One of ENGAGE's key research-based strategies to improve undergraduate retention in engineering is to increase faculty-student interaction. ENGAGE will be sending you a monthly tip that is big on student impact and low on time commitment.  

 

 

 

ENGAGE Tip:

Rotate Students Through Small-Group Office Hours

Some students complain they find their faculty intimidating to approach while some faculty complain that they have empty office hours. Why not change the way office hours are structured so that more students get some time with you in a very productive manner?

Many faculty already set up small groups when assigning group projects-- you can simply rotate these small groups through office hours.  By using this method, at least some of the time, many more students get a chance to meet with you, even if they wouldn't normally come on their own to office hours. They also get to hear their peers' questions.

Students perceive a professor as more approachable in a small setting. You are really likely to see a difference in your class because students tend to be much more engaged when they have had a chance to ask questions (in a small-group setting) and interact with you.  Students find informal, out-of-class positive interactions with their faculty very powerful and motivational.

One more detail: It is more comfortable for many faculty, and for students too, to hold these office hours in a public space such as the campus cafeteria or coffee shop. Using a public space increases the visibility of your work with students.

So when classes begin next semester,  give this strategy a try and see the benefit it may provide to you in terms of time savings, productivity and better course evaluations --- and to your students in terms of engagement and learning.


        

To read more about this topic check out the links below or go to www.EngageEngineering.org for a more comprehensive research brief:

 

Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2009). Student-faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437-459.

Lundberg, C. A., & Schreiner, L. A. (2004). Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analysis by student race/ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 549-565

 

 Like us on Facebook

 

Susan Metz
Contact Email
Principal Investigator

NSF LogoThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0833076. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.