|
|
|
A Matter of Law
Winter 2012 |
|
|
|
Roe Taroff Taitz & Portman, LLP
One Corporate Drive
Bohemia, New York 11716
631-475-4400
|
|
Greetings!
Welcome to our winter edition newsletter. This issue of our newsletter contains helpful information on closings, collection advice and the importance of having a will. We would also like to invite you to meet Christine P. Smith at a First Time Home Buyer Seminar presentation, to be held at Chase Bank.
Sincerely, Roe Taroff Taitz & Portman, LLP |
|
|
|
Avoid Hiccups At Refinance Closings
This past year saw the residential sale market to be fairly slow, but refinancing has been hot. With the popularity of the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP), some of you may have already found yourself taking advantage of today's low interest rates, while many of you may be wondering whether refinancing makes sense for you. If refinancing is on your mind, reach out to a trusted mortgage professional to explore whether you are in a position to benefit from the current low interest rates. In some cases, you may be able to reduce your interest rate considerably and knock years off of your existing mortgage at the same time.
As always when you seek financing, your income, credit score and the appraised value of your home will remain key factors. It is important to know, however, that there is more to the application process than just your direct qualifications with the lender: the state of your "title" is also significant.
When you apply for a mortgage, the lender will require an insurance policy, known as a loan policy, to be issued at closing. This policy is different than the policy obtained when you purchase a home (the owners' policy) and it insures that the new mortgage will be in a first lien position on the property. Thus, when a refinance application is submitted, the lender will require a title search, and it is at this stage where issues, or hiccups, may arise which can surprise and inconvenience a borrower.
The title search discloses any outstanding mortgages or lines of credit against the property, and any judgments or liens against the property. Any open mortgages must be paid off, or subordinated (i.e. moved to second in line to the new mortgage), and any open judgments must be paid off at closing. The most common hiccup occurs when a borrower has paid off an old mortgage, but a satisfaction of mortgage was never recorded in the County Clerk's office. Thus, the borrower may know the debt to be satisfied, but he will have to prove it to the title company in order to refinance.
At this point, a borrower may be forced to sift through mounds of old paperwork in order to furnish proof that the debt was satisfied. In some cases, a zero balance or "account closed" marker on a credit report may not be enough for the title company. As a result, addressing open mortgages will often prove to be a burdensome task for a borrower. This task may also be aggravated if prior lenders or title companies are no longer in business and the borrower has no entity to go to with his request for a duplicate satisfaction of mortgage. Thus, a savvy borrower should always inquire as to whether a lender, after confirming that a debt has been satisfied, has forwarded the proper documentation (either a satisfaction of mortgage or a release of lien) to the County Clerk's office for recording. In addition, it is wise to request that a copy of same be forwarded to you, for your own records and safe-keeping, so that, if faced with the inconvenience of open mortgages, you will be in a position to furnish the appropriate documentation to the title company upon their request.
Another area where title hiccups may occur relates to vesting, i.e. how you took title. In some cases, a borrower may have taken title prior to a marriage with a maiden name but are now known by a married name. Although a new deed is often not required in these circumstances, the borrower will be required to furnish a copy of the marriage license to the title company to prove that they are, in fact, now known as the married name. At closing, the borrower should expect to have to sign with both names on some of the loan documents. Similarly, when there is a divorce or death post-ownership, a copy of a death certificate or divorce decree will often be required. Although vesting changes are often minor matters to be dealt with, it is yet another area where hiccups may occur during the refinance process.
In addition, when a borrower is refinancing a condominium or a property that is part of a home owners association, the title company will require the borrower to provide a letter from the managing agent=s office letter at closing, confirming that the borrower is up-to-date with his or her monthly common charges. Once again, this requirement goes back to the lender=s requirement for a Aclean,@ first-position loan policy. Although this, may not seem like a major inconvenience, this requirement is often not communicated to a borrower until scheduling has occurred because the letter needs to be current. Thus, it can add an element of surprise to the borrower at the end-stages of the refinance process.
In conclusion, it is helpful to understand that, throughout the refinance process, there is a whole second level of analysis that is triggered by the title search. Being aware of these common hiccups at closing may help ease the flow of the refinance process and help make the closing experience a positive one all-around.
