|
|
Ecocities Emerging To support humanity's transition into the Ecozoic Era
|
March 2009
|
|
|
Greetings,
Welcome to the March 2009 edition of Ecocities Emerging, an initiative of Ecocity Builders and the International Ecocity Conference Series.
With the election of Barack Obama the United States of America turned a page in its history book and started a new chapter tentatively entitled "Change We Need." Fed up with the neocons and thrilled by a new, exciting leader in Obama, Americans called for a saner, healthier world. The world agreed.
So far the new world dawning isn't evoking the same warm feelings of the "Yes We Can" speeches. The glow from the Obama-world courtship is already fading as blowback from decades of bad planning, overconsumption, greed and carelessness rolls out in every news outlet, in every country, every day, one crisis after another. Against the odds we now face, including climate change that is crippling our planetary life support systems, enacting deliberate change, change for the common good of people and planet, is difficult, messy and frustrating. But at least everyone now agrees that the consequences of not acting are decidedly even worse.
At this time, communities of plants and animals of all varieties and many communities of human beings are either endangered and on their way out, hurting badly, in trouble or decidedly uncomfortable. In that painful space, where every day in the USA thousands are locked out of their own homes, a new door is being pried open, creating an opportunity for systemic change made possible by that upheaval. At every level - individual, neighborhood, city, region, state, country, continent, watershed, ocean, bioregion, planet, atmosphere - change is happening. It's up to us whether or not this change will, through our most dedicated efforts, be shaped and directed to become the change we need.
As we build, so shall we live.

Kirstin Miller, Ecocity Builders Oakland, California, March 2009 ecocitybuilders.org
|
The
Ecozoic Era refers to a vision, first promoted by cosmologist Thomas
Berry, of an emerging epoch when humanity lives in a mutually enriching
relationship with the larger community of life on Earth.
Will
we be able to make the transition in time to retain a biosphere healthy
enough to regenerate living systems now under extreme stress? Our role in exploring ecocities is to clarify a vision of cities that can. And then go out and build them. There is
no way to be certain we will succeed, but our position is that there's no time to just sit
around and wonder about it: now is time for action.
Thank
you for all that you are doing to help accelerate progress toward a
civilization in balance with living systems.
Maybe one day all cities
will be ecocities.
|
|
Three Signs of the Times
A New Ghost Town, Thomas Friedman's One-Half Epiphany and Japan's Eco-Model Cities Program
by Richard Register, President, Ecocity Builders
Mid March already, 2009, as the economy continues to "contract" around the world. People are catching on to ecocity ideas, or at least getting closer to confronting them in many places. Will the pieces come together before we run out of money and slide far enough beyond Peak Oil to have lost the opportunity for ecologically healthy rebuilding before economic and cultural collapse? That I don't pretend to know, but three "signs of the times" pop out at me in the last few days that should not go without comment.
 The first sign was a visceral experience, like being hit in the stomach, actually: a visit to the hospice bedside of a suburban cancer (out of control growth) victim - Hearth and Home at Liberty, just outside of Rio Vista, California. It was to be a 558-unit development built by Shea Homes. It was barely started, then frozen in time and space as the weeds began to grow up. Still growing. Is it symptomatic of the beginning of the end of suburbia? Will it be completely overgrown as the few buildings molder away in the pattern depicted in "The World Without Us" by Alan Weisman? More to the moment, are we seeing prosperity murdered by automania?
Sign number two is Tom Friedman getting it right that this likely Second Great Depression is maybe even more fundamentally a turn around for resources exploitation, not another temporary down-swing of the graph charting the growth of consumption world-wide. Who are those economists who tell us the chart will pop up and fly right in 2010 or 2011? The same surprised by the "downturn" in the first place? Instead, suggests Friedman, the charts may take us in a completely new direction dictated by arriving at our limits to growth on a finite planet. Good going Tom! But then, as usual, he too misses the biggest player of all in this suicide tempting planet roulette: cities. What do they have to do with it? He, the climate scientists and almost everyone else including the ecologists - who using their own methods of analysis should know better - don't make the connection. But I like to think, maybe they are about to make the connection. We in Ecocity Builders try to tell them. Will they listen this time?
