|
Law Office Notes of James R. Linehan PC
|
Greetings!
One would think that of all Americans, our veterans of war would be first in line to have guarantees of constitutional rights and due process protection in their claims for disability. Not so argued the Veterans Administration, until a wiser Court Ordered otherwise. Read on for more detail.
|
|
234 Years Later: United States Recognizes That Veterans Have
Constitutional Rights
|
The first American soldiers were formed in 1775 as the Continental
Army for the new America, led by George
Washington as commander in chief.
Not until this past summer of 2009, 234 years later, has
that same America finally recognized that its own wounded soldiers are entitled to due
process rights under the Constitution of the United States.
Phillip Cushman was a US Marine who was injured in the
Vietnam War. In 1974, 25 years ago, Mr.
Cushman began the long process to claim his VA disability compensation.
After years and decades of bureaucratic delays
and denials by the VA, Mr. Cushman discovered that the VA was actually keeping two
versions of his medical records. Upon
further inquiry, the VA conducted an investigation that confirmed that Mr.
Cushman's medical records had been altered.
The VA however was unable "to arrive at a reasonable explanation" for
the two different records and as to why the original records had now
disappeared.
Upon further appeals to federal court, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Mr. Cushman's
military medical records had been "fraudulently altered" and ordered the VA to
review his file to determine if Mr. Cushman was entitled to additional military
compensation benefits.
During the course of his appeals, Mr. Cushman, as a US
Marine veteran argued that he was entitled to a "constitutional right to a
fundamentally fair adjudication of his claim."
The United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit admitted that this issue of a veteran's claim to a "right to due process"
was a case of first impression, never argued before the Court.
Incredibly (or not), the Veterans Administration for the United States argued
that Mr. Cushman, an injured United
States Marine seeking compensation for his wartime injuries, had no constitutional
protections in his claim and the altered medical records in the VA file were not
prejudicial nor a violation of any of his rights.
The Federal Circuit (finally) disagreed. The Court then went on to find that as a
military veteran, Mr. Cushman's VA disability benefits are indeed a "protected
property interest and may not be discontinued without due process of law." The Court then found that the VA's
consideration of the altered medical records in adjudicating Mr.Cushman's
disability claim was a "violation of his constitutional right to a fair hearing"
and that US military veterans do indeed have a constitutional right of due process to have their
VA disability claims decided in a fair manner.
Click
here to read this case.
It only took the United States 234 years to recognize this
basic right for its own military veterans. Special thanks to Kevin A. Calia, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of San Francisco, California, who argued for claimant-appellant; Mr. Cushman.
|
Survivors of Deceased Veterans Are
Entitled to Dual Benefits
|
This case centers on statutory interpretation and involves
two benefit programs: SBP, which is administered by the Department of Defense,
and DIC, which is administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
SBP is an insurance-style program allowing eligible service members
and military retirees to elect to have premiums deducted from their pay in
order to provide their spouses with additional benefits after their deaths.
DIC is Dependency and Indemnity Compensation is a separate
benefit, which is automatically paid to surviving spouses of veterans who died
while on active duty or while suffering from a service-connected disability.
Prior to 2003, surviving spouses receiving DIC payments
became ineligible to continue receiving the DIC benefit when they remarried. Congress responded by passing the Veterans
Benefits Act of 2003 ("the Veterans Benefits Act"), which restored DIC benefits
to surviving spouses who chose to remarry after age 57. The Veterans Benefits
Act also provided that, "notwithstanding
any other provision of law," those remarried spouses who are simultaneously
eligible for other benefits inuring to surviving spouses of veterans do not
suffer a reduction in their benefits due to the DIC payments.
But the SBP plan calls for reducing SBP payments by the
amount the surviving spouse receives in DIC benefits.
So, although the DIC scheme prohibited a reduction in
benefits, such as SBP payments, for surviving spouses who had remarried, the
Department of Defense continued to enforce the SBP offset provision, and
reduced remarried survivor's SBP payments by the amount he or she received in
DIC benefits.
In the case of Sharp v. US,
the Federal Circuit this past month found that the Defense Department acted
against the law in continuing to reduce remarried survivor's SBP payments by
the amount he or she received in DIC benefits.
The Court held that because only military retirees and
retirement-eligible service members are permitted to participate in SBP, so a
SBP beneficiary always is a surviving spouse (or dependent child) of a veteran.
As such, the SBP offset provision represents
"another provision of law" that makes benefits available to that individual "by
reason of such individual's status as the surviving spouse of a veteran". Because a remarried surviving spouse's eligibility
for SBP is based upon his or her status
as the surviving spouse of a veteran, then the surviving spouse's SBP benefits are protected from offset again
DIC benefits.
The surviving spouse is
permitted to keep both SBP and DIC benefits despite remarriage after age 57.
|
|
|
Trying to understand the laws and regulations surrounding disability
benefits can be incredibly confusing for the layman. It's almost
impossible unless you have devoted your education and career to
understanding this specific niche. If you want to cut through the all
the confusing obstacles that stand in your way, give the offices of
James R. Linehan a call as soon as possible. If too much time passes,
you could miss out on your Veterans Disability Benefits, Social
Security Disability, OWCP Federal Workers Compensation, or OPM medical
retirement benefits.
Our clients have the backing of an attorney who is in good standing
with the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits, the Northern,
Western, and Eastern Federal Courts of Oklahoma, the State of Oklahoma,
and the Western District Federal Court of Texas. At the offices of
James R. Linehan, we aggressively and ethically defend your rights as a
federal worker.
Sincerely,
James Linehan
CALL TODAY TOLL FREE 1-800-266-9535
|
|
|
CHANGES AT THE USDOL OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS:
ESA TO BE ABOLISHED
|
 |
There are changes being made at the Office of Workers' Compensation Program (OWCP) under the US Department of Labor. The OWCP oversees the federal workers' compensation program for millions of federal employees. The OWCP used to fall under the oversight of the Employment Standards Administration (ESA). ESA is an umbrella organization responsible for management and oversight of four subordinate agencies:
The Wage and Hour Division ("WHD")
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs ("OFCCP")
The Office of Labor-Management Standards ("OLMS"), and
The Office of Workers' Compensation Programs ("OWCP"). On July 8, 2009, Acting Assistant Secretary of ESA, Shelby Hallmark,
announced that the ESA will be abolished in November, with the leaders
of the four agencies - WHD, OFCCP, OLMS and OWCP reporting directly to
the Secretary of Labor. This change eliminates an entire layer of bureaucracy within the Department of Labor. Assistant Secretary Hallmark (who also serves as
Director of the OWCP) stated that the reorganization will result in
"streamlined organizational structure" that will "significantly improve
policy decision-making with respect to the four individual programs,
enhancing the Department's responsiveness in enforcing key worker
protection laws." How this change will effect the backlog of thousands of federal workers' compensation claims at OWCP is not explained or clear. It is not unusual for injured federal employees and their families to wait years for compensation on their injury claims. With the elimination of entire bureacracy, perhaps the OWCP process will begin to speed up and flow more smoothly. However these changes still do not permit injured federal employees basic constitutional rights on their claims. Injured federal employees and their familes are still barred by federal law from having their OWCP claims reviewed by any US Court of Law or any Congressional official. 5 USC Section 8128
|
 |
|
|