Why hybrid PACs Matter
By Dan Backer, Principal Attorney of DB Capitol Strategies
Excerpted below, CLICK HERE for the full article
"The reigning narrative is of Super PACs dominating the 2012 elections. But elections are finite moments in time, before and after which the ongoing battle to shape policy continues. The story we may not hear until 2013 is the quiet emergence of Hybrid PACs as a tool of political operators who understand the difference between winning elections and winning policy.
Policy professionals know successful advocacy as a "3-legged stool" that requires three elements: (1) professional advocacy, (2) grassroots and grasstops advocacy, and (3) PAC money.
. . .
All three legs are essential to an effective lobbying strategy that achieves results. Bumping headlong into that dynamic of effective advocacy is the dichotomy of PACs.
Many practitioners still think of PACs in terms of "Connected PACs"-those affiliated and controlled by corporate, union, or association sponsors-and "Non-connected PACs," essentially grassroots organizations.
. . .
There is, however, a more practical division, often lost on lawyers, between policy-oriented PACs and electorally-oriented PACs.
. . .
Hybrid PACs offer the best of both worlds: Hard dollars to advance specific policy initiatives the way "traditional", pre-Carey PACs have long done, and soft dollars to underwrite operations, hire advocacy-oriented staff, and support grassroots and grasstops advocacy-the other legs of the three-legged stool.
. . .
Hybrid PACs are the next rung on the evolutionary ladder of advocacy; they aren't just a legal creation but a practical, operational tool. Sophisticated political operators will see and seize the opportunity."
For the full article, CLICK HERE to visit Campaigns & Elections Magazine