And third, the Japanese are calling for "Eco-Model Cities" and a whole systems approach to cities which is absolutely necessary and a big step. But are they noticing what could give them the answers? Guess, then read.
read on
|
TOWARD AN AGREEMENT IN COPENHAGEN Negotiations on a new deal for global cooperation on climate change
March will feature the first round of negotiations this year toward a new global climate change agreement. Representatives of the 192 members of the UN Climate Change Convention will meet in Bonn, Germany starting on 29 March to begin the work on drafting a negotiating text for the new agreement.

The following is a speech by Mr Rajendra Pachauri, IPCC Chairman, at the Opening Ceremony of the UNFCCC COP 14, Poznán, December 2008
Honorable Prime Ministers, Excellencies, Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen,
I'm here to submit that there is a wealth of information in the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, a large part of which has still not received adequate attention and precise understanding. Hence, impacts of climate change are still seen as distant and undefined. But science has given us precise answers and robust conclusions.
May I in this context inform you of the unique nature of the IPCC. The Panel mobilizes thousands of the best scientists in the world for its assessment of various aspects of climate change. This work is carried out with complete transparency and objectivity in all the procedures followed and peer reviews carried out at each stage of the process by experts as well as governments; the approval and acceptance of the Summary for Policymakers involves all the governments, which gives them direct participation in the process and a full sense of ownership in the work of the IPCC.
From the Fourth Assessment Report we now know the serious impacts of climate change, which would accrue as a result of inaction. We also know the nature of their worldwide implications.
Some examples of these impacts are:
- The number of people living in severely stressed river basins would go up from 1.4 to 1.6 billion in 1995 to 4.3 to 6.9 billion in 2050.
- Roughly 20-30% of species assessed are likely to be at increasingly high risk of extinction as global mean temperatures exceed 2°-3° above pre-industrial levels. We are getting close to that range.
- Abrupt and irreversible change are possible, such as collapse of the Greenland or West Antarctic ice sheets, which can lead to Sea Level Rise of several meters. For Greenland, the temperature threshold for breakdown is estimated to be about 1.1° to 3.8° C above today's global average temperature. Again we are close to that range too.
- Climate change currently contributes to the global burden of disease and premature deaths. Adverse health impacts will be greatest in low income countries.
- Smallholder and subsistence farmers, who are generally dependent on rainfed agriculture, pastoralists and artisan fisherfolk are likely to suffer complex, localized impacts of climate change.
- Small islands, whether located in the tropics or higher latitudes, have characteristics which make them especially vulnerable to the effects of climate change, sea level rise and extreme events.
- In some countries of Africa, yields from rainfed agriculture could be reduced by 50% by 2020. At the local level many people are likely to suffer additional losses to their livelihoods when climate change and variability occur together with other stresses, such as conflict.
- If current warming rates are maintained, Himalayan glaciers could decay at very rapid rates. Decline in river flows as a result could affect 500 million people in South Asia and 250 millions in China.
The differential nature of climate change impacts and the existence of other stresses leave the poor of the world particularly vulnerable. The ethical aspects of this reality need to be accepted in devising the implementing mitigation actions.
Our collective record of mitigation of GHG emissions has not been very inspiring. Global greenhouse gas emissions have grown, of course, since pre-industrial times, but there has been an increase of 70% between 1970 and 2004. Hence, the record of global action at mitigation has been very weak, even though the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was agreed on in 1992. This record goes against the spirit and intent of the UNFCCC.
Mitigation of emissions of GHGs has various merits and is in itself desirable and feasible in several respects.
