|
|
 |
|
The Communiqué
Sometimes my job has me tremendously excited about the energy, the possibilities and the great people I get to surround myself with. Somehow the entirety of June, and the first week of July, has been a whirlwind of those times. Standing out was this week's Strategic Planning Conference when the OUSA Steering Committee and Home Office set themselves to producing this year's organizational direction and priorities. The brainstorming and planning sessions provided a clear assessment of our organizational strengths, weaknesses and opportunities, and gave us a clear action plan moving forward.
Addressing student concerns surrounding quality and value in their education will be the number one priority of OUSA in the coming year, along with identifying practices within the system that serve as examples of how to best engage students and contribute to their success. Issues of tuition, ancillary fees, accountability, student health, credit transfer, system growth and the continued broadening of student demographics will be explored through OUSA's policy and advocacy activities this year as well.
These efforts, along with the election, will provide opportunities for OUSA to demonstrate our place as leaders in the post-secondary education sector... but not without having to work diligently to reach out to our membership. Student engagement will be essential in the upcoming Provincial Election, both in terms of mobilizing the student vote and in making education a priority in the campaigns. Much of the discussion this past week has focused around OUSA's opportunities as a non-partisan mobilizer and informer of the student vote. Our campaigns, communication and activities will be aimed at empowering students to shape their educations through the election. Expect to see our election website to be full of information about the parties, their platforms and opportunities to get involved in addition to help with voting.
We need our membership to shape the direction of OUSA as well. Discussions about effective strategies for membership engagement, participation in OUSA's research, priorities and advocacy have left us focused on continuing to draw upon the members who enable our work. This is critically important as we move forward with discussions around quality and determining the elements most important to students.
StratCon was the icing on the cake that was a busy June as well. Continuing to work with our partners and the sector stakeholders has led to some productive discussions and important projects to move forward. Student health, important infrastructure investments, raising the profile of student financial assistance and the continuing debate on the value of a university education were just some of the items dominating the PSE agenda in June. OUSA is always welcoming the chance to raise the profile of education and to enhance the experience of university for everyone; this last month did not disappoint.
-Sean Madden
|
|
|
Response to Globe & Mail article "Is our students learning?"
| |
We read with interest Margaret Wente's recent opinion piece "Is our students learning?" which was published in the Globe and Mail on June 16th. Ms. Wente essentially makes the following argument:
1. The purpose of universities is to foster critical thinking and analytical skills in students.
2. One study that used the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) showed that 33 per cent of American college students do not improve their critical thinking skills during their university education.
3. This study of the American system is directly translatable to the Canadian university system.
4. Because some American college students do not improve their critical thinking skills in university, they are not learning anything worthwhile (and are not really engaged in their studies anyhow) and therefore we should cease to expand access to the Canadian system.
Wente herself is a graduate of the Canadian university system. If the depth of her argument and its logical coherence reflect the system, then concerns about critical thinking in higher education do indeed reflect a longstanding problem.
The truth of Wente's assumption regarding critical thinking is well known. Indeed, the degree to which universities impart critical thinking and analytical skills is an important variable to assess. As Wente points out, a large amount of public and private resources are spent on higher education with the expectation that the outcome is worth it. There exist legitimate issues related to quality of education and the ability of our system to produce graduates with the experience and skills necessary to participate in the new economy. OUSA has long argued that the balance between teaching and research at our institutions needs adjustment: the prestige, incentives and rewards of the latter far outweigh those of the former, and there needs to be renewed recognition of the critical importance of the teaching function of our universities. It is almost certainly true that students' learning outcomes could be improved. However, this line of reasoning should not lead one to conclude that access to the system needs to be scaled down, but rather that we should put more resources into improving teaching quality in our universities. Certainly little improvement on the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) in the United States is cause for concern. However, it is important to note that that the CLA is one particular tool for evaluating learning: it assesses critical thinking and writing, not field-specific knowledge, and is by no means a comprehensive way of determining how university education shapes personal and intellectual outcomes.
