a much more straightforward way to do that: public opinion polls. Those show much more public support for the Obama administration than is evident among Wall Street investors--or millionaire TV journalists.
|
Black Leaders Set Records in State Legislatures
Colorado Senate President Peter Groff (left) and Colorado House Speaker Terrance Carroll.
By Wendy Koch
© USA TODAY
March 6, 2009
President Obama is not the only black leader making history. As of last month, a record five African Americans lead state legislative bodies, and the number of black state lawmakers has reached record levels.
Those leaders are part of a growing movement of African Americans serving in state legislatures, often steppingstones to higher office. The number of black state legislators has risen from 401 in 1986 to a record 628, accounting for 9% of state lawmakers, says Morgan Cullen of the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Obama is part of a breakthrough generation that benefited from the gains made by civil rights leaders, says Gwen Ifill, host of PBS' Washington Week and author of The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama. "They're not race-driven" and seek support from all voters, she says.
"It's too soon to say" whether Obama's success will encourage more blacks to seek office, Ifill says. Still, "the ceiling seems a little higher."
Obama's campaign did not prompt more blacks to seek federal office, says David Bositis, political analyst at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a private research group. He says the number running for Congress, 56, was lower than in 2004 or 2000 because of a drop in black Republican candidates.
In California, Assembly Speaker Karen Bass is the first black woman to lead any legislature. In Colorado, for the first time in U.S. history, black men, Terrance Carroll and Peter Groff, preside over the House and Senate.
In January, Malcolm Smith became Senate majority leader in New York. In February, Steven Horsford took the same post in Nevada. Both are the first African Americans to lead their legislatures.
Obama "provides hope and inspiration" to prospective black candidates, says Bass, a physician assistant elected to the California Legislature in 2005. "We're going to have a whole generation that thinks this is no big deal."
"His presidency will show people we can be successful at the highest levels of government," says Carroll, 40, a Colorado attorney. He became speaker in January.
Bositis says the number of African Americans in Congress and mayor's offices has been fairly constant over the past decade. The largest jump in state and federal candidates was in the early 1990s, when more black-majority districts were created.
Voter attitudes toward race are changing dramatically, says Christopher Mooney, professor of political science at the University of Illinois at Springfield.
He says black officials can not only provide diversity of viewpoints but also tighten African Americans' connection to government. He says, "Voters enjoy seeing people like themselves in office."
|
|
|
US Supreme Court holds to narrow interpretation of the Voting Rights Act
Critics say the ruling on 'crossover' districts could reduce the political clout of minorities
By Warren Richey
© Christian Science Monitor
March 10, 2009
The federal Voting Rights Act does not authorize vote dilution lawsuits in voting districts in which a particular racial or ethnic group comprises less than 50 percent of the voting age population.
In a 5 to 4 decision announced on Monday, the US Supreme Court rejected a claim that so-called minority crossover districts qualify for protection under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). Instead, the court's conservative wing embraced a narrow view of the law.
Crossover districts are those in which a cohesive minority voting population can elect candidates of its choice by forming a coalition with cross-over votes from whites or other non-minority voters.
The case is important because it establishes ground rules that will apply nationwide during the redrawing of voting districts following the 2010 census. It could result in a reduction of minority districts by encouraging district drafters to pack traditional minority districts with more than 50 percent minority voters, rather than aiming for widespread distribution across several voting districts.
The decision comes in a case challenging the creation of North Carolina's House District 18. State officials tasked with redrawing North Carolina's voting map found themselves caught between two competing laws.
The VRA mandates that new districts may not be drawn in such a way as to dilute the existing political clout of minority voters in minority voting districts. But North Carolina has a law requiring that counties not be split up within voting districts.
State officials discovered that if they adhered to the "whole county provision" of state law, the minority voting age population in District 18 would be reduced from 39 percent to 35 percent.
Concerned that the reduction would amount to illegal minority vote dilution, the officials concluded that they were required to ignore the state's whole county provision to avoid violating the federal voting rights law.
One of the affected counties filed suit, claiming the state law's whole county provision should be upheld. The North Carolina Supreme Court agreed.
In affirming that decision, a plurality of the US Supreme Court ruled that the Voting Rights Act protects the voting clout of minority voters in districts in which minority voters comprise more than 50 percent of the voting age population.