If global mean temperature increase is to be stabilized between 2.0-2.4°C, then CO2 emissions must peak by 2015. The cost of such a stringent path of stabilization of the earth's climate would be very modest, if at all a cost would be incurred. For instance, for this trajectory the cost to the global economy would at most be less than 3% of the global GDP in 2030. In fact there are so many co-benefits from such action that if these were to be fully accounted for then these might actually result in a negative cost, or a net increase in economic output and economic welfare.
Large co-benefits of mitigation would include health benefits on account of lower air pollution at the local level, higher energy security, higher yields in agriculture, and greater employment opportunities. The record of those countries that have proactively pursued greater use of renewable energy major improvements in energy efficiency have been able to increase employment in the economy.
But even the trajectory of stabilisation described above would leave some serious problems in the nature of impacts of climate change. We would need to consider whether the effort to limit increase in global mean temperature to about 2 degrees C would be adequate because sea level rise due to thermal expansion alone with this trajectory would be between 0.4 to1.4 meters. Add to this the melting of ice bodies, and we would have serious effects of sea level rise on low lying coastal areas and small islands.
My plea to this august body would be to please listen to and reflect on the voice of science, and please act with determination and a sense of urgency. We in the IPCC do not prescribe any specific action, but action is a must.
|
Colin Grant Weighs In

Colin Grant is Founder and CEO of Visible Strategies and is contributing a regular column in Ecocities Emerging.
So here we are. Capitalism is spiraling out of control. The leading climate scientists are telling us that there is no "safe" two degrees rise in temperature and that the truth is far more inconvenient than even the shocking news Mr Gore gave us a few years ago. Our oceans are acidifying due to carbon dioxide absorption, threatening the foundations of food chains worldwide. Peak Oil is poised and ready to strike as soon as, (and quite possibly before), there is any economic upturn and demand increases.
It seems so long ago that I started this series of articles in the days of markets that at least provided the semblance of economic functionality, even if they clearly ignored ecological reality and social equity. Was that really only last year? Those of you that have read the earlier articles in this series will have detected my frustration at how staff, elected officials and citizens in most cities and communities seem oblivious to the remarkable achievement of the leading communities in the world such as Overturnea and Vaxjo in Sweden, the island of Samso in Denmark, Gussing in Austria, which has cut its GHGs 90% while becoming a renewable energy exporter and creator of green jobs, the "Solar City" of Freiberg in Germany and the miracle of planning that is Curitiba in Brazil. Communities around the world have recently gone from being dependent on importing expensive fossil grid power to exporting renewable energy in as little as a decade, creating green jobs, increasing energy security and reducing negative ecological impact. Yet so few people know about this and the vast majority of communities lag so far behind the leaders.

Vaxjo Sweden
Well, if there was any excuse left last year to ignore the blindingly obvious path to the future, (a future that already exists in these leading communities), surely the last barrier is gone? In North America, which so desperately needs to catch up with the leaders around the world, governments will pay you to do this stuff! $40 billion in Canada and around $750B in the US. And the deal is you have to spend it soon! Eh, ok! ________________________________
So here is a way that your city can show why it is a perfect fit
for Stimulus dollars and how you will wisely and transparently spend it
(warning, this is a blatant advert for my company's services, but if
you can find a better way to attract your share of a one-off, never to
be repeated funding package, please feel free to use that). Here is a
beta version of Obama's energy plan in my company Visible Strategies'
SEE-IT software http://obamaenergy.visiblestrategies.com,
(follow the drill downs marked with asterisks to find completed
scorecards). And here is how to get your city's Stimulus application to
match the Obama Team's goals perfectly - http://www.visiblestrategies.com/stimulus.htm
Give
Visible Strategies a call and we can customize a version of this SEE-IT
site for your community to show that you will spend your stimulus
dollars in a wise and transparent fashion that is a one-to-one match
with the Obama administration's goals and election platform.
