|
And He was passing through from one city and village to another, teaching, and proceeding on His way to Jerusalem. And someone said to Him, "Lord, are there just a few who are being saved?" And He said to them, "Strive to enter through the narrow door; for many, I tell you, will seek to enter and will not be able. - Luke 13:22-24
|
|
|
|
Shalom in Christ Jesus,
 Welcome to
the latest edition of BEALERT!, Moriel Ministries
email newsletter. Below is Moriel's recent updated statement
regarding the worship conference scheduled to take place at Calvary Chapel,
Albuquerque, New Mexico. Also,
included is the latest article from Moriel's Danny Isom, 'Signs
and Wonders' and a Q & A session with Jacob. If this is
your first BEALERT! and you are wondering, "How did I get
this"? Please note that we have just updated our list to include a number of
email addresses gathered from attendees at recent conferences and subscribers
to our Moriel Quarterly. If you do
not wish to receive this newsletter, just scroll to the bottom of the page and
click on the "Safe Unsubscribe" button. If you want to change your email
address, just click on the "Update/Profile/Email Address" link at the
bottom of the page. May the Lord bless you and keep you, BE/\LERT! Scott Brisk
|
Leonard Sweet and Calvary Chapel, Albuquerque Cancellation
|
MORIEL MINISTRIES - By Jacob Prasch - May 24, 2010 A number of websites reacted
unfavorably to an advertised conference scheduled to take place at the Calvary
Chapel in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA where Skip Heitzig is pastor. Moriel
also posted these reports after being contacted by various Calvary Chapel
pastors and people, mainly in the USA. Mr. Sweet is by no scriptural standard a
Christian, but by every reasonable standard a New Age mystic and a pure
Gnostic. It was therefore with some delight we are informed from the USA that
the event has been canceled. We believe pastor Heitzig made the
correct decision. It may be that he and his staff were not fully informed about
the nature of Mr. Sweet's heretical beliefs at the time he agreed to host the
conference. We are aware that multiple Calvary Chapel pastors contacted Pastor
Heitzig expressing their own concerns, but in this regard, we cannot comment
further. Plainly, however, it was not Skip Heitzig who was the villain. Mr.
Sweet on the other hand propounds views nothing short of apostate, which many
would hold to be of demonic inspiration. Our own fear of course is that such an
event featuring Mr. Sweet would have damaged the reputation of Calvary Chapel. In light of these events we have
removed our own report and we urge the various other ministries and websites to
remove their own as well. None of us is immune from mistakes and in today's
world, they can be very easy to make. We applaud Skip Heitzig's actions and
salute the godly integrity of his decision to cancel the event. We trust other
websites and electronic newsletters will drop the matter quickly and consider
it a closed affair. Jacob Prasch Moriel Ministries
|
The Value of Signs and Wonders
|
 MORIEL MINISTRIES
- By Danny Isom - April 21, 2010
Nebuchadnezzar the king
to all the peoples, nations, and men of every language that live in all the
earth: "May your peace abound! It has seemed good to me to declare the signs
and wonders which the Most High God has done for me. "How great are His
signs And how mighty are His wonders! His kingdom is an everlasting kingdom And His dominion is from generation to generation. (Daniel 4:1-3) To have a Gentile write in Scripture about his coming to
faith in the One True God is an attention grabber in and of itself, but whereas
so many people throughout Scripture are documented as remaining unchanged
spiritually after witnessing a sign or wonder, here we have someone who
actually testifies to being changed by them. But if you just flopped open your
Bible and began reading Daniel 4 you would probably think Nebuchadnezzar is
referring to the signs and wonders connected to the events in this chapter and
miss the fact that these are actually the culmination of a series of signs and
wonders. Yes, Nebuchadnezzar witnessed some very amazing signs and wonders
recorded previously in Daniel 2 and 3 but the fact is that he did not allow
them to change his heart. No, having missed the greater application of what God
was teaching through those other signs and wonders, Nebuchadnezzar's testimony
here is that after one final round of signs and wonders he finally "gets it". In Daniel 2 we are provided with the account of how God
provided an amazing dream to Nebuchadnezzar but no one could explain its
meaning to the king except through Daniel. What was the king's public
confession after witnessing these signs and wonders? The king answered
Daniel and said, "Surely your
God is a God of gods
and a Lord of kings and a revealer of mysteries, since you have been able to
reveal this mystery." (Daniel
2:47) It is an acknowledgment of sorts but far from a ringing
