Adler Law E-Letter
April 2010

Steven M. Adler, Esq.
Steven M. Adler, Esq.

Law Offices of Steven M. Adler, PLLC
666 Old Country Road, Suite 605
Garden City, New York 11530
 
Phone: (516) 876-1105
Fax: (516) 794-0463
Greetings!

U.S. Congress
Welcome to April's edition of the Adler Law E-Letter. This month, as April 15th is now just behind us, we thought it appropriate to discuss the peculiar situation we find ourselves in with respect to the Sunset Provision (or temporary elimination) of the Estate Tax.
 
In addition, this month's Newsletter includes a new section entitled "Strange but True".  Each month, Strange But True will highlight several entertaining news articles which have appeared in newspapers from around the world.
 
If you have a question or concern with respect to any particular legal subject, please contact me at the firm and I would be happy to discuss your topic in a future issue of Adler Law. In addition, if you know of someone who may be interested to read this newsletter, please forward it to them by clicking the "Forward Email" link at the bottom of this email.
 
Thank you.
 
Sincerely,                                                                      
Steven M. Adler
The State of the Estate Tax
Is there really no estate tax in 2010? 
 Estate Taxes
The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 ("EGTRRA") made sweeping changes to many areas of the Internal Revenue Code including the Estate Tax. Not only did EGTRRA provide for a gradual increase in the Unified Credit (the amount an individual can pass at death free of federal estate taxes) until it reached $3,500,000 for 2009), but it also provided for a gradual decrease in the top estate tax rate until that reached 45% for 2009.  Then EGTRRA eliminated the estate tax altogether for 2010. 
 
However, there was an unusual "Sunset" provision added to EGTRRA before it passed Congress. Beginning on January 1, 2011 the provisions of EGTRRA will be repealed which means that unless Congress acts, the estate tax rules that were in effect in 2001 come back (i.e., a $1,000,000 Unified Credit and a top tax rate of 55%).
 
Although the House did vote in December of 2009 to permanently extend the estate tax rules that were in effect in 2009 (the $3,500,000 Unified Credit and a top tax rate of 45%), the Senate did not pass the extension. While Senate Democrats wanted to approve the House version, Senate Republicans wanted a higher Unified Credit ($5,000,000) and a lower tax rate (35%). Then came Health Care Reform and Estate Tax Legislation was nowhere to be seen. 
 
The elimination of the Estate Tax this year also brings about the elimination of most of the "Step Up" in cost basis of estate assets (assets passing at death were given a cost basis equal to the date of death value). This may create some unintended consequences because while an estate may not have an estate tax to pay, it may have a significant capital gains tax burden. For example, many estates which would not have had any estate tax liability (because their value is less than %3,500,000) under prior law, may have to pay capital gains taxes because an estate will only be allowed to exclude up to $1,300,000 of capital gain (with an additional $3,000,000 exclusion for assets passing to a surviving spouse). The following tables highlight these issues:
 
                                           2009
      Asset                                                               Value
 
    Home                                                               $500,000
    Vacation Home                                               $500,000
    Rental Property                                              $500,000
    Stock                                                                $500,000
    Business                                                       $1,500,000
 
     Total                                                               $3,500,000
 
In 2009, this Estate owes no Federal Estate Taxes and heirs receive a Step Up in Cost Basis.
 
 
                                            2010
 
        Asset                  Cost Basis                           Value
 
    Home                       $100,000                         $500,000
    Vacation Home       $100,000                         $500,000
    Rental Property       $20,000                         $500,000
    Stock                       $300,000                         $500,000
     Business                  $20,000                       $1,500,000
  
    Total                         $540,000                       $3,500,000
 
In 2010, the Estate does not have an Estate Tax, but it does have a Capital gains Tax liability of $332,000 ($3,500,000 - $540,000 = $2,960,000 - $1,300,000 = $1,660,000 x .20 = $332,000).
 