Here it is folks - positively the last chance to transform your
community into an EcoCity or EcoTown. Positively the last chance to
save a planet under stress and a civilization in crisis as Lester Brown
of the Earth Policy Institute puts it, (and we can show how you are in
line with his plan too http://visiblestrategies.com/news/epi.html).
Brown's strategies are as good as they get for a general approach to world-wide recovery.

|
Google Earth offers bird's eye view of US emissions

Overview of the carbon footprint of different streets and buildings on the horizon James Murray, BusinessGreen
US businesses can now easily track pollution from their facilities and could soon be able to compare the carbon footprint of different streets, following the launch this week of a newinteractive map of carbon emissions on Google Earth.
The new application, which is based on maps and data compiled as part of the NASA-backed Vulcan project to better track US carbon emissions, allows users to view carbon emissions from factories, power plants, roads, and residential and commercial areas and compare their region's performance with other parts of the country.
Simon Ilyushchenko, an engineer at Google who worked on integrating the carbon emission data from the Vulcan Project with Google Earth, said that the application should help encourage businesses and individuals to take action to cut emissions.
"Vulcan had great information, but it was not easy for a non-scientist to analyse and understand," he said, adding that by providing dynamic maps of the data, users will be able to easily track where "people burn more gasoline from driving or where they use more fuel for heating and cooling homes and businesses ".
The new application was welcomed by Kevin Gurney, leader of the Vulcan project at Purdue University, who said that as his team develops more granular data, it should be possible for users to track the emissions of individual streets and buildings.
"This is the first step," he said. "We'll keep adding more information to enrich it. We hope to eventually get feedback from the public about energy use and activity that allows us to include even more detailed information."
The application, which Gurney said could be extended to cover Mexico and Canada, raises the prospect of customers being able to easily track and compare the carbon emissions of their suppliers and partners.
Google Earth could also serve to help shape climate change policy, according to Peter Griffith, director of NASA's Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Office which part-funds the Vulcan Project. "One of the goals of the US Climate Change Science Program is to assist with scientifically based formulation of policy and decision making," he said. "By allowing non-specialists to see changes in carbon dioxide emissions in time and across broad areas, we are helping them to understand critical information for climate change policy decisions."
|
|

Ecocity World Summit 2009 Istanbul Turkey, December 13-15 http://www.ecocity2009.com
Organized by Yildiz Technical University Faculty Of Architecture, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Parantez International in Istanbul
 Topkapı Palace (Topkapı Sarayi in Turkish, literally the "Cannongate Palace" - named after a nearby gate), located in Istanbul (Constantinople), was the administrative center of the Ottoman Empire from 1465 to 1853.
CONGRESS ORGANIZATIONADVISORY BOARD
Mr. Richard Register, Ecocity Builders, USA Prof. Dr. Huseyin Cengiz, Yıldız Technical University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Semra Atabay, Yıldız Technical University, Turkey Mr. Paul Downtown, Ecopolis Architects, Australia Mr. Rusong Wang, Ecological Society of China Ms. Kirstin Miller, Ecocity Builders, USA Dr. Zeynep Kaçmaz OZTURK, Eko Şehir, Turkey
LOCAL ORGANIZING COMMITEE
Prof. Dr. Huseyin CENGİZ - Chair Prof. Dr. Semra ATABAY Dr. Zeynep Kaçmaz OZTURK
CONGRESS ADMINISTRATION
Dr. Zeynep K. OZTURK / Administrator Ass. Prof. Dr. Yigit EVREN Ass. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Doruk OZUGUL Ass. Prof. Dr. Elif Ornek OZDEN Dr. Aysegul OZBAKIR
|
From the Ecocity Conference Series Publications Archives
What We Can Learn from African
Villagers
Lessons from the Third International EcoCities
Conference
by Joan Bokaer, Liz Walker, and Richard Register, interviewed
by Scott Sherman
 Delegates gather at the Third International Ecocity Conference in Yoff
I
N JANUARY 1996, 320 PEOPLE FROM 27 COUNTRIES
gathered at the Third
International EcoCities Conference in Yoff, Senegal, a
500-year-old fishing
village of 40,000. Together they asked the crucially important
question: How do
we build communities in balance and harmony with nature?
