Rethinking Legal Talent After Watson
In the very near future, even the most complex legal work will be deconstructed, parts broken out from the whole and assigned to the most effective yet least expensive provider.
By Jordan Furlong
 You might have been one of the millions of people who tuned in to "Jeopardy!" earlier this month to see the game show's two dominant champions go up against Watson, a computer developed by IBM specifically for this event. Watson, to the delight of some and the consternation of many others, blew away its human challengers and got everyone talking about whether the long-anticipated age of artificial intelligence was finally upon us.
In particular, Watson generated a great deal of interest within the legal profession. Could machines modeled on Watson take on jobs traditionally performed by lawyers?
Leading the way was Robert C. Weber, who brought to the discussion both a front-seat view and a slightly biased perspective in his role as IBM's general counsel. Weber wrote about the dawn of the "digital associate" - an intelligent legal research system that could carry out legal information tasks as well as (or better) than associates. "The technology can unquestionably extend our capabilities and help us perform better," he said.
Then there's Nick Brestoff of International Litigation Services, who raises the specter of bringing Watson-like technology to electronic discovery. Brestoff believes that Watson foreshadows the imminent rise of "legal informatics," a sophisticated computerized approach to information management driven by arcane (to lawyers) concepts like predictive coding and vector clusters.
It's tempting to dismiss these forecasts as bleeding-edge speculation, and to repeat the old canard that a machine will never replace what a lawyer can do. But that's not the issue. The issue is how much longer lawyers will try to replace what a machine can do. No one will ever buy Watson - it's programmed only to play a game show - but I can guarantee that people will buy legal machines built on Watson technology. IBM's counting on it.
I'm not here to advise you go out and buy Watson Law 1.0 tomorrow, or to hail these machines as messiahs. Watson's infamous error - misunderstanding a question about U.S. cities and suggesting "Toronto" as an answer - shows that IBM's work isn't done yet. What I am advising is that Watson is your final warning to rethink how your firm acquires and uses talent.
In the very near future, even the most complex legal work will be deconstructed, parts broken out from the whole and assigned to the most effective yet least expensive provider in a carefully managed production chain. The traditional law firm model that collects and leverages dozens of junior lawyers to carry out any task that (a) is tangentially legal and (b) can be billed to the client will, very shortly, not be fit for service.
Start planning now to install efficient workflow systems, to require far fewer on-site associates, to employ diverse streams of talent across town and across the planet, and yes, to use the present precursors to and future descendants of Watson. How you sell legal research, document review, due diligence and e-discovery services today is, very simply, not what the market will accept tomorrow. Contact the author, Jordan Furlong |
Designing a Lawyer Transition Framework To ensure your firm's growth and long-term survival, invest in your human capital: they are the firm's ambassadors and its future. By Juhi Garg and Sean Larkan Clients and partners alike think of a firm's senior associates in terms of a hierarchy of skill and deliverables. Excellent client service is, of course, the first rung on the ladder, followed by specialist knowledge, strategic business insights, and finally, thought leadership in their practice area or industry. This development arc also happens to parallel the transition from senior associate to practice group leader or even managing partner.
