Ecocities Emerging To support humanity's transition into the Ecozoic Era
|
Ecocity Builders May 2010
| |
|
|
Greetings,
Welcome to the May 2010
edition of Ecocities Emerging, an initiative of Ecocity Builders and the
International Ecocity Conference Series.
The contemporary degrowth movement can trace its roots back to the anti-industrialist trends of the 19th century developed in Great Britain by John Ruskin, in the United States by Henry David Thoreau and in Russia by Leo Tolstoy. Degrowth thinking surged again in the 1970s when the Club of Rome think tank commissioned MIT for a report on solutions to global problems. "The Limits to Growth", published in 1972, was the first major study underscoring the ecological perils of unprecedented economic growth.
"Degrowth" is now a very real phenomenon hitting many former factory and industrial strongholds. As the impacts of decades
worth of unchecked economic growth and related resource plundering,
overshoot and ecosystems collapse ramifications start to play out, many
cities are going through rapid changes they hadn't prepared for. Some
cities are shrinking.
"Degrowth" may also provide an opportunity if we are able to respond in time and with a clear vision and plan for how to "shrink for prosperity" using ecocity principles, to rebuild healthier and more planet friendly economic foundations as well as restore and rehabilitate natural systems that have been dug up, burned, cut down, torn up, polluted and paved over during the Age of Oil.
Degrowthing cities is
something of a very major necessity given that cities need to be reshaped to fit a diffuse, renewable energy future. With the sort of design layout and
features we promote in Ecocity Builders, we estimate renewable energy cities should be able to run on 1/10th the
energy and 1/5th the land of the average fossil fuel and car based city. Not that the
ecocity would pop forth immediately, but a shift in that direction, says
Jaime Lerner, architect (literally and metaphorically) of Curitiba Brazil's
famous remodel starting in 1972, can progress very substantially in as
few as two years.
With the infrastructure changes that results from
ecocity design and technologies -- (solar
and wind energy, bicycling and streetcars, organic local farming, etc.)
along with progressively improving lifestyles (bicycling and
recycling more and more while driving less and less) -- and in context with Lerner's statement "positive change is possible, we can do it", we would then be well down the path toward sustainability.
Sincerely,

Kirstin
Miller and Richard Register for Ecocity Builders 339
15th Street, Suite 208 Oakland
CA 94612 USA
www.ecocitybuilders.org
Read Richard's blog on degrowth for "The Broker" -- He met correspondents for the magazine at the Barcelona Second International Degrowth Conference earlier this spring and is now contributing a regular column for their publication.
 Keeper of the International Ecocity Conference Series

|
The
Ecozoic Era refers to a vision, first promoted by cosmologist Thomas
Berry, of an emerging epoch when humanity lives in a mutually enriching
relationship with the larger community of life on Earth.
Will
we be able to make the transition in time to retain a biosphere healthy
enough to regenerate living systems now under extreme stress? Our role in exploring ecocities is to clarify a vision of cities that can. And then go out and build them. There is
no way to be certain we will succeed, but our position is that there's no time to just sit
around and wonder about it: now is time for action.
Maybe one day all cities
will be ecocities.
|
|