Scott Sherman interviewed three of the major American
organizers of the
conference. Joan Bokaer and Liz Walker are cofounders of
EcoVillage at Ithaca,
in upstate New York. Richard Register is author of EcoCity
Berkeley (North Atlantic Books, 1987), which demonstrates how Berkeley,
California,
could be transformed into an ecologically sustainable community,
and founder of
two ecological activist organizations, Urban Ecology and EcoCity
Builders.
Richard was also the convenor of the first International
EcoCities Conference
held in Berkeley in 1990.
Scott Sherman: Could you give me a general overview
of the
conference?
Joan Bokaer: It really was a very exciting time where
people from the
industrial countries got to experience a very different way of
life and
discover how much the ecocity movement has in common with the
traditional style
villages.
Scott: So you feel that in Senegal they are already living
up to the ideal
of ecologically sustainable communities?
Joan: They are, but they're losing it very quickly. One
of the reasons
that the organizers from the traditional villages wanted us to
come was to make
a statement to Africans that they have something worth holding
on to. In this
regard, the conference was an enormous success. It really
affirmed the
traditional villages. What they've had for many centuries is
what we're now
trying to re-create. (Right: Serigne Mbaye Diene, village leader, Yoff)
Scott: So what do you think the lessons were for Americans
who are already
choosing to live in intentional communities or who are trying to
create their
own ecovillages?
Joan: We're on the right track! The biggest lesson was
how much we have
in terms of material possessions. It was really quite a shock
...
Scott: Was this a shock to the Africans or to
the
Americans?
Joan: Well, there were people there from 26 countries,
not just Senegal
and the United States. But people from the industrialized
countries had the
greatest shock, and were actually feeling quite guilty just how
many resources
we use compared to how little they use there. In Yoff, there was
just a genuine
feeling of well-being, of just being able to roam around in this
pedestrian
village of 40,000 people. It's so alive, and there's such a
richness. There's a
500-year-old history of sustainable living and cooperative
economies and living
in close relationship to the natural world, and the social and
economic
structures which have evolved over all these years--you walk
around in the
streets, and it's densely populated, but really peaceful. People
are getting
along, and you feel very safe--which isn't true for some other
parts of
Africa.
Scott: How do you see the connection between the ideas of
the conference--ecovillages and ecocities--and the communities
movement in America?
Liz Walker: There's a lot in common in terms of people's
intense desires
for a sense of community and a sense of living in harmony with
the natural
world. I think that ecovillages and ecocities are an attempt to
carry that to a
grander scale than most of the intentional communities that
already exist. We
have two major issues that we're trying to address here in the
human dilemma.
One is the sense of isolation that so many people in the modern
world face, and
therefore there's a need for a sense of community and a sense of
belonging. The
other is the accelerating environmental crisis, and the need to
do something
about it, to live more lightly on the Earth, and to do that on a
village-wide
and city-wide scale. So it's building on the ideas that bring
people to
intentional communities, and just expanding them to a larger
audience.
Yoff is remarkable because there are 40,000 people living
together and there's
no police force, and nobody who goes homeless. People don't go
hungry either
because the villagers have a very strongly ingrained custom of
hospitality, and
typically, when any family is having a meal, anyone can just
walk in the door
and join them. They have a very highly evolved social system,
from which we can
learn a lot.
Scott: What was the main purpose of the conference?
Was it to build
an international network of support for the ecocity idea, or was
it to focus on
the problems encroaching upon these traditional villages?