A more troubling aspect of Wente's reasoning is her uncritical application of American test scores to the Canadian context. There are substantial differences in the structure of the American and Canadian public education systems. Wente cites low American graduation rates as evidence of low quality, yet completion rates are much higher in Canada: only 10 per cent of university students have dropped out after five years of study, and 70 per cent of students have graduated, with the remainder continuing their studies. Clearly, Canada and the United States have different system outcomes; it stands to reason that our learning outcomes might be different too. Without implementing the CLA in Canada, Canadians will never know if Wente's speculation carries any truth.
Wente's conclusion that we should cease to expand access to the Canadian system due to poor quality is perhaps the most flawed aspect of her speculation. While quality of education is vitally important, a post-secondary credential is now a near necessity in the Canadian labour market. Over 70 per cent of future jobs will require a post-secondary credential. Studies have unequivocally concluded that university graduates are not oversupplied. Indeed, they have lower unemployment rates than college and apprenticeship graduates. A university graduate on average earns $13,000 more annually than a college graduate, $16,000 more than an apprenticeship graduate, and $19,000 more than someone with no education past high school. This is not to detract from the importance of pursuing careers in non-university fields, but rather to point out that if the labour market were oversupplied with university graduates without critical thinking skills, one would expect to see employment rates and earnings premiums associated with university degrees decline, not doubling in the past 20 years. Furthermore, 94% of Ontario university students are employed within six months of graduation, the number of students that report being over-qualified for their job is on the decline, and employer satisfaction with graduates is high.
Expanding access to university education does not mean lowering admissions and quality standards. It does not mean admitting unqualified students, uninterested in their studies. It does mean ensuring that individuals from all socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds have an equitable opportunity to enter university. It means ensuring that there are resources and supports in place to help students from low-income, rural and northern and Aboriginal backgrounds, student parents, and students with disabilities, succeed through their studies and experience the social and economic benefits of a higher education. This is good for Canadian society as a whole.
The public and students themselves are right to question and ask for evidence that universities are doing what they set out to do. It could be argued that Canada has to do a better job of focusing on undergraduate education and making sure that students are graduating with the hard and soft skills necessary for the changing world. More evaluation of learning outcomes would certainly not be unwelcome. However, one can understand why some institutions are hesitant to adopt more public evaluative tools like the CLA when commentators utilize the results to argue for disinvestment. Balancing access and quality in post-secondary education is a tired and unproductive debate; ensuring both access and quality will be vital for the future of our country.
-Sean Madden & Laura Pin
|
|
Building Together: Thoughts on Ontario's Long-Term Infrastructure Plan
| |

The past two weeks have seen many significant infrastructure announcements at Ontario universities, funded as part of the provincial government's Building Together plan. The plan calls for $35 billion to be spent over the next three years on infrastructure across the province. Approximately $600 million has been allocated to post-secondary institutions for the purpose of expanding student learning space. Investing in expanded infrastructure and capabilities on our campuses is important, as concerns of crowded and out-dated spaces are very real to students in this era of continuing enrolment growth. Personally exciting to me is what the space means: not only the existence of more classrooms, but also what those classrooms look like and their possibilities for pedagogy and technical integration that is responsive to changing student learning needs.
The importance of investment on our campuses extends beyond new buildings though. It is reassuring to see that the infrastructure plan places a priority on the renewal of existing facilities and asset management. It is my hope that these efforts can begin to address the nearly two billion dollars of accumulated deferred maintenance at our institutions. Currently, institutions only receive a marginal amount of funding for maintenance, resulting in universities often deferring this important work. Between 2007 and 2010, the audited value of deferred maintenance jumped from $1.6 billion to $1.97 billion. A facilities condition index found that "overall, buildings in the university sector are in poor condition." A staggering 42% of buildings were found to be in poor condition, requiring maintenance.