Ecocities SETTING THE STANDARDS by Kirstin Miller and Sven Eberlein Summer 2010 issue of the GreenMoney Journal
Google the word "ecocity" and you'll get over a half million hits, ranging from "Ecocity Vehicles" to "Sex and the Ecocity." Ecocity is fast becoming a buzzword among urban greenies, both on- and offline. With climate change front and center in our public discourse, this sudden interest in urban planning and development comes as no surprise: Home to over half of the world's population on less than one percent of the earth's surface, cities consume over two-thirds of the world's energy and account for more than 70 percent of global CO2 emissions. There is growing consensus that the path to reversing climate change must lead through cities.
In many ways, this is a welcome acknowledgment of the tremendous role urban design can and must play in changing our wasteful ways and reducing our global carbon footprint. However, as with the terms "green" and "sustainable," the rising popularity and widespread use of "ecocity" has brought with it the need to define what it actually means and what it should be used for. Not unlike greenwashing, "ecocity" used as a feel-good word for any town with a bike lane or a recycling program can hurt the cause of building and reclaiming an integrated urban ecosystem more than it helps.
At what point then, does a city graduate from boasting a collection of "eco-scores" to becoming an actual ecocity? Fortunately, a lot of footwork (pun intended) has already been done in answering this question: from when Ecocity Builders President Richard Register first coining the term in 1979 to the current development of International Ecocity Standards, the ecocity model is a well-seasoned concept already being applied in cities around the world and is on its way to becoming a globally recognized metric. After twenty years of fine-tuning and eight international ecocity conferences, urban planners and governments worldwide are poised to submit their cities to an evaluation process comparable to the USGBC's LEED ratings system for buildings.
But let's back up just a bit...
What is an Ecocity?
"Eco" is derived from "Oikos," the ancient Greek equivalent of a household or family, in which everyone works together to create a functioning unit. Similarly, eco cities are conditional upon a healthy relationship of a city's parts and functions rather than just a laundry list of random "green features." While there are single categories such as transportation, buildings or industries that play important roles in defining a city, ecocities' complex living systems interact three-dimensionally and in relatively close proximity, not unlike our human bodies.
The key word here is proximity. If there is a single defining feature of a lean and functioning eco-city, it would be the ability of its residents to access basic goods and services by foot, bicycle or public transportation, preferably in that order. While a complete phase-out is not realistic at this point, the staggering environmental costs associated with the automobile (ranging from the extraction of raw materials to production, road building, disposal, petroleum depletion, and CO2 emissions) should keep driving at the very bottom of this inverted pyramid. Using the analogy of our human body, the automobile is like a 5000-calorie daily diet, a burden on the system that negatively impacts all other organs and our overall health; any serious attempt at establishing an ecocity must keep car-free, pedestrian designs at its core.
Read on
|
Earth Day 40th Anniversary Oil
Spill Disaster by Richard
Register I
sometimes write longish e-mails to share ideas about one thing or another. Our
ecocity perspectives are often not to be found elsewhere it seems, so here's
another view to an ongoing news story "exclusive" to this publication. In a
recent correspondence, the BP Gulf Oil Spill came up. I just responded with some
of my thoughts about who's responsible: Blame
- and what to do about it
"Some simple lessons (that people don't want to
look at) fall out of an honest inquiry. One such is that the single-family
house compared to the apartment is a major problem. More closely related than
most people would notice, another is that it is the automobile driver - not BP,
or Transocean, or Halliburton, or drilling in mile-deep water, or regulators,
or a particular piece of technology and so on - that is most responsible for
the environmental disasters like the current Gulf Oil Spill. People who are getting
more sophisticated about ecology recognize that there are chains of cause
and effect and networks of cross influence and they talk about and use whole
systems thinking as when organizing their businesses. But when they don't want
to hear or see something amazingly conspicuous in ecological terms they 'don't
go there.'
 Earth Day 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon drilling platform collapses into the Gulf of Mexico releasing a disastrous oil spill.
In other words it is a simple exercise to trace
back the cause of the current Earth Day Oil Disaster (happy 40th Birthday! -
April 22, 2010, that's when the flaming Deepwater Horizon drilling platform
tilted, toppled and sank to the bottom of the sea breaking the riser pipe and
setting off the oil spill).
If you trace the chain of causes back through the
explosion, the drilling companies, the refineries, pipelines and gasoline
trucks, gas stations and into your gas tank you find the original cause. And
why do we drive cars? They are part of the whole system called sprawl city and
if we don't use them we can get almost nothing done if we live in suburbia. But who is courageous enough to say, 'Hey! It
all starts with me forking over that money for the mortgage and for the car and
gasoline and paying taxes to pave the planet.' And it takes some work and
imagination to recognize that we can actually change the way the city is
designed and built, as well as use the car less and plan on moving into a
functional community where everything you need is close together enough that
you don't need to drive. Sensing too much work and discomfort - or at least
that's my guess about the personal dynamics involved - 'they don't go there.'
The subject never comes up. I've read dozens of articles and letters to the
editor now and not one has mentioned the real causes and where responsibility
resides. Interesting!"
One day later, after writing the above, one letter to
the editor did cross my reading list. It said, "Let's face it. We drive cars and we should all take some
responsibility. So the question becomes can we find a better energy source?" He
missed the whole topic of conservation and the fact that a few million people
in the US don't drive at all and so too for the vast majority of people in the
world. What if we design cities so we don't need to drive? That sounds really
obscure in the U.S. for example, but it lies at the beginning of the chain of causes and we'd get there if we
were committed and courageous enough to think ecologically.
It is our responsibility to design better. Sounds
far, far away, but in fact it is the physical foundation upon which we've built
our whole society. Can we change it? It's changing all the time and its not the
dogs and cats that are changing it. That must mean we are responsible and we do
change it irrespective of our attitude about whether we can. "The
solution to pollution is dilution"
Read On
|
Car Free Journey by Steve Atlas
 I want to recommend a new website devoted to
traveling by public transportation. This site is a great
resource for anyone who wants to drive less. The site includes articles about
the benefits of public transit, and even includes information about how to use
intercity buses, trains, and local buses, subways, trolleys and more. And spread the word! We need more
resources like David Waight's easy-to-read www.pubtrantravel.com! It's hard to believe that a year has gone by since I first
wrote my e-book, Car Free at the Beach. (For information about the book, visit http://carfreeamerica.com.) As I prepare
to update the book, I want to mention 3 new beach areas I have discovered. (I
hope to add more each year.) Most of us have heard about the Mississippi Gulf Coast
communities of Biloxi and Gulfport, and their casinos. But few people know that
these communities + the quaint community of Ocean Springs have a regional
airport in Biloxi (served by Air Tran), great Gulf beaches (be sure to check
before going there to be sure the oil spill has not affected the beaches and
the rest of the area), and Coast Transit that serves all 3 communities, the
beaches, casinos, and key attractions and shopping in the area. For more
information about visiting the Mississippi Gulf Coast by public transit, visit www.coasttransit.com, or call (228)
896-8080. Read on |
Join Ecocity Builders

