new banner
July  2009 NEWSLETTER
 
Welcome to the July 2009 issue of our monthly newsletter dedicated to keeping you current on Education Law and related issues. 
 
FEATURED CLIENT TESTIMONIAL
 
"Dr. Dragan's report was prompt and sharp. His testimony was straightforward and clear. We had an excellent experience with Dr. Dragan." 
 
Arthur l. Raynes,Esq.
Wiley, Malehorn and Sirota
Morristown, New Jersey
In This Issue
Doe v. Dickenson, (D.Ariz.)
Pike Cty. Joint Voc. Sch. Dist. v. Knisley, (U.S.)
Independent School Dist. No. 12, Centennial v. Minnesota Dept. of Educ., (Minn.App.)
Doe v. Dickenson, (D.Ariz.)
 
May 21, 2009: Abuse and Harassment - Alleged molestation of minor student inflicted sufficiently severe damage to support mother's due process claim.

A school resource officer's (SRO) alleged molestation of an elementary school student inflicted sufficiently severe damage to the parent-child relationship to support a mother's claim that the SRO violated her due process right to familial association. It did not matter whether the alleged injuries were not both permanent and total, or that there was no evidence that the SRO actually intended to harm the parent-child relationship.
Pike Cty. Joint Voc, Sch. Dist. v. Knisley, (U.S.)
 
July 1, 2009: Civil Rights - Immunity from liability for strip search of nursing students to find missing cash, credit card -- Certiorari Granted, Vacated, and Remanded.
 
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded a case from the Sixth Circuit in light of its recent decision in Safford Unified School Dist. No. 1 v. Redding, 2009 WL 1789472. In that case The Supreme Court held that a 13-year-old middle school student's Fourth Amendment right was violated when she was subjected to a search of her bra and underpants by school officials acting on reasonable suspicion that she had brought forbidden prescription and over-the-counter drugs to school, since there were no reasons to suspect the drugs presented a danger or were concealed in her underwear. The Supreme Court further held, however, that the official who ordered the unconstitutional search was entitled to qualified immunity from liability, since there was reason to question the clarity with which the right was established. In the case at bar, seventeen female nursing students were searched separately in a bathroom by a female school nurse who asked them to unsnap their bra and shake it out under their scrub top, without removing their top, and to pull their scrub pants down to their thigh or knee level in a search for reportedly stolen cash, a gift card, and a credit card. The Sixth Circuit determined that the students had a constitutional right protecting them from being strip searched for missing property in the absence of a reasonable and individualized suspicion. The Sixth Circuit further held that this right was clearly established at the time of the search, and thus the defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity. (Case below: (unpublished) (C.A.6-Ohio 2008).)
Independent School Dist. No. 12, Centennial v. Minnesota Dept. of Educ., (Minn.App.)
 
July 6, 2009: Disabled Students - Child's individualized education program team has obligation to consider whether child's program should include specific extracurricular activity.
 
A child's individualized education program (IEP) team has an obligation to consider, based on the student's overall situation and parental requests, whether the child's IEP should include a specific extracurricular activity and, if so included, identify the supplementary aids and services necessary for that child's participation in the activity. However, the IEP need only include such activities as are required for the education of the child. Furthermore, it is the IEP team's discretion to determine whether the student's participation in extracurricular and nonacademic activities is appropriate. It is not a parental prerogative to require accommodations for every activity that the parent may identify.
Quick Links
 
Learn more about us and how our education and school liability expertise can help resolve your education case.
 
 
phone: 609.397.8989
 
Education News
  
Dr. Dragan will be a presenter at the Annual Education Law Conference to be held in Maine on July 22, 2009.  Dr. Dragan's presentation "Turning the Outrage of Harassment into a Teachable Moment" is based upon his upcoming book "No More Tears: Danger-Proofing your Child."  For additional information about the conference please visit http://www.usm.maine.edu/pdc/edlaw/
 
 
  
Supreme Court Sides with Student's Family in Special Ed Funding Case
 June 23, 2009  
 
Supreme Court sides with a family of a special needs high school student against the school district that had been ordered to pay the student's hefty private school tuition. Full Text Article
 
Featured Articles
Savanah
 
 

Savana Redding, above, stands outside the U.S. Supreme Court in April of this year. The court ruled today that school authorities violated her rights with a strip-search aimed at finding prescription-strength ibuprofen pills. -Evan Vucci/AP-File 
  
 

Supreme Court Limits Strip-Searches of Students
 
June 25, 2009
 
Public school officials violated the Fourth Amendment rights of a 13-year-old girl who was strip-searched for suspected drug possession, but are entitled to qualified immunity from legal action, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled.
 
The ruling on sprip-searches of students clarifies the standard for when such searches are permisible, but it does not prohibit them. 
 
 
 
 
 
Articles from previous issues:
 
 
 
 
 
FOR OTHER EDUCATION RELATED ARTICLES VISIT OUR Re-DESIGNED WEBSITE AND BLOG
 
Join Our Mailing List
I hope that our newsletter has provided you with valuable information.  If there is anything else that you would like us to include please do not hesitate to give us your feedback.
 
As an education administration expert, I am committed to providing individualized service to our clients while dealing with large and complex consultations quickly and professionally.  These include case review and analysis, expert testimony, school reviews in custody matters, presentations and working with parents or schools to ensure children receive an appropriate education. 
 
I take pride in the fact that my firm responds to our clients' needs personally and promptly.  We continue to strive to combine the resources of a large firm with the personal consultant-client rapport of a small practice.
 
Sincerely,
 
Edward F. Dragan, Ed.D.
Education Management Consulting, LLC