|
TAKE THE NIH SURVEY!
There are only about 200 slots left! Take the survey here! Whether you are a patient or a caregiver, there's a version of the survey for YOU!
As you know, in partnership with the Center for Managing Chronic Disease at the University of Michigan, we have received a grant from the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of the study is to examine the challenges faced by the chronically ill, and ways in which interventions can be more effective in addressing those challenges.
You can TAKE THE SURVEY NOW online, or you can take the survey over the phone if that would be easier for you.
If you want to take the survey by phone, just give us a call at (860) 674-1370 and we'll set it up for you. Thank you!
|
Art for Advocacy!
Our dear friend and artist extraordinare, Julia Lucich, has agreed to paint your portrait with all proceeds going to Advocacy for Patients with Chronic Illness. This is a limited time offer, so don't delay. Check out Julia's website here, and email her at the contact info on the website if you're interested in having a Julia original in your home, or presenting one as a gift.
|
Look What I Just Found! The Kakkis EveryLife Foundation is dedicated to encouraging biotech research for treating rare diseases. They are running an Art Contest through December 31, 2009. If you are an artist with a rare disease, submit your art work and win a gift card!
|
It's Too Hard to Be Sick in America
Our new book, It's Too Hard to be Sick in America, is now available FREE for your reading pleasure on our website. In it, we tell the stories of some of the patients with whom we've worked in order to show policymakers what chronic illness really looks like. Go have a read -- and the next time you talk to someone who clearly doesn't "get it," give them a copy of It's Too Hard to be Sick in America.
|
Advocacy for Patients on the Move!
November 13-14: Keynote speaker at the Association of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Nurses conference in Washington, DC.
Come say hello! |
| Know Your Rights Handbook |
 |
Want to be your own advocate? Learn how by ordering the Know Your Rights Handbook today. Click here for more information. |

Get Your Guts In Gear
Advocacy for Patients is a beneficiary of Get Your Guts in Gear's 2009 Rides. To learn more about the 2009 Rides in New York, Seattle, and the Midwest, and how you can participate as a rider or volunteer crew member, see their website for details or call 866-9IGOTGUTS (866-944-6848). |
Advocacy for Patients
with Chronic Illness We provide FREE information, advice and advocacy services to patients with chronic illnesses in areas including health and disability insurance, Social Security disability, employment discrimination, Family & Medical Leave Act, school-based discrimination, and resource location.
Need help? Call (860) 674-1370 or email us.
For Connecticut residents ONLY:
Advocacy for Patients Needs Your Help!
To keep providing these services for FREE, we need your help.
WE DO NOT SOLICIT DONATIONS OUTSIDE OF CONNECTICUT. Advocacy for Patients is committed to using its funds to support the work we do on behalf of patients. Accordingly, due to the cost of registering to solicit donations in other states, we do not solicit donations outside of Connecticut. Nevertheless, generous donors from many states make unsolicited donations for which we are very grateful.
THANK YOU! |
|
|
My Trip to the NIH
As you know, we've partnered with the University of Michigan Center for Managing Chronic Disease on a study funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to explore the obstacles facing the chronically ill and the strategies we find to surmount those obstacles. Many of you have taken the survey. In all, we have over 1300 respondents to date -- and counting.
Our grant is part of a group of grants called Partners in Research, through which researchers and community-based organizations are working together on health-related projects -- things like promoting health in low literacy populations, raising capacity for incontinence and skin care in dementia patients, enhancing understanding of biomedical research in African-American communities, and so on. Some of the projects involve physicians, and some, like ours, involve social science researchers, but all of them involve some segment or representative of a community with particular health needs and concerns.
Going to NIH is a pretty interesting, sort of exciting experience. First, it's huge -- a campus much like a large college campus. Second, the security is intense. I arrived the first morning by taxi, and not only did I have to get out of the cab and go through security, but so did the cab driver -- and then they inspected the taxi itself, under the hood, in the trunk, under the car! So at least I knew I was really, really safe!
