Business Evaluation Systems
BES Newsletter
March - April 2010
Business Evaluation Systems, Inc.
1700 F.M. 517 E. Suite A           281.337.1919 Phone
Dickinson, Texas 77539            281.337.1915 Fax
Greetings, 
H Texas Image/Article 
Since 1973, Business Evalutation Systems has been involved in the appraisal of over 16,000 companies, covering almost every industry on a national and international basis, ranging in value from $50,000 to over $7 billion.
 
Our experience has qualified us to meet the requirements of the Appraisal Foundation, the Internal Revenue Service, lending institutions, and courts of law around the country. Two of the appraisals the company was involved in have passed the scrutiny of the World Bank. The appraisers in Business Evaluation Systems have sold over 1,000 businesses.
 
Sincerely,
 

Business Evaluation Systems, Inc.
 
  Linked In BES Logo
In This Issue
Advalorem Tax Appraisals
EBITDA Pro's and Con's
Recent Changes in SBA Loan Guarantee Program
 

Advalorem Tax Appraisals

Nine in ten Companies overpay their personal property "advalorem" taxes. The state and county requirements for the reporting of personal and real property is substantially different than the requirements for either income tax reporting or financial statement reporting.

Most Companies use a CFO, CPA or Income Tax Representative to prepare their financial statements and all required tax forms. However, if these individuals are not specifically trained in advalorem tax reporting they may not realize that many assets required to be reported in financial statements or reported to the IRS are not required to be reported as personal property. Additionally, the class life systems for IRS depreciation or financial statements do not apply to personal property and the property's life may be entirely different.

Most advalorem tax renditions are prepared as an after-thought, after financial statement preparation and after income tax preparation by an individual who is not an advalorem specialist. Significant dollars are lost each year due to this mistake and then the mistake is compounded annually.

Business Evaluation Systems, with its broad range of valuation and advisory solutions, helps companies make strategic business decisions confidently.

 
 

EBITDA Pro's and Con's

By: George D. Abraham

Business Evaluation Systems

 

EBITDA, an acronym for "earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization", is an often-used measure of the value of a business.  

EBITDA is calculated by taking operating income and adding depreciation and amortization expenses back to it. EBITDA is used to analyze a company's operating profitability before non-operating expenses (such as interest and "other" non-core expenses) and non-cash charges (depreciation and amortization).

Critics of EBITDA claim that it is misleading due to the fact that it is often confused with cash flow and factoring out interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization can make even completely unprofitable firms appear to be fiscally healthy.  Looking back at the dotcom companies, there are countless examples of companies that had no hope, future or earnings and the use of EBITDA made them look attractive.

Also, EBITDA numbers are easy to manipulate.  If fraudulent accounting techniques are used to inflate revenues and interest, and taxes, depreciation and amortization are factored out of the equation, almost any company will look great. Of course, when the truth comes out about the sales figures, the house of cards will tumble and investors will be in trouble.  In the mid-nineties when Waste Management was struggling with earnings, they changed their depreciation schedule on their thousands of garbage trucks from 5 years to 8 years. This made profit jump in the current period because less depreciation was charged in the current period. Another example is the airline industry, where depreciation schedules were extended on the 737 to make profits appear better. When WorldCom started trending toward negative EBITDA, they began to change regular period expenses to assets so they could depreciate them. This removed the expense and increased depreciation, which inflated their EBITDA. This kept the bankers happy and protected WorldCom's stock.

Another concern is that EBITDA does not take into account working capital. It could be helpful to also point out that EBITDA is not a generally accepted accounting principal.

Because EBITDA can be manipulated like this, some analysts argue that a it doesn't truly reflect what is happening in companies. Most now realize that EBITDA must be compared to cash flow to ensure that EBITDA does actually convert to cash as expected.

To sum up the cons:

 

1. EBITDA ignores changes in working capital and overstates cash

                flow.
 
            2. EBITDA can be a misleading measure of liquidity.
 
            3. EBITDA does not consider the amount of required investment.
 

4.  EBITDA ignores distinctions in the quality of cash flow resulting

                from different accounting policies.
 
            5. EBITDA deviates from the GAAP measure of cash flow because it
                fails to adjust for changes in operations-related assets and

    liabilities.  

 On the plus side, EBITDA makes it easier to calculate how much cash a company has to pay down debt on long term assets. This calculation is called a debt coverage ratio. It is calculated by taking EBITDA divided by the required debt payments. This makes EBITDA useful in determining how long a company can continue to pay its debt without additional financing.

Overall, EBITDA is a stripped down, uncomplicated look at a company's profitability. It eliminates the subjectivity of calculating amortization and depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are unique expenses. First, they are non-cash expenses - they are expenses related to assets that have already been purchased, so no cash is changing hands. Second, they are expenses that are subject to judgment or estimates - the charges are based on how long the underlying assets are projected to last, and are adjusted based on experience, projections, or, as some would argue, fraud.

EBITDA takes out interest which is a result of management's choices of financing. And, it removes taxes which can vary greatly depending on numerous situations.

