FAIR Canada
FAIR Canada Newsletter

March 2012

Victims of Fraud and Insolvency Need Better Compensation 

In its recent submission to the AMF, FAIR Canada stated that better compensation in cases of fraud or insolvency of regulated firms is needed. At present, many registrant firms are not members of a self-regulatory organization ("SRO") backed by a compensation fund which provides coverage in the event of the firm's insolvency. 

 

In addition, coverage under the Québec's Financial Services Compensation Fund (the "Fund") will not be provided if the product sold was outside the registrant's authority (a consumer will generally not know the scope of that authority). Recent cases, such as Norshield Asset Management (Canada) Limited, Portus Alternative Asset Management Inc. and Norbourg Asset Management Inc. offer clear examples of why these gaps in compensation coverage need to be addressed immediately. 

 

 

Read more >>  

 

Retail Investors Need Greater Protection in Exempt Market

FAIR Canada submitted comments to the CSA in response to a request for comments regarding the minimum amount (MA) and accredited investor (AI) exemptions that allow the sale of investments to retail investors without a prospectus. FAIR Canada pointed out a number of concerns regarding these exemptions, including:  

  • The lack of information available regarding the exempt market in Canada. Regulators should provide data to show where losses are suffered by consumers due to fraud or other misconduct in order to focus regulation on high-risk areas. 
  • The limited protections afforded to investors by current "suitability" obligations. 
  • A lack of compliance by market participants with "suitability" requirements and qualifications for the AI exemption.
  • The need for effective oversight of exempt market firms in order for investors to be adequately protected. 
  • The absence of any compensation fund coverage (such as CIPF or IPC) for clients of Exempt Market Dealers.
  • A lack of disclosure of large commissions made on the sale of exempt products and conflicts of interest that are rife in this market.
  • Flawed presumptions underlying the current MA and AI exemptions. The fact that a consumer may have a certain income or level of financial assets does not mean that the person is financially sophisticated and not in need of protections provided by securities law.

 

Read more >> 

 

Canadians Vulnerable to Online Investment Fraud

A fake financial scam website created by Canadian securities regulators found that Canadians remain vulnerable to online investment fraud. Between November 27, 2011 and February 5, 2012, Canadian securities regulators ran a public education initiative that included online ads and social media promotions pointing to the website for a fictitious company, BlueHedge Investments. During the ten-week campaign, the BlueHedge website received almost 18,000 visits from across Canada. Consumers who tried to provide personal information or who clicked on an "Invest Now" link were redirected to an investor education website (www.BlueHedgeIsntReal.ca
), where regulators provided information and tools, including the five red flags to recognizing an online investment scam:
  1. Guaranteed high returns, no risk
  2. High pressure sales tactics to invest immediately
  3. Tax-free and offshore
  4. Slick appearances that don't measure up
  5. Lack of quality information

 

Read more >>

 

Improving Corporate Democracy

FAIR Canada's Executive Director, Ermanno Pascutto, appeared on BNN's Headline with Howard Green along with Carol Hansell (Davies) and Stan Magidson (Institute of Corporate Directors) to discuss the quality of Canadian boards. During the discussion, Mr. Pascutto suggested that board governance is more problematic with junior companies (including emerging market listings) and recommended that director compensation include shares in order to align directors' interests with those of the company and its shareholders. He also suggested that corporate democracy be improved by making it easier for shareholders to nominate directors and to vote for or against directors (and not simply to vote for or abstain).

 
The show is provided online in 3 parts: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3. The discussion was prompted by recent headline stories involving the boards of CP Rail, RIM and SNC Lavalin, as well as the long-running Sino Forest scandal.

www.faircanada.ca
who we are | top news | submissions and reports | join our fair canada facebook and linkedin groups

 

Join Our Mailing List