Summer  2009

TCG-Small Graph
Advancement Perspectives

A continuing commentary on constituency building, fund raising, public relations and other advancement concerns of nonprofit organizations
INTRODUCTION:
A Time to Get Back to Basics


The current economic environment presents some extraordinary challenges, not only to the larger, national enterprise, but also to the nonprofit sector.

The stresses in the world and national economies and the worst bear market in at least a generation have forced nonprofits --- both new and mature --- to take a hard look at all aspects of their operations and their advancement initiatives. In response, many organizations have renewed their emphasis on the basic and essential building blocks of organizational strength and advancement success.

One of the most important of those building blocks is the organization's governing board, the purpose of which is to provide leadership that will help the organization to carry out its mission and fully realize its vision. In its responsibilities of governance and oversight, the board carries the essential seeds of the organization's operational success. With the ultimate legal and fiduciary authority over the organization in its hands, the board must be constructed, populated and managed in such a way that vision and mission are protected.

In the early years of a new organization's history, focused, inspired and effective governance is pivotal to its future well-being. At a time such as this, when the economy and a variety of other factors in the larger, external environment are posing many unprecedented challenges, that governance is a key to organizational success.

In response to requests, therefore, we are reprising an earlier discussion in which we offered some of our own views on the critical importance of the nonprofit board construct and how it affects the success of any board, particularly the new or younger organization, and especially where advancement initiatives are concerned.

NEEDED ON YOUR BOARD:
"MOVERS AND SHAKERS"


TCG-Small GraphIf you are one of those at the helm of a new or young nonprofit organization, philanthropy and the need to generate major gifts very quickly will become important issues and concerns.
    Investment by constituents or stakeholders in the vision and mission of the organization is critical to any nonprofit's survival and success.

    It is not enough, however, for your fund-raising needs to be an issue and a concern. Just as in well-established and more mature nonprofits, they must become a real, sustained action priority for the entire organization, from top to bottom -- the top being the governing board.

"Ownership" of Organizational Advancement
    When there is a movement to build or reinvigorate an organization's overall advancement program or to improve its fund raising, it always should start at the level of the board, because that body already has responsibility for governance --- fiduciary and legal issues and general oversight of the operations and well-being of the organization.
    The success of the advancement functions is key to the board's being able to meet its responsibility to provide the budget resources needed for carrying out the organization's mission. What board members must realize, therefore, is that focus on the general advancement, advocacy, constituency-building and fund-raising solutions has to start with them, too.
    As the "owners" (stewards) and leaders of the organization, board members should be expected to own the advancement process and to set an example as front-line advocates who enthusiastically participate in all aspects of constituency development, relationship management and philanthropy.
    Your board needs to be made up of people who understand this reality on every level. If it is not, it might be time to reorient or even rebuild your board. Any nonprofit board must follow this basic, three-part fund-raising axiom:  (1) give yourself (according to your means, of course); (2) find others who will give and ask; or, (3) find someone else to take your place as a board member. It's that simple!

A Partnership Between Board and Staff
    The board must assume a pivotal role in the organization's advancement initiatives, always in a partnership with the senior staff, while not usurping the staff's management role and authority in the advancement functions. Board members should be given every opportunity to be equally involved in constituency building and cultivation, relationship management, public relations and communications activities, and, most especially, in the fund-raising process.
    The mistake many nonprofits make when establishing a board or recruiting new members is to focus almost exclusively on the service mission and programs of the organization, to the neglect of the board's role in other strategic realms, such as visioning and institutional advancement.
In the final analysis, mission and programs mean nothing if the strategic plan and essential resources underlying their implementation are either inadequate or nonexistent.

