Ozark Waters 
Volume IV, Issue 51December 20, 2010
In This Issue
Check Out Our Archive
Feature Article: A Winter Night on the River

Missed an issue of  Ozark Waters?

 

Visit the Ozarks Water Watch website to find archives of all our newsletters.

www.ozarkswaterwatch.org

 

 

 

Want to join a Watershed Group? Click on the site you want to join...


James River Basin Partnership

http://www.jamesriverbasin.com

 

Kings River Watershed

http://www.kingsriverwatershed.

org/about_us.html

 

Illinois River Watershed Ptshp

http://www.irwp.org/

 

Elk River Watershed

http://www.erwia.org/

 

Friends of the North Fork and White River

www.friendsoftherivers.org

 

Save the Illinois River

www.illinoisriver.org

 

 

 

  

 

Join Our Mailing List!

 

 

Comments or Questions?

 

 

Tis the Season...

to wonder at the beauty of nature as we celebrate the birth of a very special baby. He has entrusted the earth to us to take care of. Our mission is to do our part in taking care of the waters of the Ozarks.

 

Many find it easier to feel connected to God in the stillness of the forest or floating down a quiet stream.

 

Whatever your family traditions are, hopefully you will find some of that quiet  time to reflect on all that has been given to us.

 

May the peace & joy of the season be with you.

From the staff at Ozarks Water Watch,

 

Merry Christmas!

Upcoming Events

Click on the Event Title to go to the event webpage.

 


 

Send us your upcoming water quality-related events! 

Watershed Management Plans  

 

David Casaletto

 

Having a good plan is always the key to achieving success. A plan is the roadmap that keeps you on course heading for the objective. That is why EPA and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources requires a Watershed Management Plan (WMP) before a Section 319 nonpoint source implementation grant application will be considered. A WMP aims to outline goals and actions to protect and improve water quality in a certain focus area. This is done by identifying pollutant sources, identifying better management practices to be implemented on the land (watershed), setting reachable goals and developing a timeline for implementation of projects to reach those goals.

 

Our partner organization, Table Rock Lake Water Quality, has already administered two WMPs for the Lower James and the James River arm of Table Rock Lake. They are currently  in the process of holding stakeholder meetings to produce a WMP for Table Rock Lake and will begin work on a Lake Taneycomo WMP in July 2011. 

 The watershed management plans for Table Rock Lake and Lake Taneycomo will increase the success of future projects, determine where efforts and funding should be focused, assist all water quality organizations and municipalities in water quality protection efforts, and provide insight for creation of more efficient public awareness and education on water quality protection.  

 

The watershed management planning process includes stakeholders or citizens from all walks of life that live and/or work in the local area. Meetings are held to address water quality problems and list possible solutions to those problems that are not only practical, but also realistic to community settings and expectations. The discussion at these citizen meetings as well as water quality data and information is then drafted into a management plan for the watershed that will help guide future projects. The watershed management planning process is therefore a community driven planning process on how to best protect water quality in our area for all to enjoy. 

 

Watershed Management Plan Meeting in Kimberling City

 

To be accepted by MDNR, a WMP must include the following 9 critical elements:

1. Identify the causes and sources or groups of similar sources that will need to be controlled to achieve the load reductions estimated in this watershed-based plan (and to achieve any other watershed goals identified in the watershed-based plan), as discussed in item (b). Identify the sources that need to be controlled at the significant subcategory level with estimates of the extent to which they are present in the watershed (e.g., X number of dairy cattle feedlots needing upgrading, including a rough estimate of the number of cattle per facility; Y acres of row crops needing improved nutrient management or sediment control; or Z linear miles of eroded streambank needing remediation).

2. An estimate of the load reductions expected for the management measures described under paragraph (c) below (recognizing the natural variability and the difficulty in precisely predicting the performance of management measures over time). Estimates should be provided at the same level as in item (a) above (e.g., the total load reduction expected for dairy cattle feedlots; row crops; or eroded streambanks).

 

3. A description of the NPS management measures that will need to be implemented to achieve the load reductions estimated under paragraph (b) above (as well as to achieve other watershed goals identified in this watershed-based plan), and an identification (using a map or a description) of the critical areas in which those measures will be needed to implement this plan.

4. An estimate of the amounts of technical and financial assistance needed, associated costs, and/or the sources and authorities that will be relied upon, to implement this plan. As sources of funding, state should consider the use of their Section 319 programs, State Revolving Funds, USDA's Environmental Quality Incentives Program and Conservation Reserve Program, and other relevant Federal, State, local and private funds that may be available to assist in implementing this plan.

5. An information/education component that will be used to enhance public understanding of the project and encourage their early and continued participation in selecting, designing, and implementing the NPS management measures that will be implemented.

6. A schedule for implementing the NPS management measures identified in this plan that is reasonably expeditious.

7. A description of interim, measurable milestones for determining whether NPS management measures or other control actions are being implemented.

8. A set of criteria that can be used to determine whether loading reductions are being achieved over time and substantial progress is being made towards attaining water quality standards and, if not, the criteria for determining whether this watershed-based plan needs to be revised or, if a NPS TMDL has been established, whether the NPS TMDL needs to be revised.

9. A monitoring component to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation efforts over time, measured against the criteria established under item (h).


Read more on watershed management plans from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources and find the completed WMPs at: http://www.trlwq.org/index_files/WatershedPlans.htm

 

 

 Quote of the Week

 To waste, to destroy our natural resources, to skin and exhaust the land instead of using it so as to increase its usefulness, will result in undermining in the days of our children the very prosperity which we ought by right to hand down to them amplified and developed. 

 

 ~Theodore Roosevelt, seventh annual message, 3 December 1907

 

Current News Articles

Water-driven power plant has been producing clean energy for more than a century

 

The Kansas City Star, 12-11-2010

 

How does old become new? One answer can be found here on the edge of the Kansas River.

That's where the national drive to create renewable energy meets a 105-year-old hydroelectric plant that produces 2.3 megawatts of clean power.

Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2010/12/11/2514007/water-driven-power-plant-has-been.html#ixzz18gbPnz33


Springfield City Council rejects ban on coal tar-based sealant

 

News-Leader.com, December 14, 2010

 

The Springfield City Council on Monday voted down a resolution calling for the increased study and partial prohibition of coal tar-based asphalt sealants.

 

Councilmembers voted 5-3 against the resolution, which would have formalized a ban on using the substance on city property, called for testing of local waterways and urged increased monitoring by state and federal authorities. To read more...

 

http://www.news-leader.com/article/20101214/NEWS01/12140351/1007/Springfield-City-Council-rejects-ban-on-coal-tar-based-sealant

New face leads DNR

 

LakeNewsOnline.com, December 15, 2010

 

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources has a new director. Gov. Jay Nixon announced the appointment of Sara Parker Pauley, of Hartsburg, to lead the state agency responsible for maintaining air, land and water quality standards.  For more...

 

http://www.lakenewsonline.com/news/government/x1922000673/New-face-leads-DNR

Contact Info
OZARKS WATER WATCH

David Casaletto, President
(417) 739-4100

contact@ozarkswaterwatch.org