|
Taking Transferceuticals to the WORLD |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov. 10, 2008
Ron Knisely Research analyst 
Preventative & Recovery Medicine
and Anti-Aging technologies.
Special interest in immune system
enhancement based around
Transfer Factor & Nano Factor science.
The information in this newsletter is for educational purposes only. Know your options, stay informed, do it 4life. |
LET US HELP YOU SPREAD THE WORD
ABOUT STAYING WELL AND AGING SLOW
IT'S ALL ABOUT EMPOWERING YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM
AND YOUR BANK ACCOUNT
712-432-3000
Pin# 914079
HOSTED BY RON KNISELY
MONDAY
( PRODUCT )
6:15pm (PST) 9:15pm (EST)
SATURDAY
( PRODUCT/OPPORTUNITY )
1:00pm (PST) 4:00pm (EST)
|
|
At the mall the other day, two young teenage girls were talking to each other. One of them said, "My mom got me that safe sex vaccine." Of course, the girl could only have been talking about Gardasil - the vaccine that helps prevent human papillomavirus (HPV) in women. As with the Telephone Game (where a simple message gets thoroughly distorted when passed from one person to another) the Gardasil message has gotten skewed as it's filtered down from drug makers, to the mainstream media, to doctors, to parents, and finally to young girls. The message starts out as "Gardasil helps prevent a virus that may cause cervical cancer," and ends up, "Gardasil is a safe sex vaccine." And with that mangled message, these young girls may actually be under the impression that they're protected from ALL sexually transmitted diseases. They might even believe the vaccine is a method of birth control. If beliefs like these are being passed around in malls and high schools, this generation of teens may soon develop health issues they never dreamed of. On top of that, IF the vaccine works as well as predicted, about one in four girls who receive Gardasil will still be vulnerable to HPV and cervical cancer. Off message Here's one way misinformation gets rolling: Last month, Reuters Health released a report stating that an aggressive HPV vaccine program that includes women as old as 45 could cut cervical cancer rates in half. A "crippling blow against the disease" is how Reuters described the potential. This new information is based on a University of Alabama study that found cervical cancer rates could be lowered by as much as 55 percent for 45-year-old women, 67 percent for 25-year-old women, and 85 percent for 12-year-olds. Okay...three glaring problems with this harebrained study... 1) These numbers are nothing but numbers because the study wasn't based on a clinical trial, it was based on a mathematical model. 2) The model assumed 100 percent vaccination rates, which is 100 percent malarkey (the full course of three shots costs nearly $400 - prohibitively expensive for the thousands of women with no health insurance). 3) The FDA hasn't approved Gardasil for women over the age of 26, largely because the vaccine provides no protection once women are exposed to HPV strains that cause cervical cancer. Once a woman becomes sexually active, all bets are off. So this "crippling blow" that could cut cervical cancer rates in half is pure fantasy, but it's reported with the optimism of a guaranteed sure thing. Outside the safety zone You can be sure that many parents read the Reuters Health report and decided their children should be vaccinated. And one of the reasons they might feel emboldened is because the article didn't mention one word about the vaccine's serious side effects. When I sent you the e-Alert "Hide Your Daughters" (8/21/08), the FDA had received more than 9,700 adverse event reports for Gardasil. Among those reports, 580 include severe reactions such as seizures, convulsions, and death. Meanwhile, in Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (their FDA) is investigating three cases of pancreatitis that appear to be linked to Gardasil injections. This is in addition to more than 1,000 Gardasil adverse reactions reported to the TGA. The attention these cases received just might play a role in a "mystery" that's occurring in South Australia. Health department officials there can't fathom why the parents of nearly 16,000 young girls opted out of a program that offers the vaccine for free. Of course, the health department party line is familiar: "Safe and effective!" But one Australian newspaper notes that in addition to a fear of side effects, many parents are concerned that young girls are getting the impression that unprotected sex is safe after receiving the vaccine. Note to parents everywhere: That impression is real.
CHECK OUT THE 9 MINUTE VIDEO
|
|
ON MY LAST NEWSLETTER THIS LINK DIDN'T WORK, THIS ONE SHOULD
HAVE YOU READ WHAT DR. ROB ROBERTSON HAS TO SAY ABOUT
|
|
Once upon a time, not so long ago . . .
� The FDA was the country's largest law enforcement agency.
� Conventional wisdom at the FDA, in many political circles, and in orthodox medicine was that the use of dietary supplements was quackery.
