Ecocities Emerging
To support humanity's transition into the Ecozoic Era



March 2009
  ecocities.emerging                                       

Greetings,


Welcome to the March 2009 edition of Ecocities Emerging, an initiative of Ecocity Builders and the International Ecocity Conference Series.

With the election of Barack Obama the United States of America turned a page in its history book and started a new chapter tentatively entitled "Change We Need." Fed up with the neocons and thrilled by a new, exciting leader in Obama, Americans called for a saner, healthier world. The world agreed.  

So far the new world dawning isn't evoking the same warm feelings of the "Yes We Can" speeches. The glow from the Obama-world courtship is already fading as blowback from decades of bad planning, overconsumption, greed and carelessness rolls out in every news outlet, in every country, every day, one crisis after another. Against the odds we now face, including climate change that is crippling our planetary life support systems, enacting deliberate change, change for the common good of people and planet, is difficult, messy and frustrating. But at least everyone now agrees that the consequences of not acting are decidedly even worse.

At this time, communities of plants and animals of all varieties and many communities of human beings are either endangered and on their way out, hurting badly, in trouble or decidedly uncomfortable. In that painful space, where every day in the USA thousands are locked out of their own homes, a new door is being pried open, creating an opportunity for systemic change made possible by that upheaval. At every level - individual, neighborhood, city, region, state, country, continent, watershed, ocean, bioregion, planet, atmosphere - change is happening. It's up to us whether or not this change will, through our most dedicated efforts, be shaped and directed to become the change we need.

As we build, so shall we live.

 signature
Kirstin Miller, Ecocity Builders
Oakland, California, March 2009
ecocitybuilders.org

chinacityplayground


The Ecozoic Era refers to a vision, first promoted by cosmologist Thomas Berry, of an emerging epoch when humanity lives in a mutually enriching relationship with the larger community of life on Earth.

Will we be able to make the transition in time to retain a biosphere healthy enough to regenerate living systems now under extreme stress? Our role in exploring ecocities is to clarify a vision of cities that can. And then go out and build them. There is no way to be certain we will succeed, but our position is that there's no time to just sit around and wonder about it: now is time for action.


Thank you for all that you are doing to help accelerate progress toward a civilization in balance with living systems.

Maybe one day all cities will be ecocities.


Three Signs of the Times
A New Ghost Town, Thomas Friedman's One-Half Epiphany and Japan's Eco-Model Cities Program


by Richard Register, President, Ecocity Builders

Mid March already, 2009, as the economy continues to "contract" around the world. People are catching on to ecocity ideas, or at least getting closer to confronting them in many places. Will the pieces come together before we run out of money and slide far enough beyond Peak Oil to have lost the opportunity for ecologically healthy rebuilding before economic and cultural collapse? That I don't pretend to know, but three "signs of the times" pop out at me in the last few days that should not go without comment.
sidewalk.ends.jpg
The first sign was a visceral experience, like being hit in the stomach, actually: a visit to the hospice bedside of a suburban cancer (out of control growth) victim - Hearth and Home at Liberty, just outside of Rio Vista, California. It was to be a 558-unit development built by Shea Homes. It was barely started, then frozen in time and space as the weeds began to grow up. Still growing. Is it symptomatic of the beginning of the end of suburbia? Will it be completely overgrown as the few buildings molder away in the pattern depicted in "The World Without Us" by Alan Weisman? More to the moment, are we seeing prosperity murdered by automania?

Sign number two is Tom Friedman getting it right that this likely Second Great Depression is maybe even more fundamentally a turn around for resources exploitation, not another temporary down-swing of the graph charting the growth of consumption world-wide. Who are those economists who tell us the chart will pop up and fly right in 2010 or 2011? The same surprised by the "downturn" in the first place? Instead, suggests Friedman, the charts may take us in a completely new direction dictated by arriving at our limits to growth on a finite planet. Good going Tom! But then, as usual, he too misses the biggest player of all in this suicide tempting planet roulette: cities. What do they have to do with it? He, the climate scientists and almost everyone else including the ecologists - who using their own methods of analysis should know better - don't make the connection. But I like to think, maybe they are about to make the connection. We in Ecocity Builders try to tell them. Will they listen this time?