Since 2005, provincial investments have contributed $26.7 million per year through the facilities renewal program, though that amount was reduced to $17.3 million in 2010. There were also supplementary investments in new capital projects in 2005, 2008 and 2009. Overall, provincial investment in facilities improvement and renewal has totalled over 2 billion dollars over five years. While this funding has helped stymy the tide of further deterioration of our campus facilities, a sustained long-term investment plan is required to adequately address growth in the system. Hopefully, the asset renewal plans required by Building Together will incentivize the funding necessary to maintain Ontario university infrastructure for generations of students to come.
A further hope for Building Together is that the government will open capital funding eligibility to projects that haven't typically received support in the past, such as student buildings or recreational facilities. Universities rely very heavily on students to fund these infrastructure projects through ancillary fees, a trend which continues to be a point of concern for students. With an average capital ancillary fee of $72 across Ontario universities, students are rightfully questioning why the provincial government chooses not to support student and recreational facilities used by faculty, staff and the broader communities that campuses situate themselves in.
In the final report of the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities/Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure Long-Term Capital Planning Project, compiled by the Courtyard Group in 2009, it recommended that "funding should be extended to traditional 'ancillary' projects which demonstrate significant contribution to student development." Students couldn't agree more. With Monday's announcement of funding for a mixed-use academic and health facility at St. Clair College, we are hopeful that the government has embraced this recommendation.
All told, it is assuring to students that the Building Ontario plan includes post-secondary education as a key component. An intention to tackle both the pedagogical and physical demands of Ontario's changing and growing student populations demonstrates the importance of the post-secondary education to the Province.
-Sean Madden
|
|
Investment in Pathways to Education Will Help Underrepresented Youth Access Higher Education
|
Students were delighted to hear the news yesterday afternoon that the McGuinty Government will be investing $28.5 million in continued funding to Pathways to Education. Truly, this investment will help students from low-income communities access education, as well as provide significant returns for the province.
Since its inception in 2001, the success of Pathways to Education has been overwhelming. Beginning in the Regent Park region of Toronto, Pathways was responsible for reducing the regional secondary school dropout rate by 46 per cent. Concurrently, the program has been credited with increasing the Regent Park post-secondary intake rate from 20 per cent to 80 per cent, split evenly between College and University.
The staggering scope of these results prompted an initial investment of $19 million in Pathways from the province in 2007, allowing the program to expand to other communities such as Hamilton, Kitchener, Kingston and Ottawa. From a public administration perspective, it has been estimated that an investment in Pathways provides a return to society of $25 for every dollar invested and a $400,000 value for every graduate of the program. This return on investment is seen in effects such as increased income tax revenue generated from post-secondary graduates, decreased use of welfare and decreased health costs associated with risky behaviour.
OUSA has been a long-time advocate for investment Pathways to Education, most recently lobbying the government for extension of funding at our 2010 Student Advocacy Conference. In addition, our individual members have participated in fundraising activities in support of regional iterations of Pathways. For example, The Federation of Students at the University of Waterloo works to advocate for the role of Pathways in the Kitchener-Waterloo Community through our annual Colour Me Educated Campaign. During this campaign, students and university community members come together to celebrate the work of Pathways and to raise money for the program's Kitchener branch. The 2010-2011 campaign wrapped up in March with a Paint Drop (pictured above), and a donation of close to $4,500 to Pathways. University of Waterloo students plan to continue supporting the regional program in the future, kicking off a new campaign in January 2012.
Students are overjoyed that the provincial government has recognized the tremendous role played by early outreach programs like Pathways to Education. As Ontario strives to attain the goal of 70 per cent participation in university, it is vital that the doors remain open to students from all backgrounds. There is more work to be done to continue to widen accessibility through early outreach programs, but this is certainly a great step and a demonstration of the value placed on access to education in this province.
