|
Welcome to the REPTECH Report. Our goal is to keep you up to date on the news and rules affecting your plan.
But this is also your medium. We want to hear from you. Send questions or comments to our web editor at the address below.
Meantime, please join us for this issue. |
| REPTECH News
A Word From Our President |
| As we approach our 30 year anniversary, we are pleased to announce that REPTECH has become a subsidiary of National Investment Managers, Inc. NIM is a national operation with 23 regional pension consulting/administration firms operating in 15 states.
What does this mean to you?
First, nothing will change in the administration of your plan nor in our relationship with you. Eileen Baldwin and I will continue to run the day-to-day operations and provide our consulting services to you. Your analyst and all of our employees will remain in their current or in expanded positions. REPTECH will remain an autonomous unit; even our name will stay. This follows NIM's business model of allowing each office to continue operating in the way that made it successful in the first place. Our substantial ownership interest in NIM ensures that we have a stake in putting your needs first, via superior service. 
Most of all, however, we view this transition as both opportunity and expansion. This merger gives us access to other member firms, thus expanding our markets beyond our traditional services. We will, for example, have ESOP expertise, open-architecture daily valuation recordkeeping, and expanded Cafeteria Plan technology, including self-adjudicating debit card reimbursements.
When we purchased REPTECH in 1991, we were committed to providing high-quality consulting and administrative services to independent business owners and professionals, making it easy to sponsor a retirement plan. We still feel the same, 17 years later. We hope to serve your needs for many years to come.
Ralph Shaw
President/General Counsel
REPTECH |
| COLA Refresher
IRS issues 2009 cost-of-living adjustments |
|
The Internal Revenue Service in October released the 2009 Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs) for plans, noting that, "Many of the pension plan limitations will change for 2009 because the increase in the cost-of-living index met the statutory thresholds that trigger their adjustment."
Those adjustments include:
|
Item |
2009 |
2008 |
|
Annual Compensation |
$245,000 |
$230,000 |
|
Elective Deferrals |
$ 16,500 |
$ 15,500 |
|
HCE Threshold |
$110,000 |
$105,000 |
|
Catch-up Contributions |
$ 5,500 |
$ 5,000 |
|
Defined Benefit Limits |
$195,000 |
$185,000 |
|
Defined Contribution Limits |
$ 49,000 |
$ 46,000 |
|
Key Employee Compensation |
$160,000 |
$150,000 |
|
|
|
| |
| 403(b) Deadline Approaches
IRS issues updates on its approval program
|
| The Internal Revenue Service is preparing for 403(b) plan document debuts, those kin to 401(k) plans, but used by certain nonprofitsand educational institutions.
The 403(b) plans fall under final Treasury Regulations that say sponsors must have a written plan document in place by January 1, 2009.
The IRS recently released an update on its progress, noting that it is developing programs similar to those for 401(a) plans, including preapproved plans and a determination letter process.
Program updates also include:
- The program for preapproved plans should be open this spring;
- The individually designed plan program will open in early 2011;
- The IRS will post a draft 403(b) Listing of Required Modifications (LRM) on its website in the fall, asking for public comment; and
- The agency will issue a revenue procedure by calendar year end, opening the preapproved 403(b) plan program for submissions from prototype sponsors, it says.
|
| HEART Update
2009 provisions set to start |
| January 1, 2009 ushers in a second deadline for the Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008 (HEART). The law, signed in June, applies to sponsors of 401(a), 403(b) and 457(b) retirement plans, both defined contribution and defined benefit plans.
For 2009, it requires that sponsors who pay differential wages to active duty military:
- consider those employees as active employees; and
- deem the differential payments to be compensation for plan purposes. Sponsors must report that compensation on W-2 Forms rather than 1099s.
- The Act likewise says active duty participants who serve more than 30 days will have severed employment. They can thus request distributions from their account, although they will then be subject to a a six-month suspension on deferrals.
HEART also made certain provisions retroactive to January 1, 2007, specifically that all 401(a), 403(b) and 457(b) retirement plans provide the same death benefits for participants in qualified military service as they do for participants who die while employed. This applies to deaths  on or after January 1, 2007.
Two other provisions of HEART:
- The Pension Protection Act (PPA) allowed qualified reservist distributions, or penalty-free withdrawals from elective deferrals and earnings for military called up after September 11, 2001. It applies to those who serve a minimum of 180 days and who are on active duty. The provision came with a December 31, 2007 deadline. HEART removes that deadline. After active duty, the withdrawals can be repaid within two years.