Liz: There were three major purposes: first, to study
the traditional
villages from all over the world--to study how they have lived
lightly on the
earth and have developed social systems which are very much
community-based;
and second, to look at emerging modern ecovillages and
ecocities. There was a
wonderful presentation by Jeff Kenworthy from Australia. He's
been studying
ecological city designs around the world and he had a great
slide show on
different examples of cities that were either successfully
implementing new
planning techniques, or ones that were total disasters. The
third purpose was
to develop a network of people who are working on these issues
and who will
stay in touch. This is especially important because of the
upcoming UN
Conference on Habitat Two which which will be focusing on the
environment.
That's in June in Istanbul.
Scott: As I talk to you, I'm on the 46th floor of an
office building
in Seattle, looking out over suburbs stretching far away to the
horizon in all
directions. How can the concepts of ecocities apply to a major
urban metropolis
like this which is already in place with millions of people? How
can we
retrofit existing cities and transform them into
ecocities?
Liz: We talked about that a lot at Yoff. There are a
number of issues to
look at: zoning; land-use planning; drawing an urban growth
boundary around the
outskirts of the city so as to create an urban greenbelt;
withdrawing from
sprawl; trying to create zones of pedestrian activity in the
downtown area
which will revitalize these areas; creating whole centers of a
city that are
pedestrian-focused and multi-use so that there are commercial
buildings mixed
in with residential; and creating transit corridors that really
work, so that
public transit is subsidized and is the driving force (so to
speak) of getting
around.
One of our keynote speakers was Cleon Ricardo de Santos from
Curitiba, Brazil.
We saw in his slide show how his city's recycling programs are
tied to a barter
system which provides homeless people with essential resources.
He also showed
Curitiba's transit corridors, and their 24-hour downtown areas
that keep the
heartbeat of the city always pulsing. They've done wonderful
educational
efforts with children as well, on how to live more sustainably
in their city.
Scott: Could you say more about the atmosphere in Yoff
itself? How is this
village of 40,000 people different from typical towns and cities
and
communities in the West? (Right: Catch of the day.)
Richard Register: The village has very narrow streets,
which are all
made of sand. What is unique in Yoff is that they have
compounds--they have
extended larger families, where there are six to 12 rooms around
a central
courtyard with a tree or two inside. A lot of their social life
centers around
this larger extended family in this open space. So it has a
sense of enormous
openness. This is different from most fenced-off and gated-in
American housing
tracts, but is increasingly found in intentional communities and
cohousing
developments.
There is an extraordinary peacefulness which perhaps has to
do with the
closeness, and the sandy streets, and the fact that Yoff is
totally
pedestrian--you feel very safe there. And it's very dark; they
have electricity
but they don't use much. So you see all these beautiful stars at
night. Because
of the lack of cars, there's not much air pollution or haze, and
there are few
street lights, so you can always see the stars and moon at night
in the desert
air. You walk along these rather dark canyons with the close-in
walls and you
occasionally open on a square, and you're always walking on this
very soft
sand. It's a dream-like environment that you're floating
through at
night.
In the daytime, the children are absolutely guileless--they'll
go up to you
and smile and laugh and want to shake your hands. There are no
material things
in the way. With the adults too, there's a warm, genuine
presence. They
extended a very open reception with celebrations, dancing, and
drumming, and
they fed 175 of us for eight days.
Scott: What lessons might there be for intentional
communities here
in the West?
Richard:Yoff is not an intentional community in the
traditional sense
that you get together with people with similar minds and
dispositions. Yoff is
a traditional fishing village community into which people have
been born for
generations.
Intentional communities like to adopt ecologically healthy and
sustainable
practices. A lot of these details are excellent: appropriate
technology, the
intention of becoming much healthier vis-a-vis the environment,
living lightly
on the land, caring for one another, sharing life experiences,
being peaceful
and just towards one another and towards nature--that's all
there. But the
physical structure seems to be almost not dealt with.
