Restore the Delta, local and statewide environmental
groups have voiced their strong concern regarding a
package of water bills released by the Legislature.
This legislative package, if enacted, would result in a
massive and costly restructuring of California's water
laws and water infrastructure - covering several
contentious water issues including governance of the
Bay-Delta region, water conservation, and an updated
version of the multi-billion dollar Peripheral Canal,
which was overwhelmingly rejected by California
voters in 1982.
"While we are pleased to finally see some of the
language, we remain strongly concerned about the
process, the transparency, the costs and abdication of
oversight contained in these proposals," said Jonas
Minton, Water Policy Advisor for the Planning and
Conservation League (PCL). "To be clear, we strongly
support the need to address our state's critical water
needs and hope to see issues addressed, including,
but not limited to the governance of the San Francisco
Bay-Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta, water
conservation, flood management and groundwater
recharge, reclamation and reuse.
"However, the Schwarzenegger plan to build a 50 mile-
long canal will not generate any new water, abdicates
any meaningful oversight, cedes absolute authority to
faceless bureaucrats and will cost over $10 billion,
even more once you add mitigation and restoration
costs. The language in this legislation does nothing to
change those facts," added Minton.
Representatives from the Sierra Club California,
Restore the Delta, the California Sportfishing
Protection Alliance, Friends of the River and the
Environmental Justice Coalition for Water joined PCL
in expressing concern over the fact that the
Legislature developed these bills (SB229 - Pavley;
SB12 - Simitian; AB39 - Huffman; and SB458 - Wolk)
with no public input and their worry that the bills will be
rushed through in the last three weeks of the
legislative session.
"There is no question that the Delta is in crisis and we
must find a way to work together to save the Delta and
the San Francisco Bay," Minton noted. "But there has
to be a better way than jamming this down the public's
throat and asking them to pay billions for a project they
haven't had any say in at a time when the state has
been issuing IOU's, cutting back on schools, and
shutting down parks."
"We want a more comprehensive approach to
address our state's water needs," said Barbara
Barrigan-Parrilla, campaign director for Restore the
Delta. "We want an approach that safeguards the Bay,
the Delta, the environment and the people who live
and work in the area. We want real solutions that
include cost effective and environmentally sound
programs and projects that will capture, recycle, and
treat water . We want long-term Delta management
that is based on a firm understanding of Delta
freshwater needs.
"The current process doesn't make sense," Barrigan-
Parrilla added. "This legislation is not enough and
there is no need to rush into the Governor's New
PeripheralCanal."
To read all the bills in their entirety, click here.
The drafts of these bills will be discussed at the joint
informational hearing of the Assembly Water, Parks &
Wildlife and Senate Natural Resources & Water
Committees on August 18, 2009. At this point in time,
we do not know what type of or if any public input or
testimony will be part of this hearing. Restore the
Delta will be sending out daily legislative updates as
we learn more.