Speak with Steve Taitz, Pete Roe, or Christine P. Smith if you have any questions about your Real Estate closings. |
| Creditor's Rights
We are often asked about dealing with customers through sales agents. In New York, basic Agency Law provides that an agent cannot be held responsible for the debt of a disclosed principal, unless the agent specifically agrees to become liable, either jointly or independently. That agreement must be in writing prior to the transaction. We always recommend a Credit Application be obtained from the customer, regardless of whether the order is placed through an agent.
The best thing a creditor/vendor can do is to get an agreement from the principal of the customer where they become independently responsible for payment of the bill in the event that the debtor business does not pay. We have had clients tell us that any Credit Application would "get in the way" or "will kill my business".
Think about the percentage of your accounts that go to collections. If your delinquency rate is relatively low, requiring a Credit Application might not make statistical sense. If your receivables figure is high from a certain customer, you should take all steps to protect yourself. If you aren't getting paid, you won't miss the business and you will actually save yourself time, money and aggravation.
Ultimately, the creditor/vendor has to make an intelligent business decision on whether to require a guaranty agreement prior to doing work for a particular sales agent or customer. If you do require one, include provisions for finance charges and for the recovery of collection fees in the event of a default. That will take the financial sting out of referral to an attorney later.
Contact Lester Taroff or Elliott Portman. |
|
 |  |  |
|
Attorney Spotlight
Christine P. Smith, Esq. will speak at the First Time Home Owner Buyer Seminar at Chase Bank , 546 Route 111, Hauppague, NY 11788 Wednesday March 28th at 6:30pm. |
|
 |  |  | |
THE INTESTATE FARMER IN THE DELL

Many people die without a will ("intestate") because they frankly see no reason for having one. The attitude is "everything I have will go to my husband/wife and kids, which is what I want anyway, so I don't need a will." Here is a cautionary tale of where that can lead.
In 1925, a local farmer died intestate, leaving behind a wife (his second) and thirteen children. Under the law in effect at that time, one-third of the family farm went to his widow and the other two-thirds passed to his children in equal shares. The widow died some thirty years later, also without a will. Her one-third of the property passed, by operation of law, to her children.
Virtually all of the children of the farmer (four by wife number one, nine by wife number two) died without wills. One of them left nine children. By 2003, when the last of the farmer's children died, there were 47 heirs with possible claims to the farm, scattered across the country from Oregon to Florida. When a granddaughter sought to quiet title to the property, all the potential claimants had to be located and named in a suit to determine ownership. Letters and phone calls ensued, internet searches were conducted, death records reviewed, and court records searched. Some of the heirs simply could not be found. Notice of the suit had to be published, so that they might be found that way. There were judgments against some of the potential heirs, and all the creditors had to be named in the suit, as well. In all, the lawsuit named 82 potential claimants to the property. The process servers' bills alone were enormous. In the end, only four heirs answered the complaint, and title was eventually quieted. It was a protracted and expensive proposition.
Ah, but what a pair of wills might have done. The farmer could have left the farm to his wife outright. The wife's will could have directed that the farm be sold and the proceeds divided amongst the children. Any one of a number of scenarios might have been directed. With a will, there would have been an executor charged with seeing to the orderly disposition of the property in accordance with the decedent's wishes. It is difficult to imagine that the farmer or his wife would have wished for a protracted lawsuit, two generations later, to determine who owns the family farm. But that is what happened for want of a will.
Speak with Christine Shiebler or Pete Roe about your probate issues. |
|
|
|
Announcements
Please join us in welcoming a new Legal Assistant, Tracy Besso, to our Firm. Tracy will be assisting in the Real Estate, Litigation and Trusts and Estate Planning departments. |
|
About Our Law Firm
|
|
Partners: John J. Roe, III Lester P. Taroff Steven Taitz Elliot Portman
|
| Counsel: Linda D. Calder Paula Wetstein Christine R. Shiebler
|
Associate: Christine Perrucci Smith
| Roe Taroff Taitz & Portman, LLP
One Corporate Drive
Bohemia, New York 11716
631-475-4400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|