|
|
|
|
Dear Fissure Friends,
Make
sure you checkout a new feature beginning with this issue. For the next several issues one of our
instructors (guides) will give you a firsthand look at their work, teaching and
life experiences, and how they came to be Fissure guides. I think you will enjoy their stories
and getting to know how they came to be so passionate about helping others
learn and develop.
We
deal with change constantly, but we're still not handling the transitions very
well. For a great example we only
have to look at the million or more Green Bay Packers and Minnesota Vikings
fans that now all have to find a new routine involving Bret Farve. Now I know not all of our readers are
football fans, but most everyone is aware of Bret Farve's return to football
after a "hall of fame" career with the Green Bay Packers. Bret is having his own trouble with change
and transition, but that is another topic for another day.
The
Packer fans who loved Bret when he played for them, don't quite know how to
deal with him playing for the hated Vikings. The Vikings fans who hated him when he played for the
Packers, don't quite know how to deal with him playing for their beloved
Vikings. Let's see what we can do
to help all these frustrated fans.
In
our change management and leadership training we define change as the event
that causes your current routine to "be no more" while transition is the
process we all go through to finally arrive at our new routine. The part of the transition process that
currently relates to most of the Vikings and Packers fans is the "Chaos"
phase. It's the part of the
transition where you have already "Let Go" of the old routine (Packers fans
have definitely let go, check out "We'll Never Forget you Brent" on Google),
but haven't quite arrived at what the new routine is going to look like. The
Chaos phase is best described as a time of opportunity where you are open to
the possibilities of what the new routine will be. The chaos phase is characterized by ups - a result of an
idea you have of what the new routine is going to look like, and downs - a
realization that your idea is not the right or final answer.

So
how do we help all these Vikings and Packers fans stuck in Chaos? People in Chaos can be helped through
the process by encouraging them to look for answers to the new routine and by
helping them be as creative as possible in coming up with innovative answers. I have a personal reason for thinking
about how to help the Farve fans get through Chaos. As a transplanted Minnesotan, married to a Minnesotan, I
have spent the last 20 years watching my wife watching the Green Bay Farve. To put it nicely, she didn't like him
much and I would say "if he played for the Vikings you would love him". I won't share with you in writing her
response to that statement. So now
that he is playing for the Vikings I
am having a firsthand look at a fan in Chaos. One moment she can almost see him as the Viking's
quarterback and the next moment she is seeing him as Green Bay Farve. It is the classic case of the ups and
downs of Chaos as she looks for the answer that will allow her to actually
cheer for Farve's success, rather than his failure.
You
can encourage their answers, as I have done with my wife, but be careful of
trying to give them the answer, as I have learned not to do with her (at least
for the most part). Ask questions
to trigger their creativity. An
example for my wife might be "Doesn't Bret look good in purple?" The key is giving people in Chaos the
time they need to find their own answer.
Some like the feeling of the unknown and will take longer, some don't
like the unknown and will arrive at their new routine more quickly. We all need to just give the Green Bay
and Vikings fans time to find their answers.
It
has been a while, and worth the wait as Mike Wold has contributed a very nice
article on hope. He shows us why
it is important as project managers and people to have hope, and that it also
needs to be realistic hope.
In his article in this issue Geof Lory asks a great
question: We spend a lot of time measuring things like
schedules, budgets, and requirements. But is that really what's most important
to our projects?
Our upcoming public workshops can be found on our Fissure website
- our computer simulation powered workshops are an effective and fun way to learn
AND EARN PDUs. Make sure
you also check out what's happening at Fissure (Fissure News).
Thanks for reading and I wish you all a beautiful
summer,
Jesse Freese
Fissure, President
Back to top
|

The Importance of Hope
by Mike Wold, PMP
I have a friend who unfortunately has a very negative view
of life. As I was talking to him on the phone the other night it was both amazing
and sad to see how many negative things he could find in the world in a short
conversation - the economy, the unemployment, the terrorists, people dying,
marriages breaking up, ... As my mentor and founder of Fissure, Ed Tilford would
say "he was looking for the bad and finding it in abundance". As I listened to
my friend and tried to give him a more positive view, it suddenly struck me how
important it is for people to have a sense of hope. It also struck me how
debilitating it is if this is lacking. My friend's success is being limited by
a scarcity of hope in his view.