Getting to listen and talk to other people about these types of projects was also very interesting. Since ours is a survey, we have people from all over the United States, and we're located quite a distance from our research partner. Other partners are located in the same geographic area, making collaboration easier in some ways. And other projects centered on certain populations -- Native Americans, African-Americans, Latinos -- whereas we've done outreach in a way that did not focus on race or ethnicity, and -- probably as a result -- the majority of our respondents are white (something to think about for our next project -- why didn't our recruitment mobilize racial and ethnic minorities and how might we do that in a follow-up study?). On the other hand, some of the others have had a hard time recruiting people to participate in their projects, whereas we're way ahead of schedule because so many of you have taken the survey.
At the end of the first day, we were able to display our survey methodology and some of our preliminary findings, and it was very exciting to me to be able to share the beginnings of what we have found. For example, although our respondents are mostly white, upper-middle class women, 62% of whom have health insurance, fully HALF of them report that they forgo health care due to cost, telling us that under-insurance (high co-pays, for example) is a a serious problem for the chronically ill. And more than 70% indicate that managing their disease is a huge burden. So socio-economic class, or even universal health insurance, is not the answer to all of the problems facing the chronically ill.
In the coming months, we'll have more results that we can start to share. After two days listening and thinking and talking, my head is spinning with ideas, and we're already talking with our partners at Michigan about how to fund next steps in our work.
Going to the NIH was really a wonderful experience for me. I'm not a policy wonk or a researcher, so being in a scientific environment was a huge cultural change, and I enjoyed it tremendously. In my daily work, I spend so much time responding to problems that I rarely have time to sit back and reflect. This was an opportunity to be surrounded by people who reflect for a living. I wouldn't change what I do for anything -- but spending a couple of days in the world of science was fascinating.
I can't wait to have more study results to share with you. I think you'll agree that the partnership between research and community-based organizations generates really interesting results.
|
Health Insurance Reform UpdateThings are so up in the air that it's hard to know what to say. Good things we know: All proposals eliminate pre-existing condition exclusions, lifetime caps, and premium-setting based on gender and health. And there will be an exchange -- a marketplace -- where uninsured, individual, and small group consumers can go and compare and choose the plans that are available to them. And Medicaid almost certainly will be expanded to include adults without children who meet the income limit, and the income limit is likely to increase to 133-150% of the federal poverty level. Bad(ish) things we pretty much know: Much, if not all, of these changes will not take effect until 2013, when the exchanges are up and running. However, it appears that there may be a temporary high risk pool for people who have not had insurance for at least 6 months and have been denied affordable coverage under a private plan due to a pre-existing condition. And the rules governing coverage of pre-existing conditions for group plans would be relaxed immediately, as well. A timeline of when the provisions of the House bill, including insurance market reforms, will take effect can be found here. And cost remains a huge problem. We are hoping for caps on out-of-pocket expenses to eliminate catastrophic losses, but especially without a public option, people may be expected to spend as much as 12% of their income on health insurance premiums -- not including deductibles, copays, and coinsurance. The two biggest things we don't know: Will there be a public option, a choice that people can opt into as an alternative to private insurance? And although I'm pretty sure there will be some kind of individual mandate to purchase insurance, how tough will it be? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has introduced a House bill that contains a public option. It is not the version that liberals wanted, which would have tied reimbursement rates to Medicare rates. Instead, rates to be paid to doctors and other providers will be negotiated. Speaker Pelosi is calling her version a "consumer option" instead of a "public option" to try to make it clearer that this is a choice that will be offered to consumers, not a government take-over of insurance. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said that the Bill he will bring to the Senate floor will include a public option from which states can opt-out. However, several "moderates" -- including, sadly, my own Senator Joe Lieberman -- have pledged to block this and any other version of a public option. Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine -- the only Republican to support any version of health insurance reform in committee -- supports a "trigger," allowing a public option to be activated if and only if private alternatives are not affordable. There's some talk of offering, instead, a proposal to create a nonprofit-run plan that would function like a public plan in terms of lowering administrative costs, but that would not be run by the government and, thus, that would not be opposed by those who are offended by the growing size of the federal government. From my perspective, this would be fine. What we need is a lower cost alternative that will ensure that private insurers have to control their premium increases to remain competitive. As for the individual mandate, it looks like there will be a requirement that people purchase insurance, just like we're all required to buy car insurance. Indeed, the House bill also includes an employer mandate, requiring employers with annual payroll over $500,000 to cover their employees. However, it's impossible to say what the penalties will be for people who fail to comply, especially with the individual mandate. Some members are concerned that we not impose large expenses on the middle class; others are concerned that, without a significant penalty, too many people will opt out of the system entirely. Why does this matter? The cost of including people with pre-existing conditions will be balanced out by people who are young and healthy, helping to control premiums, if the young and healthy really do buy insurance. Speaker Pelosi's bill has been introduced, and debate will begin soon. Senator Reid will follow shortly. Expect extensive debate and amendment before there's a vote. We really won't know what we will end up with until this process has played out. A lot can and will change. There's a lot more to both the House and Senate bills. I strongly urge you to listen and read actively, aggressively. Wherever you are on the issue, one thing's for sure. This is all going to come down to the next eight weeks. If you want your voice to be heard, now's the time. Write or call your members of Congress; write letters to the editor and op-eds. Talk to your friends and family and get them involved. This issue will affect every one of us -- and it will affect the chronically ill more than others. So be heard. And by the way, in case you haven't heard, the response to the national health reform call-in day was huge -- over 300,000 people reported their calls to Organizing for America. For those of you who called, thanks! For more information about some of the truths and untruths of health care reform, see White House Reality Check and Factcheck.org, as well as our blog.You can reach the Congressional switchboard at 1-866-210-3678.
To find your Representative, go here; to find your Senator, go here. |
New Law Lets Chronically Ill College Students Keep Parents' Health Insurance
A new federal law that took effect on October 9, 2009 allows seriously ill or injured college students to keep their parents' health insurance for up to a year while they take time off from school.
Known as "Michelle's Law," the law allows college students to take up to a year off school for medical reasons and remain on their family's health insurance plan. It is named for 22-year-old Michelle Morse, who died of colon cancer in 2005 six months after graduating from Plymouth State University in New Hampshire. Michelle's doctor's had advised her to take time off from school, but she maintained a full course load while undergoing chemotherapy because she otherwise would have lost her health insurance.
This law applies to both group and individual insurance policies. It requires a written certification from a physician stating that the child is suffering from a serious illness or injury and that the leave of absence is medically necessary.
|
|
The Chronicity Project
This is the space in our newsletter where we talk about health care policy affecting the chronically ill.
Here's an update on what's happening in the legislative arenas:
Federal
Other than health care reform, this is important:
If you're a patient with an immune or autoimmune disease, you may be interested in S. 701 and HR 2002, bills to improve access of Medicare beneficiaries to intravenous immune globulins (IVIg). This is critically important legislation designed to eliminate some of the existing obstacles to getting this much needed treatment. So contact your members of Congress to support this legislation.
To find your Representative, go here; to find your Senator, go here.
Connecticut
The sleeping giant is taking a break, and we are glad. The cuts that affect the sick and the poor are outrageous and wrong, but they are a done deal. Stay tuned for updates once the next session starts in January. Thankfully, the next session will be a short one.
As always, it's never too late to contact your State Senator or Representative and thank them for their votes.
Your State
So many of you ask me what you can do. First, be aware. Read your local newspapers. Find the website for your state legislature. Read. Write your state legislators about things that concern you. One tool we like is the Kaiser Health News, to which you can subscribe for free. But don't just read: ACT. Go to hearings and testify. Tell your story. Put a real face on the healthcare crisis.
|
|
|
Jennifer C. Jaff, Esq.
Executive Director Advocacy for Patients with Chronic Illness, Inc.
| |
|