Join us and help rebuild cities in balance with nature.
Ecocity Builders and our network of members -
- Pioneer ecological concepts in urban transportation, landscape design, policy, and planning
- Engage with communities, government, and industry leaders in designing thriving neighborhoods
- Convene movers and shakers in urban and regional planning and community building at our International Ecocity Conference
Ecocity Builders nurtures great visions for healthier cities - for people and nature alike - and provides practical tools for building them. We are a nonprofit organization, and donations are tax-deductible. All levels receive a subscription to the newsletter, special invitations to meetings and events, updates and more.
CLICK HERE TO JOIN Buy our books Take part in our active projects Volunteer

|
|
|
What We See: Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs A Book and Civic Engagement Project
 New Village Press and The Center for the Living City have teamed up to bring you the book What We See:
Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs, a collection of original
essays by leading thinkers that honors the late Jane Jacobs. Here are
fresh and timely ideas to springboard public dialog, community activism
and celebration of what's local. On the What We See website
you'll find news of forums led by the book's contributing authors,
guidelines for starting study circles or conducting informal
neighborhood (Jane's) walks, plus ideas for block parties, mapping
community assets, and many creative forms of community sharing.Contributing Authors:Janine
Benyus, Hillary Brown, Robert Cowan, David Crombie, Pierre
Desrochers, Samuli Leppälä, Matias Sendoa Echanove, Nan Ellin, Mindy Thompson Fullilove, Jan Gehl, Arlene Goldbard, Roberta Brandes Gratz, Ken Greenberg, Nabeel Hamdi, Chester Hartman, Sanford (Sandy) Ikeda, Allan Jacobs, Daniel Kemmis, Jaime
Lerner, Elizabeth Macdonald, Clare Cooper Marcus, Richard
Register Mary Rowe, Janette Sadik-Khan, Saskia Sassen, Ron
Shiffman, Robert Sirman, Rahul Srivastava, James Stockard, Ray Suarez, Deanne Taylor, Alexie M. Torres-Fleming, Susan Witt, Peter ZlonickyEdited
by Stephen Goldsmith and Lynne Elizabeth Foreword by Michael Sorkin
Link to the unedited full version of Richard Register's essay for What We See entitled "Jane Jacobs Basics".
 |
Ecocity Builders' News
Ecocity Dreamin' - June 24 Benefit Silent Art Auction + Opening for Richard Register Art Exhibition at SPUR. Proceeds to benefit Ecocity Builders' innovative projects.
June 24, 2010 6-9pm SPUR Urban Center 654 Mission St. San Francisco
Tickets - donations - online: www.regonline.com/ecocity_builders_benefit
"Re-imagining Center Street" Our Center Street Plaza project was recently endorsed with an overwhelming majority vote by the Berkeley City Council. The project is now in the final stages of schematic design. To further illustrate the vision of things to come, we are partnering with Earth Island Institute's "60 Boxes" project to decorate utility boxes in the downtown. Our contribution is "Re-imagining Center Street". We will help decorate two Center Street utility boxes with images and ideas that evoke the design and intent of the Center Street Plaza project. Oakland based artist Letitia Ntofon will create the art for the mural.
Towards a Just Metropolis
|
"The problem is
the present design of cities only a few stories high, stretching
outward in unwieldy sprawl
for miles. As a result of their sprawl, they literally transform
the earth, turn farms into parking lots and waste enormous amounts
of time and energy transporting people, goods and services over
their expanses. My solution is urban implosion rather than explosion." -Paolo
Soleri
www.arcosanti.org
|