Law firms (especially those in India) must realize that this transition will not happen naturally or by accident. They must provide lawyers with structured guidance and consistent mentoring throughout this process, customized to the firm's culture, expectations, client requirements and market dynamics. What they need, specifically, is a lawyer transition framework. A lawyer transition framework can be broken into two stages: building a base of market knowledge and firm expectations, followed by the establishment and development of key business skills and concepts. Stage One: Ensure your lawyers fully understand and can act on: - your values and cultural attributes
- your services and markets, today and tomorrow
- your methods of delivering those services
- your understanding of your markets
- your lawyers' position and reputation within those markets
- your communications and presentation to the market, and
- your key partner attributes
Stage Two: Establish your lawyers' grasp of fundamental concepts and critical skills (specific to your firm's goal and markets: - business development
- client communication
- effective client service
- teamwork and management
- the firm brand
- financial management
- knowledge management
- leadership, and
- ensuring the lawyer's contribution to the firm
The goal of a lawyer transition framework is twofold: not only to cultivate senior associates, but also to encourage (and sometimes push) better transitions among current partners who have yet to fully tap their potential. Critical to the success of this effort is active management, leader commitment, performance assessment, and sophisticated analysis and feedback. What are the benefits of a lawyer development framework? - engagement of key lawyers ("say," "stay" and "strive" ) and resulting improvement in recruitment, development and retention
- formalized partner succession through a structured development program
- successful differentiation of the firm through lawyers' unique skills
- enhanced client service and stronger long-term relationships
- powerfully reinforced brand
- stronger firm culture, and
- better assets for the future of the firm
To ensure your firm's growth and long-term survival, invest in your human capital: they are the firm's ambassadors and its future. The sooner you invest, the sooner you reap. Contact the authors Juhi Garg and Sean Larkan |
Brand (con)Fusion A brand can be a meaningless mish-mash that is not consistent with what a law firm or its employees offer or do - or it can be a firm's most valuable asset. By Sean Larkan
Nowadays, the term "brand" is frequently mentioned in law firms but is often misunderstood. The potential value of brand (for top-tier firms, in the billions of dollars) is seldom appreciated, and it is rarely correctly managed as a dynamic asset requiring constant review.
Few law firm partners and employees fully understand brand. Even fewer can articulate their own firm's brand. Ask them to describe the firm's brand and you will receive many different answers, ranging from the perceptive to the vague.
Many firms describe their brand in limited terms covering names, logos, styles, color schemes and websites, but of course these are merely symbols for the brand. Others feel that they have "done brand" because the logo and color scheme were re-jigged a year or two back.
To maximize brand value, law firms need to develop and articulate a consistent philosophy, which staff and partners endorse and confidently embody in all their interactions with clients and other stakeholders.
Successfully fusing a firm's brand with firm and staff behavior creates an enormously valuable asset. Apple is a premier example of this, where every product, advertisement, specialized store and even the personnel reflect key characteristics of the brand.
Over the past decade the Brand Fusion methodology has been developed and has evolved to provide law firms with a simple, effective framework to understand, build and get full value for their brand. This program assists law firms to match the various things that make up their brand offering with client and stakeholder perception and experiences of that offering - achieving "brand fusion" and avoiding a damaging "brand gap."
The Brand Fusion philosophy: - ensures a firm and its employees are clear and unified about what the firm offers to its internal and external markets and stakeholders- something like Clifford Chance's recent incursion into the Australian market - very focused, in this instance around a small limited suite of service offerings;
- emphasizes that firm brand statements must match what is actually experienced by clients and stakeholders to achieve "brand fusion";
- recognizes that brand warrants a separate strategy and disciplined management, and that this strategy must tie in with organizational strategy to avoid a "brand gap";
- uses clear language and is simplified;
- involves everyone in a firm in developing and implementing brand and clarifies for them what brand is and is not - ensuring that at every touch-point, wherever others see or experience the brand, that it happens in a consistent way;
- sets a clear goal of achieving a brand for which there is no substitute;
- recognizes that brand is dynamic and needs constant renewal;
- demonstrates that brand must be managed in three major areas - for the firm, for individual partners and in relation to the firm's employment brand - each area needs specific treatment to achieve maximum brand value;
- builds dynamic resilience into the brand strategy to ensure the brand can withstand whatever the market throws at it, and
- finally, clarifies that brand is not something to be fobbed off to the marketing department; it is a strategic issue of top import requiring senior leadership and partner involvement.
As a strategic, high-value asset, brand warrants thorough treatment and consideration. Everyone within a law firm must fully understand and support the firm brand if this asset is to achieve its potential. This is becoming even more important as changing communication channels such as social media severely stress-test the strengths and gaps in brands. Contact the author Sean Larkan. |
|

|  |  |
Edge
International
Partners
Toronto,
Canada
|
|
 |  |  |
At The Podium: Upcoming Appearances by Edge Partners
April 13, 2011: Ed Wesemann speaks to the Atlanta Chapter of the Association of Legal Administrators
|
|
|