� The FDA's ally, the Federal Trade Commission, tried to ban the words, "natural," "organic" and "health food" from the marketplace.
� Among guns, cigarettes, booze and vitamins, only vitamins were illegal.
And then along came the courage of natural health retailers and natural healthcare providers. This joined the power of natural health consumers. Laws were passed, including the Dietary Supplement, Health and Education Act (DSHEA) in 1994, and things changed. And though there has always been more work to be done, we've enjoyed freer access to dietary supplements, to natural health products and services, and a freer exchange of natural health information.
But still . . .
� The American Medical Association claims that a majority of Americans want more government regulation of dietary supplements and natural health care.
� A number of key senators have criticized DSHEA, either because its badly written, or it's been exploited by the supplement industry, or its been mismanaged by the FDA, or all of the above. One House Representative, John Dingle from Michigan, has called for repeal of DSHEA altogether.
� Others who have expressed criticism about DSHEA and its implementation include Sen. John McCain on the one hand, and Sen. Richard Durbin on the other hand, who is a close ally and advisor of Sen. Obama's.
� Influential lobbyists are working to require pre-market approval for dietary supplements, so that they will be regulated more like drugs.
� The pressure to increase regulation of dietary supplements in the U.S. is coming from not just within our borders, but also from other countries where access to natural dietary supplements is more limited.
An Open Letter to All Citizens For Health
If you're like those of us behind the scenes here at CFH - ardent supporters of natural health - you may find yourself shaking your head when the subject of healthcare reform comes up in the election debates and policy discussions. What these folks are talking about is not healthcare reform. What they're talking about is health insurance reform - the finance and administration of the "sick care" system.
A real discussion about healthcare reform isn't going to take place until natural health is included as part of the discussion. And natural health has got to be a major part of the discussion at that, rather than referred to as a marginalized "alternative." All the information we see today about natural health - wellness & lifestyle practices, dietary supplements and autonomous healing methods - is just the beginning. It's no time to turn back! Read More . . .
|
WHAT ABOUT OMEGA 3 FATTY ACID
All too often, the first sign of hidden cardiovascular disease is the last: sudden cardiac death. Many of these deaths are caused by abnormal heart rhythms, or arrhythmias.
Arrhythmias--some harmless, some life-threatening--afflict nearly 10 million Americans. While conventional medical treatments focus on invasive implantable devices and medications that carry serious side effects, compelling evidence shows that you can arm yourself against dangerous heart rhythm disorders by optimizing your omega-3 fatty acid intake.
Physicians Finally Recommend Fish Oil
In the last two years, conventional medical practitioners have increasingly embraced omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil for their heart-health benefits.
But just 30 years ago, had you suggested that fish oil could provide extraordinary benefits towards reducing the risk of heart attack, help prevent or suppress abnormal heart rhythms, and even reduce the likelihood of death from heart disease more than any prescription drug known, you would have been laughed out of town. But you would also have had the last laugh.
For years, physicians have dismissed the value of nutritional supplements, including omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil. This unwillingness to utilize fish oil has prevailed despite considerable scientific data documenting the flagrant health damage wreaked by omega-3 deficiency in Americans. Even after a 1999 study showed that heart attack survivors who supplemented with a modest amount of fish oil each day experienced significantly less cardiovascular mortality (30%) and sudden death (45%), many physicians failed to recommend omega-3 fatty acids to their patients.
Prescription Fish Oil
Practicing physicians remained reluctant to recommend fish oil until a pharmaceutical company decided that it would commercialize omega-3 fatty acids as a prescription drug. Reliant Pharmaceuticals pushed its version of fish oil omega-3s through human clinical trials, an expensive and laborious process required for FDA approval as a pharmaceutical agent. In November 2004, the FDA approved fish oil as a prescription drug for the treatment of triglyceride levels of >500 mg/dL. (It is standard operating procedure for pharmaceutical companies to obtain drug approval for a single condition that is likely to pass regulatory muster.) Of course, once the product reaches pharmacy shelves, it can be prescribed "off label" for other uses. The initial product name was "Omacor�," but has recently been changed to Lovaza™ due to confusion from a similar-sounding but unrelated product.
Promptly following FDA approval, marketing efforts exploded. Practicing physicians received weekly visits, phone calls, and emails from eager sales representatives, not to mention invitations to dinners and "educational" conferences. Now, three years and plenty of marketing efforts later, your neighborhood physician is beginning to prescribe fish oil for high triglycerides.
