Do you have "how to" questions on OWCP? SSA? OPM? VA?
Then join the crowd and Ask Here!
To join in or just to read the valuable information:
CLICK HERE TO ASK YOUR QUESTION AND GET ANSWERS
You don't have to register or sign in, you can remain completely anonymous.
And you can choose to receive email for newly posted messages -- just click the "Get email" button when you get there.
It's is free to you from the Law office of James R. Linehan!
Join the crowd today! Ask your questions and get your Answers Now!
|
|
Call Toll Free Nationwide
1-800-266-9535
or
click here to email me |
|
|
Greetings!
I am pleased to bring you news of some recent successes for claimants in appeals of their federal workers' compensation claims and in social security disability. Also the VA has published a list of ships that may qualify crews for Agent orange exposures. Read on for more information. |
|
 | | OWCP claimants must choose the right doctor for treatment |
OWCP AWARDS BENEFITS AFTER CLAIMANT IS EXAMINED BY ANOTHER MEDICAL DOCTOR
Choosing the right doctor in a federal workers' compensation claim can mean the difference between a claim that is awarded or denied.
In this federal workers' compensation claim, the claimant had injured her back while on the job for a federal agency. She properly and timely filed her federal workers' compensation claim with employer and the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP). As is the right of every federal employee injured on the job, she had first choice of her treating physician.
She chose a chiropractor.
Subsequently her claim for a bulging and herniated disc in her spine was denied by the OWCP. On contacting this office for her appeal, I immediately noted that the problem in her claim was not proof of injury. The problem was her choice of doctor. OWCP does not recognize chiropractors as medical doctors in OWCP claims except for the extremely limited treatment of subluxation of the spine. Chiropractors are physicians only to the extent that their reimbursable expenses are limited to treatment consisting of the manual manipulation of the spine to correct a subluxation as demonstrated to exist by X-ray. Subluxation means an incomplete dislocation, off-centering, misalignment, fixation, or abnormal spacing of the vertebrae which must be demonstrable on any X-ray film to an individual trained in the reading of X-rays. Where the x-rays do not show any subluxation of the spine, then a chiropractor is not considered as a "physician" by the OWCP and his reports will be disregarded.
On appeal I arranged for the claimant to be seen by an orthopedic doctor who in turn wrote up a report showing the complete extent of her injuries and their connection to her work. With that and legal argument on appeal, the OWCP then reversed its denial and immediately awarded the claimant full compensation and medical benefits for her on the job injury. |
|
 US ATTORNEY AGREES TO REVERSE SOCIAL SECURITY DENIAL WITHOUT ARGUMENT
The client here had been denied his social security disability benefits. The SSA Judge had found that he was not disabled as he was able, according, to the SSA Judge, to do other jobs. Those were listed by the SSA Judge as light, unskilled jobs of "maintenance work" and "cleaner".
On appeal to the United States Federal Court, I made a very simple argument. The two jobs listed by the SSA Judge did not exist. In social security disability claims the SSA bears the burden to prove that other jobs exist that a claimant can perform. The SSA relies upon a large book called the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) for this proof. The DOT lists thousands and thousands of jobs.
On federal appeal, after a complete review of the DOT and its thousands of job listings, I found that there is no job listing per se for light, unskilled "maintenance work". In regard to "cleaner" I found there were dozens of DOT jobs for "cleaner" but they all posed different intermingling skill and work capacity levels. Since the two jobs listed by the SSA Judge did not exist per se in the DOT, and it was his burden of proof to show that they did, I argued to the Court that the SSA failed to meet its burden of proof and the claimant should not have been denied benefits.
Upon review of the Brief submitted on appeal for the claimant, the US Attorney's office readily agreed and with no further argument, asked the Court to reverse the SSA decision and send the matter back to the SSA for re-hearing. |
|
VA PROVIDES LISTINGS OF SUSPECT SHIPS FOR AGENT ORANGE EXPOSURES
WASHINGTON (Sept. 2, 2011)- Veterans who served aboard U.S. Navy and Coast Guard ships operating on the waters of Vietnam between January 9, 1962, and May 7, 1975, may be eligible to receive Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability compensation for 14 medical conditions associated with presumptive exposure to Agent Orange.
An updated list of U.S. Navy and Coast Guard ships confirmed to have operated on Vietnam's inland waterways, docked on shore, or had crewmembers sent ashore, has been posted HERE to assist Vietnam Veterans in determining potential eligibility for compensation benefits.
|
|

Jim Linehan
Specialties: Federal workers' compensation (OWCP) Federal medical disability retirement (OPM) Social Security disability (SSA) Veterans Disability (VA) Accomplished legal professional with more 20 years of experience in preparation of complex cases. Expertly represent individuals on claims and appeals before the United States Department of Labor Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, before the United States Office of Personnel Management and Merit Systems Protection Board, and before the United States Social Security Administration. Outstanding practitioner focused on successfully representing complex claims and federal appeals for social security claimants, federal employees, and veterans nationwide. Invited by United States Congress to appear before the United States Congressional Committee of Government Reform 2000 to present summary testimony of oversight findings and recommendations for the reform of the United States Department of Labor, Office of Workers' Compensation programs. Pioneer in establishment of a "cyber" law practice. |
|
|