And third, the Japanese are calling for "Eco-Model Cities" and a whole systems approach to cities which is absolutely necessary and a big step. But are they noticing what could give them the answers? Guess, then read.

read on
 


TOWARD AN AGREEMENT IN COPENHAGEN
Negotiations on a new deal for global cooperation on climate change

March will feature the first round of negotiations this year toward a new global climate change agreement. Representatives of the 192 members of the UN Climate Change Convention will meet in Bonn, Germany starting on 29 March to begin the work on drafting a negotiating text for the new agreement.


pachauri

The following is a speech by Mr Rajendra Pachauri, IPCC Chairman, at the Opening Ceremony of the UNFCCC COP 14, Poznán, December 2008

Honorable Prime Ministers, Excellencies, Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen,

I'm here to submit that there is a wealth of information in the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, a large part of which has still not received adequate attention and precise understanding. Hence, impacts of climate change are still seen as distant and undefined. But science has given us precise answers and robust conclusions.

May I in this context inform you of the unique nature of the IPCC. The Panel mobilizes thousands of the best scientists in the world for its assessment of various aspects of climate change. This work is carried out with complete transparency and objectivity in all the procedures followed and peer reviews carried out at each stage of the process by experts as well as governments; the approval and acceptance of the Summary for Policymakers involves all the governments, which gives them direct participation in the process and a full sense of ownership in the work of the IPCC.

From the Fourth Assessment Report we now know the serious impacts of climate change, which would accrue as a result of inaction. We also know the nature of their worldwide implications.

Some examples of these impacts are:

- The number of people living in severely stressed river basins would go up from 1.4 to 1.6 billion in 1995 to 4.3 to 6.9 billion in 2050.

- Roughly 20-30% of species assessed are likely to be at increasingly high risk of extinction as global mean temperatures exceed 2°-3° above pre-industrial levels. We are getting close to that range.

- Abrupt and irreversible change are possible, such as collapse of the Greenland or West Antarctic ice sheets, which can lead to Sea Level Rise of several meters. For Greenland, the temperature threshold for breakdown is estimated to be about 1.1° to 3.8° C above today's global average temperature. Again we are close to that range too.

- Climate change currently contributes to the global burden of disease and premature deaths. Adverse health impacts will be greatest in low income countries.

- Smallholder and subsistence farmers, who are generally dependent on rainfed agriculture, pastoralists and artisan fisherfolk are likely to suffer complex, localized impacts of climate change.

- Small islands, whether located in the tropics or higher latitudes, have characteristics which make them especially vulnerable to the effects of climate change, sea level rise and extreme events.

- In some countries of Africa, yields from rainfed agriculture could be reduced by 50% by 2020. At the local level many people are likely to suffer additional losses to their livelihoods when climate change and variability occur together with other stresses, such as conflict.

- If current warming rates are maintained, Himalayan glaciers could decay at very rapid rates. Decline in river flows as a result could affect 500 million people in South Asia and 250 millions in China.

The differential nature of climate change impacts and the existence of other stresses leave the poor of the world particularly vulnerable. The ethical aspects of this reality need to be accepted in devising the implementing mitigation actions.

Our collective record of mitigation of GHG emissions has not been very inspiring. Global greenhouse gas emissions have grown, of course, since pre-industrial times, but there has been an increase of 70% between 1970 and 2004. Hence, the record of global action at mitigation has been very weak, even though the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was agreed on in 1992. This record goes against the spirit and intent of the UNFCCC.

Mitigation of emissions of GHGs has various merits and is in itself desirable and feasible in several respects.

If global mean temperature increase is to be stabilized between 2.0-2.4°C, then CO2 emissions must peak by 2015. The cost of such a stringent path of stabilization of the earth's climate would be very modest, if at all a cost would be incurred. For instance, for this trajectory the cost to the global economy would at most be less than 3% of the global GDP in 2030. In fact there are so many co-benefits from such action that if these were to be fully accounted for then these might actually result in a negative cost, or a net increase in economic output and economic welfare.

Large co-benefits of mitigation would include health benefits on account of lower air pollution at the local level, higher energy security, higher yields in agriculture, and greater employment opportunities. The record of those countries that have proactively pursued greater use of renewable energy major improvements in energy efficiency have been able to increase employment in the economy.

But even the trajectory of stabilisation described above would leave some serious problems in the nature of impacts of climate change. We would need to consider whether the effort to limit increase in global mean temperature to about 2 degrees C would be adequate because sea level rise due to thermal expansion alone with this trajectory would be between 0.4 to1.4 meters. Add to this the melting of ice bodies, and we would have serious effects of sea level rise on low lying coastal areas and small islands.