The appearance of fish oil as a pharmaceutical agent has paved the path for large clinical trials to study its usefulness for treating a number of conditions. The larger sums that a drug manufacturer can charge for a product (because "drugs" are paid for by the health insurance industry) bring in greater revenues sufficient to fund large clinical studies.
Among the emerging applications of omega-3s is the treatment or prevention of heart rhythm disorders, or arrhythmias. Since rhythm disorders are complex, the media has painted a confusing picture of their management with fish oil. Yet if we sift through the hype and media confusion, we will discover that fish oil is emerging as a very powerful treatment for heart rhythm disorders. Although newer studies have focused on the prescription form of omega-3s, fish oil is available to us without a prescription, just as it has been for years. The good news is that fish oil may represent the number one nutritional strategy for protecting against dangerous abnormal heart rhythms.
What You Need to Know: Averting Arrhythmia with Omega-3 Fatty Acids
Heart arrhythmias are a leading cause of sudden cardiac death. Abnormal heart rhythms have traditionally been treated with prescription medications. However, these medications have dangerous side effects and may not decrease overall mortality.
Compelling evidence suggests that omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil may prevent sudden cardiac death, which is likely mediated through rhythm-stabilizing effects. Individuals with lower levels of omega-3 fatty acid intake are more likely to experience heart arrhythmias.
The American diet is extremely low in omega-3 fatty acids. The recent approval of a prescription form of omega-3 fatty acids has fueled a burst of interest in extending its uses, including management of abnormal heart rhythms. High-quality fish oil as a nutritional supplement is readily accessible.
Omega-3 fatty acids help stabilize heart rhythms through numerous mechanisms, and may help prevent the common arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation. Omega-3 fats may find usefulness even in people with dangerous heart rhythms that necessitate defibrillators.
Fish oil supplements remain the best source of the omega-3 fatty acids, with alpha-linolenic acid a second choice.
A Nationwide Deficiency of Omega-3s
Before the late 1980s, the American diet was extremely high in saturated fats, which was linked with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease.2
In response, many arbiters of healthy eating, including the Surgeon General's office, the USDA, and eventually even the FDA spoke out against fat intake in the American diet. Thus was born the low-fat era. Not only did Americans receive an introduction to the concept of low-fat foods, but the food manufacturing industry spotted a new opportunity for an entirely new range of products that exploited the low-fat concept: low-fat cookies, low-fat breakfast cereals, low-fat lunch meats, and thousands of others.
Along with the low-fat concept, the same agencies advocated a switch from saturated fats to polyunsaturated fats, based on some evidence suggesting that replacing saturated with polyunsaturated fats reduced blood cholesterol levels, heart attack, and cancer. Polyunsaturated fats from corn, safflower, sunflower, and other sources thereby became deeply entrenched in Americans' nutritional habits.
At the same time, a new trend was emerging in the Midwestern farm belt. Traditional American farms, in which livestock roamed and fed on grasses, were replaced with large-scale factory farms that could generate large amounts of low-cost meat. These factory farms kept animals confined to small pens and fed them corn or industrialized food substitute. While grass-fed beef contains a substantial amount of omega-3 fatty acids, factory farm-raised beef does not. This trend drove down the cost of meat, but it also depleted the nation's meat supply of omega-3 fatty acids. Now, most supermarket meat is rich in omega-6 fatty acids, with the resultant greater fat composition visible to the unaided eye as "marbling."
Thus, a confluence of events led to creating an excess of omega-6 fatty acids and a depletion of omega-3s in the American diet. Compared to the diet of a primitive human feeding on wild game, the average American diet based on factory farm-raised livestock contains less than 10% of its original omega-3 fatty acid content.
The consequence of deep, long-term depletion of omega-3 fatty acids from the American diet is a collection of inflammatory diseases: cancer, high blood pressure, mental illness, and heart disease.
Could the many cases of heart rhythm disorders afflicting humans today represent the end result of decades of a diet lacking omega-3 fatty acids? Intriguing evidence suggests that this may be the case.
Understanding Arrhythmias
What is that flip-flop feeling you get sometimes while lying in bed or after a strong cup of coffee? When is irregular or rapid heart rhythm just a passing, harmless phenomenon, and when is it a harbinger of real trouble?
