Halloran Logo 
Labor & Employment Law Update 
 
Summer 2009 - Vol. 1, Issue 3
 
Dear Clients and Friends,
 
handshakeWe are happy to provide you with another edition of the Labor & Employment Law E-Newsletter.  We hope that you find it informative and useful.  Please use this information as a resource and we look forward to your feedback and questions. 
 
                                                                             Kevin J. Greene                    
                                                                             Chair, Labor & Employment Practice Group
Our Labor & Employment Team 

 greene  

 
 
Maura A. Droney, Associate
 
Stephen P. Fogerty, Partner 
 
 
 

Breastfeeding Promotion Act of 2009 (H.R. 2819) 
By: Maura A. Droney, Esq.
 
breastfeeding symbolIntroduced on June 11, 2009, the Breastfeeding Promotion Act of 2009 (H.R. 2819) would amend several federal statutes to provide additional protections for breastfeeding in the workplace. 
 
Read more
Our Newest Practice Group Member
 
contract magnifying glassMaura Droney, Associate Hartford Office
 
 
 
  • Focuses her practice in employment and labor disputes including the defense of wrongful termination, workplace discrimination and sexual harassment claims.
  • Handles general litigation including premises liability.
  • Interested in new issues and legislation affecting the operation and management of the workplace. 

Click here to read her full bio.

Non-Solicitation Agreement Missing Operative Language Causes Litigation Headache For Employer 
 
contract magnifying glassA recent Connecticut Appellate Court case underscores precisely why employers should ensure that their non-solicitation clauses comply with the requirements of Connecticut Law.
U.S. Supreme Court Makes It Clear That Employees Alleging Age Discrimination Must Prove That Age Bias Was Actual Cause of Adverse Job Action 
 By:  Kevin J. Greene, Esq.
 
age discriminationIn a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Clarence Thomas in the case of Gross v. FBL Financial Services, the United States Supreme Court clarified that the plain language of the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) requires that an employee affirmatively establish that age was the "but for" cause of the employer's adverse decision and not simply one motivating factor underlying the action taken by the employer.  
 
Read more
Favorable Verdict Obtained For International Water Utility Company 
 
Quick Links
Join Our Mailing List