Two weeks ago, we invited Golf Lab customers to
participate in a free "Donate Your Swing to
Science" program. Our goal is to find out,
once and for all, whether the PowerBilt Air Force One
driver delivers the claimed improved performance.
We weren't impressed at first. The idea of building a
driver head charged with Nitrogen under pressure
sounded preposterous. Why would that work?
If it weren't for the "Iceman" and his playing partners
we would have completely ignored the Air Force One.
The foursome took a demo driver to the course to hit
against their current "gamers". The Air Force One
delivered enough improvement that three of the four
players went out and bought one the next week.
When
it comes to new golf clubs, that's the acid test. You
play the club and your playing partners play the club.
You see the results compared against your gamer on
a course where you know your distances. If there's
enough improvement, you buy one.
We scheduled "preliminary fittings" to test the Air
Force One indoors against customers' current drivers
with our launch monitors. Then, knowing the
correct "stock" shaft and loft - and trimming to "playing
length" - we picked out a demo driver for a few days of
on-course testing. The follow-up is to re-shaft the Air
Force One drivers with a "custom" shaft -
counterweighted and "tweaked" to maximize
performance. All this to answer the ultimate
question, "is this driver good enough to buy with real
money?"
A few players have completed their "First Look" and
checked in for the second stage. The results so far
are positive. If you haven't signed up for the program,
it would be a good idea to make a phone call. 650-
493-1770. Schedule a convenient time. You can't
lose, the program is completely free.
Golf Lab On-Course
Launch monitor results show small increases in ball
speed. Two to three MPH might not sound like much,
but that translates into six to ten yards of carry
distance. But the key to extra distance for most
amateurs is not carry distance. Rather, for any
player's ball speed a combination of trajectory - an
under 39 degree "angle of descent" - and low spin to
promote run out - make the difference.
Clint and I both played the Air Force One last
weekend to make sure we had personal experience
to help understand our customers' reports.
Clint chose the "Pro" model in 10.5* and shafted it
with a 47" Oban Devotion shaft in a very light 55 gram
weight. On Monday morning, he was smiling.
(Customers who know Clint will know what that
means!!) He played with Bob at Spring Valley. Bob
noticed the increased distance - estimated at 10-15
yards. Most of the increased distance came from
better roll. But the most interesting result was
improved accuracy. Clint reported that he never, ever,
had a better day keeping it in the fairway. It was
clearly better than his current gamer, a 9.5* Taylor
Made Burner shafted with a 47", 55 gram Fujikura Z-
Com shaft.
I chose the "Geometric" model in 9.5* shortened to
44.5" with the stock shaft in "S" flex. I added six
grams of lead tape to the head to adjust the swing
weight. Stock shaft length for the Air Force One is
45.5" - too long for the weight of the shaft.
My round was at the San Jose Country Club. SJCC is
an old-fashioned course with tree-lined fairways and
plenty of out of bounds. I kept my drives inside the
tree line all the way around. That's a pretty unusual
occurrence - even on a good day. My playing partners
included "JS" a player who hits his drives a long way
past mine when he catches one. Several times, I
found myself just a few steps behind JS and asked
him "how did you hit that one". His reply was "OK". I
took that as a very good sign for distance. SJCC is
not my home course so I had no good independent
indicator.
The downside is that I got very little roll. I would rather
have tested the "Pro" version of the Air Force One.
(The Company opinion is that the Pro version is lower
spin and lower "effective loft".) Alas, I didn't have any
more Pro heads when it came my turn to choose a
driver.
I am definitely ready for a shaft upgrade. My
unquestioned conclusion is that the driver is "spooky
straight".
The "Tracy Twins"
One of the "TT's" walked into the Golf Lab fifteen
minutes after we announced the testing program by
email. That proves the Twins are avid golfers. They
play weekends at the Tracy Country Club.
I set up one of the Pro Series drivers in 10.5* loft with
a "regular" flex stock shaft. I trimmed it to 45" and
added five grams of weight to the head with lead tape.
On Monday morning, both of the Twins were at the
front door of the Golf Lab, reporting that they had
found themselves in "places I've never been before". I
then re-shafted two 10.5* Pro heads. One took a
Mitsubishi Whiteboard in "R" flex, the other a House of
Forged "Whup-in" shaft in "stiff". They went out for
another week of final, definitive testing on the course.
Both of the Twins would have bought the Air Force
One with the stock shaft but I wanted to take the test
to the limit. Stay tuned for the results of the test in
Tracy.
We have more demo Air Force One drivers on the
way. We can handle fifteen testers at a time. Make
that call to reserve your fitting appointment.
More Information on the Air Force One
When things started to get interesting I figured I'd
better get a little more information on the Nitrogen
Charged Driver.
The idea goes back ten years. The inventor doesn't
even play golf. But, being an inventor and having a
nose for opportunity, Al Blowes ran across a little-
known fact in 1999. He found out that Taylor Made
took back 400,000 cracked titanium drivers that year.
He reasoned that solving that problem should be
worth a lot of money.
That's when smashing and empty pop can on his
head gave him the idea of pressurizing the driver
head itself. So the original idea was not about
distance or control - it was about durability.
The unintended result was that the Air Force One
could be constructed differently from most other
drivers. The key is a single thickness, unreinforced
titanium face on the driver. The theory is that the
single thickness of titanium enlarges the sweet spot.
Most titanium drivers today are made with some kind
of "sculptured" face. Some look like little volcanoes.
Some are thicker in the middle and taper out toward
the edges. A couple of years ago, there was a buzz
for "cup face" - presumably a construction technique
that allowed a "single thickness face".
The theory about performance is that the single face
thickness produces better results on off center hits.
That feature was noted by all testers.
Engineering Genius or Pure Luck?
It makes you wonder when a product that was
designed to solve one problem is presented to solve
another. How lucky that a more durable head would
also be "longer" or "more forgiving". Could that be
true?
It is early to know for sure, but so far, every tester has
reported a positive experience. In the end, will the
true virtue be distance, control or both? My opinion is
that the ultimate benefit is more likely to be control.
All players have reported less dispersion on off center
hits.
Every week a customer asks the question, "what's the
best driver?" The answer is obvious. If there were
one best driver - there surely would be only one - and
we would all be playing it. That hasn't happened in
400 years so there is not much chance that it will
happen this year. We still have a list of favorites that
have brought great improvement to players who
happened to find their own "Magic Driver" at the Golf
Lab.
We would like to complete a testing sequence with at
least thirty Golf Lab customers. So far, ten have
reserved sessions so we have plenty of room if you
want to find out if the Air Force One fits your swing.
Call 650-493-1770 to schedule an appointment. See
you at the Lab.
Reduced Schedule Next Week
Leith will be traveling to Boston from Tuesday through
Saturday next week. Clint will be in the shop - along
with Michael - to handle all customer needs except
fitting. The occasion is to celebrate the graduation of
his son, Ryan, from Harvard University where he will
receive a PhD in Chemistry with a focus on
biotechnology. (Any Golf Lab customers in that
industry who could help him make a connection in
California would be profusely thanked. He can't stand
the Boston winters and wants to return to California.)
Regards,
Leith Anderson, Clint Smith, Bob Huff and Michael Quagletti