This experience pointed out to me once again the importance
of us as project leaders (or any leaders for that matter) that we instill a
sense of hope in our teams. I am not talking here about painting an
unrealistically positive picture of reality - that only has the effect of
ruining our credibility. (And as project managers we certainly have enough
opportunities to do that without yet another way!) We all know that managing a
complex project is really difficult and that hardly a day goes by when there is
not an unpleasant "surprise" awaiting us that will impact our cost, schedule and/or
scope... What I am talking about is the idea of instilling the hope of success in
our team while facing cold reality.
This is the concept that Admiral James Stockdale learned as
prisoner of war for seven years in Vietnam. On September 9, 1965 Stockdale, who
was then Commander of Carrier Air Wing 16 aboard the carrier USS Oriskany, was
shot down over enemy territory. He was so resistant to his captors and provided
so much leadership to other prisoners that he was put into solitary confinement
where he was routinely tortured. In a conversation with Jim Collins, author of
the popular book Good to Great, about
his coping strategy during his seven years of captivity he said:
"I never lost faith on the end of the story. I never doubted
not only that I would get out, but also that I would prevail in the end and
turn the experience into the defining event of my life, which, in retrospect, I
would not trade."
When Collins asked who did not make it, Stockdale replied:
"Oh that's easy, the optimists. Oh, they were the ones who
said, 'We're going to be out by Christmas." And Christmas would come and
Christmas would go. Then they'd say 'We're going to be out by Easter.' And
Easter would come and Easter would go. And then Thanksgiving and then Christmas
again. And they died of a broken heart.
He then added:
"This is a very important lesson. You must never confuse
faith that you will prevail in the end - which you can never lose - with
the discipline to confront the most brutal facts in your current
reality, whatever they might be."
This concept of never losing hope while never being afraid
to face cold reality is now called The
Stockdale Paradox.
Another man who lived through a terrible experience was
Viktor Frankl, the psychiatrist who survived the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz.
In his book Man's Search for Meaning
he describes one of his talks to his fellow prisoners. He, like Stockdale, took
upon himself the role of leader, attempting to soothe the pain of his fellow
prisoners. In his book he describes a talk he had with his fellow prisoners:
"I told my comrades (who lay motionless, although
occasionally a sigh could be heard) that human life, under any circumstances,
never ceases to have a meaning, and that this infinite meaning of life includes
suffering and dying, privation and death. I asked the poor creatures who
listened to me attentively in the darkness of the hut to face up to
seriousness of our position. They must not lose hope but should keep
their courage in the certainty that the hopelessness of our struggle did not
detract from its dignity and meaning."
I think this idea of facing the reality but never
losing hope has a lot of value for us as we lead our teams. In spite of all
the pressure as a project leader to "present the best case" and the temptation
to lose hope, we owe it to our team to instill hope while constantly facing
(and asking them to face) the reality of the current situation. This could be
one of the most important abilities of a great project manager.
Back to top
|
 A Few Closing Words by Geof Lory
 Every year at this time my wife, Beth, and I get away to spend a
little time together to relax, recall, reflect, and recommit. It is a
special time, an annual milestone if you will, and a time to
re-baseline our plan for the coming year. As is standard practice, we
set some goals for the new year that will require certain changes in
behavior. We are deliberate in making these commitments to ourselves
and to each other so that collectively we agree to help each other be
aware and responsible. Hold on to those words, aware and
responsible-they are going to come up again.
This year, instead of some of the more physically challenging New
Year's resolutions like eating better or working out, I've decided to
do a little work from the inside out. I'm going to watch what comes out
of my mouth rather than what goes in it. I plan to recommit to using
words that are open, internal, and reflect choice. Keep those words in
mind too. We'll combine them with the two from above.
