Truck with Mountain
Now that summer is over - and what a strange summer it was weather-wise - I trust everyone is getting back into the work and school routine. I also hope that our glacially moving economic recovery will experience its own global warming and heat up.
 
In this issue I want to respond to a question that was submitted in response to our last newsletter concerning carrier-prepared vs. shipper-prepared bills of lading and who is required to issue the bill of lading.  Andy addresses the lack of a federal Estate Tax this year, and Kevin encourages everyone to attend the OTA Safety Management Council meeting coming up on September 30.

In our next issue we will be addressing questions raised regarding a broker's use of  carriers with less than  "satisfactory" safety ratings and how the changes to the safety ratings contained in CSA 2010 will affect your contracts.


Please keep your questions coming since they will drive the newsletter. We want to focus primarily on your concerns and not just on what we, as lawyers sitting in our offices, think is important. To submit a question simply reply to this email.
Carrier-Prepared vs. Shipper-Prepared Bills of Lading
By John Anderson

John Anderson
John Anderson
Is a carrier required to issue a bill of lading? No, which I am sure is a surprise to many of you. Courts have held that "nothing in the Carmack Amendment [49 USC 14706(a)(1)] requires a carrier to issue a bill of lading."  The U.S. District Court in Massachusetts stated this just last month. This is indeed surprising since the Carmack Amendment states that a carrier "shall issue a receipt or bill of lading ..." and, in addition, 49 CFR 373.101 states that "[e]very motor common carrier shall issue a receipt or bill of lading ..." However, courts point out that the Carmack Amendment also states that "[f]ailure to issue a receipt or bill of lading does not affect the liability of a carrier."
 
What happens if a no one issues a bill of lading? The Carmack Amendment will determine the liabilities. This would mean that the carrier is giving up its right to limit its liability and incorporate the terms of it rules tariff. Carriers need to avoid this. Carriers need to have their own bill of lading which sets out on its face the limits of its liability (which itself must be done in a specific way) and incorporates its rules tariff, which also sets out the limits of liability and other critical terms and conditions applicable to the service provided.
 
Are Shipper-Prepared Bills of Lading Valid?  Maybe. The bill of lading serves three purposes, it is the basic contract of carriage, it is a receipt, and it is evidence of the party entitled to delivery. If the only document that exists concerning a shipment is a shipper-prepared bill of lading, then it is the contract of carriage once the carrier's driver signs it. Again, carriers should avoid this situation.  Shippers also need to be careful about their own bills of lading. Frequently shipper-prepared bills of lading unwittingly incorporate carriers' tariffs that limit the shipper's recovery, a rude awakening for the shipper.  Shippers cannot argue mistake since they drafted the bill of lading.
 
What should a carrier do?  Carriers need to do several things: (1) prepare their own bill of lading that incorporates its rules tariff, and know what it says; (2) prepare a rules tariff  that sets forth all of the terms and conditions of service and specifically states that all service is provided under and pursuant to the carrier's bill of lading and tariff, that its drivers have no authority to change any terms and conditions, and that the driver's signature serves as a receipt only; (3) make every effort to issue its own bill of lading on each shipment and have it signed by the shipper; (4) educate its customers about the terms and conditions of the service provided; and (5) consider the use of  "pro stickers" when a shipper-prepared bill of lading is used. The larger LTL carriers routinely use pro stickers that are placed on shipper-prepared bills of lading by their drivers and  state that service is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in its own rules tariff, which is incorporated. There is nothing stopping TL carriers from adopting this procedure.
 
These issues can be avoided altogether by carriers and shippers entering into a comprehensive written transportation contract which sets out the mutually agreed upon terms and conditions and renders the bill of lading as a receipt only.

John Anderson - Email John
Estate Tax Update
By Andrew Schlegel

Andrew Schlegel
Andrew Schlegel
Lately, we've been fielding questions from our Estate Planning clients regarding the status of the Estate Tax in the year 2010 and beyond.  As the issue is applicable to all small business owners, I thought I would pass along a brief update on the situation as it currently stands. 
 
As I'm sure you have heard in the news by now, due to inaction by Congress the Estate Tax has lapsed in 2010.  Perhaps the most notable beneficiaries of this are members of the family of George Steinbrenner, who will save a reported $500 million due to the timing of Mr. Steinbrenner's death!  While there are fears that Congress could retroactively apply a new law to the estates of those who pass away in 2010, the longer Congress takes to act the less likely it is that any new tax would be retroactive.  Additionally, the Generation Skipping Tax does not exist in 2010.
 
However, as we know, when Congress is involved all good things must come to an end.  Due to the provisions of the 2001 bill that ended the Estate Tax in 2010, the Estate Tax will come roaring back in 2011 with a vengeance.  Unless action is taken by Congress, all estates with $1 million in assets will be subject to the Estate Tax (as opposed to $3.5 million in 2009) and the top tax rate will be 55% (as opposed to 45% in 2009).  While both Democrats and Republicans have stated their intention to pass a bill raising the minimum net worth required to be subject to the Estate Tax, neither side has put forward a bill that has garnered enough support to be passed.  If there is no action, many small businesses and their owners will be negatively affected.
 
While the future of the Estate Tax is uncertain, there are steps you can take to minimize the effect of any estate tax on your family and your business should the worst happen.  It is important to implement and review your Estate Plan with an attorney to determine how you can best address this confusing situation.


Andrew Schlegel - Email Andy
OTA Safety Management Council
By Kevin Anderson

Kevin Anderson
Kevin Anderson
As a member of the OTA Safety Management Council Board of Directors, I would like to invite you to our upcoming season of meetings.  The monthly lunch meetings of the OTA Safety Management Council provide a great opportunity to hear speakers present on current safety issues, exchange ideas with motor carrier safety professionals, and network.

The first meeting of the season will be on September 30 at the Holiday Inn in Wilsonville.  The meeting will feature a presentation by Mike Riffe on "Accidents: Learning from the Mistakes Made."  Mike is the Senior Safety Compliance Officer/Fatality investigator with OSHA. Mike has worked in safety and health for more than 24 years and speaks regularly in Oregon and Washington.

 
The cost is $25 for OTA members and $30 for non members and day of registrants. It includes lunch and certificates of participation are available upon request. Register by calling the OTA at (503) 513-0005 or online at www.ortrucking.org/events.htm.
 
I look forward to seeing you there!


Kevin Anderson - Email Kevin
The information presented in this communication should not be construed to be formal legal advice
nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.