Passion, Commitment & Advocacy
    Most organizations strive for boards characterized by diversity. Who would quarrel with the value of a board that is marked by diversity in terms of occupation, experience, skills, age, gender or even socioeconomic status?
    At the same time, many nonprofit leaders overly concern themselves with recruiting board members who bring technical talent or a commitment only to the organization's service mission, programs and activities.
    There is no disputing the worth and advantage of technical talent, and it is imperative that all board members share a firm commitment to vision and mission.
    However, what organizations really ought to focus on are people who are the genuine "movers and shakers" in the community --- those who are strategic thinkers, opinion-shapers, advocates and business leaders, those who can bring multiple skill sets to the table, those who understand philanthropy and get involved in volunteer roles. If they also happen to be generous individuals with a history of personal philanthropy and a connection to others like themselves, all the better for the organization.
    In the larger sense, all board members must approach their role with an obvious passion for and commitment to the cause, a desire to communicate that passion and commitment to the larger audience outside, and a dedication to advocacy on behalf of the organization.

    The time-tested approach of building governing boards with a mix of prominent, respected, talented, visionary and philanthropic people in the community, as well as the mission activists and consumers or clients, should still be followed.
    The "movers and shakers" certainly will dedicate themselves to the vision and mission --- to governing --- but are not likely to lose sight of the organizational advancement program and how it must operate for success.


Setting an Example, Setting the Pace
   When "the rubber meets the road" in the organization's advancement program and philanthropy initiatives, it is the board that must set the example and the pace --- for giving as well as seeking.
   The axiom articulated earlier bears repeating here. The board must own the advancement process. The efforts to generate and secure philanthropic support for the organization and its mission must originate from the working partnership between the board and the executive staff. Before board members can ask for gifts from external constituencies, they must give credible reality to their own commitments and investments. 
   It is perfectly reasonable to expect that all board members will make sacrificial, annual gifts to support the organization's operating needs, as well as special, major campaigns and appeals. Having done so enthusiastically and according to their personal means, they are in a legitimate position to help raise plentiful gifts, both large and small, from others.
   While time, talent and treasure are needed from every board member, the organization with a genuinely strong culture of advancement and philanthropy will never be compromised by receiving only one or two of these three from its top leaders.


Assembling a Well-Built Board
    The process of building a new board or perpetuating an existing one should begin and work in a way similar to the volunteer-recruitment process in an organization's major fund-raising initiatives.
     Just as in capital and endowment campaigns, where board members first make their own gifts, then solicit gifts from others and, in turn, recruit them to serve as volunteer solicitors, board members also must contribute to and help manage the board-building process by seeking others to serve with and after them in the governing role.

    Whether yours is a new nonprofit, building a board for the first time, or an established, mature organization rebuilding or restructuring your board, here are two critical, effective strategies for creating, populating and organizing a board filled with genuine "movers and shakers:"
  • Develop board member job descriptions that include clear statements about the role the board must assume and the responsibilities it must fulfill in governing, organizational oversight and the advancement process, as well as other strategic areas of concern. All board members should understand that they will be expected to help recruit and orient new members, to make a personal financial investment and ask others to do the same, and that individual involvement in constituency building and cultivation, advocacy, public relations and corporate communications is part of their job, too. These should be clear and nearly non-negotiable issues with them. If they do not want to be involved in some way in mission advocacy, fund raising and the advancement process as a whole, they perhaps should not be asked to join or continue in the board role.
  • Ask current board members to make periodic lists of the 25 most respected, savvy, generous, philanthropic and community-involved people they know. This will help to identify for future consideration those people who are opinion-shapers, business leaders, advocates, and individuals most concerned about issues of the larger public/community good.
    The list approach serves as a means for preliminary identification of appropriate prospects for future board membership and other volunteer opportunities, as well as contributed, financial support of the organization in its campaigns. Divide up the prospects, and assign them within the board for contact, communication, cultivation and relationship development.
    Prepare a written strategy for how each prospect will be approached, introduced to the mission and cultivated for future involvement and support. Then have board members contact these prospects using and adhering to the overall strategy you have created --- much like in a major-gifts fund- raising program for capital or endowment needs.