I am a big believer in the power of words and in fact receive a daily dose from A.Word.A.Day
to keep my vocabulary challenged and fresh. What I find most
interesting about words is how they can be used to optimally express my
true intent when communicating. The more specific the word, the more
specific the meaning, which hopefully better expresses intent. I find
that it is easy to get lazy with the use of certain words that, over
time, program beliefs and behaviors we might not consciously choose.
While it may be true that many words are colloquially used
interchangeably, I contend that the subtle differences in the
undertones or implicit meanings of words set a framework for our
actions and values. And when it comes to programming our core system,
our operating system, we can't be too careful with the quality of our
code.
Furthermore, the words we choose and use not only program ourselves,
but, with habitual use, also affect those we speak with regularly.
Consistent use of a certain style or flavor of words sets an
expectation in others that becomes their filter through which our words
are heard. This filter in turn predisposes their interpretation of our
words, often in spite of our best intentions. Choose your words
carefully because over time they will establish the way you think, act,
and are perceived.
In a previous article, Measure What Matters,
I spoke about a few of these words and how I was deliberate with my
daughters in using words that are open to the possibilities, represent
internal motivation, and express personal choice. These words develop
awareness and responsibility in the person speaking the words and
builds trust in the person hearing the words.
Words may appear similar on the surface but underneath, and
especially through repetition, they subtly program the speaker and the
receiver differently. So, by pre-programming myself consciously to use
these words, I am programming others' subconscious perception. They
learn to expect a certain perspective from me that is open,
responsible, and conscious, setting the stage for better interactions.
Let's look at some of these words.
Open vs. Closed
Closed words limit possibilities by expressing a situation as
absolute or pre-judged. Rarely is anything absolute or without
possibility. Plus, absolute and judgmental words are indicative of a
closed mind, a prime target for practicing some challenging inquiry
that can loosen even the tightest grip on these unrealities. My ears
perk up whenever I hear words like always and never because I know that
within them is the opportunity for new thinking that can bring about
easy change if I can move the conversation to open words. My daughters
accuse me of always golfing. I may golf a lot, but I'm not ALWAYS
golfing. What is it they are really trying to tell me? Listening for
the ALWAYS opens up the possibility for the real conversation.
External vs. Internal Motivation
These are words that reveal my mental and emotional position
relative to the situations and consequences of life. Words that reflect
an external motivation like should and need to imply we are victims of
our circumstances and have little control over our current or future
condition. This position of innocence is a seductively alluring, but it
sets us on the slippery path to abdicating personal responsibility. At
a societal or organizational level it begs oversight and judgment, as
external forces are left to dictate not only what we do, but who we are
or can be. Over time, conformability settles in with this position and
it eventually leads to determinism and ...
Denying Choice
Ultimately, these words express a lack of choice on our part. By
limiting the possibilities and giving up control to external forces, we
lose the sense of responsibility for our life. We feel the forces from
outside have control and defensively we take comfort in the protective
shield of blame. Blame is a major source of productivity loss in
organizations. Blame cultures limit our willingness to take risks and
accept responsibility, which in turn discourages innovation and
creativity out of fear of criticism or prosecution. It is a sign of
immaturity in individuals, teams, and leadership. Listen to the words
of young children; you will hear this kind of speech because that is
their chronological point of reference.
The Awareness and Responsibility Check with Teams
Here's a little exercise I do with my teams and family that helps
increase awareness while encouraging responsibility by maintaining a
frame of reference that is positive and open, internally motivated, and
acknowledges living life by choice.
We start by brainstorming words to "check" each other on because
they are closed, external or deny choice. If there is a documented Team
Operating Agreement we may even add them to that. These could be words
like "never, got to, always, can't, should, have to, must, need to" and
my all time favorite, "the problem is..."