By physical structure, I mean not the buildings but the
physical structure of
the community. So what's needed here are the streetscapes, the
buildings
organized with a great deal of diversity close together, a sense
of this
"access by proximity"--that is, you get access not by driving
somewhere or by
walking a long distance; you have access because things are
close to you. So
that seems to be missing in most intentional community and eco
village work.
That's a wonderful thing to realize, because it's just a small
addition to
what's already there, which is very profound and important--it
could be the
missing element that pulls all the other pieces together. We're
at a very
interesting juncture right now.
Scott: Currently, in Africa as well as much of the rest of
the world, people
seem to be going away from communities. They are following the
Western
industrial model of development which often leads to urban
sprawl and cities
out of balance with nature. Do you fear that this is happening
in Africa?
(Below: children of Yoff welcome the foreign delegates)
Richard: Absolutely. The Africans fear that as well. The
city of Yoff is being
overwhelmed by Dakar, the capital city of Senegal. The old
tribal land is being
sold off to developments. The Dakar sprawl is consuming all the
land around
this little village. The agriculture is disappearing. Meanwhile,
the population
is growing and the African national debt is so large that each
person on the
continent would have to work an average of 42 years for nothing
other than
paying off their debt! It's ludicrous. It hobbles them so badly
that they are
trying to find any way out of this mess. There's an air of
desperation when
you're broke. It's difficult to know what to do about this, but
I'm glad
they're still sincere at exploring ecologically healthy ways of
living in the
future.
Scott: Do you think that the ecovillage movement can
become more
widespread in the future and serve as an alternative model to
the Western
industrial urban sprawl?
Richard: Well, I'm hopeful, because there are so many
growing signs of
change that are worldwide now--appropriate technology, better
transport, and a
strong concern for democracy. Plus the growth of the intentional
communities
movement, and other people looking for cooperative solutions:
the legacy of the
anti-war movement, the people working to bring labor and the
environment
together. There are so many good things in this movement towards
more democracy
and cooperation. Currently, there's about 20 to 30 percent of
the people who
are very aware of environmental issues, who are concerned about
restoration of
natural habitats, biodiversity, the ozone hole, collapsing
fisheries, etc.
So we have a kind of a readiness for the next step which is
the one that
integrates all the pieces--so I think that's where the
ecovillages come in. But
I think people have to get over their addiction to the
automobile, and face up
to the fear of the change in their own neighborhoods. They'll
have to stop
escaping to the country, they'll have to think about reshaping
the inner cities
and even the suburbs. They'll have to start creating more
density and diversity
toward the centers of cities. If people do go to the country,
they should do it
like some of the intentional communities are doing--for example,
what Albert
Bates is doing at The Farm--around the idea of building a real
full-bodied
village: not just a residential area with gardens, but a place
where people
have employment, where they trade with people in neighboring
communities. If
all these things start coming together, I think things are quite
hopeful. If
you put it all together, you see there's a whole system, and
then you're
empowered to do an awful lot.
Scott: How did the ecocity conference at Yoff build
on the recent
Ecovillages and Sustainable Communities conference at Findhorn
in November
1995?
Richard: It didn't build on it much at all. There were
only four people
at Yoff who attended both conferences. There wasn't much of a
connection--at
Yoff, we were dealing with the urban scene as well as the rural
scene. That was
very different about Yoff--it was a direct effort to bring the
city and the
village together and an effort to deal with the city itself.
There was some of
that at Findhorn, but not much.
In Findhorn, almost all you saw were white faces. There were
maybe a couple of
people from Hawaii, and one from Africa. But at Yoff, it was 70
percent
nonwhite. Many people were from local villages in Senegal, but
we also had
people from Borneo, Malaysia, Indonesia, Ghana, Mali, Zaire,
Tunisia,
Mozambique, South Africa, and from all over Europe--they came
from about 27
countries in all.
Scott: At Yoff, did many people come from
intentional
communities?
