|
|
Strategic Guidance to Build Your Business
|
Volume 4, Issue 5, May 2010
|
|
|
|
"The Business Builder" is brought
to you by VSA, Inc. in collaboration with Rink
Consulting. VSA, Inc., founded by Valerie
Schlitt,
builds and implements B2B prospecting
programs for
businesses and professional service firms.
VSA has
a
team of professional telephone callers who open
doors to new business opportunities for VSA
clients.
Linda Rink, president of Rink Consulting,
specializes
in
B2B and consumer marketing and research. Both
Wharton MBA graduates, Valerie and Linda often
team together to help clients identify and
reach new
customers. In this newsletter, they share
some of
their business development insights.
|
|
Answer the Phone To Build Your Business
by Valerie Schlitt, President of VSA, Inc.
Statistics show that companies can increase revenue
by doing one simple thing: answer the
phone.
By answering virtually every call with a live human
being, analysts predict that companies can:
- Generate orders valuing 20% higher than industry
averages
- Increase revenue from marketing campaigns by
33%
- Retain clients longer
If all it takes is answering the phone, why do firms
continue to let their calls go to voicemail? Why do
some firms respond to voice messages hours or
days later?
I asked a few colleagues these questions and my
conclusion is that: Companies just don't know
that their behaviors are putting their businesses at
risk.
Here are the answers I got:
- This is the way I've always done it, and my
business is thriving
- All the other businesses my size use voicemail;
it's just impossible to go to meetings and answer my
phones at the same time
- People expect to leave voice messages today;
nobody answers their own phones
- It's too expensive to hire someone when I'm not
there
- My company looks bigger when I let the calls go to
voicemail
- I don't always have time to respond to my voice
messages right away
- I don't check my voice messages until the next
morning
Some of the points above are valid. However, the real
customer-oriented firms who are getting 20% larger
orders are looking at the situation in an entirely
different way, and changing the way they interact with
clients. They are saying:
- My business is thriving now, but how can I
accelerate my growth even further?
- I want to be different than the other businesses my
size, so customers will call me and not them!
- People expect to leave voice messages. If my
phones are answered by a human being, this will
exceed my customers' expectations.
- It's too expensive not to hire someone to answer
the phones when I'm not in the office. I can't afford to
lose even a single business opportunity.
- I don't want my company to look big and
impersonal. I want customers to know they can reach
us easily.
- Making time to check my voice messages and
respond quickly is not a luxury. It's a necessity
I don't really believe today's ubiquitous voice mail
systems are signs of companies ignoring their
clients. I believe companies just haven't considered
the missed opportunities their behaviors produce.
They haven't considered that their cost saving
processes result in lower revenues.
They haven't looked at other ways of ensuring their
phones are answered by a human being, such as
answering services or by phone systems that allow
you to take calls on your cell phone while you're away
from the office.
I encourage all of you to take another look at your
telephone answering process. Ask yourself how you
can get higher revenues simply by answering the
phone. You might come up with some truly
break-through ideas.
VSA now answers your phones when you're
not able to do so. If you'd like to explore how we can
help, please call Valerie at 856-240-8100. If you call
Monday through Friday between 8:30 and 5:00 and
your call goes to voice mail, VSA will provide one free
hour of phone answering for your company.
|
 |
VSA, Inc.
441 Station Avenue
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
856-429-5078
valerie.schlit@vsaprospecting.com
www.vsaprospecting.com
|
|
 |
Go With Your Gut
by Linda Rink, President of RINK Consulting
Some people pride themselves on making
decisions
based on "gut feel." Are you one of them? Whether
you call it gut feel, intuition, or making a snap
judgment, you're certainly not alone. And sometimes
there is simply no time to mull over options, you have
to decide now.
We all know that there can be good and bad
outcomes to "gut" decisions, just as with any
decision. The key to a good outcome is what
is driving that "gut feel."
- Is it experience, based on similar
situations that you have gone through?
- Is it knowledge, based on statistics, data,
or research?
- Or is it emotion, based on fear, arrogance,
or some other non-logical input?
Actually, all of the above - even emotion (i.e.,
emotional intelligence) -- can play a part in formulating
a sound, sensible decision. But danger lies when
business decisions are made quickly without
sufficient data to "inform" that gut feel.
Much has been written about the role of intuition in the
decision-making process, including such best-selling
books as "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell. Says
Gladwell, "I think those instant conclusions that we
reach are really powerful and really important and,
occasionally, really good." When it comes to
business strategy, however, being a researcher, I
strongly believe that decisions based on data are far
preferable to Gladwell's "instant conclusions."
Last March the
McKinsey Quarterly, the business
journal of consulting firm McKinsey & Company,
published a very interesting interview with Nobel
laureate Daniel Kahneman and psychologist Gary
Klein, titled "Strategic Decisions: When can you trust
your gut?" * Their answers can be summed up as: "It
depends."
Gary Klein states, "You need to take your gut feeling
as an important data point, but then you have to
consciously and deliberately evaluate it, to see if it
makes sense in this context."
Daniel Kahneman cautions, "In strategic decisions, I'd
be really concerned about overconfidence. There are
often entire aspects of the problem that you can't
see-for example, am I ignoring what competitors
might do? An executive might have a very strong
intuition that a given product has promise, without
considering the probability that a rival is already ahead
in developing the same product."
So how do you strike a balance between total gut
and "analysis paralysis"? And what do you do when
you don't have the luxury of mulling over an issue for,
say, a couple of weeks? How do you increase the
likelihood that you make a smart decision?
My advice is to "go with your informed
gut." By this I mean keeping in touch with the
marketplace and not just relying on what's in your own
head:
- Seek information from or about your customers
and/or prospects.
- Keep an eye on what your competition is
doing.
- Be informed about industry news and trends.
Smart business people do this regularly; it's part of
thinking strategically. Then, if you have the luxury of
time, you could also:
- Seek objective viewpoints from individuals outside
of your company.
- Commission research that specifically addresses
the issue.
So there's nothing wrong in making gut decisions, as
long as you're going with an informed gut. If
your "feels right" decision is based on current
knowledge and guided by relevant experience, then go
with your gut!
(* Daniel Kahneman is a Nobel laureate and a
professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at
Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School. Gary
Klein is a cognitive psychologist and senior scientist
at MacroCognition. Kahneman and Klein co-
authored "Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to
disagree," published in the September 2009 issue of
American Psychology.)
|
 |
RINK Consulting
1420 Locust Street, Suite 31N
Philadelphia, PA 19102
215-546-5863
lrink@lindarink.com
www.lindarink.com
|
|
|