|
|
|
Saturday, Feb. 4th, 2012 #1202 |
 |
Thlothlopopka-hatchee (Fisheating Creek)Mark Renz Photo Art
|
|
|

Fisheating Creek! The Settlement Agreement Advisory Board meets February 4, 9-11 am, at the Screen House at the Fisheating Creek Outpost (http://www.fisheatingcreekoutpost.com/ in Palmdale, FL. The campground is located one mile north of the intersection of Rt 29 and Rt 27 in Palmdale Florida. |
|
You're invited to Ortona Volunteer Fire Dept's annual
CANE GRINDING FESTIVAL
Saturday February 4 10AM til 3PM
Ortona Indian Mound Park (just west of Ortona Cemetery on SR78)
Good food !! Fun! Lots of booths, music, dancing!
|
|
Carl Hiaasen to speak at
Carl Hiaasen
www.collieraudubon.info Carl Hiaasen grew up on the edge of Florida's Everglades where he spent his childhood romping through the mangrove swamps and fresh water lagoons surrounding his home, soaking up the natural beauty around him and developing an early fascination and appreciation of nature. |
In Blue Revolution, award-winning journalist Cynthia Barnett reports on the many ways one of the most water-rich nations on the planet has squandered its way to scarcity, and argues the best solution is also the simplest and least expensive: a water ethic for America. ... The first book to call for a national water ethic, Blue Revolution is also a powerful meditation on water and community in America. |
 | Stalwart Sentinel Great Blue Heron -- Lake Okeechobee Mark Renz photo
|
|
|

Have you ever had to turn away millions of dollars? It sounds crazy, but here's why the Sierra Club chose to do exactly that.
In 2010, soon after I became the organization's executive director, I learned that beginning in 2007 the Sierra Club had received more than $26 million from individuals or subsidiaries of Chesapeake Energy, one of the country's largest natural gas companies. At the same time I learned about the donation, we at the Club were also hearing from scientists and from local Club chapters about the risks that natural gas drilling posed to our air, water, climate, and people in their communities. We cannot accept money from an industry we need to change. Very quickly, the board of directors, with my strong encouragement, cut off these donations and rewrote our gift acceptance policy. Let me tell you how it came about.
In the fall of 2005, Sierra Club staff and volunteer leaders agreed to make the enormous challenge of climate disruption the Club's highest priority. By that time, we had already begun to have great success with our Beyond Coal campaign, which had started in 2002, and which had already stopped the construction of several dozen new coal-fired power plants.
This Beyond Coal initiative has continued to have unparalleled success working with literally hundreds of other organizations, small and large, and using grassroots power to stop more than 160 new coal plants and prevent 500 million tons of carbon from entering the atmosphere. Sierra Club activists are now fighting Big Coal pollution in all 50 states and on college campuses nationwide. Today, the Sierra Club is not just focusing on stopping new plants from being built but is also accelerating efforts to retire old and dirty coal plants nationwide.
As this campaign was gearing up, the Sierra Club board of directors, working with the best science at the time and with extensive input from staff and volunteers, determined that natural gas, while far from ideal as a fuel source, might play a necessary role in helping us reach the clean energy future our children deserve. It was also during this time, in 2007, that the first contributions to the Sierra Club were made from entities or individuals associated with Chesapeake Energy. The idea was that we shared at least one common purpose -- to move our country away from dirty coal.
The big challenge, however, is what follows coal. How do we keep the lights on as we move quickly to an economy powered by clean, renewable energy? During the period that the Sierra Club first started receiving donations, several of our local chapters were becoming increasingly alarmed by dangerous and disruptive natural gas industry practices in their communities -- particularly horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," a technique where millions of gallons of water, laced with other ingredients (including, often, toxic chemicals) are pumped into rock to release gas deposits. Gradually, more and more legitimate questions were raised about the risks that fracking poses to our air, water, communities, and indeed our climate.
By the time I assumed leadership of the Club in March 2010, our view of natural gas had changed -- so I made sure our policy did, too. We created a strong natural gas campaign comprised of staff and volunteer leaders. Some chapters sought to establish tough safeguards at the state and federal level to protect their air and water; others sought to suspend fracking completely until those standards were in place. By mid-August 2010, with gas industry practices and our policies increasingly in conflict, I recommended to the Board, and it agreed, to end the funding relationship between the Club and the gas industry, and all fossil fuel companies or executives.
Our position today could not be more clear: We still need to move America beyond coal, as quickly as we can while taking care of the workers in the mines and at coal-burning utilities. And as we retire these coal plants, we'll need to replace them with as much clean energy as we possibly can. In the process, we'll use as little gas as possible and work to ensure that the gas that is used is produced as responsibly as possible.
It's time to stop thinking of natural gas as a "kinder, gentler" energy source. What's more, we do not have an effective regulatory system in this country to address the risks that gas drilling poses on our health and communities. The scope of the problems from under-regulated drilling, as well as a clearer understanding of the total carbon pollution that results from both drilling and burning gas, have made it plain that, as we phase out coal, we need to leapfrog over gas whenever possible in favor of truly clean energy. Instead of rushing to see how quickly we can extract natural gas, we should be focusing on how to be sure we are using less -- and safeguarding our health and environment in the meantime.
The Sierra Club opposes any natural gas development that poses unacceptable toxic risks to our land, water, and air. We insist that the volume and content of all fracking fluids and flowback should be disclosed, and that all toxics should be eliminated. There should be proper treatment, management, and disposal of both fracking fluids and toxic flowback. Fracking should not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that drinking water is protected and that all cumulative impacts can be mitigated. And, of course, many beautiful areas and important watersheds across this country should be off-limits to drilling.
Exempting the natural gas industry from environmental protections was a terrible idea. It looks even dumber today, when the real risks that natural gas drilling poses to water supplies and critical watersheds are that much more apparent.
Ultimately, the only safe, smart, and responsible way to address our nation's energy needs is to look beyond coal, oil, and gas, and focus on clean, efficient energy sources such as wind, solar, and geothermal. It's clear to countries around the world that the most successful 21st-century economies will be based on using energy that is safe, secure, and sustainable. Let's get to work building that economy right here at home.
|

