Northeast Forensic Training Center Header

 
 E-news Update - June 2012
NFTC Training Featured on Tempo In Depth in May
NFTC Training Featured on Tempo In Depth in May
  
Greetings!

In May, the Northeast Forensic Training Center was featured on Tempo In Depth to discuss job training capabilities. We were grateful for the opportunity to convey our mission, that all First Responders receive the training necessary for them to perform their job to their upmost capabilities, to another audience. As part of our mission, the NFTC is continuously reaching out to practitioners to ascertain what they are lacking in their training. We are constantly looking to expand our training to accommodate those needs and exceed expectations. As part of that expansion, we are offering our first week long training course, Basic Bloodstain Pattern Analysis, in November. To submit a suggestion for a new training topic, please click here to send us an email.

 

Upcoming NFTC Classes
(Click class title for more information.) 

  

June 12-13, 8am-4pm

 

June 20, 8am-4pm

 

June 21, 8am-4pm

 

June 26, 8am-4pm 

Nov. 12-16, 8am-5:30pm
(Registration opens in July.
Workshop is excluded from Subscription Program.)
Connect with Us
 Like us on Facebook Become a Fan
 
Email us image Email Us

 

 

Links

ABMDI

ASIS International

Bethlehem Police Twitter

CLPEX

IAI

IAC&ME

Lynn Peavey Co.

MP Uniform & Supply Co.

SIRCHIE

TriTech Software 

 
Scientific Working Groups
 

  

Investigative Tips & Techniques:

OBJECTIVE vs. SUBJECTIVENFTC June Article Image  

Andrew Kehm, Detective/Sergeant (Active) Program Manager, NFTC

 

How do we as First Responders of diverse professions deal with the public expectation when conducting our job? The reality is that most of the investigations we are confronted with are not the high profile investigations we all get our adrenalin pumping over. Unfortunately, we have the human factor within each of us to contend with. We have a tendency to get lax in our approach to investigations at times and need to find our individual method to fight this.

 

The diversity and complexity of scenes we are presented with that need to be investigated can be mind boggling at times. As we all have realized what we do is nothing like the crime dramas on television, but the public many times expects that farfetched type of investigation. We can go from a Criminal Mischief investigation to an Assault Investigation to an In-Custody Death investigation. Missing clues or evidence at an investigation scene can be extremely embarrassing to start. Compile that with the potential effects it could cause to the final outcome of the investigation.

 

Your approach to the scene is an extremely critical factor in how the scene gets worked. Every scene needs to be approached in an objective, not subjective manner. My approach has been for many years to not solicit details of the preliminary investigation immediately upon arriving at a scene. I get the basic call information and conduct a walk through with the "Primary Reporting Officer". Yes, this has caused some egos to get ruffled, by not getting the details from the on-scene supervisor. I want to have the opportunity to get a firsthand look at the scene, and give the scene the opportunity to "tell me a story". This has to be prior to any subjective opinion from others that have had time to develop a theory. Once I have a good idea of what I believe the evidence is saying; I now want the opportunity for a discussion with the "Primary Reporting Officer", or the ones that secured the scene. Through the discussion, he/she may provide me with details that I missed or vise versa. If there is a discrepancy in what was observed, we have the opportunity to walk back through the scene together and continue to discuss it. If this is a newer Officer, what a learning experience this could be. If it is a more seasoned officer, you may find yourself learning something new.

 

I changed my approach after letting my guard down and relying on the scene description provided by another officer. Luckily, I followed my hunches, but it was after a significant amount of time had passed. If you are fortunate enough to work with a partner doing scene work, develop the atmosphere to be critical of the work performed following the scene. An "After Action Review" if you will. This is difficult to do with the Alpha personality most of us tend to have with our respective professions. Discuss what worked and what did not. If this is honestly done following each scene worked, you, along with your colleagues will notice your professional development.   

NFTC Image 

In the News

Practitioner Error vs. Deficient Procedures

Evidence Technology Magazine

For many years, forensic science has embraced the idea that any errors made were due to practitioner shortcomings or malfeasance.
<READ MORE>

 

Resizing Digital Images to Actual Size (1:1) Using Adobe® Photoshop® 
ASCR

Photographing fingerprints, footwear prints and impressions, and tool marks is standard practice during a crime scene investigation. However, if those photographs are going to be of use for comparison at a later date it may be necessary to print the images to a 1:1 scale.

<READ MORE>  

  

Addressing Shortfalls in Forensic Science Evidence

National Institute of Justice

Increasing interest in forensic science has led to a proliferation of academic programs in the United States and abroadUnfortunately, the field of forensic science lacks a standard curriculum, an issue that creates problems for students and future employers. 

<READ MORE>

 

Organ and Tissue Procurement Committee Standards and Best Practices for Interaction Between Medical Examiner/Coroner Offices and Organ and Tissue Procurement Organizations

Scientific Working Group for Medicolegal Death Investigation

<READ MORE>

 

Scientific Working Group on Friction Ridge Analysis, Study and Technology

Drafts for comment on Standard:

Testimony of Friction Ridge Examiners <READ MORE>

Friction Ridge Digital Testimony <READ MORE> 
 

Invocation of Right to Counsel During Interview Must Be Unambiguous

Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute

When a person is subjected to custodial questioning by law enforcement, he or she must be advised of their rights under Miranda v. Arizona.  One of the rights under Miranda is the right to have an attorney present during questioning.  On March 27, 2012, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided the United States v. Hampton <READ MORE> 

 

 

CBI Logo