Ray G Behm Jr DDS

                        Newsletter          August 2007
In This Issue
Success Stories
ADA warns members: Trouble ahead for mercury fillings
American Dental Association Update July 1, 2007
Map to Natural Dentistry
 
727 446.6747

Success Stories 

For the last 5 years I have had constant pain in my knees. I've had x-rays of both knees and specialists have told me that both joints were at least ½ gone and I would need knee replacements on both of them.

 

I came to see Dr. Behm to get my mercury fillings replaced. The procedure was to replace the top fillings first and then the bottom fillings.

 

After the replacement of the top fillings, I got in my car to drive the 70 miles back home. As I was driving, I noticed my right leg was very relaxed. I moved it about as much as you can while driving and didn't have any pain. I thought perhaps it was just because of the way I was sitting.

 

When I got home and got out of the car, my foot hit the ground and I usually have to stand for af few seconds before moving. I moved my right leg up and down - side to side and there was NO PAIN.

 

I though OK, this pain will return after I walk around - but it never has. I have two little dogs I walk twice a day - and some days it is very difficult to get a walk in with them because of my knees hurting.

 

My right knee has been pain-free since the extraction of the mercury fillings. It will be interesting to see what happens with my left knee now that the mercury is complete removed from my mouth.

 

Thanks, Dr. Behm.

Susan H

 

 

ADA warns members:

Trouble ahead for
mercury fillings

Dr. Behm's comments are in purple italics.


Charlie Brown

The American Dental Association sends out an ADA Update to its members only, but of course we have several Fifth Columnists (dentists who belong to the ADA but are in disagreement with their approval of amalgam fillings)who wheel it on to us.

 
    Charles Brown, Esq.
Gone is the old ADA braggadocio about the Food & Drug Administration finding mercury fillings to be safe. Gone is the timeworn assurance to its members that the good old ADA will take care of any problems those "anti-amalgamists" are stirring up. Instead, the ADA meekly advises its members that warnings are likely, and a ban is conceivable.
 

Below is their entire message on this issue. Note the quotations - again, folks, this is straight from the American Dental Association:

 

·           "We don't know the direction the FDA will take,"

·           FDA could issue "a mandatory brochure or even limited warnings,"
·           FDA could even issue "a ban," though "we don't expect the latter."
 

Charles G. Brown, 7/8/07, National Counsel

Consumers for Dental Choice                     

1725 K St., N.W., Suite 511

Washington DC 20006    

Ph. 202.822-6307; fax 822-6309

 
American Dental Association Update
July 1, 2007

Dr. Behm's comments are in purple italics.


"The FDA has been contemplating regulatory action for several years to reclassify dental amalgam as either a Class II or III material.

Components of encapsulated amalgam currently are classified separately. 

This is a way the ADA has snuck by the FDA up to this point is by categorizing each component of the filling (tin, copper, silver, zinc) separately; not the amalgamated mixture as a whole. The word "amalgam" actually means mercury mixed with other metals. The ADA makes it the individual dentist's responsibility that he mixes a powder of the above metals with liquid mercury, this is the way the ADA circumvents responsibility for millions of plugs of deadly toxin STILL being placed in the mouths of Americas every year.

The FDA divides medical substances up into classes.

Class I may be sold to anyone without controls. The manufacturer needs to give FDA notice of the product coming on the market, but does not need FDA's approval. It is called Pre-Market Notification.

Class II may be sold, but subject to "special controls," which range from quite strict or meaningless. Again, though, the manufacturer need only give FDA notice of the product coming on the market, but does not need FDA's approval. It is called Pre-Market Notification.

Class III means that the manufacturer must first prove to FDA that the device is safe before it can be sold. It is called Pre-Market Approval. A "III" classification will sink mercury fillings, because they can't be proven safe. Even the ADA's lawyer acknowledges that a III means curtains for amalgam. See FDA Regulatory Requirements.

So, as you can see, we are fighting for a III. If not a III, then we want a II with strict controls, like prohibited for children & young women; that will mean its gradual end.

 

"The ADA has supported classifying dental amalgam as a Class II device in the past. We expect the FDA will issue an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) this summer, seeking input from interested parties.

"An ANPR is the beginning of the regulatory process. After consideration of input generated by the ANPR, the FDA will likely issue a notice of proposed rulemaking, setting forth a specific proposal for public comment.

"Only after that would a new regulation be issued. At this point, we don't know the direction the FDA will take. The agency could simply reclassify amalgam as a Class II material, adding special controls to its use, such as a mandatory brochure or even limited warnings, or classify it as a Class III material, which could result in a ban. We don't expect the latter.

"We're closely monitoring these developments and of course will offer appropriate advocacy comments and develop strategies for addressing the ANPR. We'll also keep you updated as this process plays out."

Click on photo for map to Natural Dentisry.
Natural Dentistry office