 
If Congress does nothing and the Estate Tax rules which were in effect in 2001 return in 2011, the following scenario would apply:
 
                                             2011
        Asset                                                                Value
  
   Home                                                                  $500,000
   Vacation Home                                                $500,000
   Rental Property                                                $500,000
   Stock                                                                  $500,000
   Business                                                         $1,500,000
 
    Total                                                                $3,500,000
 
In 2011, the Estate would have an approximate estate tax of $1,375,000 ($3,500,000 - $1,000,000 = $2,500,000 x .55 = $1,375,000).
 
Most financial and estate tax planners truly believed that Congress would have been able to address and resolve this issue by now. Unfortunately, they could not and now, the longer the uncertainty remains, the closer we are to a higher estate tax rate and a lower Unified Credit. This means more estates will be subject to estate taxes.
 
Contact us today to find out if and how the Sunset Provision may affect your Estate.

Quick Links

 
 
Strange but True!  
 
In February, the dean's office at Yale University disclosed that it was formally soliciting anonymous, first-person reports of student sexual experiences to publish on a school Web site, as "strategies for creatively navigating Yale's sexual culture," according to an advisor. "There is a real need for students to have space to think about what happens to them and what they want to have happen," she said. "Sex@Yale" would contain "70 to 80" specific perspectives, she said, but critics suggested the anthology might grow to resemble Penthouse magazine's often-ridiculed "Forum" section of lascivious fantasies. [Yale Daily News, 2-26-10]
 
Alan Rosenfeld, 64, a New York City lawyer and real estate entrepreneur, is also a full-time schoolteacher, although he has been prohibited from teaching since 2002 because of accusations of leering at female students. He is thus a "rubber room" teacher whose union contract requires full salary and benefits even though the Schools Chancellor has barred him from the classroom as a "danger" to students. The Department of Education pays him $100,000 a year plus health care (plus retirement benefits worth at least $82,000 a year). The New York Post reported that Rosenfeld reports to "the room" each day but works exclusively on his business affairs. [New York Post, 1-31-10]
 
In March, on duty on opening day of the jail at the new Adair County judicial center in Columbia, Ky., sheriff's deputy Charles Wright accidentally locked himself in a cell and was fired after he tried to shoot open the lock. [WKYT-TV (Lexington), 3-3-10]
 
A Collier County, Fla., sheriff's deputy suffered a broken ankle when he and a colleague accidentally locked wheels while patrolling in Naples on their Segways. [Naples Daily News, 2-23-10]
 

Legal Services
We Provide:
 
Estate Planning
Elder Law
Estate Administration
Real Estate Law
Corporate Law
Guardianship
Litigation
Moving Violations
Personal Injury
Family Law
 
 
Testimonials:
 
This is a special thank you note in appreciation for all you have done for me.
Julia T.
 
I am thankful for your kindness and professional advice to me and my family.  I hope that soon I will be needing your services.  Vera F. 
 
 
The Law Offices of Steven M. Adler, PLLC are committed to providing their clients with the highest level of professional legal services at reasonable prices. Steven M. Adler, Esq., along with the rest of his law firm's highly competent support staff, gives all of his clients the personal attention and the legal expertise which they are entitled to receive. The Law Offices of Steven M. Adler, PLLC takes pride in the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of their legal services.
 
Law Offices of Steven M. Adler, PLLC
666 Old Country Road, Suite 605
Garden City, New York 11530
Phone: (516) 876-1105
Fax: (516) 794-0463
 
Mention this E-Letter to Receive a Free Consultation
 
The information contained in this e-mail is sent by an attorney or his/her agent, and is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential, the disclosure of which is prohibited by law. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail.

U.S. Treasury Circular 230 Notice: To the extent that there is any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), it was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (a) avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or by any other applicable tax authority or (b) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein. We provide this disclosure on all outbound e-mails from our practice group to assure compliance with new standards of professional practice regarding conformity of our tax advice to certain requirements as to form and substance.