- The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) required that plans provide full or partial benefit accruals or contributions for the time a participant is
serving in the military, once his service is done and he is rehired. HEART takes that a step further, allowing, but not requiring, plans to consider an active duty participant as reemployed on the day prior to his or her death or disability, with termination falling on the date of the death or disability.
Finally, sponsors will need to amend their plans to reflect the HEART Act provisions by the last day of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2010. The government plan deadline is January 1, 2012.
|
| Compliance Zone
Breaking Down the Expenses Paid by a Plan: Settlor Functions v. Plan Administration Functions |
ERISA explicitly authorizes the payment of plan expenses from a plan when they are "reasonable" costs of administering the plan. Plan fiduciaries must consider the plan's expenses and determine whether the plan is permitted to pay for each expense. To evaluate whether a plan expense can be paid from the plan, the plan fiduciary must: (1) determine if the plan expense is reasonable; (2) determine if the plan document authorizes the payment of plan expenses from plan assets; and (3) determine if the expense is related to plan administration functions or settler functions.
What are Settlor Functions?
Settlor functions are related to the establishment, design and termination of the plan. Expenses related to settlor functions cannot be paid by the plan.
What are Plan Administration Functions?
Plan administration functions are related to administrative tasks such as recordkeeping, auditing, and disclosing information and documents. Expenses related to plan administration functions may be paid by the plan, provided the plan document permits payment of administrative fees.
Which Types of Expenses Can Be Paid by a Plan? (Examples of Expenses Related to Plan Administration Functions)
-
Third party administrator (TPA) fees for administration of the plan
-
Fees for nondiscrimination and other compliance testing
-
Investment fees, including fees associated with investment education or advice for the plan or for plan participants
-
Legal, actuarial and consulting fees to keep the plan in compliance with current laws
-
Legal advice concerning topics such as plan operation, fiduciary responsibilities, or plan interpretation
-
Plan amendments that are required to comply with Title I of ERISA or to maintain a plan's tax qualified status
-
Changing a plan's design after the plan has been amended
-
Fees related to disclosure of plan information, including preparing and distributing summary plan descriptions and other communication regarding participant benefits
-
Submitting the plan to the IRS for a favorable determination letter
-
Fees related to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) determination
-
Audit fees
-
Trustee fees
Which Types of Expenses Cannot Be Paid by a Plan? (Examples of Expenses Related to Settlor Functions)
- Fees for advice on the design or adoption of a plan, including drafting a plan document for a new plan
- Fees for amending an existing plan design, other than a required amendment to comply with changing laws
- Consulting fees to evaluate possible plan design changes related to new laws (beyond advice about complying with new laws)
- Fees incurred in deciding whether to terminate a plan
- IRS or DOL penalties
- Fees related to the preparation of the employer's corporate financial statements
- Reimbursement to the plan sponsor for plan expenses previously paid on behalf of the plan
- Fees related to union negotiations
Each issue, Jennifer J. Smith, J.D., REPTECH's Compliance Associate, will explain different document components and their effect on your plan.
|
| Plan Participation Up in '07
EBRI study says numbers up for first time since 1998 |
|
They're up. Participation levels in employment-based retirement plans increased in 2007 for the first time since 1998, according to a study from Employee Benefits Research Institute.
Participation is strongly tied to macroeconomic factors, the study says, which explains the higher participations rates in the 1990s and lower rates in the 2000s. The study found that participation increased in the late '90s, fell in 2001 and 2002, flattened in 2003 and 2004, and fell in 2005 and 2006.
A few other findings:
- Participation increases with age.
- Overall, men participate more than women, "but among full-time, full-year workers, women had a higher percentage participating than men (57.0% for women, compared with 54.0% for men)."
- Hispanic workers participated less than black or white workers.
- Workers in the South, West and Southwest participated least, while those in the Midwest and Northeast participated most. Wisconsin led the country, with a 68% participation rate.
Finally, the study anticipated further growth as automatic enrollment provisions in the Pension Protection Act of 2006 take effect in 2008. The study's summaries did not mention the recent global financial crisis and its effect if any on participation rates. |
| Ask An Analyst
FAQs answered by REPTECH's QKAs |
|
By Steve Flannery
The Internal Revenue Service says it won't take paper vouchers anymore. You might think that affects your required deposits of mandatory withholding on distributions from retirement plans that are eligible for rollover. You are correct.