Richard: At Findhorn, most of the people who came either
lived in
intentional communities or wanted to live in intentional
communities. At Yoff,
it was the minority. Many people
lived in
modern sprawling urban centers and were just interested in
transforming the
social and economic structures of the cities that existed.
Perhaps that's
symptomatic of the fact that the two camps--people building
ecovillages and
people in intentional communities--haven't been in close enough
touch. We need
to bring the two movements together.
Scott Sherman is an attorney who has studied
sustainable architecture with
Sim Van der Ryn.
Copyright © 1996 by Fellowship for Intentional Community. All rights reserved. Opinions expressed by the authors and correspondents are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher.
|
Coriandoline Housing development designed by children Excerpted from an article by Dany Mitzman
Once upon a time, there was a construction cooperative in the small
north Italian town of Correggio, not far from the larger cities of
Modena and Parma. One day, back in
1990, its members made a decision that would radically change the way
they worked.
Taking on the new name, Andria - inspired by an ideal city in Italo
Calvino's novel, Invisible Cities - they transformed it from a
cooperative for abitazioni (habitations) into a cooperative for
abitanti (inhabitants). Andria decided that, since
families comprise both adults and children, to be a true cooperative
for inhabitants, they would have to listen to children as well as
adults. And that's how the idea to build Coriandoline was born. 
The first phase began in 1995 with a research project involving 700
children from 12 local schools. Teachers and child psychologists worked together with a group of architects,
engineers, surveyors, builders and carpenters: talking to the children,
taking them on trips to learn about architecture, encouraging them to
draw, building models with them. Four years later, having transcribed hours of conversations and
collated and processed all the material and information gathered during
the initial phase, the Manifesto of Children's Living Needs was
published. The manifesto is a synthesis, a distillation, of the most
popular needs and desires commonly expressed by those 700 children as
to how they would like their ideal house to be. Ten essential features
ranging from 'transparent', 'hard outside' and 'soft inside' to
'playful', 'decorated' and 'magical'. 
Even residents who don't have children appreciate their design
ideas. Gino Neviani, a single man who lives in one of the apartments,
says the main reason he came to live in Coriandoline was because the
neighbourhood is so quiet. He's got 700 infant school pupils to thank
for that: 'peaceful' was one of their top ten essential requirements. 
###
The Coriandoline website
Link to additional information: http://www.radionetherlands.nl/thestatewerein...
|
Car-Free Journey
by Steve Atlas
As spring rapidly approaches, living car-free becomes easier and more of a joy than a chore. This month, I want to share a tip with you about how commuter express buses can greatly expand where and how to live car-free.
Consider Commuter Transit When Deciding Where to Live As commuters get tired of traffic and parking hassles, many turn to public transportation for an alternative. Commuter trains and express buses are two popular options. (Biking to work, subways and light rail, and sometimes commuter ferries are other possibilities.)
However, even if you are not a commuter, or are retired, commuter service can dramatically expand your choices. Here is an example.
York, PA has no train service, no airport, and very limited bus service to Baltimore and Washington. So, retiring to York could mean being trapped there-even though Rabbit Transit provides seven-day public transportation within York and certain nearby suburban areas.
However, many York residents work in Harrisburg (capital city of PA), and Baltimore (both Baltimore City and Baltimore County). Traffic and congestion on I-83 in both directions can be challenging.
Rabbit Transit offers an alternative: express buses between York, nearby communities and either Harrisburg transportation center (served by Amtrak, local Harrisburg buses, and intercity Greyhound and Capital Trailways buses), or Baltimore County light rail stations (and nearby office parks). All commuter trips (A.M. and P.M) operate in both directions in the morning and afternoon.
"read on"
|
|
|
Principal Features of an Ecocity http://www.ecocityprojects.net/

|
An eco-friendly place to live, work and play.

Designed for people, animals and the earth.
|
Click here for more information and to register for classes in the Sustainable Design Program at UC Berkeley Extension.
Go Green with Berkeley!

|
|
|
|
|
|
|