|
April 12, 2011
Public Hearing on the 2011-12 School District Budget
via
Open Topics Forum
After meeting with citizens to listen to their concerns and recommendations regarding the 2011-12 budget, members of the Board of Education shared summaries of their groups' discussions with the community. Many common items of concern and recommendations were mentioned across the six groups. With that in mind, Superintendent Dr. Shine has categorized the following responses based on those major themes, noting specific school references where appropriate.
Enrollment and Class Size
Each year school district enrollment is reported to the State Education Department, the Board of Education and Lloyd Bishop, Ph.D., of Bishop Associates, who complete an enrollment analysis and make projections for the next ten years. The projections are based on the premise that what happened in the past will happen in the future, with high, average and low projections based on average kindergarten to birth rate ratios over a five-year period, as well as school-by-school and grade level-by-grade level migration ratios. Every once in a while past trends do not repeat, and this year was one of those years; that is, actual enrollment in September 2010 was 40 students over projection and 32 additional students enrolled during the school year. If those 72 students enroll at the elementary schools and are prorated and distributed over the 77 sections, there would be very little impact on class size. If the new arrivals do not follow that pattern and move into the schools with grade levels that are at the upper end of the class size guidelines [22], it can and does cause concern. If the 72 students were prorated and distributed across all 13 grade levels, the impact would, of course, be negligible. Again, that is not how it usually happens and it did not happen that way this year.
At the elementary schools, especially Midland and Osborn, there have been wide swings of enrollment based on where people buy or rent homes and how the in-out migration works over a period of years. Within the past 10 years the Board approved changes in attendance zones to relieve enrollment growth pressure at Midland School. The Board also used a committee to review the pros and cons of a different grade level configuration: K-1; 2-3; 4-5 and concluded that a change of organization was not best for Rye. Now the unanticipated growth seems to be at Osborn School, the largest of the three elementary schools. In June of each year, school principals ask parents to notify them if personal circumstances will cause a change in enrollment. The administration reviews school and grade-level enrollment with the new information in June, a time when sections can be changed. The Superintendent continues to oversee enrollment numbers throughout the summer, watching for changes. If numbers jump in late August, as is often the case, the administration and Board add sections where warranted.
Some of the comments from the meeting participants were:
1. Smaller class sizes are needed, particularly at the lower grades;
2. Class size is impacted by the presence of English Language Learners
and students with learning disabilities in the classroom;
3. August is too late to add sections effectively;
4. After a certain date, consider a lottery for school assignments to control class
size;
5. Re-consider a redistricting plan.
Teacher Aides
There were many questions about the number of teacher aides in the elementary schools, the equity of their assignment across the schools, and their supervision. Currently, the District assigns a teacher aide to each kindergarten classroom. The school principals assign other teacher aides to supervise students' arrival in the morning, as well as during lunch and recess, and the end-of-the-day dismissal. At other times during the day, teacher aides are used to provide clerical support to grade level teachers or are assigned other responsibilities from the school principal.
Teacher aides assigned to special education classrooms or students are guided by Individualized Education Plans [IEPs] developed by the Committee on Special Education.
In the last two years, several teacher aide positions were eliminated in order to protect class size and keep budget cuts as far away from classroom teachers and students as possible. However, the ratio of students to general education teacher aides is 44 to 1 in each elementary school. There are 34.9 general education aides [10.3 at Midland, 9.3 at Milton and 13.3 at Osborn] in addition to 22.8 special education teacher aides and 5.4 FTE special education teaching assistants. While the enrollment has increased with new arrivals since October, the administration has not recommended the addition of any new positions. There are students moving in and moving out almost every day; however, comparing October to February the numbers are as follows: Midland +5; Milton -7; Osborn +14.
Program Protection
Several of the groups' recommendations were made to protect programs. Of the many programs that exist, the following were mentioned:
- Protect the average child's programs, not just the Advanced Placement Program.
- Protect the middle school's team structure.
- Protect the high school writing mentor program.
- Protect middle school and high school athletics, arts and student activities.
- Support for adding the third team at the seventh grade to protect class size.
It has always been the philosophy of the administration that budget cuts and/or reductions should be made as far away from students as possible. That philosophy was supported by the Board and community over the last two years when budget cuts and reductions had to be made. The 2011-12 proposed revenue projections and budget plan allow the District to continue that effort. All programs and services have been protected at their current levels. Class size continues as a major priority and additional staffing positions are in the budget to support enrollment growth at the middle school and high school.
Facilities Maintenance and Renovation
Specific concerns were expressed for the high school science labs, the high school and middle school locker rooms, upgrades to the athletic fields, heating and ventilation at Midland School (the vent stack project) as well as the middle and high school buildings, and for core spaces at Midland School, namely the multipurpose room, the gymnasium and the auditorium. Specific mention was made regarding the possibility of mold and asbestos at Midland School. With enrollment growth continuing at the middle school and high school, inquiries have been made regarding the District's space planning. Some individuals/groups indicated they would support the Board's effort to use a bond to accelerate the construction process to complete these projects in a timely manner.
All of these items have been discussed before at Facilities Committee meetings and with the Board. Proposals have been reviewed and all are still under consideration. The middle school/high school space study that was completed in 2009 will be updated by the District's consultant before the end of this school year.
A specific response needs to be made to the concerns about mold and asbestos. Each time similar mold concerns have been expressed in the past, testing by professionals has been completed and each has been negative for mold. A few years ago, a special effort was made to resolve a drainage problem in the rear of the school that was allowing water into the basement tunnels. That effort resolved the problem successfully. All of the schools still have vinyl asbestos tile [VAT] on the floors. As long as the tiles are intact and not friable, they are not dangerous. The District has a long-term plan to replace these tiles as needed during the summer months at each school.
Technology
Many parents and groups indicated their support to expand the District's efforts to provide students and teachers with new technological tools for learning, especially SmartBoards and the handheld devices that are now available. In addition, there was expressed support for the 2011-12 technology budget, which includes the installation of a wireless topology for the middle school and high school.
Tax Cap and Unfunded Mandates
There is still a need for communication about the unfunded state mandates that are included in the District's budget as well as the current state of tax cap legislation and what it means.
There are three major areas of mandate relief in addition to numerous other minor manifestations of state requirements. Two of the major unfunded mandates are related to employee pensions, the state pensions that have been assigned to local school district in two forms. The Teachers' Retirement System [TRS] includes teachers and administrators, and the Employees' Retirement System [ERS] covers all other District employees. These are not new costs to the District- in fact, over the years, they have been manageable. However, because these pensions are a defined benefit, the rates are growing at a 30% to 50% rate causing significant increases in the RCSD budget. The third major area is special education. While the District has a moral obligation to provide education to ALL students, this is also a legal mandate. A number of children need placements in specialized school with related services to help them progress, and federal and state aid never fully reimburses school districts for providing these services. Originally, the governments were able to provide more support to districts in meeting the needs of special education students, but unfortunately, they have backed away from that commitment in recent years, placing a greater financial burden on individual districts.
Board of Education President Josh Nathan suggested that the District publish a FAQ on the tax cap question. The District has since created this document and sent it out via our E-Newsletter. We hope it was helpful in filling in some information gaps. Nevertheless, citizens need to communicate with Rye's Senator and Assemblyman as suggested in the communication.
In closing, the District would like to thank the community members who came out on March 29 to participate in the Open Topic Forum and share their thoughts, concerns, and suggestions. The Board of Education members and administration value this input from residents and appreciate the opportunity to respond to and address the points and questions that were raised.
|