July 27, 2012: Volume 4, Issue 15

 

In This Issue
Eaton County Dumps Prevailing Wage Law
Public Construction Advisory
State Acknowledges Huge Uncertainty About Obamacare
Quick Links

 

  

 

Facebook 
Our Sponsors
Pinnacle Insurance Partners
Visit Our Sponsor
ABC SIWCF
Visit Our Sponsor
The BlueBook
Visit Our Sponsor
Contact ABC
230 N. Washington Sq.
Suite 202
Lansing, MI 48933
 
Phone:   (517) 853-2545
Fax:       (517) 853-2546
email:     info@abcmi.com
website: www.abcmi.com

Eaton County Dumps Prevailing Wage Law

Written by: Jack Spencer, Capitol Affairs Specialist, Mackinac Center for Public Policy

 

Last week, Eaton County repealed its prevailing wage law, opening up the local market to more competitive wages for construction jobs.

 

The 12-3 vote by the Board of Commissioners was along party lines with Republicans voting to repeal the restrictive wage law; Democrats voted to keep it in place.

 

Prevailing wage laws mandate that union-scale wages be paid on construction work funded by taxpayer dollars regardless of whether the company's workers belong to a union. Local governments can do nothing about federal and state prevailing wage laws, but they do have control over their own.

 

Eaton County's action in repealing its prevailing wage law was the second time a Michigan community has done so this year. In January, Bay City repealed its prevailing wage law.

 

Prevailing wage opponents say they hope Eaton County's step will help embolden other communities to rid themselves of their prevailing wage laws.

 

"I want to commend the Eaton County Board of Commissioners for their responsible decision to level the playing field and ultimately, save hard-earned taxpayers' dollars," said Rep. Deb Shaughnessy, R-Charlotte, who represents Eaton County in the State House. "During these challenging economic times, every dollar saved is so important and it is my hope other communities across the state will follow suit."

 

Chris Fisher, president of Associated Builders and Contractors of Michigan, said he was pleased with Eaton County's action.

 

"It was encouraging to see Eaton County stand up for accountability to taxpayers and join the super-majority of other Michigan communities that have no wage mandate," Fisher said. "We look forward to working with other local officials to promote fair and open competition elsewhere."

 

Sen. Rick Jones, R-Grand Ledge, whose Senate district includes Eaton County, said the county's action was overdue.

 

"I'm surprised that it took so long for them to do it," Sen. Jones said. "This was something they needed to do right away."

 

The three Democratic Eaton County Commissioners who voted against the motion to repeal the prevailing wage law did not return phone calls for comment.

 

At the state level, prevailing wage affects school districts and universities. Earlier this year, it was believed that the Michigan Legislature might make some prevailing wage law changes this summer, but it now looks like that won't happen until after the November election.

 

In a letter to the Eaton County Board circulated before Wednesday night's vote was taken, Fisher said that experience and studies show that the primary effect of prevailing wage laws is to add to the financial burdens of taxpayers in more ways than one.

 

"As Michigan and Eaton County work hard to climb out from a troubling economic climate punctuated with a high unemployment rate, Department of Labor data has also shown a correlation between prevailing wage requirements and higher unemployment," Fisher wrote. "When Michigan's prevailing wage law was suspended for 30 months, from December 1994 to June 1997 as a result of a federal district court ruling, 11,000 more construction jobs were created. Common sense and indisputable employment data show a clear correlation between prevailing wage and employment. Indeed, if history serves as any sort of a good indicator, which it typically does, it is well advised that Eaton County repeal its prevailing wage policy without delay."

 

Columbia University has released a study showing that taxpayers pay too much for construction under prevailing wage laws.

 

The Mackinac Center for Public Policy has looked at the costs of prevailing wage laws in Michigan and come to the same conclusion.

 

Written By: Jack Spencer, Capitol Affairs Specialist, Mackinac Center for Public Policy www.mackinac.org

Public Construction Advisory

 

On June 29, 2012 changes to Michigan's Fair and Open Competition in Governmental Construction Act became law. This again means that government-mandated PLAs are illegal.

 

This new law prohibits the use of government-mandated (including public school, community college and university) project labor agreements (PLAs), Construction Unity Board (CUB) agreements, harmony agreements and any pre-hire collective bargaining agreement with one or more labor organizations that establishes the terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project. Also, any discrimination on the basis of labor affiliation is explicitly prohibited. Changes to this law specify that contractors may enter into a PLA, only if doing so is voluntary and not mandated.

 

Any local ordinances, policies or contract documents in conflict with this new law are now nullified.

 

Click here for a copy of the Public Act and a list of Frequently Asked Questions regarding Public Act 238 of 2012.

State Acknowledges Huge Uncertainty About Obamacare

 

State officials were unable to provide specific details about how almost $10 million in taxpayer funding would be used to create a state health care exchange under Obamacare, or even how a state and federal exchange would differ, leading state Rep. Mike Shirkey to call for the state to sit tight and wait.

 

Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs officials testified before Shirkey and a joint hearing of the House Health Policy Committee and House Subcommittee on LARA as to whether the state or the federal government should create a Michigan health care exchange.

 

"It seems the only thing that is for certain regarding Obamacare is uncertainty, and setting up a state health care exchange now would be the absolute wrong approach," said Shirkey, a member of the House Health Policy Committee. "We, in Michigan, should stay focused on being innovators and leaders in creating an investment-rich, job-rich environment. We do not need to be innovators and pioneers in socializing or nationalizing health care."

 

Shirkey pointed to four main reasons to wait, saying we don't know yet what a federal exchange would look like; the federal government continues to unveil new rules and regulations regarding Obamacare; the feds haven't released reports on best practices associated with these types of taxpayer investments; and the state has limited time and resources.

 

"The 2,500-plus page Obamacare bill is, at best, a work in progress," said Shirkey, R-Clarklake. "Since there is currently so much uncertainty regarding both the state and federal health care exchanges, waiting provides the most flexible option and best protects the taxpayers of Michigan."

 

Shirkey said a state health care exchange could be created next year before the federal exchange is implemented in January 2014, or the state of Michigan could convert to a state exchange after 2014 once it learns how the federal exchange is administered.

 

Shirkey said additional joint committee hearings are planned.

Associated Builders and Contractors of Michigan is a statewide trade association, working in partnership with three local chapters, dedicated to providing Michigan with high-quality, affordable, safe and on-time construction.  ABC of Michigan is an equal opportunity organization that opposes all discrimination in the construction industry including discrimination based on union affiliation. A leading construction industry voice with state government, ABC provides many member services including legislative advocacy, networking opportunities, member benefits, legal updates, business development and educational opportunities.