"The rule provides straightforward guidance to courts and to those officials charged with drawing district lines to comply with Section 2 [of the VRA]," wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy in the plurality decision.
"We decline to depart from the uniform interpretation of Section 2 that has guided federal courts and state and local officials for more than 20 years," he said in the opinion.
"Minority groups in crossover districts cannot form a voting majority without crossover voters," Justice Kennedy wrote. "In those districts minority voters have the same opportunity to elect their candidate as any other political group with the same relative voting strength."
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito joined Kennedy's decision in full. Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia concurred in the judgment, but did not agree with the underlying reasoning.
In a dissent, Justice David Souter said the plurality was being unfaithful to the intent of the Voting Rights Act.
"Minority voters in districts with minority populations under 50 percent routinely elect representatives of their choice," he said. "The effects of the plurality's unwillingness to face this fact are disturbing by any measure and flatly at odds with the obvious purpose of the act."
Justice Souter added, "States will be required under the plurality's rule to pack black voters into additional majority-minority districts, contracting the number of districts where racial minorities are having success in transcending racial divisions in securing their preferred representation."
Justice Kennedy said that enforcing the VRA to protect minority voting clout in districts where minority voters did not constitute a majority would "grant special protection to a minority group's right to form political coalitions."
He added, "Section 2 does not impose on those who draw election districts a duty to give minority voters the most potential, or the best potential, to elect a candidate by attracting crossover voters." The law safeguards those who already possess the "potential to elect" favored representatives from losing that potential through vote dilution, he wrote.
In a dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the high court's decision "severely undermines" the aim of the act. "Today's decision returns the ball to Congress' court," she wrote. "The legislature has just cause to clarify beyond debate the appropriate reading of Section 2."
The case is Bartlett v. Strickland (07-689). |
|
|
|
|
|
Rappers Create Environ of Death and Abuse
NNPA Columnist
Singer Chris Brown's arrest for allegedly beating and biting his girlfriend, pop princess, Rihanna, on the same night vulgar rapper Lil Wayne, was being lauded with four Grammy awards is a reminder of how thuggist rap culture creates a climate for not only male-on-male violence but abuse of Black women as well.
On one level Brown was only doing what the environment created by hustlers like Lil Wayne and his White backers promote. When the dope-using, pornographic rappers aren't bragging about how good they are at killing other Blacks, they swagger around calling Black women "..itches and sluts" and showing their agility at dogging and abusing them.
In fact, Snoop Dogg once showed up at the MTV Video Awards accompanied by partially clad girls being pulled along by dog leashes.
The White establishment is applauding this behavior by elevating the thug music that glorifies killing, maiming and abuse to great fortunes. After all, the thugs are only killing Black men and abusing Black women. What a great victory for White supremacists, who no longer need the KKK.
Blacks brandishing guns and a pimp mentality are destroying each other faster than White militants could ever dream of.
Mainstream Time magazine in its July 2008 issues headlined Lil Wayne as the "Best Rapper Alive." The magazine took great pleasure in commending him for how well he could rhyme "day" with "say" and "way."
Those sophomoric rhymes are worthy of praise for 5-year-olds but for a grown man? Give me a break. What else does Lil Wayne advocate that makes mainstream America love him so much? His "Lollipop" number was honored as Best Rap Song.
It is all about having the so-called "fun and games" of oral sex, of young girls licking him like a lollipop before regular intercourse. Of course, the promoters would not honor any artist who also talks about how HIV/AIDS is epidemic among Black youth and how 72 percent of households are headed up by single Black women, which means the boys and men are missing in action as soon as the babies come.
Another song which the Grammys saw worthy of honor ("Act A A- -") was included in Wayne's latest album, Tha Carter III. With all the media hype behind it, it sold over 1 million copies the first week.
If there is any doubt what Wayne thinks about women, the lyrics make it plain: "I ain't got no loves for broads...I grab 'em on they butts and all." Then he goes on to sing about how wonderful it is for his girls (sluts) to have oral sex with his dog.
It is not hard for me to understand why White-led media and music institutions want to honor Blacks who entertain them with low-life, illiterate rantings, while creating a climate of death and destruction for Black people.