Sustaining & Maintaining an Excellent Board
    So, you have recruited and seated a board populated by committed, inspired, talented, eager and energetic individuals who are ready to serve. Now what?
    Cooperate with the board's leaders in the effort to identify and recruit new members and lend the full support of the executive staff to the process of nomination and appointment.
    Develop and put special emphasis on creative, engaging and challenging programs of orientation for new board members and annual/continuing education for the full board. Provide the board with an opportunity for annual self-assessment and discussion of the implications of the exercise for the board's and the organization's visioning and strategic planning.
    Work to promote a partnership of the board's leaders and the senior executive staff in an effort to keep board members fully focused on their proper governance and oversight role, as well as their strategic planning and goal-setting responsibilities. This helps to avoid the potential for the board to micromanage issues and meddle in day-to-day operations and the tasks of the staff.
    Support the board in its critical role and involvements in the organizational advancement process and initiatives. Help each board member to understand the value of personal advocacy, the importance of giving and asking, and the need for seeking others who will see the vision, share the mission and also give and ask. Challenge the board to participate in strategic, goal-based advancement planning and its implementation.
    Assist the board in the development of appropriate policies and procedures, the establishment and staffing of needed operating committees, the proper enforcement of term limits and rotation of officers, and in the routine execution of its legal and fiduciary responsibilities.
    Finally, it never hurts to pursue every opportunity to publicly and enthusiastically thank your board for its service and to communicate to constituents, donors, volunteers, staff and the larger, external community how the contributions and accomplishments of your board help the organization to carry out its mission effectively.
   Thank the board every day for making the mission possible!


Initiating Change Among Board Members
    What do you do if your board is largely resistant to change or to assuming its proper role, particularly in advancement?
    You look for at least one member of the board (preferably a senior member) who clearly understands the problem. Try to persuade that individual to work from within for reorientation and refocusing of the other members and their perceptions.

    The initiative to make changes or redirect the board usually cannot come from a staff person other than the chief executive. Sometimes, however, even the CEO cannot or will not help to stimulate such change. Bringing in an outside resource, such as an experienced consultant or other skilled facilitator, to do an internal audit or a governing board assessment and to develop and broaden the board's understanding of its proper governing responsibilities, also can help.

Rules of the Advancement Road
    This is an era of limited resources, extreme financial constraints and severe competition for support, and these are being felt by nonprofits of all sizes and types. In this climate, there are at least two realities --- two rules of the road --- that governing boards must face, particularly in new or younger organizations, when building, strengthening or refocusing the advancement program:
  • The organization must learn to be willing and prepared to allocate at least twenty percent (20%) of its resources to advancement, most especially to constituency-building, constituent-cultivation, communications, and fund-raising strategies and initiatives.
  • The governing board members, the CEO and the senior advancement or development officer must spend at least one third of their planning and work time on the major advancement initiatives --- constituency building, constituency relations and cultivation, and fund-raising efforts --- most particularly in the early years. The reality, however, is that these are issues and priorities that never diminish in their importance as time goes on.

Time to Get Outside Help on Board Issues?
    If your board members or CEO react to these realities with anything less than full understanding and agreement, you probably need outside help to set or reset the focus properly.
    A good first step might be to purchase each of them a personal copy of such helpful books as:
  • The Board Member's Book, Making a Difference in Voluntary Organizations, by Brian O'Connell (The Foundation Center, © 1993, paperback 2003);
  • Governance as Leadership: Reframing the Work of Nonprofit Boards, by Richard P. Chait, William P. Ryan and Barbara E. Taylor (John Wiley & Sons, © 2004);
  • Getting the Best from Your Board: An Executive's Guide to a Successful Partnership, by Sherrill K. Williams and Kathleen A. McGinnis (BoardSource, © 2006);
  • The Fundraising Habits of Supremely Successful Boards, by Jerold Panas (Emerson & Church Publishers, © 2006);
  • Fundraising Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards, by James M. Greenfield (BoardSource, © 2003, second edition 2009).
All of these reference books are available from such sources as The Foundation Center, BoardSource and Amazon.
    A good second step is to seek organizational consensus and then act on the need for new directions in strategic planning and advancement initiatives. Getting the board leadership and full membership engaged in a dialogue with the CEO about the value of developing new strategies and refocusing goals is helpful and advisable.
    The time might, in fact, be right to engage an experienced, outside consultant or other facilitator to work with the board and executive staff in developing a new vision of how the organization should approach, manage and carry out its essential mission.