This Side of Paradise Discovering Why the Human Mind Needs Nature By Eric Jaffe APS Observer - Journal for the Association for Psychological Science, May-June Edition
Today, Central Park seems as essential to Manhattan as the Empire
State Building, the Statue of Liberty, or Woody Allen. But when the
street grid for the island was first mapped out in 1811, no plans were
made for the 843-acre green sanctuary at its center. The commissioners
in charge of designing the city set aside remarkably few parcels of
parkland. They didn't think the residents would need it. After all,
they reasoned, the Hudson and East rivers that flank Manhattan render
the island "in regard to health and pleasure ... peculiarly felicitous."
A few brave souls - we'll call them "brave," though other
descriptors come to mind - find recreation in these waters today. The
rest of us are fortunate that the city reconsidered, and that the man
who designed Central Park had an understanding, far ahead of his time,
of nature's psychological impact. "It is a scientific fact," wrote
Frederick Law Olmsted in 1865, seven years after his plan for the park
was chosen, "that the occasional contemplation of natural scenes of an
impressive character ... is favorable to the health and vigor of men"
(Hartig, 2007).
As awareness of humanity's relationship with the environment has
increased in the past few decades - buoyed of late by the larger popular
concern about climate change - so has empirical evidence for nature's
psychological benefits. Back in 1865, Olmsted thought exposure to
natural environments would prevent a "softening of the brain,"
"irascibility," and "melancholy." Nearly 150 years later, scientists
now know that nature has a remarkable ability to restore attention,
that it soothes aggression, and that it may even ease mild depression.
Reinvigorating the Brain through A.R.T. The most significant understanding of nature's salutary effect on the
human mind has come through studies of attention. The foundation of
this work is the attention restoration theory, or A.R.T., set forth by
APS Fellow Stephen Kaplan of the University of Michigan. The theory
originated in the 1980s, says Kaplan, when he, APS Fellow Rachel Kaplan,
and some of their students noticed that people had an astounding
preference for scenes depicting natural environments. Kaplan and his
collaborators soon discovered there was much more to nature than just a
pretty face - they found that exposure to these scenes had a profound
restorative effect on the brain's ability to focus.
The tenets of A.R.T were established in a 1995 paper by Kaplan.
Briefly put, a person can engage in two types of attention: involuntary
and voluntary. Involuntary attention is a rather effortless form of
engagement with the world. Voluntary (or directed) attention, in
contrast, requires a good deal of focus and energy - it plays a central
role in problem solving, for instance - and is therefore susceptible
to fatigue. Voluntary attention can be restored through sleep, but it
can also be restored during waking hours when a person's involuntary
attention becomes highly engaged, essentially giving direct attention a
breather. Kaplan and his collaborators found that nature is especially
conducive to our involuntary engagement.
Nature's ability to restore human attention has since been supported
by a wide range of psychological studies. In a study coauthored by
Kaplan and led by Marc Berman, for instance, the researchers compared
the restorative effects of natural environments with those of the city
(Berman, Jonides, & Kaplan, 2008). In one trial, 38 study
participants were given the "backwards digit-span task" - an
established test of voluntary attention. The participants then performed
a task that fatigued their voluntary attention and were randomly
assigned to walk through either downtown Ann Arbor or the city's
arboretum, a substantial haven of trees and wide lawns. Afterwards, the
participants took the backwards digit-span task again. Sure enough,
the scores were significantly higher after the walks through the
arboretum, as the researchers reported in Psychological Science.
"The way I think of it is that our ancestors evolved in a
nature-filled environment," says Kaplan. "[Such places] should
feel more comfortable, more relaxed, more like home. It's not a big
leap between that and being more competent, less distracted."
Read on
|

SAVE THE DATE! August 22-26, 2011 Palais des congrès de Montréal, Canada
Hosted by Urban Ecology Montréal, Ecocity World
Summit 2011 will build on work of past
Ecocity World Summits while adding new conference themes, participatory
methods, and projects that will last beyond the life of the conference.
Detailed conference content and design will be developed in
collaboration with local and international partners, making sure that
the particular urban ecological expertise of Montréal is highlighted.
Website
|
|
|
Principal Features of an Ecocity http://www.ecocityprojects.net/
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|