Science Coordination Group
The Science Coordination Group (SCG) supports the Task Force in its efforts to coordinate the scientific aspects of restoration of the South Florida ecosystem. The SCG is primarily tasked with continually documenting and supporting the programmatic-level science and other research through updates and implementation of the Task Force's Plan for Coordinating Science. To enhance the integration of science and management, the SCG includes both senior managers and scientists appointed by the Task Force.
Science Coordination Group-sponsored public workshop for Central Everglades Planning
Feb. 13 and 14, 2012
A Central Everglades Planning Project (CEPP) workshop sponsored by the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force's Science Coordination Group (SCG) will be held Feb. 13 and 14 from 9:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. at the South Florida Water Management District Headquarters in the Governing Board Auditorium, Building B-1, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33406.
The public workshop is being sponsored by the SCG to engage the public in science issues related to Central Everglades Planning Project. The Task Force will provide feedback from the workshop to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) during the Central Everglades Planning Project. The public is advised that it is possible that one or more members of the Water Resources Advisory Commission and Governing Board of the South Florida Water Management District may attend and participate in this meeting.
Additional information on Task Force-sponsored public workshops is available at: www.sfrestore.org/cepp/cepp.html
The agenda for the Task Force's SCG-sponsored public workshop is available at: http://www.sfrestore.org/cepp/meetings/021312/CEPP_02_13_12_Agenda.pdf
Additional information on CEPP is available at: http://evergladesplan.org/pm/projects/proj_51_cepp.aspx
|
|
Great Waters Webinar -
Congressional Authorizations for Restoration Programs
America's Great Waters Coalition is hosting a webinar on Congressional Authorizations for Restoration Programs on Thursday, February 9 at 4:00 p.m. EST.
Please join Coby Dolan from Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz's office, Peter Alexander from the Northeast Great Waters Restoration Initiative, and Jeff Skelding from the Healing Our Waters-Great Lakes Coalition. They will discuss what a Congressional authorization means, why one is important, strategies and processes for securing one, and the prospects for securing a new authorization in the current political climate in Congress.
What: Great Waters Coalition Webinar on Regional Restoration Program Authorizations
When: Thursday, February 9 at 4:00 p.m. EST
Who: Coby Dolan, Legislative Director, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz Peter Alexander, Northeast Great Waters Restoration Initiative Jeff Skelding, Campaign Director, Healing Our Waters-Great Lakes Coalition
How: Dial: 1-877-890-9502, Passcode: 8599270#
|
CHNEP 2013 calendar: Send art and photos
Submit your artwork for the CHNEP 2013 calendar We live in a beautiful place and many of you have captured this beauty in your artwork, as is evidenced by the calendars produced by the Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program (CHNEP) since 2005. The CHNEP is a partnership program working to protect the natural environment of Florida from Venice to Estero Bay to Winter Haven.
We hope you will consider being a part of the 2013 calendar. |
It's the phosphorous