Q&A:
SOME BASIC ISSUES RELATED TO
NONPROFIT GOVERNING BOARDS


TCG-Small Graph
Q: What are the most critical qualities or characteristics to look for in a prospective board member?
A: In fund-raising circles, they are often summarized as the three "Ws" -- wealth, wisdom and work: the ability to identify and secure wealth (financial support); the ability to impact the mission wisely and effectively; the ability and willingness to work hard in support of the mission.
    Above all, board members clearly should be obvious leaders. Thomas Broce, in his book, Fund Raising (University of Oklahoma Press, 1979), suggests seven qualities that board members should bring to the table:
  • a natural relationship with or interest in the institution;
  • affluence or influence;
  • a willingness to contribute sacrificially and solicit others;
  • a willingness to ask difficult questions and ensure that    members of the staff are doing their homework in all areas of administration and management;
  • an ability and willingness to communicate (the mission) enthusiastically to others;
  • a willingness to be well-informed about the organization's history, current operations, and future goals;
  • a sense of urgency about the organization's mission.
  Q: Is it possible to guarantee that the process of identifying, recruiting, educating and evaluating board members is properly designed and implemented?
A: The word "guarantee" is the central problem with this question. Guarantees probably cannot be guaranteed! Rather, the goal should be to have a board establish its own committee on membership, develop a job description for members, maintain an ongoing program of education and orientation for members, and conduct a regular evaluation of its own service and performance, both collectively and individually.

Q: How important are committees to the work of a nonprofit governing board?
A: They are extremely important, because they enable a board to get its work done more efficiently. They also provide an opportunity to bring to the table the talents, energies and perspectives of others in the community who, perhaps, are not even board members, but who understand and support the mission.
    Traditional wisdom has been that every nonprofit organization should strive to have at least the following board committees in place: executive committee; governance (or board building and membership); advancement (constituency building and cultivation, fund raising, public relations and communications, volunteers, marketing, events); finance; strategic/vision planning; programs and services. Larger nonprofit organizations might also maintain other standing committees on financial audit, investment and personnel or human services.
    In recent years, however, somewhat differing views have begun to emerge relative to permanent or "standing" board-level committees. Some sector scholars, observers and analysts have suggested that many or most nonprofits, particularly smaller ones, might even have too many such committees and might function more effectively with fewer of them.
    This view sees standing board committees getting bogged down in the operational process of their very mandates and tasks, rather than actually and efficiently accomplishing anything of value. The alternative and more effective approach, it is suggested, might be to appoint only temporary or ad hoc committees, commissions and task forces, as might be needed, and to disband them when their projects  or assignments have been completed.
    An alternative committee structure sometimes discussed among today's nonprofit professionals and board leaders is one under which only several permanent committees are maintained, each with a broad purview: one for governance and board-related issues; one dealing with internal and operational concerns; and one focused strictly on issues related to constituency relationships, advancement and philanthropy. Some organizations have found this approach to be more efficient and productive. 
    While considered a bit radical in some circles, these alternative approaches to board committees see even the traditional executive committee as, perhaps, unnecessary and dispensable, because of any potential for it to usurp most of the decision-making role and initiatives of the overall board.
    In the final analysis, each nonprofit organization, whatever its size or maturity level, should give careful consideration to the issue of its own committee structure and elect to build the one that works best for its own purposes and needs. Over time, the operational structure of the board's committees and how they carry out their mandates can be adjusted or changed as needed. At every turn, the critical question should be whether and how any standing committees can help the board to fulfill its governance function effectively and get its work done more efficiently.
    Talented, dedicated and thoughtful boards will never see the issue of committee structure as daunting or insurmountable. The key concern always should be to maintain the role, responsibility and involvement of each and every board member in strategic visioning and planning and in the decision-making that will protect, support and, ultimately, advance the mission. 