My plea to this august body would be to please listen to and reflect on the voice of science, and please act with determination and a sense of urgency. We in the IPCC do not prescribe any specific action, but action is a must.

Colin Grant Weighs In

chinacityplayground

Colin Grant is Founder and CEO of Visible Strategies and is  contributing a regular column in Ecocities Emerging.

So here we are. Capitalism is spiraling out of control. The leading climate scientists are telling us that there is no "safe" two degrees rise in temperature and that the truth is far more inconvenient than even the shocking news Mr Gore gave us a few years ago.  Our oceans are acidifying due to carbon dioxide absorption, threatening the foundations of food chains worldwide. Peak Oil is poised and ready to strike as soon as, (and quite possibly before), there is any economic upturn and demand increases.

It seems so long ago that I started this series of articles in the days of markets that at least provided the semblance of economic functionality, even if they clearly ignored ecological reality and social equity. Was that really only last year? Those of you that have read the earlier articles in this series will have detected my frustration at how staff, elected officials and citizens in most cities and communities seem oblivious to the remarkable achievement of the leading communities in the world such as Overturnea and Vaxjo in Sweden, the island of Samso in Denmark, Gussing in Austria, which has cut its GHGs 90% while becoming a renewable energy exporter and creator of green jobs, the "Solar City" of Freiberg in Germany and the miracle of planning that is Curitiba in Brazil. Communities around the world have recently gone from being dependent on importing expensive fossil grid power to exporting renewable energy in as little as a decade, creating green jobs, increasing energy security and reducing negative ecological impact. Yet so few people know about this and the vast majority of communities lag so far behind the leaders.

vaxjo
Vaxjo Sweden

Well, if there was any excuse left last year to ignore the blindingly obvious path to the future, (a future that already exists in these leading communities), surely the last barrier is gone?  In  North America, which so desperately needs to catch up with the leaders around the world, governments will pay you to do this stuff!  $40 billion in Canada and around $750B in the US. And the deal is you have to spend it soon! Eh, ok!
________________________________

So here is a way that your city can show why it is a perfect fit for Stimulus dollars and how you will wisely and transparently spend it (warning, this is a blatant advert for my company's services, but if you can find a better way to attract your share of a one-off, never to be repeated funding package, please feel free to use that).  Here is a beta version of Obama's energy plan in my company Visible Strategies' SEE-IT software http://obamaenergy.visiblestrategies.com, (follow the drill downs marked with asterisks to find completed scorecards). And here is how to get your city's Stimulus application to match the Obama Team's goals perfectly - http://www.visiblestrategies.com/stimulus.htm

Give Visible Strategies a call and we can customize a version of this SEE-IT site for your community to show that you will spend your stimulus dollars in a wise and transparent fashion that is a one-to-one match with the Obama administration's goals and election platform.

Here it is folks - positively the last chance to transform your community into an EcoCity or EcoTown. Positively the last chance to save a planet under stress and a civilization in crisis as Lester Brown of the Earth Policy Institute puts it, (and we can show how you are in line with his plan too http://visiblestrategies.com/news/epi.html).
Brown's strategies are as good as they get for a general approach to world-wide recovery.

visible.sm


Google Earth offers bird's eye view of US emissions


google.earth


Overview of the carbon footprint of different streets and buildings on the horizon
James Murray, BusinessGreen

US businesses can now easily track pollution from their facilities and could soon be able to compare the carbon footprint of different streets, following the launch this week of a newinteractive map of carbon emissions on Google Earth.

The new application, which is based on maps and data compiled as part of the NASA-backed Vulcan project to better track US carbon emissions, allows users to view carbon emissions from factories, power plants, roads, and residential and commercial areas and compare their region's performance with other parts of the country.

Simon Ilyushchenko, an engineer at Google who worked on integrating the carbon emission data from the Vulcan Project with Google Earth, said that the application should help encourage businesses and individuals to take action to cut emissions.

"Vulcan had great information, but it was not easy for a non-scientist to analyse and understand," he said, adding that by providing dynamic maps of the data, users will be able to easily track where "people burn more gasoline from driving or where they use more fuel for heating and cooling homes and businesses ".

The new application was welcomed by Kevin Gurney, leader of the Vulcan project at Purdue University, who said that as his team develops more granular data, it should be possible for users to track the emissions of individual streets and buildings.