endorsement of recognizing how much the king of the earth needed the King of
Heaven. And what was Nebuchadnezzar's public confession after all
the brouhaha in Daniel 3 after witnessing the signs and wonders associated with
the persecution of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego for their faith in the One
True God? Nebuchadnezzar
responded and said, "Blessed be the God of
Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego, who has sent His angel and delivered His
servants who put their trust in Him, violating the king's command, and yielded
up their bodies so as not to serve or worship any god except their own God. Therefore I make a decree that any people, nation
or tongue that speaks anything offensive against the God of Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego shall be torn limb
from limb and their houses reduced to a rubbish heap, inasmuch as there is no
other god who is able to deliver in this way." (Daniel 3:28-29) He appears to be drawing a little closer, but this is still
far from a personal confession of a changed heart. In effect, Nebuchadnezzar
has personally witnessed signs and wonders which he himself acknowledges could
come from no one but the God of Israel, but spiritually he continues life
unchanged. So now, God is going to provide signs and wonders yet again for a
third time, but these are going to belong to a very different category than
those previously experienced. Having repeatedly failed to learn the right spiritual lesson
so as to be changed from the heart by signs and wonders which demonstrated
God's sovereignty and character benignly, now the king of the earth is going to
experience signs and wonders that express the King of Heaven's judgment. He
could have learned from signs and wonders that witnessed to the truth, now
instead he will learn from signs and wonders rendering judgment for rejecting
that truth. Yes, Nebuchadnezzar's remarkable testimony provided to us in
Daniel 4 is actually a lesson in how God uses signs and wonders in general and
how they work on the heart specifically. God repeatedly reached out with a
"carrot", so to speak, but repeated rejection of His peaceful gestures
ultimately warranted an extreme "big stick" in an attempt to save even the most
stubborn heart. God's first choice was not to put Nebuchadnezzar through seven
years of punishment, it was the only option left because of the repeated
choices Nebuchadnezzar made to reject every previous approach of the One True
God. Nebuchadnezzar did not really believe the signs and wonders provided as an
outreach, but he certainly believed after the signs and wonders of judgment. To my mind this is the overall principle behind Jesus' own
teaching that when it comes to the End Times, signs and wonders will increase
with frequency and intensity analogous to increasing birth pangs leading to a
birth. "But all these things
are merely the beginning of birth pangs. (Matthew 24:8) The "silence" or gap between each wave is meant to provide
the time to learn and properly apply the greater spiritual lesson from the last
round of events. But if we study all the signs and wonders predicted to come,
it becomes clear that they begin to transition from things that testify to our
need for a personal relationship with Christ, to judgment for consistently
refusing to heed those calls, to ultimately culminating in the expression of
God's wrath - destruction for steadfastly refusing to submit. The purpose of
signs and wonders is not to provide God with the opportunity to show off His
power, but to make an ever-greater appeal to change from the heart. When I was a teenager our local pastor became terminally ill
and yet he was miraculously cured, a medically verifiable fact by his doctors
and the local hospital. Did we start having healing crusades? Did we start
laying hands on everyone who was sick? Did he become the object of veneration
for having experienced a miracle? No, he came back empowered with the Word of God
like never before in his life and initiated revival preaching repentance and a
return to God's Word and ways with unbelievable results. To my knowledge, no
one else in the course of his ministry was ever healed of anything or
experienced anything I would call "supernatural". There was a greater message
attached to the sign that turned out to be far more important than the sign
itself. It would be easy at this point to launch into a tirade
against the many individuals, groups, and even movements who place an undue
priority on seeking signs and wonders. But equally amiss, in my opinion, are
those of us placing an undue emphasis on the signs and wonders of these Last
Days. Over the past 62 years we have received enough fulfillment
of specific prophecies in God's Word to shake us permanently out of ever living
comfortable in this old world. We have already witnessed enough to irrevocably
change us from the heart and to induce us to heed the greater lesson of these
things, which calls us into an ever-greater personal relationship with Christ.