 

Recent Changes in SBA Loan Guarantee Program

Recent changes in the Small Business Administration's 7(A) Loan Guarantee Program promise to increase credit availability for owners of companies with purchase prices between $400,000 and $4,000,000.  The program, designed to help small entrepreneurs start or expand their businesses by making capital available to small businesses through bank and non-bank lending institutions, formerly only allowed a maximum of $250,000 in intangibles (including goodwill) to be financed.  Under the revised rules, it is now possible to finance any amount of goodwill (even up to this program's lending limit of $2,000,000 ), as long as at least 25% equity exists in borrower down payment and/or seller stand-by financing.  In addition, the SBA has temporarily increased its guarantee from 75% to 90% of the total loan amount, and is currently waiving the guarantee fee (2.6% of the loan amount) charged to borrowers.  In addition to helping borrowers obtain financing, the new SBA changes promise to increase the incentive for lenders to grant loans by providing much-needed security and clarity. 

 The new changes are particularly helpful to individuals seeking to finance the purchase of a small business. It is common for the purchase price of a growing company to carry a large percentage of goodwill. As a result of the old $250,000 financing limit for intangibles, however, buyers of these companies have historically experienced considerable difficulty in obtaining SBA guaranteed financing. Under the new limits, it will be easier for a buyer to finance up to 70% of the purchase price with the SBA guarantee, even if intangibles represent a large portion of the business value. It is important to note that transfers to insiders will likely be treated differently from sales to a third party. Factors such as management experience are especially important considerations in this process. In many cases, the buyer (often an employee or relative) will have been involved in management of the business for three or more years. In addition, insider transfers are non-arm's length transactions, and the bank will likely require a valuation before approving the loan. Inside transfers also often have the benefit of more lenient seller financing requirements, as the bank will typically favor a buyer already involved in running the business rather than an untried third party. Check with an SBA lending expert to learn more about how the new policies can help business owners looking to sell.

 Lenders also stand to benefit from the recent changes, and it is expected that banking institutions will increasingly choose to participate in these loan programs. It has been notoriously difficult for buyers to finance an acquisition if much of the purchase price was attributable to goodwill, as it has no collateral value. The new regulations will make it possible for a buyer to obtain SBA financing for up to 90% of the loan amount (even amounts attributed to goodwill). This change will inevitably temper much of the reluctance exhibited by lenders in these situations, and thereby ease the process for many buyers. Lenders also stand to benefit from another regulatory change. Under the new rules, banks will not be required to submit loans including over $500,000 in intangible assets for separate SBA approval, as long as buyer equity and seller standby financing together account for over 25%. The approval process for these types of loans will therefore decrease in time by about two-thirds (from about six weeks to as little as two weeks).

 Although a buyer may meet the SBA minimum loan standards, it is important to keep in mind that the bank will likely have its own (more strict) criteria for loan approval. Although it will be necessary to contact the bank to determine its specific protocol, the following are some requirements and considerations that typically apply:

  • Adequate cash flow. A bank will assess the company's loan repayment ability using the Debt Service Coverage Ratio (cash available for debt service divided by cash required for debt service). Banks will usually deny a loan if revenues have declined in recent years, although they may make an exception if the company can demonstrate a current stabilization or growth trend over the last nine months.
  • Capital. In most purchases, the buyer will put 20% down (the bank will finance 70% and the seller typically assumes a note for the remaining 10%). In many cases, the bank will allow up to half of the required cash to come from sources such as family gifts, a tax-free rollover of a 401(k) or IRA, or home equity line of credit (as long as the buyer has an additional, unrelated income stream large enough to feasibly pay off the debt). A bank may also accept a seller's note on full standby, whereby the seller agrees to receive no payments until the senior bank debt is paid in full.
  • Buyer management expertise. The lender will expect a potential buyer to have extensive and relevant ownership or management experience. This requirement may be waived in the case of an established franchise, as long as the company is not in the hotel/motel, restaurant, or construction industry.
  • Collateral. It is rare for a bank to require a specific minimum collateral coverage; however, collateral coverage of 20% or more is preferred. Lenders will also favor proposals in which at least 51% can be attributed to real estate. Particularly strong deals may benefit from financing of up to $2,000,000 for up to 100% goodwill.
  • Buyer credit and legal history. A FICO score of at least 650 is typically required, as is a relatively clear legal history. For instance, buyers are disqualified if they have ever defaulted or settled another government loan (such as taxes or student loans). The bank will also check to see if the buyer has previously committed a misdemeanor or declared bankruptcy, although the loan may be approved if either of these occurred over seven years prior to the loan application.
  • Loan Amounts. Although the SBA currently limits loan amounts to $2,000,000 for non-real estate transactions (and up to $5,000,000 for 100% real estate deals), it is possible to combine SBA financing with other payment options to accommodate proposals with larger financing requirements. For instance, current asset-based lending or seller financing can be used for this purpose.

 The temporary provisions may only extend through the end of 2010, but Congress is expected to raise the overall guarantee limit to $5,000,000 (with up to a 90% guarantee) before July 2010.  In addition, the SBA 504 program limits for 100% real estate transactions may increase to $14,000,000.  While these developments are encouraging, banks are expected to continue to be cautious even if they have previously utilized SBA financing.  Most will likely require collateral support of a certain percentage of the loan amount (50%, for instance), particularly with larger loans.  It is also important to remember that the process of obtaining an SBA financed loan is as complicated as ever.  The considerable number of associated regulatory requirements can make the approval process somewhat problematical, but there are some banks that offer this type of financing at a national level.  Some initial research should be completed before submitting a proposal, as it will only waste time to approach a lender that does not provide buyer financing.  Most importantly, remember that these favorable conditions are likely only temporary, and a prospective borrower should move quickly to take advantage of them.