| Know Your Rights Handbook |  |
Want to be your own advocate? Learn how by ordering the Know Your Rights Handbook today. Learn about health and disability insurance, Social Security disability, employment discrimination, family and medical leave, school-based accommodations, resource location, and much more.
Click here for more information.
|
Look What I Just Found!
Well, technically not "just." Our friend Jon Reiner's book, The Man Who Couldn't Eat, comes out this month. It's a harrowing tale of living with inflammatory bowel disease. Jon also has a website and a Facebook page where you can interact with him -- and he's a great guy. I pre-ordered the book months ago -- can't wait to read it. Enjoy!
Jennifer
|
What I'm Reading
The Wounded Healer by Henri J. M. Nouwen is a wonderful book that every caregiver should read. Caregivers spend hundreds and hundreds of unpaid hours taking care of people in need. It is a thankless task -- and caregivers need to care for themselves. The Wounded Healer is a gem of a book that explains how our own pain often helps us to help others. Not light reading, but well worth it.
Jennifer
|

Get Your Guts In Gear
Advocacy for Patients is a beneficiary of Get Your Guts in Gear's 2010 Rides, and hopes to be a beneficiary of the 2011 Rides, as well. 2011 Ride dates are June 10-12 (New York); August 5-7 (Northwest); and September 16-18 (Midwest). To learn more about Get Your Guts in Gear, see their website for details or call 866-9IGOTGUTS (866-944-6848).
|
| Advocacy for Patients on the Move!
September 18, 2011: CCFA Manhattan
October 2011 (date TBD) CCFA Miami
November 6, 2011: CCFA Long Island.
Can we do a webinar for your organization? Contact Jennifer and we'll be happy to accommodate your request.!
|
It's Too Hard to Be Sick in America
Our book, It's Too Hard to Be Sick In America, is available FREE for your reading pleasure on our website. In it, we tell the stories of some of the patients with whom we've worked in order to show policymakers what chronic illness really looks like. Go have a read -- and the next time you talk to someone who clearly doesn't "get it," give them a copy of It's Too Hard to be Sick in America.
|
|
Advocacy for Patients with Chronic Illness
We provide FREE information, advice and advocacy services to patients with chronic illnesses in areas including health and disability insurance, Social Security disability, employment discrimination, Family & Medical Leave Act, school-based discrimination, and resource location.
Need help? Call (860) 674-1370 or email us.
Advocacy for Patients Needs Your Help!
To keep providing these services for FREE, we need your help.
WE DO NOT SOLICIT DONATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE FOLLOWING STATES: CT, MA, WA, MN, CA, IL, NY, TX, VT, MT, ID, WY, NV, SD, NE, IA, IN. Advocacy for Patients is committed to using its funds to support the work we do on behalf of patients. Accordingly, due to the cost of registering to solicit donations in other states, we do not solicit donations outside of the states listed above. Nevertheless, generous donors from many states make unsolicited donations for which we are very grateful.
THANK YOU!
|
|
|
|
Chronic Illness Survey
From March 2008 to March 2009, over 1500 patients with chronic illnesses completed a detailed survey reporting on their experiences as a patient and, in particular, the obstacles they face and the strategies they use to try to surmount those obstacles. We conducted the survey with our partners at the University of Michigan Center for Managing Chronic Disease. This month, we will be publishing a paper summarizing the results and making suggestions to advocates on how this data may help us to better understand and explain the experience of having a chronic illness.
The study participants comprised 1513 self-selected individuals residing across the United States. Of this number, 1426 completed an internet accessible version of the study questionnaire and 87 provided answers to the same questions in a telephone interview conducted by trained interviewers. The opportunity to provide data for a survey either online or by telephone was publicized through major communication channels of voluntary organizations serving people with neurological, digestive, rheumatologic and other chronic conditions. Patients contacted over 2300 clients through direct mail, e-mail, and phone describing the opportunity to participate in the survey. In addition, several other organizations provided information on their websites and in newsletters regarding the survey.
