Truck with Mountain

The Need for Privity of Contract 

By John Anderson


John Anderson
John Anderson

A broker asks: If a broker tenders a shipment to a carrier and the carrier subcontracts the shipment to another trucker, how much information does the broker need to obtain regarding the subcontracted trucker?

 

Response: A broker needs to have privity of contract with its carrier, which it obtains by having a written Broker-Carrier Contract.  However, a broker and its carrier's subcontractor do not have a contractual relationship and are not in privity. This means that the broker cannot go after the subcontractor for breach of contract if and when something goes wrong.  Rather than searching for some other recourse against the subcontractor, the broker can look directly to its carrier if the Broker-Carrier Contract prohibits the carrier from "brokering" and subcontracting. The broker will have a breach of contract claim against the carrier since there is privity of contract between them.

 

However, the question suggests that the broker knows that its carrier uses subcontractors. I recommend that you not allow this, but if you do, then your Broker-Carrier Contract needs to state that if the carrier uses subcontractors, the subcontractors must meet certain specified requirements.  The contract needs to spell out in detail the requirements each subcontractor must meet. Further, the Broker-Carrier Contract needs to make it clear that even if the carrier uses a subcontractor the carrier remains fully responsible and liable for the shipment under the terms of the Contract. If something goes wrong, you need to be able to look to the carrier you have a contract with, that is, with whom you are in privity. An even better solution would be for the broker to enter into a direct contractual relationship with the subcontractor and avoid the three party relationship altogether (i.e., broker-carrier-subcontractor), so that the subcontractor becomes the broker's carrier.

 

(Note: Although the question and response were from the perspective of a broker, the same situation would apply to a shipper hiring a carrier. In that case, the Shipper-Carrier Contract should prohibit "brokering" and subcontracting.)


John Anderson - Email John

Small Claims Court: You Won! Now What?
By Kevin Anderson

Kevin Anderson
Kevin Anderson

Question: We successfully go through small claims with some of our customers. What is the best way to handle or move forward to collect the judgment?

 

Response: Filing a lawsuit to collect a debt and winning in court gets you a piece of paper called a judgment. The judgment states the amount the judgment debtor owes you, but does not require the judgment debtor to automatically pay you.  If the judgment debtor has no money, no job, and no other assets, you probably will not be able to collect anything; the debtor is referred to as judgment proof.  So, before you start any lawsuit you need to satisfy yourself that you will be able to collect the judgment. It is not uncommon for judgments to be uncollectible, in which case you are out not only the original debt but also your time and expense in obtaining the worthless judgment.

 

Once you have a judgment, you should contact the judgment debtor and ask for payment. Many judgment debtors will pay. Others will need or want to make payments, which you should agree to if the judgment debtor is being honest and forthright. Any payment agreement should be in writing signed by the judgment debtor and provide that if the judgment debtor fails to follow through as agreed that you can pursue all of your rights to enforce the judgment.

 

If the judgment debtor refuses to pay the judgment, then the law gives you several tools to obtain payment. Unfortunately, you likely will find these tools more difficult to use than filing the lawsuit and getting the judgment.

 

1)      Writ of Garnishment.  If you know a third party that owes the judgment debtor money, such as an employer or business that the judgment debtor provides services for as a contractor; or if you know a third party that is holding the judgment debtors' funds, such as a bank, then you can issue a Writ of Garnishment to that third party demanding that they turn the money (to the extent of the judgment) over to you. Certain limitations apply to the garnishment of wages. You can file as many Writs of Garnishment as are necessary to collect the debt, however, each writ requires the payment of a fee to the third party.

 

2)      Writ of Execution.  A Writ of Execution is used when you want the sheriff to seize and sell property owned by and in the possession of the judgment debtor. A Writ of Execution is more complicated than a Writ of Garnishment since you need to involve the sheriff who will likely require you to post a bond.

 

3)      Judgment Debtor Examination.  If you have no idea if or where the judgment debtor has assets, you can schedule a judgment debtor examination.  The judgment debtor is required to appear in court and answer your questions under oath. The judgment debtor examination is your opportunity to ask the judgment debtor about his job, assets, property and anything else which may lead to the discovery of assets from which to collect your judgment. Failure to appear by a judgment debtor constitutes contempt of court.  This method can be effective, but time consuming, to determine what assets the judgment debtor has.

 

4)      Lien on Real Estate.  In Oregon, if your judgment is for $3000 or more, excluding interest, costs and prevailing party fees, your small claims court judgment automatically becomes a lien in the county where issued. If your judgment is for more than $10 but less than $3000 (with the same exclusions stated above), you have to go to the court and pay an additional fee to have the judgment become a lien. This should always be done since a judgment debtor will not be able to sell (and possibly buy) real property as long as there is a judgment lien in place.

 

If you know or suspect the judgment debtor owns real property in another county in Oregon, you can obtain a certified copy of your judgment and pay a fee to have it recorded in that other county. You should do this in each county where you know or have reason to believe the judgment debtor owns real property.

 

Further, you can register your judgment in another state, although the procedure can prove difficult depending on the state.

 

5)      Life of a Judgment: 10 + 10.  A judgment in Oregon is good for 10 years, but can be renewed for an additional 10 years if renewed before it expires. This means that a judgment can remain a lien and be subject to enforcement for a total of 20 years. So, although the judgment debtor may have nothing now, the judgment can be kept alive and enforced for up to 20 years.

 

As stated, enforcing your judgment can be more time consuming, confusing and difficult than obtaining the judgment in the first place. Your first step should be to talk to the clerk of the small claims court and find out what assistance and forms the court provides. This will vary from county to county, but it is the best place to start. The clerk likely will tell you to either go to a legal forms distributor (e.g., Stevens-Ness in Portland) to obtain forms or to contact your lawyer for assistance. 


Kevin Anderson - Email Kevin

Cargo Insurance Filings to be Eliminated
By Andrew Schlegel

 

Andrew Schlegel
Andrew Schlegel

On March 21, 2011, FMCSA cargo insurance filings by common carriers and freight forwarders (excluding household goods common carriers and freight forwarders) will no longer be required, and all certificates then on file will become null and void. This change was made months ago, effective next month. This is unfortunate.

 

The FMCSA should have expanded the rule by requiring  all  common and contract carriers and freight forwarders to maintain cargo insurance and make filings. The availability of that information on line was a quick and easy way to confirm coverage. Further, the insurance could not be cancelled without giving the FMCSA 30 days notice, and was not cancelled unless and until the insurance company filed a termination notice. Thus, these filings could be relied upon for at least a certain period of time, unlike a Certificate of Insurance issued by an insurance company which only tells you that the insurance was in effect on the date the Certificate was issued. (You cannot rely upon the notice requirement on the Certificate-it gives the Certificate holder no rights!)


Andrew Schlegel - Email Andy
The information presented in this communication should not be construed to be formal legal advice
nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.