FRANCHISEE'S DISHONESTY SUPPORTS TERMINATION
ROA v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH
AMERICA, INC. ( Dec. 9, 2009) - Franchisor
had shown that it had grounds under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act for
early termination of franchisee given that franchisee engaged in fraud by
paying franchisor's sales manager hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash and
gifts to influence award of gas stations to him, secretly appointing representative
for franchisor a partner in a gas station while she was an employee prohibited
from having such an interest, selling his interest in the station to the
representative after she stopped working for franchisor, and submitted a false
letter of intent that inflated purchase price to deter franchisor from
exercising its right of first refusal.
Home | About Us | Consultation | State Franchise Laws | Blog | Guest Columns | Press Releases | FAQ | Contact |
FRANCHISOR'S
INTERNET ENCROACHMENT LAWFUL
STILLWELL v. RADIOSHACK CORPORATION (Nov. 2,
2009) -- Under Texas law, franchisor's website was not an "Authorized Sales
Center" which franchisor was prohibited from establishing within franchisees'
areas of primary responsibility (AORs) under franchise agreements, and
franchisor thus did not breach agreements by making direct internet sales to
customers who resided in franchisees' AORs. The AOR restrictions did not
facially prohibit internet sales. Although restrictions demonstrated parties'
intent to provide some protection to franchisees from direct competition with
brick-and-mortar franchisor-owned stores, it could not have been intended that
franchisees would be protected from internet competition since the internet had
not existed at time agreements were executed; moreover, the franchise
agreements did not prohibit franchisor's making direct sales via mail order and
telephone.
|
FRANCHISOR'S CONTINUED SUPPLY TO FRANCHISEE AFTER TERMINATION
DID NOT WAIVE FINAL TERMINATION
TGI FRIDAY'S INC. v. GREAT
NORTHWEST RESTAURANTS, INC. (Aug. 20, 2009)
-- Even assuming that restaurant franchisor's mistakes regarding choice of food
distribution system led to franchisees' default under franchise agreement, for
failing to make requisite royalty payments, franchisees were not excused from
performing under franchise agreement, and thus franchisor's termination of
agreements was not improper under Texas law. Restaurant franchisor's "forgiving"
conduct toward franchisees, by continuing to inspect restaurants, sending them
menus and other promotional materials, and continuing to list the restaurant
locations on its website, did not waive its termination of the franchise
agreements.
Home | About Us | Consultation | State Franchise Laws | Blog | Guest Columns | Press Releases | FAQ | Contact
|
HOTEL FRANCHISOR
ESCAPES FRAUD CLAIM FOR DISCONTINUED HOTEL BRAND
LAKE WRIGHT HOSPITALITY, LLC HOLIDAY HOSPITALITY
FRANCHISING, INC. (Aug. 20, 2009) -- A hotel franchiser
did not fraudulently induce a franchisee to open a hotel under a brand name
that was eventually discontinued. At the core of plaintiff's case lies its
theory that defendants duped plaintiff in late 2000 into opening its hotel
under the Holiday Inn Select ("HISL") brand name, even though defendants had already secretly decided
in 1998 or 1999 to "kill" the brand. Plaintiff claims that defendants then
strung it and other HISL franchisees along for years, until defendants
officially decided in March 2006 to cease sales of new HISL franchises, in
order to take advantage of the positive "halo" effect that HISL's premium
reputation had on consumer perceptions of defendants' core Holiday Inn brand.
Plaintiff claims that this was done at the expense of HISL franchisees, who
were unaware that defendants had no long-term interest in establishing HISL as
a profitable, self-sustaining brand within the Holiday Inn family. The
franchisee alleged that the franchisor knew that the brand name would be
discontinued when it induced the franchisee to rebrand its hotel, but the
evidence indicated that the brand was discontinued several years later when it
failed to attract enough franchisees for long term viability.
Home | About Us | Consultation | State Franchise Laws | Blog | Guest Columns | Press Releases | FAQ | Contact
|
Thanks for your interest in our Newsletter, and we look forward to answering any questions you might have either on the cases discussed in this issue of Franchise Trends, or on general trends in franchise law.
NEW ARTICLE:
FRANCHSIE RENEWALS: THEY'VE GOT YOU COMING AND GOING
www.goldlawgroup.com Jeff Goldstein Goldstein Law Group
|