FAIR Canada
FAIR Canada Newsletter
January 2011
FAIR Canada Urges Prioritization of Clients' Best Interests: Will Canadian Securities Regulators Rise to the Challenge in 2011?

FAIR Canada recently submitted a comment letter to IIROC, supporting its initiative to be clearer about the meaning of "suitability" obligations. In its submission, FAIR Canada noted that the suitability rules, as proposed by IIROC, although moving in a positive direction, need further clarification and do not provide sufficiently clear guidance to registrants or individual investors about suitability. FAIR Canada recommends that IIROC provide a manual for retail investors in readable, plain language that explains the rights of investors and the obligations of dealers regarding "know your client" ("KYC") and suitability obligations; that explains the difference between these obligations and a fiduciary or "best interest" obligation; and explains to investors how they can safeguard and enforce their rights regarding KYC and suitability obligations.

 

Duty to Act in Client's Best Interests

More importantly, FAIR Canada continues to urge regulators to look beyond the current concept of "suitability" and consider a framework in which registrants are required to put their clients' best interests first. FAIR Canada believes that the current definition of "suitability" is inappropriate as a basis for the regulation of the activities of registered persons. Under the current definition of suitability, an investment may be "suitable" but not in the client's best interests. We believe that the fundamental framework upon which a financial advisor's activities should be regulated is one where a firm and the advisor are required to put the client's best interests first. 

 

International Best Practices

We recommend that Canadian securities regulators seriously consider developments in other leading jurisdictions. For example, the SEC recently issued a report about the implementation of a uniform fiduciary duty for both broker-dealers and investment advisors. In the UK, proposals have been put forward to ban trailer commissions (effective from the end of 2012) and to strengthen licensing requirements for financial advisors. In Australia, the government has proposed reforms which could introduce a statutory fiduciary duty for financial advisors and ban certain fees. The Australian package also includes a prospective ban on conflicted remuneration structures, including commissions and volume- based payments. 

 

These leading financial centers are moving forward to enhance investor protection. 

 

People who represent the professionalism and conscience of the financial industry have called for a mandatory duty to act in the best interests of the client. Recently, Morningstar and the new Chair of the CFA Institute added their voices, calling for action to restore the trust of Canadians in the industry.

 

Read more >>   
 
The US SEC's fiduciary study recommends establishing a uniform fiduciary standard for investment advisers and broker-dealers when they provide investment advice about securities to retail customers. The fiduciary standard recommended in the study is consistent with the standard that currently applies to investment advisers. Other recommendations include suggestions to consider harmonization of the broker-dealer and investment adviser regulatory regimes, with a view toward enhancing their effectiveness in the retail marketplace. The study concludes that retail customers should be protected uniformly when receiving personalized investment advice about securities regardless of whether they choose to work with an investment advisor or a broker-dealer. 
SCCFAIR Canada recently filed its factum with the Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC), in connection with the April 2011 reference being heard by the SCC.  The factum affirmed FAIR Canada's position that the current patchwork system of securities regulation does not adequately protect retail investors across Canada.
Read more about FAIR Canada's involvement in the SCC case >>
Joel Wiesenfeld, in a recent article, shares his views and comments about the national securities regulator debate in Canada:

"What has been completely overlooked in all the battling over the issue of a national securities regulator is how the dealers and persons who actually distribute and trade in securities on behalf of retail, corporate and institutional investors are regulated." 

Click here for full Joel Wiesenfeld article
www.faircanada.ca
who we are | top news | submissions and reports | join our fair canada facebook fan page and linkedin group

Join Our Mailing List