Although 30,000 tons of the phosphorus that plagues Lake Okeechobee is located in sediments at the Lake's bottom, it may not be economically, practically, or ecologically feasible to remove these sediments by dredging. Not only would the cost of that effort be astronomical ($3 billion according to a 2003 study commissioned for the SFWMD), but the effort could take an impractically long time given the volume of sediments to be removed. The SFWMD has estimated that 200 million cubic meters of sediment would need to be dredged to remove all internally loaded sediments from Lake Okeechobee. That is enough to fill 250,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools, and "ten times the amount of material removed from any lake in the world." If dredging techniques from another shallow Florida lake (Banana Lake) were used, such dredging this could take as long as 270 years! In addition, the process could pose unacceptable risks for the Lake's fish and wildlife: dredging would stir up more sediments and expose Lake life to increased turbidity and nutrient levels. The feasibility of dredging was recently studied by SFWMD and its partners as a part of the Lake Okeechobee Sediment Management Feasibility Study. This study concluded that "the no-action" alternative, i.e. no in-lake dredging or chemical treatment, is the preferred alternative. Instead, the study recommends concentrating control activities in the watershed versus the lake. (For more information on this study, see Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc., Evaluation of Alternatives for the Lake Okeechobee Sediment Management Feasibility Study C-11650: A report prepared for the South Florida Water Management District, April, 2003, here.
|
 | |
For every man-made solution to a man-made problem there is an opposite and much worse problem. -- Old Man River
Photo of Lake Okeechobee Rim Canal by Mark Renz
|
|
|

The Human and Natural History of Lake Okeechobee
Hendry Glades Audubon Society
Dark swollen clouds filled the sky and began to swing ponderously low in a slow, pendulum motion before releasing their liquid burden. Soon torrents of water plunged earthward in a grey deluge, flooding creeks and lakes that enveloped the Kissimmee River, turning it into a vast sheet of flowing water.
The cascading river moved ever southward to Lake Okeechobee, carrying a watery avalanche of grasses, scrubs and trees in its wet tentacles. Custard apple forest nestled along the lake's southern boundaries rapidly surrendered to the flowing fluid horde as it expanded and swept through the infamous Everglades to the sea.
Drainage of wetlands for agriculture and urban development would eventually bring an end to the prescribed water flow into Lake Okeechobee and the Everglades. The citizens of yesterday that participated in the drainage and demise of this natural inland waterway, envisioned that their fruits of labor would bear future prosperity for all. It is unfortunate that they had no way of seeing the results of their deeds through the passage of time.
Come join the Hendry-Glades Audubon Society at the Clewiston Museum on Feb. 13th, at 7:00 p.m., The evening will begin with a presentation by Mary-Bird Hansen of the Ah-Tha-Thi-Ki Museum and Boardwalk about an "Audubon Special". Then the guest speaker, Dr. Paul Gray, will present "The Human and Natural History of Okeechobee," an historical insight into Lake Okeechobee's rich past as well as an environmental perspective to its future. Mr. Gray will relate the lake's history through the eyes of a naturalist and expound on the many intricate environmental issues that currently challenge Lake Okeechobee.

Dr. Paul Gray is the Science Coordinator of Audubon of Florida's Lake Okeechobee Watershed Program. He has been employed with Audubon for 17 years and worked around Lake Okeechobee with agencies and stakeholders on Okeechobee water management, water quality, aquatic plants and fire management since 1988. Dr. Gray has also written numerous popular and technical articles on Okeechobee-related issues.
Don't miss this opportunity to learn about Lake Okeechobee's natural history and the enviormental issues it faces today and learn about the Ah-Tha-Thi-Ki Museum and Boardwalk's "Audubon Special".
Please contact the Clewiston Museum at 863-983-2870 for questions or reservations. |
 | "Lone Cypress" and Everglades drainage Moore Haven
Click Mark Renz photo for history surrounding tree
|
|
Lake O Scientists' Conference Call Estuaries/releases
Periodic Scientists Conference Call -
Lake Okeechobee/Estuaries The next conference call is scheduled for Tuesday, 10:30am. The call-in number is (888) 622-5357 and the code is 920898.
Members of the public can "listen in" but are not participants in the discussion. Public comment is accepted at the conclusion of the representatives' discussion. |
|
Support Eco-Voice
We need your financial support to keep going. Please make a donation today. Checks can be sent to: Post Office Box 50161 Fort Myers, FL 33994
Eco-Voice, Inc. has 501c3 status. |
|
 Promote Your Event
You too can promote your organization's upcoming event - complete with a link to your web site - for seven days, by sponsoring the Daily Digest with a donation of $25. Send your message, dates you want it to run, and logo to sponsorship@Eco-Voice.org. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
Eco-Voice Moderator Eco-Voice, Inc.
|
|
Eco-voice, Inc. is an independent, volunteer-run organization and provides this website as a public service. The opinions of those posting on this site are not necessarily those of the site managers or their sponsors. License to solicit: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES By CALLING TOLL-FREE (800-435-7352) WITHIN THE STATE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.'' REGISTRATION# CH31394. " |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Post Online |
To post to the website: Email suggestions for posts to ecovoicemoderator@msn.com . Add dates and specific locations to your messages if appropriate, and they will display on the site map and calendar. If posting media material please include link to the original publication.
| | at Eco-Voice.org |
|
|