In truth, everybody has some measure of irregularity of their heart beat and nobody's heart rhythm is perfectly regular. Beat-to-beat variation, in fact, is a desirable feature of heart rhythm that reflects health. The most physically fit athletes, for instance, have the greatest degree of heart rate variation. Lack of beat-to-beat variation can suggest hidden dangers and potential for heart attack and even death. This cannot be easily measured on your own, but can be assessed by electrocardiogram, or EKG. At some point, however, your heart's rhythm can violate its controls and exceed healthy limits of variability. This is arrhythmia. Actually, a more accurate term would be dysrhythmia, or disturbed rhythm, since arrhythmia means "without rhythm," but arrhythmia is the more commonly used term.
Like people, arrhythmias come in a variety of shapes and sizes. Some are benign and simply an annoyance (albeit a frightening one when your heart feels like it's jumping or racing), while others are life-threatening. Your doctor can help determine whether you have an arrhythmia, and whether it is benign or a potential cause for concern.
Several clues can suggest that an arrhythmia may be present and that medical evaluation is necessary. For example, a heart rate that is too low (less than 50 beats per minute) or too fast (more than 99 beats per minute) is unusual and should be evaluated by your doctor. The sensation of palpitations; or that flip-flop feeling in your chest, without feeling faint or losing consciousness; can suggest that an arrhythmia is present. But palpitations by themselves are exceptionally common and not necessarily rhythm-related. If you've passed out or felt faint, then you should have a physician evaluate whether you may have an arrhythmia.
Omega-3 Fatty Acids from Fish Oil Are Rhythm Stabilizing
Inexpensive, safe, and effective, the omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil provide a stabilizing effect on heart rhythm function that no medication can provide.
The evidence showing that omega-3 fatty acids stabilize heart rhythms dates back nearly 20 years to the Diet and Reinfarction Trial (DART). Conducted by Dr. Michael Burr at the University of Wales in 1989, the DART trial was the first randomized clinical trial demonstrating the benefits of fish oil. Two thousand and thirty-three men with prior heart attacks participated in the study. Those who were advised to eat fish twice per week experienced a 29% drop in all-cause mortality over the course of two years, compared with men who did not receive this dietary advice. Dr. Burr and colleagues reasoned that the modest quantity of omega-3 fatty acids obtained by eating fish likely suppressed the generation of unstable electrical impulses from damaged heart muscle that can trigger fatal heart rhythms.
Another study of 360 patients with symptoms of heart attack corroborated the DART findings, but used a higher dose of omega-3s obtained from fish oil capsules. This study, which was conducted in India, showed that patients given omega-3 fatty acids at the dose of 1,080 mg per day of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 720 mg per day of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) totaling 1,800 mg per day suffered 48% less cardiac death and 76% less sudden cardiac death, as well as a 54% reduction in dangerous heart rhythms.
Numerous experimental preparations have provided a scientific basis for the rhythm-stabilizing effect of omega-3s. These fatty acids affect myocardial membranes, regulate heart muscle cell action potentials, and impact a wide variety of cellular-signaling mechanisms, which together help avert dangerous arrhythmias. In contrast, the omega-6 fatty acids from polyunsaturated vegetable oils, which are converted into arachidonic acid in the body, may increase the potential for arrhythmias. Fish oil also reduces the blood-clotting protein, fibrinogen, and inhibits platelet aggregation, both of which prevent blood clot formation on active, ruptured coronary plaque that could contribute to heart attack. Heart attack is notorious for destabilizing heart rhythm.
Taken over months, omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil substantially reduce the frequency of abnormal irregular beats. In the recent ATTICA Study, a detailed analysis of electrocardiograms (EKGs) showed that participants who consumed more than 300 grams of fish per week (about 11 ounces, or two to three small servings) showed shorter QT intervals, a measure of heart rhythm stability. Thus, people eating fish showed less potential for unstable heart rhythms by this measure.
But just how useful are the omega-3 fatty acids for real-life suppression or prevention of abnormal heart rhythms?
Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Real-Life Applications
Clinical studies now provide solid documentation that omega-3 fatty acids reduce mortality from heart disease and disorders of heart rhythm. This is in dramatic contrast to prescription rhythm medication, which effectively normalizes heart rhythms but may also increase mortality risk.