-Natalie Cockburn
|
|
Sam Andrey | Executive Director
|  The past month has been busy but very rewarding. There were a number of announcements by the Ontario government throughout June that were good news for students. The government's long-term infrastructure strategy included significant investments in university capital - and many new projects have already been announced on campuses across the Province. Provincial funding for the successful outreach program Pathways to Education was renewed, while a pilot outreach program entitled Life After High School was launched in 37 high schools to help students pay for post-secondary application fees and explain financial aid to high school students. Finally, the government's youth mental health strategy was unveiled, which included commitments to fund mental health counsellors on campuses. All of these investments reflected the priorities and advocacy work of OUSA over the past year - and we were happy to see such positive steps being taken for students. I also had the pleasure of attending the European Access Network's conference in Amsterdam to discuss access to post-secondary education with my counterparts from around the world. It was an extremely interesting and helpful forum for dialogue, and I've come back to Ontario with lots of new ideas and perspectives. You can see my more complete thoughts here. Our advocacy work here at home continued as well, on topics including credit transfer, Aboriginal learners, accountability processes, OSAP, ancillary fees, and copyright protection. We also just returned from our annual Strategic Planning Conference, where we set our annual action plan and some exciting and ambitious goals for ourselves for the coming year. We are also currently wrapping up our research work on cost inflation in the university sector. As we move into July, our attention will increasingly be focused on the upcoming Ontario election. As the rest of their parties release their education platforms, we will be working with the College Student Alliance on ensuring that all students know both why they should be voting and how to do it. |
|
Alvin Tedjo | Director of Communications
|  The summer is in full swing, and at OUSA, that means months of preparation and planning for the year ahead. At this year's Strategic Planning Conference, OUSA's Steering Committee set out an ambitions plan for engaging members, and reaching out to students for the upcoming year. OUSA is planning on extensive campus visits this year, where we will feature more town-halls, information sessions, focus groups, and advocacy meetings. This year's team is also eager to build on the student vote excitement from the recent federal election, with some very exciting Get Out The Vote plans for the coming fall. We have much more planned, but you'll have to wait and see to find out what we have in store.
For those who are new this year, make sure to sign-up for the mailing list so you can get this Communiqué every month. For those who want to add people to the list, you just need to forward the email from inside this message (found at the top), instead of sending it through your regular mail application. Sign-up now to stay informed! |
|
Chris Martin | Director of Research
|  Where did June go? This summer has become something of a high-speed train, barrelling towards the school year at a ridiculous pace. With the election, the implementation of OUSA's second Ontario Post-Secondary Student Survey, the creation of three brand new policy papers and much more, there is no shortage of things to do (or be excited for!). Luckily, we've been making some excellent progress thus far. We just got back from a productive three-day retreat with the Steering Committee, where research and policy was discussed in detail. When all was said and done, the research team was left with an ambitious set of objectives to pursue. In addition to our three upcoming policy papers on accountability, system growth and tuition, Steering Committee will begin working on renewing our policies on students with dependents, and rural/northern students. Additionally, new policies on credit transfer and student health will be developed. These exciting new initiatives will allow us to lend new research to on our on-going advocacy efforts in the credit transfer and student health areas. In addition to our policy papers, the Ontario Post-Secondary Student Survey is currently well underway. In co-operation with the College Student Alliance, OUSA has been developing a questionnaire centred primarily on issues of quality and affordability, which we are hoping to field to over 280,000 college and university students at over 26 post-secondary institutions across the province this year. It will be a large undertaking, and I'm pleased to announce that we'll be partnering with Abacus Data Inc. on the project. As the summer continues, I'm becoming increasingly excited about where the year will take our organization. I only wish I could somehow expand the number of hours in a day to better accommodate the ambitions of our students. |
|
Laura Pin | Research Analyst