We should actually be more motivated in sharing the Gospel and working while it
is still day than ever before. But what do you suppose is going to happen to
those who, like Nebuchadnezzar, acknowledge God is working but go on living
unchanged? Sooner or later, it will escalate to judgment, and eventually to the
very wrath of God. I would submit that this is already the case. I believe what
we are experiencing in the Western world is not simply evil running amok or
strictly the eternal battle between Satan and the Church, but much is judgment
from God for a Church that has willfully chosen to no longer be salt and light
to the world. To be sure the End Times will play out exactly according to God's
will, but I am not convinced every single thing we have been witnessing in
recent years is specifically an End Times event predicted in the Bible. There
is also the reasonable possibility that in addition to those things there is an
increase in frequency and intensity because, like Nebuchadnezzar, so many are
simply not paying attention, not learning the right lesson, not repenting and
returning in earnest. I have no doubt that many of the things we are witnessing
testify of His imminent return; I equally believe many of the things we are
witnessing are the result of hardened, unrepentant hearts who are risking
having to learn things the hard way. I am not praying that I will see any new signs and wonders.
I am praying I will see more hearts yield to the greater message behind the signs
and wonders we have already seen. In His Love, Servant@WalkWithTheWord.org
|
Moriel Q & A Why Did Jesus Not Carry His Own Cross?
|
MORIEL MINISTRIES - Q & A with
Jacob Prasch - May 17, 2010 Question: Why Did Jesus Not Carry His Own Cross?
A reader writes:
I'm writing to ask for
something to be clarified from an article which Jacob wrote and that was
published in the Moriel Quarterly - December 2009, The Road to Emmaus.
On page 13 under the
section for "The Corporate Solidarity of Simon Cyrene" it quotes Luke 23:26 and then
the article goes on to ask, "Why did Jesus not carry His own cross?" and the
response to the question was to allude that to do so would be an admission of
guilt and He wasn't guilty.
Can you explain to me, in
the light of what has been said about Jesus not carrying His own cross, what
the explanation for John
19:17 might be please?
Your explanation would
appear correct in the light of Matt, Mark and Luke as they all seem to agree
with it, and in my Bible there were no cross-references to say He did actually
carry His cross, but John 19 seems to say quite clearly that He did. And if He
did, how does this then affect the allusion that to do so, would be an
admission of guilt?
Thanks very much for your
time.
Jacob Responds:
Thank you for your question.
To reply at length would necessitate a detailed explanation
why John's Gospel and the synoptic Gospels differ from each other in content
while the Synoptics only differ marginally in comparison.
The details included or highlighted in each gospel reflect
the doctrinal emphasis each author was inspired to highlight and the readership
it was oriented toward at the time. While the doctrinal content applies to all
believers at all times, issues of author's intent and immediate readership must
be first taken into account in order to properly establish what it means for us.
John (like Matthew) for instance was writing to Jews while Luke was not. John's
gospel was written with an evangelistic aim (John 20:31), while
the Synoptics (particularly Luke) were written with more of a historical aim (Luke 1:1-4). It is
not possible to even attempt to make an exhaustive effort to address these
issues of theme, readership, and author's intent by email, but bear in mind it
is such considerations that account for the textual differences and variations
in content, etc.
The Greek term in John 19:17 for He
"went out" is "ekalthen" which simply means that He carried the cross
out of the immediate presence of Pilot (where He was condemned on our behalf).
It does not mean that He carried it all the way to Gogaltha. There is also a
translation difficulty in some versions; "that He carried His own cross"
is better translated "He carried it out Himself"'.
John is not concerned with the public procession of the
condemned is his theme or aim. John is writing for another reason and so omits
those details; Luke includes them. It is in the public procession to execution
that Jesus does not carry the cross because it could be misconstrued as a
public omission of guilt so God providentially arranges for the episode with
Simon of Cyrene.
The public procession to execution is however, theologically
important because it fulfills in part the ritual typology of the scapegoats ("seir
azazel") on The Day of Atonement/Yom Kippur which we read about in Hebrews
and Leviticus. Here lies another difference: John's Passion Narrative is more
concerned with showing Jesus as the Messianic fulfillment of the Spring holy
days in Leviticus 23-25, particularly the Paschal or Passover aspects.