At the beginning of the survey, respondents reported the chronic diseases they have and then selected one disease on which to focus throughout the survey. Among these "diseases of focus," roughly thirty percent were digestive; thirty percent rheumatologic; seventeen percent neurologic; and the remainders were an array of other chronic illnesses including rare diseases such as Sjögren's syndrome and sarcoidosis. Survey respondents were overwhelmingly female (eighty-one percent female; nineteen percent male), Caucasian, highly educated, and middle to upper-middle class. They were spread throughout the United States. Half live in suburban areas, twenty-eight percent in urban areas, and twenty-two percent in rural areas. Thirty-four percent were employed, and twenty-six percent were on either Social Security disability or private disability insurance.
When asked about forms of assistance related to the cost of care for their condition, respondents reported the following sources: sixty-two percent have private health insurance; twenty-three percent have Medicare; and seven percent have Medicaid. In addition, twenty-one percent indicate that they receive financial assistance from family members, twelve percent receive free medication or medical services, and eleven percent receive reduced cost medical services or medication. In addition to these means of financing health care, many respondents receive other forms of assistance not specifically focused on medical care. Twenty-two percent receive Social Security disability, six percent are on private disability insurance, six percent receive food stamps, and two percent live in government subsidized housing. Although over ninety percent of respondents have some form of health care financing - private insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare - over half of them said that they have skipped medical care or treatment due to cost, and twelve percent said that their single greatest challenge related to their disease is financial. Finally, when asked an open-ended question about the greatest financial challenge, thirty-two percent said the cost of medical care, which is remarkable since most respondents have private insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid. Another fifteen percent said out-of-pocket medical expenses such as copay; eleven percent said they lost their job or were unable to work; another eleven percent said treatments not covered by insurance, including doctors who were outside of their insurer's network; and another eleven percent said the cost of insurance itself is too high.
On average, respondents reported that, in the preceding twelve months, they have visited an emergency department 1.04 times, spent 2.05 nights in the hospital, attended 10.98 scheduled doctor or clinic visits, and seen a doctor or clinic 2.04 times on an unscheduled basis. When health utilization was examined by disease category, our analysis indicated significant differences among disease categories for each type of utilization (p<0.0001). Notably, those with digestive diseases reported the highest emergency room and hospital utilization, whereas those with rheumatologic and other diseases reported the highest doctor and clinic visits. Those with neurological disease reported the lowest overall healthcare utilization. Care coordination was an issue among respondents. Fully half of respondents said that their doctors do not communicate with each other to coordinate care, and seventy percent said they have to put in a lot of effort to manage health care providers and coordinate their own care. Care coordination was cited as a greater problem by those with rheumatologic diseases, as well as the "other" category. Over forty percent said they've been told by a doctor that they weren't really sick; twenty-seven percent were told by a doctor that they were mentally ill; nineteen percent said they were told that they were seeking unneeded drugs; and fourteen percent of them said that they have been told that they were taking up too much time. Fully thirty-four percent of respondents reported that a health care provider has given up on them, and fifty-eight percent felt that a doctor they saw did not understand the disease. All of these experiences were used to construct a single variable called "negative clinical experiences" wherein a higher score indicates more negative experiences. This score was slightly lower among respondents with neurological diseases. Although the survey aimed to recruit a sample reflective of our nation's diversity, a limitation of the study is that respondent's were largely white, highly educated, affluent women. It is striking that, despite these demographic advantages, this group reported significant challenges, as described above. The heavy response by women may suggest that they feel a considerable burden from their conditions and are motivated to seek opportunities to discuss their experience. Problems expressed by women may or may not be the same as those expressed by men. Further, we expect that we would see even greater challenges among minority respondents and those at low socio-economic status. Conscious and deliberate efforts at recruiting more men, minorities, and respondents at low socio-economic status should be made in future study.
