Nexus Logo
Performance. Improvement. 
In Healthcare Diagnostics

The Nexus Newsletter

April 2012
In This Issue
In Focus: Software Tools
Product Guides 2012
Web Article
Art or Science?
Lean and Green
 
Market Research, Lean Training, Laboratory Workflow and More...
 
Visit Our Website

In Focus

 

Nexus creates a variety of software tools to help labs track metrics, improve turnaround times; and help lab vendors to position solutions more effectively

Learn More 

Product & Services Guide 2012


 


Join Our Mailing List

Web Article

  

After working with thousands of healthcare organizations over the past 15 years, we at Nexus have discovered that there are primarily four reasons that organizations go outside the company in order to use a "consultant". Read More.

 

Greetings!

 

Thanks for subscribing to the Nexus Newsletter.  Through this newsletter and our web site archives, we hope to provide some ideas for you to create more effective processes.  Whether your role is a marketing professional, sales manager or lab manager, these concepts apply to all walks of life.

Finally, we are frequently asked about the Lean-enabling devices concepts.  You can review this and other past articles in the archives at: Nexus News Archives. 

Is a Process Art or Science?

 

A process is defined as "a series of actions, changes, or functions bringing about a result". In the disciplines of management science and quality management the "process" is a fundamental building block[1], requiring us to pay special attention to its design, implementation and maintenance. In general, the outcome of a well-designed process is reduced variability. For example, when we set up the processes for accounts payable, we expect that our department will submit payments to the appropriate party in the exact time frame specified in the exact amount required. Any variation might be a problem. A lot of variation can bankrupt a company.

 

But sometimes we find that a process is more art than science, more abstract than logic, and more flexible than specific. Moreover, sometimes the customer desires variation.

 

This generally doesn't apply to the world of healthcare diagnostics and medical devices. In fact, the industry has made dramatic quality improvements in the past 20 years by standardizing some processes that were previously left (to some degree) to the judgment of the operator. Some examples include performing a cell differential in hematology, interpreting cytology slides, and automating the type and screen test in blood banks. These are examples of macro processes, and for each there are hundreds of micro processes that have been standardized by the lab protocols and automation that we use every day.

 

So when is a process more art than science? Generally, we look for these conditions to make that determination:

  • The inputs to the process are variable

This happens in judgment-based work when the environment is highly dynamic. Sometimes the raw materials are variable so a "craftsman" is needed to make the calls to mold the materials into the product that will bring out the best quality. The construction of musical instruments requires this type of craftsmanship, and within our world of healthcare a prime example is a surgeon: though there are established practices, there are many judgment calls to make in a successful procedure.

 

  • The customer desires / requires variability

In some environments treating each customer in a standardized way will decrease overall effectiveness. In other words, some customers are so different that they each want something different from the process. The hotel and restaurant management environment faces much of this: not everyone will want to eat a sirloin cut, cooked to medium rare. In a Ritz-Carlton, employees are taught an artistic approach to customer service so that they have flexibility in satisfying the demands of each hotel guest.

 

At Nexus we have worked within both environments and sometimes a combination of both. (Click for full article)



[1] Most important after the 'element', a series of which comprise a process


Lean and Green Continues

 

For many years the major clinical and pathology automation vendors have understood the lean concepts of minimizing waste and optimal piece-flow. Design engineers have looked at workflow in the laboratory and asked customers questions (usually via marketing channels) as to how the instrument can be designed to help the lab achieve their goals. More often than not, lab goals in recent years have centered on work and product efficiency.

 

Early in the diagnostic instrument life-cycle an instrument is usually as good as the quality of the test. As time progresses, the designers must compete by providing better instrument features. An example of this evolution is the instrument rack size. Early instruments were typically designed to work with batches of samples (sometimes up to 96 samples - the size of a microplate). Over time the assay quality was assumed and the customer demanded more flexibility and better throughput from lab automation. An outcome of this is usually better batch size: instead of running 96 samples (and having to wait for all 96 to complete) the customer demands single piece flow so that the cycle time per sample is improved. Although the best solution would be single-piece flow with batch sizes of 1, the compromise is usually somewhere in-between. This is why many instrument racks today have a capacity of less than 10.

 

Additionally, many vendors have done good work with visual cues: having identification and color codes to help the operator to avoid mistakes. Poke-yoke techniques (fail safe features) are also used (i.e., designing a reagent bottle to fit only in the exact spot on the instrument where it is required).

 

The next phase of instrument design has been in motion for some time and involves the "green" aspect of "lean and green". This isn't just a socially conscious need - there is also an impact on laboratory costs. Many labs spend tens of thousands of dollars per year in solid and liquid disposable costs. The labs that try to minimize these costs (such as pathology labs that perform xylene recycling) are still spending thousands of dollars in labor and capital. Lab suppliers are working on these issues, from the aggressive (the use of xylene substitutes) to the moderate (more efficient reagent packaging).

 

The "Lean and Green" evolution has fully arrived. While the bottom line remains test quality and efficiency of the process, laboratory decision makers are increasingly aware of and asking for products that minimize waste and are environmentally friendly. The suppliers that don't address these issues today will be hard pressed to compete in tomorrow's lab space.

Find us on FacebookView our profile on LinkedInFollow us on Twitter