The Italian GISSI-Prevenzione trial persuasively demonstrated fish oil's life-saving benefits. Over 11,000 subjects participated in this large trial that firmly established fish oil as a mainstay of heart disease management. Participants took 1,000 mg of EPA and DHA, the omega-3 fatty acids of fish oil, or placebo, with a resultant 30% reduction in cardiovascular mortality and 45% reduction in sudden death among those taking fish oil. The protective benefits (reduction in death) began as early as three months after initiation of fish oil supplementation.1 Similar, though even more profound, effects were suggested by a Harvard study showing that men who had higher blood levels of omega-3 fatty acids suffered an 80% lower likelihood of sudden cardiac death compared with men who had low omega-3 blood levels. Thus while prescription medications may exert more potent effects on suppression of irregular heart beats, fish oil may have the upper hand in providing life-saving benefits
Substantial research suggests that omega-3 fatty acids may protect the cardiovascular system by increasing heart rate variability. While abnormal and dangerous heart rhythms are often characterized by irregularity, there is also a modest modulation that normally occurs from heartbeat to heartbeat, ebbing and flowing in waves that track respiratory (breathing) patterns. This sort of irregularity is actually desirable and healthy, reflecting heightened parasympathetic nervous system tone. Interestingly, omega-3 fatty acids increase this type of desirable heart rate variation, which may help explain their ability to modulate heart rhythms. Omega-3 fats also reduce resting heart rate and improve heart rate recovery after exercise.
The rhythm-suppressing properties of fish oil are so effective that some cardiologists now recommend that patients who have implanted defibrillators (to manage life-threatening heart rhythms) take fish oil to reduce the rhythm instability of the heart and reduce defibrillator firings, which are very painful and frightening. In a 2005 Harvard study, 402 survivors of heart attacks with implanted defibrillators were given a low dose of fish oil or placebo. Fish oil supplementation produced a 38% reduction in painful defibrillator firings over the course of 11 months.
>
Can fish oil prevent dangerous rhythms in people without known heart disease? The Physicians' Health Study provides the clearest perspective on this intriguing question. Over 17 years of observation, participants who died from sudden cardiac death had much lower blood levels of omega-3 fatty acids at the start of the observation period than those who did not. Protective levels of omega-3 were obtained by just eating one or more servings of fish per week, yielding a 52% reduction in the risk of sudden cardiac death, which was likely mediated by the decrease in fatal heart rhythms.
An intriguing but unanswered question is whether fish oil suppresses the common arrhythmia known as atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation plagues approximately 10% of people over age 80 and is a frequent reason for hospitalization. Furthermore, atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke by contributing to blood clot formation in the left atrium that fragments and is released into the circulation. Conventional medical treatment for atrial fibrillation is fraught with side effects and limited effectiveness, and better therapies are sorely needed. Fish oil has impressively suppressed atrial fibrillation in experimental non-human preparations. The question is compelling: does taking fish oil prevent this common arrhythmia?
Prevention of atrial fibrillation would be difficult in a broad population, as is any preventive strategy, since the rhythm develops in only a small percentage of people during the limited period of a study. A convenient "laboratory" to study this question is provided by persons undergoing heart bypass surgery, since atrial fibrillation occurs in approximately one-third of patients following the operation. One such effort was a recent study of 160 patients given 2,000 mg per day of EPA-DHA versus placebo, begun five days prior to surgery, which demonstrated that the occurrence of atrial fibrillation plummeted from 33.3% in the placebo group to 15.2% in the omega-3 group. Interestingly, the only other therapeutic agents that have been shown to achieve a similar reduction in atrial fibrillation after heart surgery have been the beta-blocker class of antihypertensive drugs such as metoprolol, anti-arrhythmic medications like sotalol, and the anti-arrhythmic drug, amiodarone. All
> of these drugs carry side-effect risks. In contrast, the use of omega-3 fatty acids was accomplished with virtually no side-effects.
Prescription Anti-Arrhythmia Medications: Playing with Fire
Thirty years ago, physicians diligently monitored their patients' heart rhythms, selecting and prescribing specific medications called anti-arrhythmia medications, such as procainamide or amiodarone, accordingly. These medications were highly effective at reducing or eliminating irregular beats and rhythms.
It came as a surprise when several large clinical trials in the 1980s reported that while heart anti-arrhythmia medications reduced the quantity of "abnormal" heart beats, they were associated with an increase in mortality or death rates.
In 1995, Life Extension magazine exposed the FDA's failure to take lethal anti-arrhythmia drugs off the market, which at that time had already killed 50,000 Americans.