Then, team members are challenged to listen for (practice awareness
of) use of these words in team interactions. Whenever someone uses one
of those words, rather than correcting them or having them pay a fine
(a practice I've never been able to effectively administer) the
observer is to challenge the speaker's position in a curious and
respectful way. This could sound like:
"The problem is I'm always working. I really should work less, but I can't get any time off."
Hearing this from a team member, assuming it is not just a moment of
venting that is out of the ordinary, I would be compelled to respond
with some reality. It may be how the person is feeling, but it is
probably far from reality. I may call them out on why it is a problem,
or the true numbers of hours worked, or even ask them why they are
working so much. But eventually the conversation will turn to the fact
that it is really their choice to work as much as they do. And until
they can accept that reality, they will lack the awareness and
responsibility necessary to contribute optimally to the team.
You get the idea. It's not an attack on the speaker; mostly it is
just clarifying and bringing a little consciousness to the
conversation. With some practice, the game becomes self-perpetuating as
people look more to the possibilities and begin to take responsibility
for conditions and situations. Over time, team members know that others
are listening intently (this game will also encourage better listening
skills) and people will choose their words more consciously and
deliberately. The end result is that not only will overall
communication improve (more conscious speaking and listening), but you
will develop a culture that is positive, open, internally motivated,
and choice-filled.
As teams learn to work together, they often get stuck in the
Storming stage. In my next article, I will touch on the impact of
developing awareness and responsibility as a prerequisite for getting
out of Storming, and how to use the Team Check as a barometer for
building high performing teams. Back to top
|
A Fissure Guide
|
Month YearA |
I am a 37 year survivor of the technology wars. In 1972,
after completing a degree in Physics, and sampling grad school for a couple of
years, I realized that I was more energized by software development than by lab
research and started work as a rookie programmer at Mayo Clinic. The first
phase of my career, I spent 23 years performing various combinations of
technical work, business analysis and project management for major corporations
in the region, including Mayo Clinic, West Publishing, National Car Rental and
Northwest Airlines. During this time, I also when to school in the evenings and
completed a Masters in Business Administration (MBA).
However, as you may know, those last three corporations have
now been acquired by other larger entities. As I reflected on the uncertainties
of corporate America, I decided to begin the second phase of my career,
spending 8 years as a consultant. During this period, I contributed business
analysis and project management to many projects, and also assisted some major
corporations in establishing best practices in project management and setting
up project offices. Clients included Carlson Companies, Cargill, Best Buy and
United Health Group.
During this second phase, I also discovered Project
Management Institute (PMI), and passed their Project Management Professional
(PMP) certification exam in 1996. I then started teaching PMP exam classes for
the Minnesota chapter of PMI, and ended up leading their team of eight
instructors for five years and serving on the board of directors for two of
those years.
Finally, when the younger of my two daughters became college
age, I decided to stop consulting by day and teaching by night, and launched
phase three. For the last six years, I've been a full-time instructor guiding
various workshops including business analysis and project management offerings
from Fissure, and also serving as an adjunct professor for the University of
Minnesota, teaching the project management class in their Masters of Science in
Software Engineering.
Of the classes I teach, I find the Fissure Simulation
Powered Learning (SPLŪ) workshops particularly rewarding. The students are much
more engaged and enthusiastic when a simulation is part of the class, and it's
clear that more of the learning sticks with them and gets put to use.
During my years with Northwest Airlines, I developed a
passion for travel and intercultural understanding that continues today. In
those years, I met many people and learned many things traveling to Europe,
Japan and Hong Kong. I'm now finding that teaching can also be a wonderful
cultural opportunity. In recent years, my teaching assignments have taken me to
locations as diverse and fascinating as Tokyo, Cairo and even Peoria Illinois.
When I'm not teaching or nurturing the plants in the large
yard that my wife and I maintain, I can be found playing the many musical
instruments that clutter our house, or navigating the wonderful bicycle trails
near our home in search of the fountain of youth.
Back to top
|
|
|
|