|
|
Welcome to AVZ
2011 Year End Tax Planning
Dear Friend,
Twenty-five years ago, Congress overhauled the Tax Code in the Tax Reform Act of 1986. At that time, the 1986 Tax Reform Act was lauded for simplifying a Tax Code that had grown too complex. Since 1986, complexity has return to the Tax Code, largely because Congress has enacted a host of temporary tax incentives with a variety of expiration dates. Today, many taxpayers are trying to navigate all of this complexity as they draft their 2011 year-end tax plans. This letter highlights some of the more widely-utilized 2011 year-end tax strategies for individuals and businesses.
Click here for entire article |
|
|
New York Personal Income Tax: Nonresident Partner Could Not Claim Additional Passive Activity Loss
The New York Department of Taxation and Finance has issued a personal income tax advisory opinion involving a nonresident with investments in real estate through partnerships having New York-source passive activity losses in 2010. As a result of the losses, the partner had zero federal adjusted gross income. A federal bonus depreciation deduction tied to the losses was subject to an addback on the partner's New York return. Another New York modification allowed her to subtract a depreciation deduction, based on those same losses but calculated under federal law preceding adoption of the bonus depreciation deduction. As a result, the partner owed New York income tax for 2010. The partner asked whether she could claim an additional passive activity loss equal to the New York adjustments and, further, whether she should be subject to New York income tax on real estate activities conducted through partnerships having significant economic losses exceeding the New York adjustments. According to the advisory opinion, there is no provision under the Tax Law that would allow the partner to claim an additional passive activity loss equal to the New York adjustments. The fact that the partner owed 2010 New York income tax was not changed, even though the partnerships in which she was a partner had significant economic losses exceeding her New York adjustments. |
Case Law from the Crypt
The Law of Halloween
The scariest part of Halloween for most people might be having their car toilet-papered or getting a little egg in the face. For lawyers, however, All Hallows' Eve presents its own unique legal challenges.
To start, Halloween presents legal cases that simply do not exist at any other time of the year. For example, in one recent case, a plaintiff alleged that her neighbor's Halloween lawn decorations were defamatory, harassing, and caused emotional distress. The decorations included an "Insane "Asylum" directional sign pointed towards the plaintiff's house and a homemade Halloween tombstone purporting to reference the plaintiff, which read:
At 48 she had
No mate No date
It's no debate
She looks 88
She met her fate
in a crate and
Now We Celebrate
1961 - 2009
Click here if you dare |
|
|
|
Don't forget to have your voice heard. Log on to www.avz.com to take the LI Economic Survey & Opinion Poll Password: AVZ2011ES |
|
|
Albrecht, Viggiano, Zureck & Company, P.C.
25 Suffolk Court, Hauppauge, New York 11788 P.631.434.9500 F.631.434.9518
245 Park Avenue, 24 Floor, New York, New York 10167 P.212.792.4075
PERSONAL SERVICE. TRUSTED ADVICE. |
|
|
|
|
|