This startling discovery posed many questions for physicians. When should abnormal rhythms be treated, and when should they be left alone? Is a reduction in rhythm irregularity a positive change--or potentially fatal? This drove home the lesson that simply suppressing irregular heart beats may not translate into better outcomes.
This finding ended the days of suppressing all abnormal heart rhythms. Since then, investigators have learned that not all rhythms need to be suppressed. We also learned that while rhythm medications do reduce the number of excess beats, they are also potentially very dangerous.
Add to this the fact that many anti-arrhythmia medications carry risks of side-effects outside of heart rhythm, some very serious. The agent procainamide, for instance, can cause a lupus-like syndrome, while amiodarone is clearly related to thyroid disorders and liver dysfunction. Today, antiarrhythmic medications are reserved for dangerous and usually life-threatening rhythms.
The imperfections and pitfalls of anti-arrhythmia medications led many cardiologists to embrace implantable defibrillators that deliver an internal shock to the patient's heart to terminate rhythms that pose life-threatening risk. These devices are expensive and require a surgical procedure for implantation.
Thus, while certain medications can suppress the number of irregular heart rhythms, they do not necessarily extend life or reduce cardiovascular "events".
Your doctor or cardiologist can help you develop a plan to keep your heart in healthy rhythm. Fortunately, nutritional supplements like omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil can play a preventive role even with serious arrhythmias--and they do not have the undesirable aspects of anti-arrhythmia medications.
Obtaining Omega-3 Fatty Acids
Fish oil is the most concentrated source of the omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA. These fatty acids are present in cold-water fish such as wild salmon, halibut, and mackerel, as well as in fish oil supplements.
Existing data suggest that a dose of fish oil that delivers approximately 1,400-2,000 mg of EPA plus 1,000-1,500 mg of DHA is likely to yield heart rhythm benefits. This dose is similar to that used in the GISSI-Prevenzione trial that yielded a substantial reduction in cardiovascular events.
A secondary source of omega-3 fatty acids is alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) found in flaxseed, walnuts, and canola oil. Less than 10% of the alpha-linolenic acid ingested, however, is converted into active EPA or DHA, since much of it is simply burned for calories. These sources should be viewed as second choices in your quest to obtain adequate levels of omega-3 fatty acids necessary for optimal health. Nonetheless, emerging experiences are suggesting that alpha-linolenic acid may also reduce the likelihood of dangerous rhythm disorders that result in sudden cardiac death.
Since most of us are unable to obtain the necessary quantity of omega-3 fatty acids through diet alone, fish oil capsules or liquids provide a convenient and readily available means of protecting against dangerous heart arrhythmias. If you use the medication warfarin (Coumadin�), consult a physician before supplementing with fish oil.
Conclusion
The world of arrhythmias can be a confusing web of complex issues, even for physicians and cardiologists. The apparently straightforward strategy of suppressing abnormal heart beats with prescription medication does not often improve outcome, as the experience with heart rhythm drugs has shown us.
Chronic and severe deficiency of the omega-3 fraction of fats from the American diet may be a major causative factor behind cardiovascular disease, particularly life-threatening heart arrhythmias. Fish oil rich in omega-3 fatty acids may help treat the basic nutritional deficit that underlies many rhythm disorders.
Studies have shown that people with lower levels of omega-3 fatty acids are more prone to arrhythmias and cardiovascular events. Researchers have also demonstrated that omega-3 fatty acid consumption reduces such events. Supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids can thus provide a useful, practical method to prevent the development of several varieties of common arrhythmias.
Dr. William Davis who wrote this article is an author and cardiologist practicing in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who focuses on developing strategies for reversal of heart disease. He is author of the book, Track your Plaque: The only heart disease prevention program that shows you how to use the new heart scans to detect, track, and control coronary plaque. He can be contacted through www.trackyourplaque.com.
THE SOLUTION
Omega 3s from 4life Research |
CHECK OUT THE 4LIFE OPPORTUNITY FLIP CHART
OPPORTUNITY KNOCKS
CHECK OUT THESE 4 SHORT VIDEO CLIPS
|
|
Hospitals and Clinics Recommending Transfer Factor
|
The Use of Transfer Factors in Various Diseases
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This information has not been evaluated by the FDA. We do not claim that the products offered through this newsletter directly prevent, treat, or cure any disease. We do not suggest that anyone should replace traditional medical treatment with these products. The products are promoted for their ability to enhance the effectiveness of homeostasis and immune system functions. | |
|
|
|
|