"This is the first step," he said. "We'll keep adding more information to enrich it. We hope to eventually get feedback from the public about energy use and activity that allows us to include even more detailed information."

The application, which Gurney said could be extended to cover Mexico and Canada, raises the prospect of customers being able to easily track and compare the carbon emissions of their suppliers and partners.

Google Earth could also serve to help shape climate change policy, according to Peter Griffith, director of NASA's Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Office which part-funds the Vulcan Project. "One of the goals of the US Climate Change Science Program is to assist with scientifically based formulation of policy and decision making," he said. "By allowing non-specialists to see changes in carbon dioxide emissions in time and across broad areas, we are helping them to understand critical information for climate change policy decisions."



EWS2009

Ecocity World Summit 2009
Istanbul Turkey, December 13-15
http://www.ecocity2009.com

Organized by Yildiz Technical University Faculty Of Architecture, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and
Parantez International in Istanbul

topkapi.jpg
Topkapı Palace (Topkapı Sarayi in Turkish, literally the "Cannongate Palace" - named after a nearby gate), located in Istanbul (Constantinople), was the administrative center of the Ottoman Empire from 1465 to 1853.


CONGRESS ORGANIZATION

ADVISORY BOARD

Mr. Richard Register, Ecocity Builders, USA
Prof. Dr. Huseyin Cengiz, Yıldız Technical University, Turkey
Prof. Dr. Semra Atabay, Yıldız Technical University, Turkey
Mr. Paul Downtown, Ecopolis Architects, Australia
Mr. Rusong Wang, Ecological Society of China
Ms. Kirstin Miller, Ecocity Builders, USA
Dr. Zeynep Kaçmaz OZTURK, Eko Şehir, Turkey

LOCAL ORGANIZING COMMITEE

Prof. Dr. Huseyin CENGİZ - Chair
Prof. Dr. Semra ATABAY
Dr. Zeynep Kaçmaz OZTURK

CONGRESS ADMINISTRATION

Dr. Zeynep K. OZTURK / Administrator
Ass. Prof. Dr. Yigit EVREN
Ass. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Doruk OZUGUL
Ass. Prof. Dr. Elif Ornek OZDEN
Dr. Aysegul OZBAKIR



       chinacityplayground
                                                                                        

From the Ecocity Conference Series Publications Archives

What We Can Learn from African Villagers
Lessons from the Third International EcoCities Conference

by Joan Bokaer, Liz Walker, and Richard Register, interviewed by Scott Sherman

chinacityplayground
Delegates gather at the Third International Ecocity Conference in Yoff

I N JANUARY 1996, 320 PEOPLE FROM 27 COUNTRIES gathered at the Third International EcoCities Conference in Yoff, Senegal, a 500-year-old fishing village of 40,000. Together they asked the crucially important question: How do we build communities in balance and harmony with nature?

Scott Sherman interviewed three of the major American organizers of the conference. Joan Bokaer and Liz Walker are cofounders of EcoVillage at Ithaca, in upstate New York. Richard Register is author of EcoCity Berkeley (North Atlantic Books, 1987), which demonstrates how Berkeley, California, could be transformed into an ecologically sustainable community, and founder of two ecological activist organizations, Urban Ecology and EcoCity Builders. Richard was also the convenor of the first International EcoCities Conference held in Berkeley in 1990.

Scott Sherman: Could you give me a general overview of the conference?

Joan Bokaer: It really was a very exciting time where people from the industrial countries got to experience a very different way of life and discover how much the ecocity movement has in common with the traditional style villages.

Scott: So you feel that in Senegal they are already living up to the ideal of ecologically sustainable communities?

[photo]

Joan: They are, but they're losing it very quickly. One of the reasons that the organizers from the traditional villages wanted us to come was to make a statement to Africans that they have something worth holding on to. In this regard, the conference was an enormous success. It really affirmed the traditional villages. What they've had for many centuries is what we're now trying to re-create.

(Right: Serigne Mbaye Diene, village leader, Yoff)

Scott: So what do you think the lessons were for Americans who are already choosing to live in intentional communities or who are trying to create their own ecovillages?

Joan: We're on the right track! The biggest lesson was how much we have in terms of material possessions. It was really quite a shock ...

Scott: Was this a shock to the Africans or to the Americans?