|  Summer is here! And the last month has been a busy month in the OUSA office. The Steering Committee has set the strategic priorities for the organization of the coming year, and it looks like it is going to full of many exciting research projects. I have been tasked with working on a policy paper on Student Health for the General Assembly in March, and am also providing research support for a policy paper on System Growth. Both of these topics are timely as universities are projected to continue to grow over the next ten years, and institutions will have provide health care for an increasingly diverse student population. In addition, over the past month I have continued discussion and consultation about our Aboriginal Students policy paper in preparation for student discussions on our campuses which will be held this fall. Finally, I was fortunate to have the opportunity to meet with the Parental Engagement Office of the Ministry of Education, and we are currently assisting in the development of materials for the parents of secondary school students outlining student financial aid and post-secondary application procedures. |
|
|
Chris Rudnicki | Research Intern
|  Hello everyone! I¹m pleased to report that the accountability file is moving forward smoothly as the summer progresses. After having conducted extensive research into the state of post-secondary education accountability in Ontario and other jurisdictions, we have reached a stage where we can begin drafting the paper to be presented at our fall General Assembly. We will be focusing on three guiding questions: To whom should our educational institutions be accountable? For what should they be held to account? And how can we hold them accountable for our chosen priorities? Answering these questions will give us a holistic vision for post-secondary accountability that refocuses our efforts around the needs of the sector's stakeholders. As it stands, the answers seem to direct us toward an accountability framework that guarantees transparency, quality, and accessibility. These recommendations couldn¹t come at a better time,as the Ministry is planning to renegotiate the Multi-Year Accountability Agreements in the fall. I look forward to sharing the results! |
|
Kristen Holman | Research Intern
|  The past month has been dedicated to compiling tuition research for our upcoming policy paper. After several weeks of number crunching and report reading, we've begun to dig into key areas of concern as well as topics that warrant further research. Some of the most prominent issues to be taken up in the tuition paper will include: the discrepancies that are built into the current 5% tuition cap model, the perils of the tuition payment process, and the declining affordability of PSE - particularly for Ontario's middle income families. Research to date has focused on the nuances of the current Ontario system in terms of how policy is being observed at individual institutions and across programs from year to year. The implementation of an aggregate institutional cap has raised issues of unpredictability for students as well as the potentiality for wide variations among comparable programs at different schools. Secondly, we have focused on the payment processes of all Ontario universities, particularly those institutions that operate on a flat-fee model that financially disadvantages students who are taking less than a full course load yet still paying full-time tuition. Equally striking is the fact that the majority of institutions require full up-front payment of tuition fees in September, a payment process that is at odds with the revenue streams most students use to pay for PSE. This is troublesome given evidence that the structure of fee schedules can often have more of an effect on affordability than fee levels themselves I'm also excited to say that our research on tuition will reach beyond analysis of the current system to an exploration of alternative tuition models. Keeping Ontario's unique climate in mind, we will be looking at the merits of PSE funding models that are allowing other OECD countries to better cope with a general trend of decreasing government funding. We're excited about the direction of our tuition research to date and look forward to sharing even more with you in the coming month! |
| Steering Committee Updates |
|
Natalie Cockburn | FedS VPED & OUSA VP Finance
|  For those who haven't yet been introduced, my name is Natalie Cockburn, the Vice President Finance for OUSA. Our Strategic Conference just wrapped up this week, and I have to say it was a great experience and I am thrilled with what we were able to accomplish over the course of three days. A number of exciting priorities were identified specifically in the VP Finance role including making policy improvements, developing a long term stability and spending plan, exploring investment opportunities, and creating our first ever annual report! I am also very much looking forward to starting work on our Systems Growth policy with President Madden. Outside of my specific financial duties I've had the opportunity over the past few months to meet with a number of sector and government partners including the COU, HEQCO, and Minister Milloy of Training Colleges and Universities. I look forward to a renewed focus on quality as an advocacy priority for OUSA, as well as discussions on the tuition framework. |
The Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance represents the interests of over 145,000 professional and undergraduate, full- and part-time university students from nine student associations across Ontario.
-- Alvin Tedjo Director of Communications OUSA | Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance |
|
|