If your funds are managed through large vendors, such as John Hancock or ING, no worries for you. They'll make those deposits for you.
But if you use FBOs or self-directed brokerage accounts, this information applies to you.
There is an alternative.
Now you can deposit electronically through the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System, a.k.a. EFTPS. Maybe you use this IRS system  already for your business payroll withholding deposits. Now, via the Internet or telephone, you can take care of those deposits of withholding from a 401(k) plan distribution.
To enroll, you'll need approximately 10 minutes to complete the online New Taxpayer Enrollment Form.
Once EFTPS receives your information, the IRS says you'll receive a confirmation and instructions on how to obtain your Internet password. This will be created and mailed to the name and address you entered on the enrollment form. Likewise, your online PIN will be mailed to your official IRS address of record.
Once enrolled, you can make secure payments on the Internet or via phone from anywhere, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week by sending instructions on when your funds should be debited from your bank account. Or you can schedule a payment up to 120 days in advance.
Check out the EFTPS brochure at 1.800.555.8778 or https://download.eftps.com/966_brochure.pdf. And as always, you can call your REPTECH analyst with questions.
* Web Editor's Note: Each issue, one of REPTECH's analysts will briefly answer a question commonly asked by our customers. If you have a question, send it to webeditor@reptech.com, and we may answer it in a future issue. |
| Did You Know... |
| During the past 12 months, 24% of workers age 45+ say they have increased their work hours, and 20% stopped putting their pay into retirement accounts, an October AARP study says. More than 80% said they didn't have enough left over after bills.
Late last month, the Social Security Administration released its four-component strategic plan, a compendium of how the overburdened agency plans to handle the increasing Baby Boomer population. The  four goals: Eliminate the hearings backlog and prevent recurrence; improve speed and quality of the disability process; improve retiree and other core services; and preserve the public's trust in agency programs. Tacked on is a special initiative: "Encourage Saving."
"The labor force participation rate of workers 55 to 64 years old fell from about 62% in 1970 to 54% in 1986 and then rose steadily, to nearly 64% in 2007. The rate for workers age 65 and older followed a similar pattern and is at nearly the same level today as it was in 1970," Congressional Budget Office Director Peter R. Orszag told the House Committee on Education and Labor in his October 7 testimony.  "In order for a private-sector worker to purchase a modest annual annuity of $20,000, she must accumulate an estimated $260,000 in a 401(k). Yet, the median 401(k) balance for heads of households approaching retirement in 2004 was just $60,000," Christian E. Weller, Ph.D., from the University of Massachusetts Boston, told the House Committee on Education and Labor in his October 7 testimony.
"Although many asset allocation models and/or financial advisors may suggest that extreme concentrations to equities for the young cohorts would be acceptable, it is less certain that those approaching  retirement would receive similar recommendations. Nevertheless ... more than 1 in 4 (27%) of the oldest 401(k) participants (age 56-65 in 2006) had 90% or more of their 401(k) assets in equities. Another 11% had 80-90% in equities, and 10% had 70- 80% in equities." -- Jack VanDerhei, EBRI in his October 7 testimony to the House Education and Labor Committee. | |
|
|
|
| Quarterly Quote |
|
"The trends in total household wealth show that families have lost wealth at a breathtaking speed over the past year."
-- Christian E. Weller, Ph.D. to the House Committee on Education and Labor's "The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Workers' Retirement Security"
|
| REMINDER! |
|
PLAN DOCUMENT RESTATEMENTS!
Last summer, you were mailed a packet of information explaining the document restatement regulations. If you haven't mailed your engagement form, please do so as soon as possible.
Plan changes, including trustee changes, should be communicated to your analyst or included with the engagement form. |
|
|
| Fast Facts |
|
What's the difference?
Interim Amendments are amendments to your plan that are required by law. They apply to retirement plans in general.
Discretionary Plan Amendments are amendments changing your particular plan document at your request. |
|
| Contacts |
Eileen Baldwin-Shaw Vice President 303.327.5545 ebaldwin@reptech.com
Ralph W. Shaw President/General Counsel 303.327.5544 rshaw@reptech.com REPTECH 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle Suite 500 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Main: 720-489-8700 Fax: 720-489-8444 Toll Free: 877-291-4015 www.reptech.com |
|
|