Joan: Well, there were people there from 26 countries, not just Senegal and the United States. But people from the industrialized countries had the greatest shock, and were actually feeling quite guilty just how many resources we use compared to how little they use there. In Yoff, there was just a genuine feeling of well-being, of just being able to roam around in this pedestrian village of 40,000 people. It's so alive, and there's such a richness. There's a 500-year-old history of sustainable living and cooperative economies and living in close relationship to the natural world, and the social and economic structures which have evolved over all these years--you walk around in the streets, and it's densely populated, but really peaceful. People are getting along, and you feel very safe--which isn't true for some other parts of Africa.

Scott: How do you see the connection between the ideas of the conference--ecovillages and ecocities--and the communities movement in America?

Liz Walker: There's a lot in common in terms of people's intense desires for a sense of community and a sense of living in harmony with the natural world. I think that ecovillages and ecocities are an attempt to carry that to a grander scale than most of the intentional communities that already exist. We have two major issues that we're trying to address here in the human dilemma. One is the sense of isolation that so many people in the modern world face, and therefore there's a need for a sense of community and a sense of belonging. The other is the accelerating environmental crisis, and the need to do something about it, to live more lightly on the Earth, and to do that on a village-wide and city-wide scale. So it's building on the ideas that bring people to intentional communities, and just expanding them to a larger audience.

Yoff is remarkable because there are 40,000 people living together and there's no police force, and nobody who goes homeless. People don't go hungry either because the villagers have a very strongly ingrained custom of hospitality, and typically, when any family is having a meal, anyone can just walk in the door and join them. They have a very highly evolved social system, from which we can learn a lot.

Scott: What was the main purpose of the conference? Was it to build an international network of support for the ecocity idea, or was it to focus on the problems encroaching upon these traditional villages?

Liz: There were three major purposes: first, to study the traditional villages from all over the world--to study how they have lived lightly on the earth and have developed social systems which are very much community-based; and second, to look at emerging modern ecovillages and ecocities. There was a wonderful presentation by Jeff Kenworthy from Australia. He's been studying ecological city designs around the world and he had a great slide show on different examples of cities that were either successfully implementing new planning techniques, or ones that were total disasters. The third purpose was to develop a network of people who are working on these issues and who will stay in touch. This is especially important because of the upcoming UN Conference on Habitat Two which which will be focusing on the environment. That's in June in Istanbul.

Scott: As I talk to you, I'm on the 46th floor of an office building in Seattle, looking out over suburbs stretching far away to the horizon in all directions. How can the concepts of ecocities apply to a major urban metropolis like this which is already in place with millions of people? How can we retrofit existing cities and transform them into ecocities?

Liz: We talked about that a lot at Yoff. There are a number of issues to look at: zoning; land-use planning; drawing an urban growth boundary around the outskirts of the city so as to create an urban greenbelt; withdrawing from sprawl; trying to create zones of pedestrian activity in the downtown area which will revitalize these areas; creating whole centers of a city that are pedestrian-focused and multi-use so that there are commercial buildings mixed in with residential; and creating transit corridors that really work, so that public transit is subsidized and is the driving force (so to speak) of getting around.

One of our keynote speakers was Cleon Ricardo de Santos from Curitiba, Brazil. We saw in his slide show how his city's recycling programs are tied to a barter system which provides homeless people with essential resources. He also showed Curitiba's transit corridors, and their 24-hour downtown areas that keep the heartbeat of the city always pulsing. They've done wonderful educational efforts with children as well, on how to live more sustainably in their city.

[photo]

Scott: Could you say more about the atmosphere in Yoff itself? How is this village of 40,000 people different from typical towns and cities and communities in the West?

(Right: Catch of the day.)

Richard Register: The village has very narrow streets, which are all made of sand. What is unique in Yoff is that they have compounds--they have extended larger families, where there are six to 12 rooms around a central courtyard with a tree or two inside. A lot of their social life centers around this larger extended family in this open space. So it has a sense of enormous openness. This is different from most fenced-off and gated-in American housing tracts, but is increasingly found in intentional communities and cohousing developments.

There is an extraordinary peacefulness which perhaps has to do with the closeness, and the sandy streets, and the fact that Yoff is totally pedestrian--you feel very safe there. And it's very dark; they have electricity but they don't use much. So you see all these beautiful stars at night. Because of the lack of cars, there's not much air pollution or haze, and there are few street lights, so you can always see the stars and moon at night in the desert air. You walk along these rather dark canyons with the close-in walls and you occasionally open on a square, and you're always walking on this very soft sand. It's a dream-like environment that you're floating through at night.

