Silver Law Group Beverly Hills, CA
 E-Alert 
Silver Law Offices Inc.
9665 Wilshire Boulvard · Suite 810
Beverly HIlls, CA 90212
310.684.3611 · 888.600.6101 fax
Bio | vCard | Website
  • Scott Silver negotiates over $500,000 in rent reductions in the second half of 2009.

  • What is an FDIC "Loss Sharing Agreement"?

  • 2009 retail store closings end up being less than 6,000, far short of the 10,000 to 12,000 closings experts projected last year. Why?
$500,000 in rent reductions negotiated by Silver Law Offices in second half 2009

My landlord clients are continuing to make the best of a bad situation. In response to my article published in Shopping Center Business last month (link below), a number of shopping center owners have retained this Firm to negotiate and document rent relief amendments which actually benefit them. Most importantly, they result in avoiding another painful and expensive vacancy. The leases they modified were enhanced by the addition of landlord termination and relocation rights. Additionally, we obtained Bills of Sale "in escrow" (I hold them and deliver them to my client Landlord only upon tenant default) giving landlords ownership of all restaurant FF&E which means greater savings, increased flexibility and quicker re-tenanting if the tenants ultimately fail. http://www.shoppingcenterbusiness.com/articles/NOV09/story9.shtml or Article in PDF
 
FDIC Loss Sharing Agreements

Loss sharing arrangements were first used in the early '90s and now the FDIC is employing them again to entice "healthy" banks to acquire a failing bank's loans in a government assisted transaction. Through August 2009, the FDIC had entered into 53 loss sharing agreements, with $80 billion in assets under loss share. According to the FDIC, the estimated "savings" exceed $11 billion, compared to an outright cash sale of those assets.There were 25 bank failures in 2008 and there have been 125 bank failures so far in 2009, of which the FDIC entered into less than 10 loss sharing agreements as part of a corresponding assisted transaction.

Here's how it works. The FDIC agrees to share in loan losses that may be incurred by the acquiring healthy bank as a direct result of any nonperforming loans that it acquired from the failed bank. The loss sharing agreements also provide that the FDIC will share in any recoveries on nonperforming loans. The FDIC uses two forms of loss sharing. The first is for commercial assets and the other is for residential mortgages. For commercial assets, the agreements typically cover an eight-year period with the first five years for losses and recoveries and the final 3 years for recoveries only. The FDIC will reimburse 80 percent of losses incurred by acquirer on covered assets up to a stated threshold amount (generally FDIC's dollar estimate of the total projected losses on loss share assets), with the assuming bank picking up 20 percent. Any losses above the stated threshold amount will be reimbursed at 95 percent of the losses booked by the acquirer. For single family mortgages, the length of the agreements tend to run for 10 years and have the same 80/20 and 95/5 split as the commercial assets. The FDIC provides coverage for four basic loss events: modification, short sale, foreclosure, and charge-off for some second liens (loss sharing agreements differ on types of acceptable loss events). Loss coverage is also provided for loan sales but such sales require prior approval by the FDIC. Recoveries on loans which experience loss events are shared in the same proportion as the original loss. So If asset losses are lower than anticipated, then the FDIC receives the majority of the benefit.

If you are a borrower on a loan that is purchased by an acquiring bank in a transaction assisted by an FDIC Loss Sharing Agreement then knowing that your lender's losses are "backstopped" will assist you in negotiations.  We can obtain and review particular loss sharing agreements which can be found in corporate and governmental filings available to the public. We have worked on at least one loan workout involving a loan wherein the loss sharing agreement prohibited the lender from selling the loan to the borrower at all; in order to qualify for loss sharing, the property had to either go through foreclosure or the lender could sell the note or approve a short sale of the property to an unaffiliated buyer (not affiliated with the borrower), in either case subject to FDIC blessing.

Why did less stores close in 2010 than projected?

This from retailtrafficmag.com: "Some experts are seeing the fewer-than-expected closings as a sign that the worst is over for the industry, especially given the broader economic stabilization that has emerged in recent months. But a number of retail consultants and space disposition experts contend that many underperforming stores were kept in business this year thanks to rent relief measures granted by their landlords, as well as a great deal of corporate cost-cutting... If many underperforming stores managed to stay open this year, it was due in large part to tenants' successful efforts to secure rent reductions for those locations rather than to a better than expected business climate, says Alvin Williams, principal with Excess Space. "At the end of 2008, we thought that 2009 would be a record-setting year as it relates to store closures, but something very different occurred-retailers were able to [use poor market conditions] to open up a dialogue with landlords to restructure leases to make it more feasible to operate under-performing locations," Williams says. "Retailers have really done all they can to keep their lights on in 2009, and we think in 2010, retailers that were unable to restructure their leases or continue to struggle in spite of restructuring" will close stores, he adds."

© 2009 Silver Law Offices Inc. All rights reserved. This email and its content is intended for general information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on any specific facts or circumstances.