From the point of view of health advocacy - an area dominated over the past two years by discussions of health insurance and health care reform - perhaps the most striking, albeit unsurprising, data relate to financing of health care. Although sixty-two percent of respondents have private health insurance, twenty-three percent have Medicare, and seven percent have Medicaid, more than half of them reported that they have skipped medical treatment due to cost. Thus, advocates must be mindful of the impact of under-insurance on the ability of people to access the care they need. What is and is not included in the essential benefits package that will become the standard for insurance coverage under health reform, effective in 2014, will have a tremendous impact on the ability of patients to obtain the care they need. One thing is certain: Achieving universal coverage is not the whole answer ; what is and is not covered matters just as much if one of our goals is to ensure that patients with chronic conditions adhere to doctors' orders so as to improve health outcomes and reduce costs. Quite a few respondents reported financial difficulties related to items not typically covered at all by insurance. For example, twenty-three respondents with Celiac disease indicated that their greatest financial challenge is purchasing gluten-free food, and eleven respondents said that their greatest financial challenge is paying for transportation to and from medical appointments. Advocates and policy-makers should consider ways to promote access to non-medical aspects of treatment. Also relevant to cost is the fact that digestive disease patients go to the emergency room or are admitted to a hospital more often than patients with rheumatologic, neurological, or other illnesses. Further research is needed to determine the reason for these differences. It may be beneficial for digestive disease patients and physicians to discuss strategies for coping with emergencies. The advent of medical homes with 24/7 telephone access to physicians also seems appealing in light of the data. The data also confirm what many advocates already know, that the clinical experience differs with one's insurance status. Respondents on Medicaid have a significantly more negative experience than do patients with private insurance or Medicare, and patients with private insurance have the most positive clinical experience. Indeed, the experience of patients with Medicaid is not significantly better than that of people with no insurance at all. Interestingly, there appears to be a connection among frequency of doctor visits, somatic symptoms, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. Indeed, the patients with the fewest number of doctor visits (neurological) had the best somatic symptoms scores, the highest patient satisfaction scores, and the second highest quality of life scores. Patients with the second fewest doctor visits (digestive) had the second highest patient satisfaction scores, the highest quality of life scores, and the second best somatic symptom scores. Conversely, those who reported the most doctor visits (rheumatological and other) report more somatic symptoms, lower patient satisfaction scores, and lower quality of life. That's a taste of what we found. More will be available later this month on our website. And for all of you who participated in the survey, thank you. |
We Did It! 
This newsletter comes to you from our new home at 195 Farmington Avenue, Suite 306, Farmington, CT. It's been hard -- and exciting -- and we are very happy about our new digs. If you're in the area, stop by. We'd love to show you around!
|
|
The Chronicity Project
This is the space in our newsletter where we talk about health care policy affecting the chronically ill.
Here's an update on what's happening in the legislative arenas:
Federal
As you know, Congress passed a debt deal that involved only spending cuts, without revenue enhancement. Further deficit reduction will be proposed by a super-committee -- half Democrat and half Republican -- who are tasked with coming up with $1.5 trillion in debt reduction by Thanksgiving or many program cuts will take effect automatically. It's a very scary time as we watch not only our fragile economy, but also the likelihood that there will be some changes to Medicaid and Medicare as part of the deal -- if a deal is reached.
Contact your members of Congress and tell them what you think. To find your Representative, go here; to find your Senator, go here.
Connecticut The unions re-voted on the proposed changes to state employee benefits, which will allow us to avoid layoffs. The new Exchange Board has been selected and has begun to meet. You can follow their activities here. We are very concerned that no consumers or consumer advocates were selected to serve on the Board, and will be working with other organizations to try to find the best way to make sure consumers' voices are heard. Your State
We know that budget cutting has been threatening to result in major cuts in every state, and that seems universally to include Medicaid. I don't have a state-by-state analysis, but the Kaiser Family Foundation is a great resource on Medicaid. If you have questions about your state's Medicaid program, check them out. In the meantime, keep up the fight. First, be aware. Read your local newspapers. Find the website for your state legislature. Read. Write your state legislators about things that concern you. One tool we like is the Kaiser Health News, to which you can subscribe for free. But don't just read: ACT. Go to hearings and testify. Tell your story. Put a real face on the healthcare crisis. |
|
Jennifer C. Jaff, Esq.  Executive Director
Advocacy for Patients with Chronic Illness
|
|
|