In the daytime, the children are absolutely guileless--they'll go up to you and smile and laugh and want to shake your hands. There are no material things in the way. With the adults too, there's a warm, genuine presence. They extended a very open reception with celebrations, dancing, and drumming, and they fed 175 of us for eight days.

Scott: What lessons might there be for intentional communities here in the West?

Richard:Yoff is not an intentional community in the traditional sense that you get together with people with similar minds and dispositions. Yoff is a traditional fishing village community into which people have been born for generations.

Intentional communities like to adopt ecologically healthy and sustainable practices. A lot of these details are excellent: appropriate technology, the intention of becoming much healthier vis-a-vis the environment, living lightly on the land, caring for one another, sharing life experiences, being peaceful and just towards one another and towards nature--that's all there. But the physical structure seems to be almost not dealt with.

By physical structure, I mean not the buildings but the physical structure of the community. So what's needed here are the streetscapes, the buildings organized with a great deal of diversity close together, a sense of this "access by proximity"--that is, you get access not by driving somewhere or by walking a long distance; you have access because things are close to you. So that seems to be missing in most intentional community and eco village work. That's a wonderful thing to realize, because it's just a small addition to what's already there, which is very profound and important--it could be the missing element that pulls all the other pieces together. We're at a very interesting juncture right now.

Scott: Currently, in Africa as well as much of the rest of the world, people seem to be going away from communities. They are following the Western industrial model of development which often leads to urban sprawl and cities out of balance with nature. Do you fear that this is happening in Africa?

(Below: children of Yoff welcome the foreign delegates)

chinacityplayground

Richard: Absolutely. The Africans fear that as well. The city of Yoff is being overwhelmed by Dakar, the capital city of Senegal. The old tribal land is being sold off to developments. The Dakar sprawl is consuming all the land around this little village. The agriculture is disappearing. Meanwhile, the population is growing and the African national debt is so large that each person on the continent would have to work an average of 42 years for nothing other than paying off their debt! It's ludicrous. It hobbles them so badly that they are trying to find any way out of this mess. There's an air of desperation when you're broke. It's difficult to know what to do about this, but I'm glad they're still sincere at exploring ecologically healthy ways of living in the future.

Scott: Do you think that the ecovillage movement can become more widespread in the future and serve as an alternative model to the Western industrial urban sprawl?

Richard: Well, I'm hopeful, because there are so many growing signs of change that are worldwide now--appropriate technology, better transport, and a strong concern for democracy. Plus the growth of the intentional communities movement, and other people looking for cooperative solutions: the legacy of the anti-war movement, the people working to bring labor and the environment together. There are so many good things in this movement towards more democracy and cooperation. Currently, there's about 20 to 30 percent of the people who are very aware of environmental issues, who are concerned about restoration of natural habitats, biodiversity, the ozone hole, collapsing fisheries, etc.

So we have a kind of a readiness for the next step which is the one that integrates all the pieces--so I think that's where the ecovillages come in. But I think people have to get over their addiction to the automobile, and face up to the fear of the change in their own neighborhoods. They'll have to stop escaping to the country, they'll have to think about reshaping the inner cities and even the suburbs. They'll have to start creating more density and diversity toward the centers of cities. If people do go to the country, they should do it like some of the intentional communities are doing--for example, what Albert Bates is doing at The Farm--around the idea of building a real full-bodied village: not just a residential area with gardens, but a place where people have employment, where they trade with people in neighboring communities. If all these things start coming together, I think things are quite hopeful. If you put it all together, you see there's a whole system, and then you're empowered to do an awful lot.

Scott: How did the ecocity conference at Yoff build on the recent Ecovillages and Sustainable Communities conference at Findhorn in November 1995?

Richard: It didn't build on it much at all. There were only four people at Yoff who attended both conferences. There wasn't much of a connection--at Yoff, we were dealing with the urban scene as well as the rural scene. That was very different about Yoff--it was a direct effort to bring the city and the village together and an effort to deal with the city itself. There was some of that at Findhorn, but not much.