In the synoptic passion narratives, there is a greater
emphasis on alluding to Christ as fulfilling the Autumn feast of the scapegoat
while John is more fixed on Jesus as the Paschal lamb. The Day of Atonement
theme is not absent from John (e.g. one goat would die and one go free)
represented also in John by Barabbas. Likewise, the Paschal theme is not absent
from the Synoptics. But john puts emphasis on the Paschal theme and imagery
(e.g. John 19:36
from Exodus 12:46)
while the Synoptics have greater emphasis on the atonement theme. Under divine
inspiration each spotlights different aspects of these same events and include
the historical details they require to so illustrate this typology accordingly.
It is much more involved than this, but the prohibitions of
time and the limitations of email prevent me from commenting further.
Nonetheless, I trust this helps clarify the matter for you.
Blessings in Jesus,
Jacob
This entry originally posted by MORIELDANNY May 17, 2010 http://moriel.org/MorielArchive/index.php/author/prasch/why-did-jesus-not-carry-his-own-cross#more-6084 |
Moriel Q & A The Young Lions of Tarshish
|
MORIEL MINISTRIES - Q & A with Jacob Prasch - May 21, 2010 Question: The Young Lions of Tarshish
A Reader Writes: Jacob, Bro, I'm preparing a five part teaching on The United
States in Prophecy. I'd like some input from you on something. What do you
think about Ezek. 38:13
and the reference to the young lions of Tarshish (KJV)? Have you done a study
on this as to whether or not it is a possible reference to the United States?
Just wondering. God bless. Jacob Responds: There are those who speculate that this is a prophetic
prediction of the British Isles. The evidence is nebulous but not impossible.
However, it would mean that there is a third Tarshish in addition to the ones
existing, probably around the Rock of Gibraltar as in the book of Jonah and
also the Horn of East Africa as in the days of Solomon. There is simply no
proof. No proof does not mean it cannot possibly be
true but that it cannot be proven to be true. They then draw the conclusion that since countries like the
USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand came mainly from Britain that it applies
to them. This is of course more speculation. When Scripture speaks of nations in prophecy it defines them
geographically, anthropologically, or both. (Greek: basilea "kingdom" or ethnon = "race" with the Hebrew equivalents of Malchut
and Goy respectively). There is simply no documented or archaeological evidence
that a third Tarshish existed in the British Isles. A further problem is that those most pressing this view are
the British-Israelite cults (known as Armstrongists in the USA). On the
basis of the evidence that exists, I would never teach that the USA could be
said to be the "young lions of Tarshish" (although it may be a possibility in
some estimations). The most I would say is, "There are some who have speculated
that..." I would also say that the USA is never specifically mentioned in
Scripture nor is Britain. Its existence was not even known (except by God) to
people in Israel. What may be a better case is Spain. One scriptural instance
of Tarshish was almost certainly located on the opposite side of the
Mediterranean near Gibraltar (which the ancient Greek mariners knew as 'The
Pillars of Hercules"). Since one Tarshish was in Spain and since Spain is twice
named in the New Testament (Paul wrote of his desire to visit Spain in Romans 15:24, 28), a stronger
scriptural case could be made for Spain. Furthermore, regarding this argument of this pertaining to
nations coming from the British Isles, we must remember that geographically the
USA was more Spanish than British or French or Dutch. Florida, Texas, Arizona,
New Mexico, Colorado, and major areas of Oregon, Utah, and Nevada as well as
Puerto Rico were all Spanish. Later France temporarily ceded Louisiana to Spain
before the Louisiana Purchase by Jefferson from Napoleon. Americans of Hispanic
descent already outnumber those of British (English, Welsh, and Scottish
descent); it is only when we add those of Irish descent that Americans
descended from the British Isles are the largest ethnic group of Americans. New
York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, Phoenix, Albuquerque,
San Diego, San Juan, and Las Vegas all have huge Hispanic-American populations
and Spanish is the second language in the USA. But again, we cannot be dogmatic
about these things or over-speculate concerning them. It is fine to consider
the evidence, but the evidence is so inconclusive it should not be the object
of focus in a major way. What Scripture states about the Middle East and Europe in
eschatological prophecy however, does not require any speculation.
It is therefore the focus on which we should mainly concentrate. That is about all I can tell you. In Jesus, Jacob This entry originally posted by MORIELDANNY May 21st, 2010 http://moriel.org/MorielArchive/index.php/author/prasch/question-the-young-lions-of-tarshish
|
|
Live Teaching Engagements
|
|
Contact Us
|
P. O. Box 100223
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
15233
|
|
|
|
|
|