But I cannot understand why so much of the Black establishment-the pastors, civil rights institutions and universities-accept this standard without protesting their outrage at the systematic destruction of our young.
The major themes of most rap songs are guns, drugs, death and destruction. And, with the help of White corporations they are reaping a rich harvest.
For example, homicide is the leading cause of death for Black males between the ages of 18 and 24; 94 percent of Blacks murdered are murdered by other Blacks, usually men.
Our Black women, whose images are being dragged through the mud not only in rap videos, but in movies, are increasingly being raped and beaten. Black women are 35 percent more likely to be sexually and physically assaulted than White women. And one in four girls is in danger of being raped by age 18. Every 45 seconds a woman is physically assaulted, according to the National Victims Center.
Big bucks, of course, are fueling this genocidal assault. Women-hating rappers whine about how the man won't fund them if they don't go violent and after all they are only giving the public want they want. The argument is that titles like Get Rich or Die Trying will sell, but uplifting songs won't. If that is so, why aren't Stevie Wonder and Smokey Robinson broke?
No amount of money should make Black rappers stoop so low as to scandalize Black women, whose birth canals are their very entry into humanity. They insult our mothers, daughters and sisters.
They are no different from the 19th century White slave masters who paraded half-naked Black women in the public square to be auctioned off to the highest bidder.
Unfortunately, the self-esteem of so many young Black women, have fallen so low that they too see themselves as half-nude, butt-shaking objects, who can be sold for group sex, drugs or background filth for videos. They are faceless, pride-less, pitiful creatures who agree they should be treated like dogs.
In the case of Chris Brown, Wrigley is pulling his chewing gun ad and RadioNOW, a Black-owned Radio One network affiliate, is taking a stand by not playing his music. All that is good, yet, until the Black establishment protests artists like Lil Wayne, who White corporations are paying to sing and dance the death jig, the beat down of Black women will still be viewed by many as acceptable behavior for Black men. Dr. Barbara Reynolds is an ordained minister, author of five books and president of Reynolds News Service. Her website is www.reynoldsworldnews.com.
| |
|
|
|
| Speaking Engagements |
 |
|
April 25, 2009
Barber-Scotia College National Alumni Association
Concord, N.C.
May 8, 2009
Alabama A&M Univ.
(Commencement)
Normal, Ala.
May 9, 2009
Knoxville College Board of Trustees
Knoxville, Tenn.
June 5, 2009
Urban Financial Services Coalition
Detroit, Mich.
June 10-14, 2009
100 Black Men of America
New York, N.Y.
June 21, 2009
Old Storm Branch Baptist Church
North Augusta, S.C.
June 24-27, 2009
The PowerNetworking Conference
Atlanta, Ga.
July 18-21, 2009
National Speakers Association Convention
Phoenix, Ariz.
August 2-5, 2009
National Black Nurses Association
Toronto, Canada
August 6-9, 2009
National Association of Black Journalists
Tampa, Fla.
August 30-September 3, 2009
White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities
Washington, D.C.
|
| Book George Curry for a Speech |
|
Let Curry Spice Up Your Next Event
|
| "Keeping it Real with Rev. Al Sharpton" |
 Listen to George Curry every Tuesday 2-3 P.M., EST, on Sharpton's Radio Program
|
| "The Bev Smith Show" |

.
Listen to George Curry on "The Bev Smith Show" every Friday, beginning at 7:12 p.m., EST
|
|
Books by George E. Curry |
|

The Best of Emerge Magazine
Edited by
George E. Curry
"This whopper of an anthology perfectly captures black life and culture...This retrospective volume is journalism at its best: probing, controversial and serious...Although Emerge was devoted unequivocally to African-Americans, Curry's vision and editorship of this book will instruct, provoke and sometimes entertain or inspire any reader." - Publishers Weekly
|
|
The Affirmative Action Debate Edited by George E. Curry
"... Collects the leading voices on all sides of this crucial dialogue...the one book you need to understand and discuss the nation's sharpest political divide."
|
|
|
Jake Gaither: America's Most Famous Black Coach By George E. Curry
"Curry has some telling points to make on the unlooked for effects of court-ordered desegregation." - The New York Times "... an excellent example of sports writing." - Library Journal
| |
|