In Findhorn, almost all you saw were white faces. There were maybe a couple of people from Hawaii, and one from Africa. But at Yoff, it was 70 percent nonwhite. Many people were from local villages in Senegal, but we also had people from Borneo, Malaysia, Indonesia, Ghana, Mali, Zaire, Tunisia, Mozambique, South Africa, and from all over Europe--they came from about 27 countries in all.

Scott: At Yoff, did many people come from intentional communities?

Richard: At Findhorn, most of the people who came either lived in intentional communities or wanted to live in intentional communities. At Yoff, it was the minority. Many people lived in modern sprawling urban centers and were just interested in transforming the social and economic structures of the cities that existed. Perhaps that's symptomatic of the fact that the two camps--people building ecovillages and people in intentional communities--haven't been in close enough touch. We need to bring the two movements together.

Scott Sherman is an attorney who has studied sustainable architecture with Sim Van der Ryn.

Copyright © 1996 by Fellowship for Intentional Community. All rights reserved. Opinions expressed by the authors and correspondents are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher.

Coriandoline
Housing development designed by children
Excerpted from an article by Dany Mitzman

Radio Netherlands Worldwide

Once upon a time, there was a construction cooperative in the small north Italian town of Correggio, not far from the larger cities of Modena and Parma. One day, back in 1990, its members made a decision that would radically change the way they worked.

Taking on the new name, Andria - inspired by an ideal city in Italo Calvino's novel, Invisible Cities - they transformed it from a cooperative for abitazioni (habitations) into a cooperative for abitanti (inhabitants). Andria decided that, since families comprise both adults and children, to be a true cooperative for inhabitants, they would have to listen to children as well as adults. And that's how the idea to build Coriandoline was born.

coriandoline.1

The first phase began in 1995 with a research project involving 700 children from 12 local schools. Teachers and child psychologists worked together with a group of architects, engineers, surveyors, builders and carpenters: talking to the children, taking them on trips to learn about architecture, encouraging them to draw, building models with them.

Four years later, having transcribed hours of conversations and collated and processed all the material and information gathered during the initial phase, the Manifesto of Children's Living Needs was published. The manifesto is a synthesis, a distillation, of the most popular needs and desires commonly expressed by those 700 children as to how they would like their ideal house to be. Ten essential features ranging from 'transparent', 'hard outside' and 'soft inside' to 'playful', 'decorated' and 'magical'.

coriandoline.2

Even residents who don't have children appreciate their design ideas. Gino Neviani, a single man who lives in one of the apartments, says the main reason he came to live in Coriandoline was because the neighbourhood is so quiet. He's got 700 infant school pupils to thank for that: 'peaceful' was one of their top ten essential requirements.

coriandoline.3

###

The Coriandoline website

Link to additional information: http://www.radionetherlands.nl/thestatewerein...

Car-Free Journey
by Steve Atlas

walking                           
As spring rapidly approaches, living car-free becomes easier and more of a joy than a chore. This month, I want to share a tip with you about how commuter express buses can greatly expand where and how to live car-free.

Consider Commuter Transit When Deciding Where to Live
As commuters get tired of traffic and parking hassles, many turn to public transportation for an alternative. Commuter trains and express buses are two popular options. (Biking to work, subways and light rail, and sometimes commuter ferries are
other possibilities.)

However, even if you are not a commuter, or are retired, commuter service can dramatically expand your choices. Here is an example.

York, PA has no train service, no airport, and very limited bus service to Baltimore and Washington. So, retiring to York could mean being trapped there-even though Rabbit Transit provides seven-day public transportation within York and certain nearby suburban areas.

However, many York residents work in Harrisburg (capital city of PA), and Baltimore (both Baltimore City and Baltimore County).  Traffic and congestion on I-83 in both directions can be challenging.

Rabbit Transit offers an alternative: express buses between York, nearby communities and either Harrisburg transportation center (served by Amtrak, local Harrisburg buses, and intercity Greyhound and Capital Trailways buses), or Baltimore County light rail stations (and nearby office parks). All commuter trips (A.M. and P.M) operate in both directions in the morning and afternoon.

"read on"
Principal Features of an Ecocity
http://www.ecocityprojects.net/

eco-city characteristics
 

TTT.jpg


vs-logo.jpg
An eco-friendly place to live, work and play.
BClogo
Designed for people, animals and the earth.

Click here for more information and to register for classes
 in the Sustainable Design Program at UC Berkeley Extension.


Go Green with Berkeley!
ucbsmall

   STV.EE.AD      sm.ecb    sm.ecs