© Trident Communications Group, 2006-2009
LOGO: Trident Communications Group
 
Trident Communications Group is a full-service consultancy providing a complete range of organizational advancement counsel and direct services to nonprofit organizations throughout New England and the northeast region. We are skilled, experienced professionals consulting in fund raising and donor relations, governance management, public relations, special events management and marketing communications --- focused on your organization's strategic interests.

Trident Communications Group's mission is to help organizations, large and small, to build and communicate with constituencies -- to manage the relationship with them, to earn and sustain loyalties, to encourage, promote and steward their philanthropic support, and to achieve the goal of successful competition in today's challenging, nonprofit marketplace.



RJM-h&s


Raymond J. Mitchell
President & Principal Counsel




Trident Communications Group
56 Augusta Way, Dover, New Hampshire  03820
603-749-6547 [voice]  ·  603-749-6548 [FAX]
www.tridentcg.com  ·  inquire@tridentcg.com


Advancement Perspectives                                      Summer  2009

The featured subject matter in this issue of Advancement Perspectives was previously covered and discussed by Trident Communications Group on paper and online. It has been edited and expanded for republication and presentation here in response to today's business environment and to current levels of reader interest in the subject matter.

Advancement Perspectives
is published as a service by Trident Communications Group, 56 Augusta Way, Dover, NH  03820. All rights reserved. This material may not be republished, copied or distributed without the written permission of the publisher. When cited in text, proper and full attribution must be given to the publisher.



© Trident Communications Group, 2006-2009
E-Mail Security & Your Privacy

, we would like to continue sending Advancement Perspectives to you. If your e-mail inbox is protected by spam filters, please take a moment right now to add our address, inquire@tridentcg.com, to your e-mail address book or your spam software or mail system's safe-sender list. Adding our address will help ensure that you receive this e-newsletter and that your e-mail software displays the HTML content and images properly.

TCG fully respects your privacy. We will not, under any circumstances, reveal, trade or distribute your e-mail address or other contact information to any other individual or organization.

Thank you for your interest!

IN THIS ISSUE
Introduction: A Time to Get Back to Basics
Needed on Your Board: "Movers and Shakers"
Q&A: Nonprofit Boards




Subscriptions





Advancing Words,
Advancing Thought
________________


"Nearly all men can
stand adversity, but
if you want to test
a man's character,
give him power."



Abraham Lincoln
(1809 - 1865)





Reading & Reference


Blogs, Boards & Newsletters

The Agitator
www.theagitator.net

Philanthropy Today
(Daily Update Service of
The Chronicle of Philanthropy)
www.philanthropy.com/news

Tactical Philanthropy
www.tacticalphilanthropy.com

Online Media Daily & MediaPost
(MediaPost Communications)
www.mediapost.com

MarketingProfs Today
www.marketingprofs.com



Suggested Reference Books

The Board Member's Book:
Making a Difference in
Voluntary Organizations

by Brian O'Connell
(The Foundation Center)

Governance as Leadership:
Reframing the Work
of Nonprofit Boards

by Richard P. Chait, William P. Ryan and Barbara E. Taylor
(John Wiley & Sons)

Getting the Best from Your Board:
An Executive's Guide
to a Successful Partnership

by Sherrill K. Williams and
Kathleen A. McGinnis
(BoardSource)

The Fundraising Habits of Supremely Successful Boards
by Jerold Panas
(Emerson & Church Publishers)

Fundraising Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards
by James M. Greenfield
(BoardSource)