Getting it Right: Meeting Customer Expectations
A Rude Awakening
I can't begin to tell you how many times over the last 40
years I have had someone ask me a seemingly innocent question like, for
example, "is there any requirement that sequence matched and numbered panels be
balance matched all from the same log?" My typical first reaction to questions like this is, "uh-oh."
You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to deduce that this
question was probably triggered by a customer, fabricator, end user, what-ever,
whose expectations have already not been met. A possible scenario that would precede this little chat
might follow this sequence (sorry):
Regular Buyer: "May I have a quote
for 24 sheets of ¼" A-4 PS Red Oak on VC, sequence matched?"
Eager to Please Sales Rep: "Of course! Your price is $_____." (a very attractive number)
RB: "Your price sure is high. My PO number is _____." (I know...I took a short-cut to get to this point.)
Fast forward several
weeks/months to the opening question:
End User to RB: "Why do these panels look
different? I ordered them to all
look the same."
RB to ETPSR: "Why do these panels look
different? I ordered them to all
look the same."
End result: Not good.
With a little digging, we will probably discover this was an
order for a law library for the most prestigious firm in the city with the blue
prints calling for balance matched panels, matched in 4 sets of 5 all from one
log to be fabricated into judges panels. Somewhere in the process the quantity probably got rounded up to a
"press load" increment of 24.The
illustrations on the prints actually depict well defined cathedrals within the
individual components, and there may even be a specification for component
width. Did we mention that the
color expectation for the red oak is "light straw?" Probably not.
Now it's a mess. All the original material must be replaced. Everyone is blaming everyone else, and the client just wants
their expectations met.It will be
a tough clean-up job and in the end no one wins.The best result in this case will be that the
specifier is appeased at a minimum loss to all parties to the point they
may consider one day specifying your product again, and that is a sad state of
What Can Be Done to Prevent This?
In the movie The Karate Kid II, Daniel-san LaRusso asks Mr.
Miyagi how to avoid getting hit by his opponent. Mr. Miyagi looks at him nonchalantly, shrugs and replies,
"no be there."As the story grows,
he expertly coaches Daniel-san on avoidance techniques that in the end make him
Although Mr. Miyagi is a fictional character with seemingly supernatural
abilities, we can still learn from his lesson and "no be there" in the first
place.For us to avoid taking this
punch, like Daniel, we need to rely on our own instincts, training, and
knowledge.We need to learn to
look for not only what is said, but also what is not.Many times everyone in the supply chain is so busy that it
is easy to miss these subtleties I call "red flags" that telegraph to us that a
potent punch is headed in our direction.
Sometimes red flags are insidious.
Sometimes they are innocent.But, if you listen carefully and pay close attention you can pick
them out.A red flag may be hidden
in any of the following:
- Unusual quantity, grade, cut, or species for this customer
o Less than standard packaging, even if "press load" quantities
o Higher grade face with a very low grade back
o Plain sliced cut for a species more often purchased as rotary
- Unusual description, color, grain appearance
o Sequence matched (and numbered)
- It comes from an unfamiliar buyer
Spec calls for one species in different thicknesses or cores
- ANYTHING that just doesn't seem right!
Any of these red flags should cause us to STOP, take a deep
breath, and ask questions. At the
very least you should ask, "how is it going to be used?" If the answer is, "I don't know," don't
be afraid to say, "please find out!"Once we know how the product is going to be used we can ask a series of
- Will all panels be used on the same job?
- Is this a one time or repeating job?
- Do the panels need to all come from the same log?
- Can we match between sequence for color and grain for larger quantities?
- Is there a particular look the specifier has in mind?
- Should this be a custom grade?
- Are samples required?
- What type of match within a panel (running, balance, center) is expected?
- Which core is best for this application?
- Can we use a higher grade back to improve the overall quality?
Of course, neither of these lists should be considered
complete, but they should help establish a baseline for pursuing the real
expectations so that we can ensure those expectations are met!
Having participated in the above dialogue many, many times
in the past, I will tell you that I frequently hear the objection that our
customers don't have time to answer all these questions, and that if we try to
dig too deeply they may become impatient or angry. No sympathy here...my question then becomes: would you rather irritate your customer
by asking too many questions on the front end in order to meet expectations, or
would you prefer to wait until you have failed to meet those expectations and
see how well that works out?
Until next time!
Wood Works Newsletter
This is a service of CFP University and Ang Schramm to provide the Columbia community with tips, solutions and insights. Email Ang if you have ideas for more Wood Works
subject matter. Feel free to forward to colleagues and customers that might benefit from the information.
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST!
Forward this email to customers or colleagues and they can click here to be added to the next WOOD WORKS Newsletter mailing.
is offered in good faith for general purposes only. It is believed to
be accurate and has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable.
It is offered for your consideration, investigation, and verification.
Columbia Forest Products makes no warranty of any kind, expressed or
implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of the information and
data herein. Furthermore, Columbia Forest Products will not be liable
for claims relating to any party's use of, or reliance on information
and data contained herein, regardless or whether it is claimed that the
information and data are inaccurate, incomplete, or otherwise misleading.